Natural Flow of History: Hamas Should Rethink Charter

“Now it is time to naturalize the flow of history,” wrote Ahmet Davutoglu, Turkey’s Minister of Foreign Affairs (British Guardian, March 16).

The process of naturalization is now underway in the region Davutoglu refused to describe as the Middle East (arguing that the term is “orientalist”, and preferring to call the region “West Asia and the south Mediterranean”).

Davutoglu is one of the most articulate and passionate Turkish politicians of the Justice and Development Party (AKP). Along with Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Abdullah Gül, he has labored to naturalize the flow of history in Turkey, sidelining an incessantly intrusive military, and forging links between regions, cultures and competing political thoughts. While the mission was — and remains — arduous, it has successfully led to the emergence of a unique Turkish political thought — proud of its roots, yet receptive to progress and modernity.

When Hamas was elected as the majority party at the Palestinian Legislative Council in 2006, the group was inspired by the objectives that propelled the AKP. Ahmed Yusuf, a top Hamas official in Gaza, has even been writing a book entitled, “Erdoğan and a New Strategic Vision”

“Erdoğan’s model is liberal. It is a model that dares to take responsibility and change things and establishes good relations between the religious and secular elements of society,” Yusuf said, according to Turkey’s Hurriyet (June 10, 2010). “It is a model that works for democracy and human rights, and supports an open society. That is what we want.”

In fact, this is precisely what most ordinary Palestinians want for themselves. It’s also the same desire that inspired several Arab revolutions. The same goals were ferociously defended and largely achieved in Tahrir Square in Cairo. Palestinians also wish to see their society free of narrow factional interests and limited political agendas.

Despite every attempt, whether through siege, wars or protracted bombardments, radicalization has not taken a hold in Palestinian political thought. Of course, there is much anger and a continued desire for justice, but political rhetoric in Gaza (and by other Hamas leaders in Diaspora) seems largely prudent and increasingly universal in its values and outreach.

Exiled senior Hamas leader, Khaled Meshal, commenting on the Egyptian revolution, claimed: “Today we are witnessing Cairo returning to its natural state, after it disappeared from that state for a long time. The people in Egypt and Tunisia have given us back our lives.” (Khartoum, March 6)

The massive revolutionary undertaking by Arab peoples is allowing the Arabs to determine their own fate, to chart their own course for a better future, and on their own terms. Davutoglu has advised that this undertaking also comes with challenges; if Arabs fail to overcome these, they will “lose the momentum of history”.

Palestinians don’t need a regime change, per se, as in other Arab polities, for they are under siege and military occupation, and have no true political sovereignty on the ground. They need a roadmap, a new vision that is inspired by the rights and aspirations of Palestinian people everywhere, but also free from the conventional wisdoms that were either enforced by Oslo – which fragmented Palestinian society – or by those who offered alternatives based mainly on ideological, factional or religious rationale. This painful period of Palestinian history, marred by factionalism, disunity and civil strife, has diverted from the natural flow of Palestinian history. Now, we speak of Hamas and Fatah, of West Bank and Gaza, of individuals, of personal initiatives, of NGOs and funding, and of everything except one Palestine, one Palestinian people, one goal, one strategy, and one destiny.

What is happening in Palestine is anti-history. It cannot be sustained for long without exacting an even heavier price from Palestinian people and their internationally recognized rights. The very credibility of any Palestinian leadership, of course, has now been greatly eroded.

Hamas, since its official inception in 1987 – and even prior to that, when the Islamic movement was dedicated mainly to charity work and institution building – has proved capable of changing and growing. Its growth has not been based on the diktats of Israel or any outside power, but rather its own motivations. It is now a political body that has managed to evade numerous Israeli bombs and attempts at undermining it as a legitimate group. It is regarded highly among many segments of Palestinian society, and international public opinion is also now shifting in a similar direction. For example, “45% of Europeans believe Hamas should be included in the Peace Process (and) only 25% believe it should be excluded,” according to an ICM European poll conducted in January 2011.

This time of people marching for change, freedom and democracy in the region should provide the perfect opportunity for Palestinians to break away from political exclusivity and the localization of their struggle for freedom. Hamas should now re-think its charter of 1988, which was once an almost impulsive rally cry, and which will always be used in the interests of those seeking to discount Hamas’ credibility. The language of the charter might have served a purpose in the past, but it fails to live up to the of the expectations of a people who wish for unity and to see past the confines of Oslo, its ‘peace process’ and its wealth-amassing elites. Post-Oslo Palestinian leaderships require new language, new ideas, new approaches, and most certainly a brand new vision and strategy.

There must be a break with the past. All hurdles need to be removed in order for the natural flow of history to resume. This is the most opportune time for Hamas to revisit and amend its charter, and to resume the process of change and self-correction which it began many years ago. The political landscape in Palestine will certainly experience serious changes in coming months and years. Genuine Palestinian leaderships must anticipate and accommodate a new era. It is what the people want, and what history repeatedly shows.

Ramzy Baroud is an author and a journalist. His latest volume is The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People's Struggle (Pluto Press, London). He can be reached at ramzybaroud@hotmail.com. Read other articles by Ramzy.

2 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Ismail Zayid said on March 26th, 2011 at 10:56am #

    Ramzy Baroud states accurately the need of the Palestinian people to be free of this oppressive occupation and secure their legitimate rights, without adopting any religious or ethnic exclusivism. Thus, only, they can be united and adopt a leadership devoid of sectarianism and devoted to a continuous struggle for freedom and justice.

  2. 3bancan said on March 26th, 2011 at 1:05pm #

    I’ve quite a couple of articles by Ramzy Baroud and all of them give me a feeling that he’s somewhat detached from the reality in the ME.

    “All hurdles need to be removed in order for the natural flow of history to resume”

    “History” – as intended here – is man-made, not “a natural flow”, and – at least up to now – has been mostly shaped by those who had/have more power and were/are more ruthless than the others to impose their kind of “natural flow” of history – of which the history of Palestine is the example par exellence.

    “It (=accommodation of/to a new era) is what the people want”

    I’d greatly appreciate to see – written down in concrete terms – what Ramzy Baroud thinks the Palestinian people want and what exactly are the Palestinian people’s “internationally recognized rights” and how he thinks they should be fulfilled.

    As to Hamas’s charter: I haven’t read it but – if it doesn’t already include – it should include: liberation of historic Palestine from the Jewish nazi occupation, prosecution of all the Jewish criminals against humanity and getting reparations for all the crimes that the Jewish nazi genociders have committed against the indigenous population and other countries in the ME.

    As to Ramzy Baroud critique of “Ingenuine Palestinian leaderships”: Any Palestinian leadership that doesn’t surrender to Jewish nazi diktat is not recognized as such by the Jewish nazis and the zionazified “international community”, and normally gets murdered or incarcerated by the Jewish nazis. Btw, it’s the Jewish nazi genociders who ultimately control the life of the Palestinians, from water to food, from economy to politics, from life to death…

    As to the shift of “international public opinion”: the opinion of the public doesn’t have any influence on the policies of the more and more zionazified ruling class. One needs to just have a look at the clout of the growing recognition of Palestine by South American states: it’s zero – because no one single state (maybe one could call Iran an exception) in the world dares give REAL support to the Palestinians. It’s the Jewish nazis who control and shape the “international community”‘s opinion and policies in the ME – not only in Israel, but also in Europe, Russia, all the anglophone countries, India, China…