|
When
President Bush decided to invade Iraq, his spokesmen began comparing Saddam
Hussein to Adolph Hitler, the most monstrous figure in modern history.
Everybody was therefore shocked when a high German bureaucrat turned the
tables by comparing Bush himself with Hitler. As to be expected, she (the
bureaucrat) was forced to resign because of her extreme disrespect for an
American president. However, the resemblance sticks--there are too many
similarities to be ignored, some of which may be listed here.
-
Like Hitler, President
Bush was not elected by a majority, but was forced to engage in political
maneuvering in order to gain office.
-
Like Hitler, Bush began
to curtail civil liberties in response to a well-publicized disaster, in
Hitler’s case the Reichstag fire, in Bush’s case the 9-11 catastrophe.
-
Like Hitler, Bush went on
to pursue a reckless foreign policy without the mandate of the electorate
and despite the opposition of most foreign nations.
-
Like Hitler, Bush has
increased his popularity with conservative voters by mounting an
aggressive public relations campaign against foreign enemies. Just as
Hitler cited international communism to justify Germany’s military
buildup, Bush has used Al Qaeda and the so-called Axis of Evil to justify
our current military buildup. Paradoxically none of the nations in this
axis--Iraq, Iran and North Korea--have had anything to do with each other.
-
Like Hitler, Bush has
promoted militarism in the midst of economic recession (or depression as
it was called during the thirties). First he used war preparations to
help subsidize defense industries (Halliburton, Bechtel, Carlyle Group,
etc.) and presumably the rest of the economy on a trickle-down basis. Now
he turns to the very same corporations to rebuild Iraq, again without
competitive bidding and at extravagant profit levels.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
displays great populist enthusiasm in his patriotic speeches, but
primarily serves wealthy investors who subsidize his election campaigns
and share with him their comfortable lifestyle. As he himself jokes, he
treats these individuals at the pinnacle of our economy as his true
political “base.”
-
Like Hitler, Bush
envisages our nation’s unique historic destiny almost as a religious cause
sanctioned by God. Just as Hitler did for Germany, he takes pride in his
“providential” role in spreading his version of Americanism throughout the
entire world.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
promotes a future world order that guarantees his own nation’s hegemonic
supremacy rather than cooperative harmony under the authority of the
United Nations (or League of Nations).
-
Like Hitler, Bush quickly
makes and breaks diplomatic ties, and he offers generous promises that he
soon abandons, as in the cases of Mexico, Russia, Afghanistan, and even
New York City. The same goes for U.S. domestic programs. Once Bush was
elected, many leaders of these programs learned to dread his making any
kind of an appearance to praise their success, since this was almost
inevitably followed by severe cuts in their budgets.
-
Like Hitler, Bush scraps
international treaties, most notably the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty,
the Biological Weapons Convention, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the
Convention on the Prohibition of Land Mines, the Chemical Weapons
Convention, the Kyoto Global Warming Accord, and the International
Criminal Court.
-
Like Hitler, Bush repeats
lies often enough that they come to be accepted as the truth. Bush and
his spokesmen argued, for example, that they had taken every measure
possible to avoid war, than an invasion of Iraq would diminish (not
intensify) the terrorist threat against the U.S., that Iraq was linked
with Al Qaeda, and that nothing whatsoever had been achieved by U.N.
inspectors to warrant the postponement of U.S. invasion plans. All of
this was false. They also insisted that Iraq hid numerous weapons it did
not possess since the mid-190s, and they refused to acknowledge the
absence of a nuclear weapons program in Iraq since the early nineties. As
perhaps to be expected, they indignantly accused others of deception and
evasiveness.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
incessantly shifted his arguments to justify invading Iraq--from Iraq’s
WMD threat to the elimination of Saddam Hussein, to his supposed Al Qaeda
connection, to the creation of Iraqi democracy in the Middle East as a
model for neighboring states, and back again to the WMD threat. As soon
as one excuse for the war was challenged, Bush advanced to another, but
only to shift back again at another time.
-
Like Hitler, Bush and his
cohorts emphasize the ruthlessness of their enemies in order to justify
their own. Just as Hitler cited the threat of communist violence to
justify even greater violence on the part of Germany, the bush team
justified the invasion of Iraq by emphasizing Hussein’s crimes against
humanity over the past twenty-five years. However, these crimes were for
the most part committed when Iraq was a client-ally of the U.S. Our
government supplied Hussein with illegal weapons (poison gas included),
and there were sixty U.S. advisors in Iraq when these weapons were put to
use (see NY Times, Aug. 18, 1992). U.S. aid to Iraq was actually doubled
afterwards despite disclaimers from Washington that our nation opposed
their use. President Reagan’s special envoy Donald Rumsfeld personally
informed Hussein of this one hundred percent increment during one of his
two trips to Iraq at the time. He also told Hussein not to take U.S.
disclaimers seriously.
