Some
readers may know that I published a piece in Black Commentator last week
under the title “Savage
Morality: Selective Concern and Dominant Media in an Age of Empire and
Inequality.” The point of this essay was that
United States media authorities
make revealing class-, race-, and empire-selective choices in determining
what should be on the table of Americans' moral concern. By the perverse
moral calculus of dominant American media, I argued:
* The
potential development of a few nuclear weapons by an Arab state trumps
Israel's already massive
thermonuclear arsenal as a matter of public concern.
* The
death of 1500
U.S. soldier-occupiers in
Iraq morally outweighs
the demise of 100,000 occupied civilians in the same nation.
*Bill
Clinton's amorous misadventure with Monica Lewinsky was a terrible crime but
his murderous missile and bomb attacks on the
Sudan and
Serbia were reasonable and
appropriate.
*
Affirmative action in college admissions for historically oppressed people
of color is a big concern but Legacy admissions for super-privileged whites
(including the former drug offender who currently occupies the oval office)
is a minor matter.
* The
occasional public racial bigotry of some white personalities is a source of
considerable outrage (e.g., the Trent Lott fiasco of late 2002) but deeply
entrenched racist social structures, institutions, and values are generally
ignored.
* The
cost of suburban highway tolls to white commuters is a bigger issue than
the enormous public expense and terrible social consequences of the nation's
massive, racially disparate prison-industrial complex.
* The
murder of a powerful white federal judge's mother and husband is a huge
public drama but the murders of thousands of poor blacks and Latinos are of
slight concern.
* The
adulterous behavior of The Boeing Corporation's CEO is a hot topic but the
murderous technology and heavily taxpayer-subsidized super-profits of that
CEO's imperialist "defense" corporation is outside the spectrum of serious
ethical inquiry.
Now I
need to add another instructive contrast to this short catalogue of dominant
U.S. media's savagely selective
morality: the death of Terri Schiavo versus recent reports showing that
unequal health care contributes to more than 100,000 black Americans dying
earlier than whites each year. Thanks to that media's obsessive coverage of
the Schiavo tragedy, nearly every moderately cognizant American adult has an
opinion on whether it is right for doctors to act to release Schiavo from
her dreadful vegetative state.
Sadly,
only a small number of Americans have any kind of opinion on a recent report
showing that middle-aged black men are dying at nearly twice the rate as
white men of a similar age. According to former U.S. Surgeon General David
Satcher in a paper published in the March-April issue of Health Affairs,
elimination of this racial gap would prevent an estimated 83,750 early
deaths each year. In another paper published in the same Health Affairs
issue, David R. Williams of the
University of
Michigan and Pamela Bradbury
Jackson of
Indiana
University showed that black
infant mortality is two and a half times higher than white infant
mortality. Numerous factors contribute to these appalling racial health
disparities, but lower income, poorer access to health care, differential
neighborhood quality, and residential segregation play critical roles,
according to Satcher, Williams, and Jackson. The nation's abysmal failure
to guarantee health care to all its citizens combines with savage racial
wealth disparities and persistent residential race apartheid to inflict a de
facto early death sentence on hundreds of thousands black Americans.
Do a
Lexis-Nexis and then a Yahoo or Google search to determine which issue
receives more media attention -- this heavy national black death toll or the
death of one white woman in
Florida. If you care about social
justice and racial equality, you will be chilled to the bone by the outcome.
While
you are at the computer, punch in some searches on
Harvard
University's currently embattled
president Lawrence Summers. Compare the heavy attention given to his recent
claim that women lack the innate mental capacity to climb the highest tiers
of the academic science and math professions with the relatively moderate
attention received by his 1991 memo (written when he was the World Bank's
chief economist and Vice
President) to the effect that poor nations
are under-polluted.
People
in “less developed countries” don't live long enough, Summers argued, to
lose all that much, well, life to toxic waste. When Summers’ memo became
public in February 1992,
Brazil's then-Secretary of the
Environment wrote to tell Summers that his “reasoning is perfectly logical
but totally insane. Your thoughts,” the Brazilian official argued,
“[provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation, reductionist
thinking, social ruthlessness, and arrogant ignorance of many conventional
‘economists’ concerning the nature of the world we live in.”
