The Philippines: Southeast Asian Keystone
by Matthew Riemer
Dissident Voice
February 5, 2003
In January 2002,
following the war in Afghanistan, the Philippines quickly became the second front
in the United States' "war on terrorism." Located in the strategic
heart of Southeast Asia, this tiny archipelago has long been a focus of U.S.
foreign policy, beginning as early as the 19th century when, following the
Spanish-American War, the U.S. immediately faced insurgent Filipino forces
previously utilized to defeat the Spanish.
Within the
context of the "war on terrorism," the Philippines play a crucial
role because they are home to the Islamist group Abu Sayyaf: a small, seemingly
insignificant, gang-like collection of soldiers and militants who use guerrilla
tactics in the southern part of the country. U.S. officials have also linked
Abu Sayyaf to al-Qaeda further emphasizing the importance of this particular
group to U.S. security, though so far the Bush administration has been unable
to provide substantive evidence to support this claim.
A former Mujahideen who fought the Soviets in
Afghanistan during the late '80s, Abdurajak Abubakar Janjalani founded Abu
Sayyaf in 1991, itself a radical splinter of the Moro National Liberation Front
(MNLF). It is through Janjalani that the alleged al-Qaeda link has the greatest
merit: presumably he knew Osama bin Laden while in Afghanistan fighting the
Soviets.
Abu Sayyaf is
mainly known for its kidnappings that brought the group substantial ransom
sums, as well as smaller bombings and grenade attacks. Janjalani was killed in
'98 to be succeeded by his brother, Qaddafy Janjalani. Abu Sayyaf is on the
U.S. State Department's list of terrorist organizations and was named by the
Filipino government as a threat to Filipino democracy.
Philippine
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was one of the most vocal Southeast Asian
leaders in her support of the U.S.' "war of self-defense" in
Afghanistan. This gained her much praise from the Bush administration, visits
by top officials, and the deployment of over 1,000 troops over the course of
2002; the troops were sent as trainers for the Filipino army, but were not
intended to engage in actual combat.
Yet aside from
the presence of this small "terrorist" organization, there's another
more compelling reason for the U.S. to begin a rekindling of military ties with
the Philippines: the archipelago's prime strategic location in Southeast Asia,
situated in the breadbasket created by an arcing Indonesia and the coast of
China; critical Taiwan is nearby as well.
Like the
McKinley administration at the turn of the last century, the Bush
administration also recognizes the Philippines invaluable position in
geopolitical affairs. Both the various islands of Indonesia and the large
Malaysian peninsula have come under intense scrutiny in the last year as
possible hotbeds for Islamist cells because of their porous borders and the
inability of local officials to patrol effectively thousands of miles of
coastline.
Filipino
Brigadier General Emmanuel Teodosio recently said, "They [the U.S.] see
the Philippines, especially if they will be involved in any conflict in Asia
for example or any tropical country, as the best place to train."
A U.S. presence
in the area serves, at the very least, as an inconvenience to those within
their sphere of influence, or, at the most, a strong deterrent. However, since
U.S. troops have returned to the Philippines following a ten-year absence,
there's been no abatement of terror attacks. There have been numerable
incidents in the past year: a large explosion in Bali, Indonesia which killed
over 200, a package bomb detonated at a restaurant which killed a U.S. soldier
and two Filipinos while wounding 20, and several more kidnappings.
But the military
presence also serves as an experiment in strategic troop deployment complicated
by new attitudes towards the presence of the U.S military in South Korea and Japan.
Agence France-Presse (AFP) summarizes U.S. concerns: "U.S. forces in Asia
are looking for possible alternative training sites in the Philippines amid
growing restrictions on the American military in Japan, a top Filipino general
said."
The Philippines
can be seen as a kind of long-term litmus test being carried out by Washington:
How tolerant will the region's powers be in the post 9-11 paradigm to large
numbers of U.S. troops in the Philippines?
China,
predictably, opposes such an idea, just as they do a militarized Taiwan whether
or not they say otherwise in public and diplomatic moments. South Korea and
Japan have a similar, concerned reaction though not as suspicious as Beijing's.
Japan needs the United States as an ally, but regionally wants to step out from
the shadows and feel genuinely independent of the U.S., if only for a time.
Now, 300 Special
Ops troops are slated to arrive in San Ramon in the southern part of the
country to carry out specialized, anti-terrorist training for Filipino forces.
And with a war in Iraq imminent, likely galvanizing further worldwide
opposition to the Bush administration's unilateralism, the role of the
Philippines and the value and risks of stationing troops there will come under
further scrutiny from both Washington and their opponents alike.
Matthew Riemer has written for years about a myriad of
topics, such as: philosophy, religion, psychology, culture, and politics. He
studied Russian language and culture for five years and traveled in the former
Soviet Union in 1990. He is a columnist and editor with Yellow Times.org, where this article first appeared.
Matthew lives in the United States, and encourages your comments: mriemer@YellowTimes.org