Killing the
Political Animal:
CIA
Psychological Operations and Us
by Heather Wokusch
October 17, 2002
Dysfunctional Bush and his anachronistic cronies are leading
us right into a catastrophic Middle Eastern blowout. That much is apparent. But
what's not so clear is why we're allowing it to happen.
Analyzing Dubya's psychological challenges is not enough -
he's the symptom not the cause, and while the rapidity of societal decline has
seemed to accelerate since 2000's farcical US presidential election, the
framework for rollback was in place long before. If it hadn't been, citizens
quite simply wouldn't have tolerated the rigged results.
But what mechanisms could have been used to facilitate the
rollback? How can an unwilling population be trained to blindly accept a new,
repressive social order?
A CIA instruction manual entitled "Psychological Operations in
Guerrilla Warfare" provides some clues. Written in the early
1980s (coincidentally, soon after Bush Sr. headed the Agency) the document was
part of the US government's crusade to bring down Nicaragua's leftist
government, by providing training and weapons to the Contra rebels. Detailing
how to gain a community's support through propaganda and selective violence,
the manual begins "In effect, the human being should be considered the
priority objective in a political war ... Once his mind has been reached, the
'political animal' has been defeated, without necessarily receiving
bullets."
The following are quotes from the original psyop textbook,
along with contemporary examples-
PSYOP quote: "It is appropriate ... to guide the
discussion of a group to cover a number of points and to reach a correct
conclusion." The people "should feel it was their free and own
decision."
Interesting to note that up until early 2000, military
personnel from the Fourth Psychological Operations Group based in Fort Bragg,
North Carolina were active at CNN's Atlanta-based headquarters - and left only
after public outcry when CNN admitted to employing them. Their presence was
perhaps not surprising given former CIA director William Colby's boast that
"the Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any major significance
in the major media."
So much for a democratic free flow of information.
Also striking is how the "discussion" around
attacking Iraq is being guided "to reach a correct conclusion." After
both the House and Senate agreed to give Bush his blank check to attack Iraq
(requesting only that Bush report to Congress every 60 days if he does decide
to take action) Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle called the endorsement of
war "a statement of American values and resolve." Apparently Daschle
was unaware of the large anti-war street protests taking place across the
country, and the overwhelming number of anti-war phone calls flooding House and
Senate offices.
Now that the vote is finished, the media will no doubt
bombard with messages echoing Daschle's myopic observation, and assuring the
American population the vote for war was their "free and own
decision."
PSYOP quote: "Always be prepared with simple slogans
in order to explain to the people, whether in intentional form or by chance,
the reason for the weapons." Reasons such as: "The weapons will be
for winning freedom; they are for you," or "Our weapons are, in
truth, the weapons of the people, yours."
The Bush administration proposes to increase its annual
military budget by $120 billion (over one third) by 2007, which would bring the
total annual budget to $451 billion; this while the economy crumbles and social
services get left behind. The justification?
George W. Bush "Nothing is more important than the
national security of our country. So nothing is more important than our defense
budget. The price for freedom is high, but it's never too high as far as I'm
concerned.”
Donald Rumsfeld “The defense budget is cheap when one
compares it to putting our security at risk, our lives at risk, our country at
risk, our freedom at risk.”
PSYOP quote: "In places and situations wherever
possible ... explain the operation of weapons to the youths and young
men."
A endless war requires an endless supply of cannon fodder;
lucky for the military if enough recruits succumb to the sexy hype about
weapons and enlist. If they don't though, there's always the Universal Military
Training and Service Act (H.R. 3598) which, aiming to bring back the
draft, states: "ALL males residing in the U.S. between the ages of 18-22
(must) receive military training for at least 6 months" and imposes
additional time on high school dropouts.
Chew on that quote for a second. The high school dropout
part is self-explanatory; longer military sentences would effectively be forced
on poor kids and minorities, those most likely to drop out of school. The
"residing" part is odd though - apparently, even citizens of other
countries who happen to live in the US will be obligated to complete military
service for Uncle Sam.
So it appears every trick in the book will be used to get
our youth on the battlefield, but once those boys come home wounded or in body
bags, they and their families will be abandoned, at least if Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld has his way. Addressing the Armed Services Committee,
Rumsfeld recently claimed he had no knowledge of the US having ever shipped any
biological weapons to Iraq; Rumsfeld said he had no knowledge despite the
existence of substantial proof, including a widely-distributed 1994 Senate
Report documenting the US sale of bacteria and viruses to Iraq.
The medical issue becomes even more serious when
considering the fact that biological warfare agents don't affect only those
service members directly exposed: they can lie undetected and later be
transferred to family and friends back home. This is the stuff of epidemics, and
the DOD's head-in-the-sand handling of the physical maladies of Gulf War
veterans has only exacerbated the danger to us all.
Small wonder that, unlike hawkish politicians who have
never seen battle, many Gulf War vets oppose an attack on Iraq. And Rumsfeld had
better take notice: the American Gulf War Veterans Association (AGWVA) is so
appalled by his claim of ignorance about the weapons sale - and attending
denial about the dangers of a new war with Iraq - they've officially called for his resignation.
PSYOP quote: "Established citizens ... will be
recruited initially as 'Social Crusaders' in typically 'innocuous' movements in
the area of operations. When their 'involvement' with the clandestine
organization is revealed to them, this supplies the psychological pressure to
use them as 'inside cadres' in groups to which they already belong or of which
they can be members."
Operation TIPS, US Attorney General John Ashcroft's plan to
enlist citizens in spying on one another is down, but definitely not out. Due
to public outcry, postal and utilities workers may have been exempted but
employees of "industry associations and groups" in the
broadly-defined transportation sector are still being "invited to receive
information" on the program.
It's anyone's guess who the invitation will be extended to next...
PSYOP quote: "Bring about uprisings or shootings,
which will cause the death of one or more persons, who would become the martyrs
... in order to create greater conflicts."
In "Body of Secrets," respected journalist James
Bamford explores official government records in which the Pentagon "called
for innocent people to be shot on American streets, for boats ... to be sunk on
the high seas, for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington
D.C., Miami and elsewhere," for "people to be framed for bombings
they did not commit" and for planes to be hijacked, all in the name of
convincing Congress and the American public to support a new war. Bamford writes
about the early 1960s, but many of the Pentagon's proposals then seem
uncomfortably reminiscent today.
So whatever happened to the basic foundations of
"life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"? Have we really gone so
far astray that independent thought is a thing of the past, trampled in the
dirt by an artificial psyop reality?
Time to read through those Amendments once again, slowly.
Then take a careful look at the insidious ways we're being controlled, and
throw off the shackles.
Heather
Wokusch is a free-lance writer with a background in
clinical psychology. Her work as been featured in publications and websites
internationally. Heather can be contacted via her website: http://www.heatherwokusch.com/