-
Like Hitler, Bush takes
pride in his status as a “War President,” and his global ambition makes
him perhaps the most dangerous president in our nation’s history, a
“rogue” chief executive capable of waging any number of illegal preemptive
wars. He fully acknowledges his willingness to engage in wars of “choice”
as well as wars of necessity. Sooner or later this choice will oblige
universal conscription as well as a full-scale war economy.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
continues to pursue war without cutting back on the peacetime economy.
Additional to unprecedented low interest rates bestowed by the Federal
Reserve, he has actually cut federal taxes twice by substantial amounts,
especially for the top one percent of U.S. taxpayers, while conducting an
expensive invasion and an even more expensive occupation of a hostile
nation. As a result, President Clinton’s $350 billion budget surplus has
been reduced to a $450 billion deficit, comprising an unprecedented $800
billion decline in less than four years. At the same time the U.S. dollar
has steadily dropped against currencies of both Europe and Japan.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
possesses a war machine much bigger and more effective than the military
capabilities of other nations. With the extra financing obliged by the
defeat and occupation of Iraq, Bush now relies on a “defense” budget well
in excess of the combined military expenditures of the rest of the world.
Moreover, the $416 billion defense package passed last week by Congress
will probably need to be supplemented before the end of the year.
-
Like Hitler, bush depends
on an axis of collaborative allies, which he describes as a “coalition of
the willing,” in order to give the impression of a broad popular
alliance. These allies include the U.K. as compared to Mussolini’s Italy,
and Spain and Bulgaria, as compared to, well, Spain and Bulgaria, both of
which were aligned with Germany during the thirties and World War II. As
a result of their cooperation, Prime Minister Blair’s diplomatic
reputation has been ruined in England, and a surprising election defeat
has produced an unfriendly government in Spain. The Philippines have
withdrawn their troops from Iraq to save the life of a hostage, and other
defections can be expected in the near future.
-
Like Hitler, Bush is
willing to go to war over the objections of the U.N. (League of Nations).
His Iraq invasion was illegal and therefore a war crime as explained by
Articles 41 and 42 of the U.N. Charter, which require two votes, not one,
by the Security Council before any state takes such an action. First a
vote is needed to explore all possibilities short of warfare (in Iraq’s
case through the use of U.N. inspectors), and once this has been shown to
be fruitless, a second vote is needed to permit military action. U.S. and
U.K. delegates at the Security Council prevented this second vote once it
was plain they lacked a majority. This was because other nations on the
Security Council were satisfied with the findings of U.N. inspectors that
no weapons of mass destruction had yet been found. Minus this second
vote, the invasion was illegal. Bush also showed in the process that he
has no qualms about bribing, bullying, and insulting U.N. members, even
tapping their telephone lines. This was done with undecided members of
the Security Council as well as the U.N. Secretary General when the U.S.-U.K.
resolution was debated preceding the invasion.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
launches unilateral invasions on a supposedly preemptive basis. Just as
Hitler convinced the German public to think of Poland as a threat to
Germany in 1939 (for example in his Sept. 19 speech), Bush wants Americans
to think of Iraq as having been a “potential” threat to our national
security--indeed as one of the instigators of the 9-11 attack despite a
complete lack of evidence to support this claim.
-
Like Hitler, Bush depends
on a military strategy that features a “shock and awe” blitzkrieg
beginning with devastating air strikes, then an invasion led by heavy
armored columns.
-
Like Hitler, Bush is
willing to inflict high levels of bloodshed against enemy nations.
Between 20,000 and (more probably) 37,000 are now estimated to have been
killed, as much as a ro-1 kill ratio compared to the more than 900
Americans killed. In other words, for every U.S. fatality, probably as
many as forty Iraqi have died.
-
Like Hitler, Bush is
perfectly willing to sacrifice life as part of his official duty. This
would be indicated by the unprecedented number of prisoners executed
during his service as governor of Texas. Under no other governor in the
history of the United States were so many killed.
