American Billions Keep Arab Regimes Sweet
by
Robert Fisk
Dissident Voice
March 2, 2003
It
was pathetic. The President of the United Arab Emirates – too old and too sick
to visit Sharm el-Sheikh – sent a message begging Saddam Hussein to go into
exile, just as the US Secretary of State, Colin Powell, had told the Arabs to
do last Thursday, when he urged them to get President Saddam "out of the
way and let some responsible leadership take over in Baghdad".
Even the Saudis didn't
oppose the Emirates' plea, while the Egyptians – host to the Arab League summit
– could only claim that they were "not in the business of changing one
regime for another". How much does it cost to produce this kind of subservience?
In Egypt's case, $3bn (£1.9bn) in US aid and other credits, plus another $1bn
in gifts. Another $1bn for Jordan, which has just accepted US troops on its
territory – only to man Patriot missile batteries, of course.
Money seems to make the Arab
world go round. The Egyptian government daily Al-Ahram and the Saudi newspaper
Al-Hayat are singing the Emirates' tune and demanding a "regime
change" in Baghdad. Turkey – not an Arab country – is waiting for its
$26bn in promises to let the US army tramp across its border into Iraq.
Syria alone – since it may
well be number two on Washington's list for "regime change" – said
that it was a mistake to identify the Iraqi leadership as the source of the
current crisis. President Bashar Assad said that America wanted Iraq's oil and
wished to "redraw the region's map". The latter is undoubtedly true,
since Mr Powell unwisely admitted just that last week. "We are all
targeted ... we are all in danger," President Assad said.
The Iraqis, needless to say,
responded with considerable anger to President Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan's
demand from the Emirates. Other Arab leaders were meanwhile scurrying to form a
consensus over whether they should send one of their beloved delegations just
to Baghdad, or to Baghdad, the US, the UN and the EU as well.
What it came down to was
whether the Arabs should allow the Americans the use of their territory to
attack Iraq or whether – this from President Assad of Syria – they should ban
the US from their territory if they wished to use it as a springboard for war.
The Kuwaitis, liberated from Iraqi occupation by the US and its coalition
partners 12 years ago, said that this view was "not realistic". The
real problem is that the US is already, in effect, in occupation of a fairly
large number of Arab nations.
US forces control half of
Kuwait; they are in Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman and in Jordan. Every one
of these countries will be called an "ally" if – when – the Americans
storm over the border into Iraq. So will Turkey. So, probably, will Egypt. And
so, of course, will Israel.
Robert Fisk is an award
winning foreign correspondent for The
Independent (UK), where this article first
appeared. He is the author of Pity Thy Nation: The Abduction of Lebanon
(The Nation Books, 2002 edition)