Comments on: Proud, Safe Gun Owners Not Proud or Safe When Names Released

By: joed

joed — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:04:16 +0000

There’s a lot of gun nuts out there. But, most gun owners are regular people who enjoy the sport of shooting, reloading ammo, hunting–sometimes even for food.
The gun nuts are going to do their thing regardless. The law abiding gun owner will continue sporting.
Seems, unreasonable to make public the names of gun owners. If addresses are obtainted then burglary/theft could occur at more than random rates.
Making public these name is not reasonable

By: Deadbeat

Deadbeat — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:52:52 +0000

I totally agree with hayate. This article reminds me of so-called progressive and Liberals demanding the weakening of jury rules after the OJ verdict. Gun owners have the right to privacy just like I have a right to own a gun and choose not to. IMO an armed populous is a populous that can fight back. This Liberal notion of disarming the populous in a Capitalist system illustrates yet another contradiction of Liberals and progressive. If Liberal truly want to disarm the populous then they MUST also advocate the elimination of Capitalism and Zionism.

By: hayate

hayate — Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:05:29 +0000

Oops

“Well guess what, it’s no almost universal in the usa that job applicants are forced to take a drug test to get a job.”

Should have been:

Well guess what, it’s now almost universal in the usa that job applicants are forced to take a drug test to get a job.

By: hayate

hayate — Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:04:13 +0000

Why not not make it mandatory that owners of high priced electronics equipment be made public? Or who own jewelry or precious metals. Or make it public who uses which gynecologist? Or psychologist? Better yet, make people who buy tobacco products list their names publicly? Why not have a public list of everyone’s children’s schools made public?

Once one crosses the line and deprives one group of their rights, it’s only a small step to deprive another group of their rights. In fact, these kind of laws are usually employed to do just that. The fascists/ziofascists worked in employment drug testing on “safety grounds” and stipulated it was to be limited to special cases. Well guess what, it’s no almost universal in the usa that job applicants are forced to take a drug test to get a job.

This article is stinks.