-
Like Hitler, Bush began
warfare on a single front (Al Qaeda quartered in Afghanistan), but then
expanded it to a second front with Iraq, only to be confronted with North
Korea and Iran as potential third and fourth fronts. Much the same thing
happened to Hitler when he advanced German military operations from Spain
to Poland and France, then was distracted by Yugoslavia before invading
the USSR in 1941. Today, bush seems prevented by the excessive costs of
the Iraqi debacle from going to war elsewhere if reelected, but not
through any lack of desire.
-
Like Hitler, Bush has no
qualms about imposing “regime change” by installing Quisling-style client
governments backed by a U.S. military occupation with both political and
economic control entirely in the hands of Americans. It is no surprise
that Iyad Alawi, Iraq’s current temporary prime minister, was once
affiliated with the CIA and has been reliably reported by the Australian
press to have executed six hooded prisoners with a handgun to their heads
just a day or two before his appointment a couple weeks ago.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
curtails civil liberties in captive nations and depends on detention
centers (i.e., concentration camps) such as a Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, and
any number of secret interrogation centers across the world. Prisoners at
the camps go unidentified and have no legal rights as ordinarily
guaranteed by the Geneva Conventions. They have also been detained
indefinitely (for 2 ½ years already at Guantanamo Bay), though there is
mounting evidence that many are innocent of what they have been
charged--some, for example, having been randomly seized by Northern
Alliance troops in Afghanistan for an automatic bounty from U.S.
commanders. Moreover, many Iraqi prisoners have been tortured, in many
instances just short of death. Recent U.S. documents disclose that as
many twenty have died while being tortured, and twenty others have died
under unusual circumstances yet to be determined.
-
Like Hitler, Bush uses
the threat of enemies abroad to stir the fearful allegiance of the U.S.
public. For example, he features public announcements of possible
terrorist attacks in order to override embarrassing news coverage or to
crowd from headlines positive coverage of Democratic Party activities. He
also uses the threat of terrorism to justify extraordinary domestic powers
granted by the Patriot Act. Even the books we check out of public
libraries can be kept on record by federal agents.
-
Like Hitler, Bush depends
on a propaganda machine to guarantee sympathetic news management. In
Hitler’s case news coverage was totally dominated by Goebbels; in Bush’s
case reporters have been almost totally “imbedded” by both military
spokesmen and wealthy media owners sympathetic with Bush. The most
obvious case is the Fox news channel, owned and controlled by Rupert
Murdoch. Not surprisingly, recent polls indicate that the majority of Fox
viewers still think Hussein played a role in the 9-11 attack.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
increasingly reduces the circle of aides he feels he can trust as his
policies keep boomeranging at his own expense. Just as Hitler ended up
isolated in his headquarters, with few individuals granted access, Bush is
now said to be limiting access primarily to Attorney General Ashcroft (who
also talks with God on a regular basis) as well as Karl Rove, the Vice
President, Karen Hughes, and a few others. Both Secretary of State Powell
and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld are now said to be out of the loop.
-
Like Hitler, Bush has
become obsessed with his vision of conflict between good (U.S. patriotism)
and evil (anti-Americanism. Many in contact with the White House are said
to be worried that he is beginning to lose touch with reality--perhaps
resulting from the use of medication that seriously distorts his
judgment. Possibly symptomatic of this concern is the increasing number
of disaffected government officials who leak embarrassing documents.
-
Like Hitler, bush takes
pleasure in the mythology of frontier justice. As a youth Hitler read and
memorized the western novels of Karl May, and Bush retains into his
maturity his fascination with simplistic cowboy values. He also
exaggerates a cowboy twang despite his C-average elitist education at
Andover, Yale, and Harvard.
-
Like Hitler, Bush
misconstrues Darwinism, in Hitler’s case by treating the Aryan race as
being superior on an evolutionary basis, in Bush’s case by rejecting
science for fundamentalist creationism.
Of
course countless differences may be listed between Hitler and President
Bush, most of which are to the credit of Bush. Nevertheless, the
resemblances listed here are striking, especially since Bush’s first term in
office must be compared with Hitler’s performance as German Chancellor
through the year 1937, preceding the chain of events immediately preceding
World War II. In any case, George W. Bush seems the worst and most
dangerous U.S. president in recent memory (for me since Roosevelt)--if not
in the entire history of the United States.
Edward Jayne
is a retired English professor with experience as a '60s activist. He can be
contacted at:
edward.jayne@wmich.edu.
Other Articles by Edward
Jayne
*
Georgie Boy
HOME
|
|