Both of
Summer's statements are odious, of course. His most recent comment elicits
more media concern, however, because it primarily offends predominantly
white Americans of highly educated privilege. The earlier comment affronts
officially unworthy and marginally significant non-Americans of color.
But
then Summers’ might never have gotten in a position to offend the
professoriate if the media and academic elite had paid appropriately
outraged attention to his earlier “totally insane” and “ruthless” comments
about the (alleged) under-contamination of the Third World.
For
another window on the racially disparate concerns of dominant media,
finally, wait a few weeks and compare the coverage given to the notorious
April 1999 teen slaughter at predominantly white, suburban, and middle-class
Columbine High with the media attention received by the recent mass murder
at the high school on the relatively poor and isolated Native American (Ojibwe)
reservation in Red Lake, Minnesota. You'll certainly see dominant
communications structures judging the Columbine victims and the
circumstances leading to their deaths as vastly more worthy of concentrated
attention than
Red
Lake's victims and circumstances.
Such are
the curious moral priorities of American “mainstream” media under the
combined and interrelated imperatives of empire and inequality.
Paul
Street is
the author of Empire and Inequality:
America and the World Since 9/11
(Boulder,
CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2004) and
Still Separate, Unequal: Race, Place, Policy, and the State of Black Chicago
(Chicago, IL, April 2005). He can be
reached at: pstreet99@sbcglobal.net.
Related Articles
* The Starving of the Five (Hundred) Thousand
by Ken Sanders
* Schiavo Case:
Media Pander to the Right by Jeff Cohen
* America's
Most Wanted Desperate Housewife by Leilla Matsui
* Following the
Terri Schiavo Donation Money by Michael Hess
* Team
Schiavo's Deep Pockets by Bill Berkowitz
* Terry
Schiavo: Never Forget by Patricia Goldsmith
* Life, Death
and Hypocrisy by Marty Jezer
* Turning Out
the Lights on the Enlightenment by Ken Sanders
* Bush,
Schiavo, and the Stench of Hypocrisy by Ken Sanders
Other Recent Articles by Paul Street
*
“Because We Are
America!”
* Martin Luther
King. Jr. and “The Triple Evils That Are Interrelated”
* Love
Motivates Us to Kill the Enemy
* Rumseld to
Troops in Iraq: “Fight Naked...Life’s a Bitch and Then YOU Die”
* No
Apology for Dissent: Truth and Cowardice
*
Love, Hates, Kills, Dies
* Killing
on Tape and the Broader War Criminality
* Dear Europe
* The United
States: “As Menacing to Itself and the World As Ever”
* The Fabric of
Deception and Liberal Complicity
* Campaign
Reflections: Resentment Abhors a Vaccum
* The 9/11
Commission Report: Bush's Negligence Didn't Happen
* Notes on
Race, Gender, and Mass Infantilization
* “A
Descending Spiral Ending in Destruction for All-Too Many”
* Racist
Democratic Empire and Atrocity Denial
* Kerry's
Predictable Failure to Make Bush Pay for Rising US Poverty
* Thought
Control, Costas, the Olympics and Imperial Occupations Past and Present
* JF Kerry: “I
am Not a [Redistribution] Democrat”
* Stupid White
Men and Why Segregation Matters
* The "Vile
Maxim" Versus the Common Good: Different Approaches to November
* We Need a
New Media Relationship
* “Failed
States” at Home and Abroad
* Be “Part of
Something”: Sign Up With The American Empire Project
*
Congratulations, Mr. Bush: You Have Not Presided Over the Final Collapse of
Capitalism
* "Slaves Had
Jobs Too"
* Brown v.
Board Fifty Years Out: Still Separate and Unequal
* Let Them
Eat "Cakewalk"
* England,
America, Empire, and Inequality
* Niall
Ferguson Speaks on the Need for Imperial Ruthlessness
* Richard
A. Clarke, Rwanda, and “Narcissistic Compassion”
*
Honest Mistakes? The New York Times on "The Failure to Find Iraqi Weapons"
*
Urban Race Relations: "Everything Changed" After 9/11?
*
Forbidden Connections: Class, Cowardice, and War
*
The "Repair" of "Broken Societies" Begins at Home
*
Deep Poverty, Deep Deception: Facts That Matter Beneath The Imperial
Helicopters
HOME
|