HOME
DV NEWS
SERVICE ARCHIVE SUBMISSIONS/CONTACT ABOUT DV
Irregular
Weapons Used Against Iraq
by
Simon Helweg -Larsen
April
8, 2003
This
document presents collected information on irregular weapons used by the United
States and the United Kingdom since the official beginning of their war against
Iraq.
Regular
air and ground weapons such as missiles, light bombs and bullets often cause
more civilian casualties than irregular weapons (cluster weapons, depleted
uranium, napalm, etc.). However, the
terrorizing, indiscriminate, experimental, and often long-lasting nature of
these weapons make for horrible and illegal battle tactics. In no way do I suggest that the invasion of
Iraq would be legally, morally, or otherwise justified given the absence of
these weapons. However, their usage
adds an element of lasting terror and suffering which significantly worsens
this already horrific and illegal war.
At
this stage of the war, and probably indefinitely, a complete list of instances
in which these weapons were used would be impossible to compile. The amount of information seeping through
Iraqi battlefields and cities is likely to be incredibly small compared to the
reality on the ground. Still, a
collection of examples that have surfaced in the English-language media will
help to document the use of these atrocious weapons.
Cluster
bombs, dropped from the air, and cluster munitions, fired from the ground, are
designated as such because they fragment into many smaller bombs. When a cluster weapon is dropped or fired,
it opens in the air and disperses hundreds of smaller explosives (submunitions,
or bomblets) which scatter over an area of up to hundreds of thousands of
feet.
Most
of these submunitions explode upon impact, but between 5% and 30% fail to
ignite. These “duds” retain their
deadly features, and typically will explode immediately when touched. Herein lies the main threat to civilians,
since dud bombs act as landmines across vast areas for many years.
During
the first Gulf War, the US and its allies dropped cluster bombs containing
around 20 million bomblets. In
addition, cluster munitions spread more than 30 million bomblets. In Kuwait, around 200 cluster duds are still
being found and destroyed each month.
In Afghanistan, the United States dropped 1,228 CBU-87 cluster bombs
containing 248,056 bomblets. Assuming
a 7% failure rate, this would leave
roughly 17,363 unexploded bomblets scattered across Afghanistan.
The
US and UK are quick to point out that cluster bombs and cluster munitions are
not specifically banned under the 1997 Ottawa Mine Ban Treaty. Still, the indiscriminate nature of
scattered explosives and the lingering danger of unexploded bombs make these
weapons nearly identical to landmines.
A strong case can also be made that cluster bombs and munitions are
illegal under the Geneva Convention, which demands the protection of civilians
even when intermingled with military personnel.
The
US and the UK both officially acknowledged on April 3 that their air forces
have been dropping cluster bombs on Iraq.
Judging by the high numbers of cluster bombs dropped by the US on
Afghanistan, Kosovo, and Iraq in 1991, the bombs have probably been used much
more often than has been reported.
*
On April 1, the residential al-Hilla outskirts of Babylon were hit with an
undetermined number of BLU-97 A/B cluster bombs. Each bomb releases 202 bomblets which scatter over an area the
size of two football fields, with a dud rate of 5%-7%. Immediate reports stated that at least 33
civilians died and around 300 were injured in the attack. Amnesty International condemned the attack,
saying that “the use of cluster bombs in an attack on a civilian area of
al-Hilla constitutes an indiscriminate attack and a grave violation of international
humanitarian law." Independent
reporter Robert Fisk wrote from al-Hilla, saying that many dud bombs landed,
and remain, inside civilian homes.
*
The British Ministry of Defence said on April 3 that RAF Harrier jets had
dropped RBL755 cluster bombs on unspecified locations in Iraq. These bombs scatter 147 bomblets, and have a
10% rate of failure.
*
Also on April 3, the United States reported that it had used B-52 bombers to
drop six CBU-105 cluster bombs on Iraqi tanks defending Baghdad. On the same day, Iraq’s Information Minister
reported that a cluster bomb attack on Baghdad had killed 14 people and wounded
66.
Cluster
Munitions used against Iraq
Cluster
munitions are similar to cluster bombs, but are fired from the ground and
contained in artillery projectiles or rockets.
When artillery or rockets fire cluster munitions, the result is the same
as in cluster bombs: multiple bomblets scatter, many of which fail to
explode. Human Rights Watch reported
that more than 4,000 civilians were killed or injured by cluster munitions in
Iraq after the end of the first Gulf War.
The
UK has admitted to firing cluster munitions around Basra. The US has yet to report that it is using
cluster munitions, but numerous reports and videos from journalists embedded
with US units show these munitions in use.
*
Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS), which only use cluster munitions, have
been used by artillery units of the US 3rd Infantry Division. The standard warhead for the MLRS contains
644 M77 individual submunitions, also known as dual-purpose grenades, which have
a failure rate of 16%. The standard volley
of 12 MLRS rockets would leave more than 1,200 unexploded grenades over an area
of 120,000-240,000 meters.
