one of the basic human rights is a right of a person not to be blamed, pigeonholed, labeled. in short, allow a person herhis right to make mistakes.
don’t love anyone- just respect one’s basic human rights.

That’s right bozh you have every right to make a fool of yourself.

“I assume that Rehmat is Jewish since no “goy” would dream of making such an obnoxious remark about Jews. We are the children of the “Holocaust generation””

Only a zionazi blatherer like MichaelKenny can produce such blather…

God as the Jewish body, rising from the ashes of Auschwitz and all that jazz.

in short, in order to own lower and ‘uneducated’ classes.

but before u’d able to understand what i mean, u first must know what kind of language represents a simplicity and which represents complexities.
all labeling–unless they come after the facts– represents enorm complexities.

as already noted, if labels r a starting point for further talk, it wld always lead to more labeling; hatred, intolerance, anger, frustration; eventual to bloodshed, etc. tnx

u and i cannot ever talk unless we first agree to use the same language. accusations, reading into what other people say-mean i do not evaluate as instructive– in fact, i deem such [ab]use of a language destructive to civility and also of elucidation.

one of the basic human rights is a right of a person not to be blamed, pigeonholed, labeled. in short, allow a person herhis right to make mistakes.
don’t love anyone- just respect one’s basic human rights.

i am accepting defeat?? by whose hands? what’s defeat mean? not engaging in terrorism? such as planting bombs in public buildings?
so, accusation is in order, as always before : my use of language amounts to defeatism!
if u want to talk, u’r welcome! tnx

Oh please. Who are you that do not know about other HOLOCAUST caused by British and American empire under control of JEWISH PLUTOCRACY, Rothschild family and its extension, including Sassoon dynasty who were responsible for MILLIONS of deaths in China, Opium war, in Iran, British policy in occupied Iran during WWI where diverted crops from local population to feed British occupying army let Iranian people, more than 8 MILLIONS, die. Are these deaths meaning anything to you? If it does, then why you have never mentioned these atrocities for the past few years and limited yourself only to the OFFICIAL STORY?
Mohammad Gholi Majd in his book “Great Famine And Genocide In Persia, 1917-1919” documents Iranian genocide by British empire due to their racist policy in Iran.

{In this book, Mohammad Gholi Majd argues that Persia was the greatest victim of World War One and also the victim of possibly the worst genocide of the twentieth century. Using U.S. State Department records, as well as Persian and British sources, Majd describes and documents a veritable holocaust about which practically nothing has been written.}

{http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/192815.The_Great_Famine_and_Genocide_in_Persia_1917_1919}

By the way, in WWII more than 56 million were killed, 23 millions from the Soviet Union. Why you never cite other groups and always bring the Zionist propaganda which has PENETRATED THE MEDIA in the West?
This propaganda is the cornerstone of Palestinian’s destruction that you support.

Natan Rothschild insisted that British Empire was under Rothschild control because the family controled circulation of money.

Majority of the famine in the region, including, Afghanistan Iran, India and China, were manmade caused by using the land for opium production to make money and leave the local to die. This policy was carried out by Sassoon dynasty which left millions of people dead in the region during British colonialism.

Millions of deaths and billions of hungry people is the result of Western Imperialism, including British, France, American and zionism that you ignore.

More than 95% of JEWS supported Gaza genocide in 2009, this means anything to you?
Mondoweiss writes:
{just as it is fair to criticize Israeli policies, it is fair to criticize its apologists — groups that claim to represent the entire American Jewish community.}
{http://mondoweiss.net/2010/10/young-jew-at-princeton-yes-american-jews-are-to-blame-for-ennabling-injustice.html}

Just look how the billionaire Jews in the Wall Street sucked the US taxpayers of US$10.7 trillion while 53% of American population cannot afford basic medical-care.

Long Live fascism in the name of ‘democracy’.

You cannot hope to build a better world without improving the individuals. To that end each of us must work for his own improvement, and at the same time share a general responsibility for all humanity, our particular duty being to aid those to whom we think we can be most useful. Marie Curie

She made artificial flowers, artificial flowers,
Flowers for ladies of fashion to wear;
She made artificial flowers, you know those artificial flowers,
Fashions from Annie’s despair.

They found little Annie all covered in ice
Still clutchin’ her poor frozen shears
Amidst all the blossoms she had fashioned by hand
And watered with all her young tears.

There must be a heaven where little Annie can play
In heavenly gardens and bowers.
And instea-a-ad of a halo she’ll wear ’round her head
A garland of genuine flowers. Darin

Marie Curie’s quote where have we hear that before? Ok who would like to help me write the book probably get ourselves in trouble so be it.

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. Galileo

Ok one more word or two HOUSE ARREST!

so, i suggest, instead of using the label “system of society” we use “usurpation by clerico-noble class of an idyllicly-structured society we once had and had been seen in many american voelken pre-european invasion of their lands.

lets not throw monkey wrenches into this clarity-simplicity by injecting labels which cannot ever be defined or understood; however, nevertheless, people in u.s. ‘know’ that socialism, healthcare, free education is bad, etc. tnx

a simplified version may go like this: capitalism= rich people owning people.
and one cld then list what rich people do.
and which cld be brought to an eye and which solely elucidates.
the problem is that most people over value words and under value eyes to gather knowledge.
“Socialism is not about running capitalism better!”
i do not understand that quote!

i am dismayed that people use labels such as capitalism, fascism, socialism and forgo to list their characteristics or what socialists, fascists, capitalists do.
defining such labels by offering further definitions is a process which never ends, yet lead to bitterness, anger, frustration and end– u guessed it– in more definitions.

one cld define god, devil, capitalism, socialism all one wants, these labels cannot be ever seen and thus never understood. tnx

I’m going to keep a copy of this article!

Thanks Frank for sharing this piece!

Capitalism can be defined, bozh.[ see http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/articles/whatiscap.html

A system of society based on the class monopoly of the means of life that has the following six essential characteristics:
1. Generalised commodity production, nearly all wealth being produced for sale on a market.
2. The investment of capital in production with a view to obtaining a monetary profit.
3. The exploitation of wage labour, the source of profit being the unpaid labour of the producers.
4. The regulation of production by the market via a competitive struggle for profits.
5. The accumulation of capital out of profits, leading to the expansion and development of the forces of production.
6. A single world economy.

Nationalisation is the wages system under new management. Nationalisation is state capitalism and does not differ from private capitalism as far as the exploitation of the workers is concerned. They still need their trade unions, and the strike weapon, to protect themselves from their employers. It is not socialism, nor is it a step towards socialism. Capitalism is not just a particular form of property holding, but is essentially an impersonal economic mechanism; impersonal in the sense that it is a mechanism that operates independently of the will of people and imposes itself on them as an external force. State capitalism and private capitalism have never existed as pure forms of society; every country has its own historically developed mix. But the main features of a model of state capitalism, drawn from historical examples, are as follows:
1. State ownership of the principal means of production
2. Generalised wage labour
3. Generalised use of money and money calculation
4. A relatively free market for consumer goods in the form of agricultural products and light industrial products
5. A market for means of production which is closely monitored by the state
6. Wide-scale planning activity, allocating supplies and directing products within the sphere of heavy industry, setting production targets, fixing prices and directing the flows of capital

Socialism is not about running capitalism better!

{http://www.monbiot.com/2011/02/14/stripped-bare/#more-1470}

it’s just an invent like sin, god, devil, democracy, rule of law, etc. devil may hel us from such [inter]ventionists! tnx