Rockin' the
Pipeline
Earthquakes and
Alaska's Oil
by Jeffrey St. Clair
It was the biggest quake to hit North America this century,
a 7.9 jolt centered beneath the tundra about 80 miles south of Fairbanks that
tickled seismographs all the way to New Orleans.
The November 4th trembler opened zizag fissures in the
earth, mangled roads, crushed a few remote cabins, triggered landslides and
cracked concrete from Fairbanks to Anchorage.
The Denali Fault appears to be awakening from a relatively
long slumber. The fault, which curves through the Canadian Yukon through the
Alaska Range past Mt. McKinley in Denali National Park, is the longest in the
US where plates move horizontally, with land to the north slipping east and
land to the south sliding west. It's a violent mix.
On October 23, a 6.7 quake rocked an area just south of the
epicenter of latest quake. "They're a very interesting pair of
earthquakes," said Roger Hansen, a seismologist at the Earthquake
Information Center in Fairbanks. "One began and unzipped in one direction,
and the second just unzipped the fault in the other." Hundreds of
aftershocks continue to swarm across Alaska, some as powerful as 5.7.
Still for all the rumbling only one person has been
injured, a 76-year old woman from Mentasa Lake who broke her arm when she fell
down the stairs of her home.
But the Denali quake did shake the foundations of the
TransAlaska Pipeline, the oil industry's conduit for North Slope crude that
slithers across the heart of the Alaskan outback like a metallic colon. The
pipeline, which carries about a billion barrels of oil a day, was shut down
hours after the quake and remained closed for days.
In its 800-mile trek from the belching ruin of Prudhoe Bay
to the tanker ship terminals of Valdez, the pipeline crosses eighty rivers and
streams, three mountain ranges, and it dips under coves, ponds and marshes. The
oil courses through the line at 140-degrees. A rupture would spill steaming
crude oil onto some of the most ecologically frail lands in the world and make
the Exxon Valdez spill seem like an oil stain on a driveway by comparison.
The pipeline is managed by the Alyeska Corporation, a
consortium of the oil companies that exploit the reserves of the North Slope:
BP, Phillips Petroleum, Exxon Mobil, Williams, Unocal and Amerada Hess. For the
past 25 years, Alyeska's flacks have maintained that the pipeline is
invulnerable to natural disasters.
But hours after the quake throttled the Alaskan interior
came reports that several of the H-shaped brackets that hold the 48-inch
pipeline off the ground had buckled and broken. So far engineers have
identified 8 severely damaged supports, including two consecutive ones near the
point where the pipeline crosses the Denali Fault.
The foulest fantasies of Dick Cheney and his cohorts to
extract the rest of the North Slope's reserves may well rest on those frail and
battered supports. Oil production at Prudhoe Bay is declining. Thus the oil
companies are anxious to extend their domain west into the National Petroleum
reserve, east into Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and north into the Beaufort
Sea. All of that oil would have to be sluiced down the pipeline to Valdez.
One of the big questions concerns the valves in the
underground sections of the pipeline, long considered the most likely point for
a catastrophic breach during a quake. Aleyska says it will send "sniffer
probes" down tubes check the valves.
There's enormous pressure from the oil companies to get the
pipeline back in operation. Quickly. It's estimated that more than $25 million
of crude flows through the pipeline everyday.
Of course with this much at stake, you can't count on
Alyeska to tell the truth about the damage to the pipeline. This is a company
with a history of lies and abuse of employees who have tried to tell the truth
about problems with the pipeline in the past.
Richard Acord was a safety inspector on the pipeline. Back
in 1991, he witnessed what has become a fairly typical occurrence. At Milepost
113.6, the pipeline dips below ground for one of 25 animal crossings, allowing
caribou and other migrating animals to cross the pipeline corridor. A giant
drilling rig, weighing more than 60,000 pounds, tried to cross over the buried
line on wooden planks, slid off and sunk in the mud directly above the
pipeline. The truck's oil line broke, spilling diesel fuel onto the tundra.