*
On March 28, while supporting the 101st Airborne Division, US MLRS fired 18
Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) against suspected air defense sites. An ATACMS releases either 300 or 950
submunitions and has a 2% rate of failure.
*
An embedded journalist reported “hundreds of grenades” being fired by the 3rd
Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion using 155mm artillery. Human Rights Watch believes these were
M483A1 and M864 projectiles, which release 88 and 72 dual-purpose grenades
respectively and have a 14% rate of failure.
*
Two US Marines died after stepping on unexploded cluster munitions in southern
Iraq on March 28 and March 29.
*
The British Ministry of Defence says that it has fired cluster shells on
Basra. L20 cluster shells have been
shot from long-range (30km) howitzers at targets described as “in the open.” These Israeli-made shells contain 49
bomblets with a failure rate of 5%.
NAPALM
Napalm
is an incendiary chemical mix first tested during the Second World War, but
used mainly during the Vietnam War. The
mix, stored in bombs and dropped from the air, was initially used to clear
jungle landing pads, but has also been used against civilian populations. The US claims to have stopped using napalm
in the early 1970s and officially destroyed its last batch of stockpiled napalm
on April 4, 2001.
*
On March 22, reporters from CNN and the Sydney Morning Herald / Melbourne Age
embedded with the 1st Battalion 7th Marines at Safwan Hill near Basra reported
air strikes dropping napalm to beat Iraqi resistance. Martin Savidge of CNN said,
It
is now estimated the hill was hit so badly by missiles, artillery and by the
Air Force, that they shaved a couple of feet off it. And anything that was up
there that was left after all the explosions was then hit with napalm. And that
pretty much put an end to any Iraqi operations up on that hill.
Lindsay
Murdoch wrote for the Sydney Morning Herald and the Melbourne Age, “[Marine artillery] were supported by US
Navy aircraft which dropped 40,000 pounds of explosives and napalm.” When the Age’s foreign editor asked Murdoch
to confirm the napalm use, the account was repeated to her by a marine officer.
The
US Navy denied the reports, submitting this letter to the Herald,
Your
story ('Dead bodies everywhere', by Lindsay Murdoch, March 22, 2003) claiming
US forces are using napalm in Iraq, is patently false. The US took napalm out
of service in the early 1970s. We completed destruction of our last batch of
napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm. - Jeff A.
Davis, Lieutenant Commander, US Navy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of
Defense.
BUNKER
BUSTER BOMBS
The
GBU-28 Bunker Buster is a 5,000 pound bomb designed to penetrate up to 6 meters
of concrete or 30 meters of earth before exploding. While former Nobel Peace Prize nominee Helen Caldicott warns that
the casing of bunker busters are made of uranium 238 (depleted uranium, or DU),
it is unclear whether the GBU-28 used on Iraq contains DU.
*
Two bunker busters were dropped in Baghdad on March 28. The bombs hit a communications tower and dug “huge craters” around the main
telephone exchange center. Little
information has surfaced from the attack, and there has been no indication as
to why a penetrating bomb was used on an above ground target.
DEPLETED
URANIUM
Used
in anti-tank shells since the first Gulf War, depleted uranium (DU) is uranium
238, the isotope remaining after uranium 235 has been enriched for use in
nuclear weapons or reactors. When
DU-tipped shells are fired at high speeds from tanks or planes, the radioactive
material burns through tank armor, igniting the vehicle. After exploding, 70% of the shell is
vaporized into tiny particles and can be carried by the wind for many
miles. Although DU is only half as
radioactive as uranium 235, the tiny particles can become trapped inside the
human body for long periods of time, creating serious health problems.
During
the first Gulf War, US tanks fired 14,000 DU shells, and anti-tank aircraft
fired another 940,000 rounds, leaving a total of 564,000 pounds of DU either
vaporized or unexploded on the desert floor.
Iraqis have since experienced extremely abnormal rates of cancer, birth defects,
and miscarriages in the areas where DU was used, particularly around
Basra. The “Gulf War Syndrome”
experienced by US veterans has also been widely blamed on depleted uranium.
The
US and UK are unapologetic about DU, however, insisting that it poses no health
risks and refusing to reduce DU usage in the current war on Iraq. DU will be used in most tank battles, and
the amount and location of DU shells are impossible to judge at this
point.
DU
shells are also being used against exposed troops as well as tanks, a tactic
which may be used increasingly as tanks begin to wage urban warfare in Baghdad
and Basra.
*
On March 28, a tank unit fired two 120mm DU rounds down the main road of urban
Kifl, creating a vacuum effect that “literally sucked guerrillas out from their
hideaways into the street, where they were shot down by small arms fire or run
over by the tanks.”
Simon
Helweg-Larsen is a Canadian freelance author on Latin America who has spent a
number of years living, working and traveling in the region. For a complete
list of sources and footnotes, to suggest instances not documented in this
article, or for other inquiries, please contact Simon Helweg-Larsen at simonhl@ziplip.com. This article first
appeared in ZNET (www.znet.org/weluser.htm)