Acord tried to issue a stop-work order to ensure that the pipeline itself had
not been damaged in the accident and to develop a plan to extract the rig
without further damage to fouled tundra. The drilling crew's supervisor
chastised Acord and told him that he would either play ball or "they would
find someone who would."
"We had oil running down the tundra," Acord
stated in a deposition about the event. "We had a rig stuck across the
pipeline, indeterminate material in the ground. All of those constitute a bad
situation." After going public, Acord was fired.
Acord is not alone. In 1994, four other safety inspector's
settled a whistleblower lawsuit with Alyeska, claiming, among other things,
that the pipeline company blacklisted them from other jobs in the oil industry
after they raised complaints about worker safety and environmental practices.
Take the case of Charles Hammel. Back in the late 1980s,
pipeline workers and inspectors began feeding Hammel information about problems
with the pipeline and with Alyeska's reckless cost-cutting and mismanagement.
Hammel, an independent oil broker, took these concerns to congress and Alyeska
was forced to spend millions of dollars to repair corrosion along the line.
The company, and the oil corporations behind it, didn't
like this one bit, so they went after Hammel with a vengeance. In 1990, they
hired the Wackenhut Corporation to dig up dirt on Hammel. They rummaged through
his trash, ran credit reports on him, set up a fake enviro group to trick him
into giving them information and even hired a hooker to try to seduce him.
Hammel sued the company for invasion of privacy and won a $5 million
settlement.
But that didn't stop Alyeska's sleazy tactics. When
whistleblowers raised concerns to management or went public, they were fired.
After one inspector got subpoenaed to testify before congress, his manager told
him that he'd "break his fucking arm" if he said anything to damage
the company.
When auditors from the BLM and other outfits began to look
at Alyeska's books, the company's managers were caught "file
stuffing" -- adding post-dated documents to make the thin records look
more robust. When one employee refused to go along, his manager threatened to
fire him on the spot. In fact, Alyeska was so brazen in its intimidation
tactics that it even spied on California Congressman George Miller, then the
chairman of the House Interior Committee.
Of course, Alyeska has plenty to cover up. A series of
audits since 1990 have disclosed thousands of code violations. The company's
maps don't accurately depict the location of the pipeline. Indeed, in one
instance, Alyeska's maps showed the pipeline being more than a mile away from
its real location.
The fact is the pipeline already leaks and has nearly since
the beginning. The fact is that the leaks are getting worse and more frequent
as the pipeline ages. Between 1979 and 1993, the pipeline averaged about two
shutdown incidents a year. Since then, the rate has increased to more than 8 a
year. Last year, a 21-inch shift in a section of pipeline at Atigun Pass went
undetected by Alyeska for several months. This is oil spillage as normalcy.
As the problems get worse, Alyeska becomes more and more
stingy, cutting costs at every turn. In the past five years, the company has
cut manned stations along the pipeline from 11 down to four. That lack of
oversight led to oil spraying undetected from the pipeline for more than 36
hours after a couple of drunks shot holes into it -- simultaneously showing
terrorists how easy it could be to turn the Alaskan tundra into a frozen
facsimile of the Kuwaiti oil fields following Saddam's retreat.
None of this fazes the Bush administration, which is moving
swiftly to reauthorize the pipeline for 30 more years of service.
"You can't help but think about your physical safety
when you are costing somebody $500 million," said one Alyeska
whistleblower. "The theory is that they will use the equipment until the
line is destroyed. When you step back and look at the big picture, God it
stinks."
Of course, one more twitch from the uneasy depths of Denali could bring it all crashing down.
Jeffrey St.
Clair is the co-author of Five Days that Shook The World: The
Battle For Seattle and Beyond with Alexander Cockburn, and is a co-editor
of Counterpunch, the nation’s best muckraking newsletter. Email: counterpunch@counterpunch.org