<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Just War?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/a-just-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/a-just-war/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 02:53:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AaronG</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/a-just-war/#comment-81245</link>
		<dc:creator>AaronG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=29437#comment-81245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Proper Authority - A war must be declared by a proper authority. The proper authority in the case of the Iraq and Afghan wars was the United Nations.&quot;

There is no human &quot;proper authority&quot; for war - definitely not the UN, which is a nice way of referring to Anglo-America and is a farce anyway. A nation or group of people that is being attacked certainly has a right to self defense, but that doesn&#039;t mean that they have the &quot;proper authority&quot; to wage war. This just keeps the tit-for-tat wheel of revenge rolling as it has during all history. As the last century clearly showed, the (jewish) kid that got beaten up has an understandable reason for revenge when he grows older, but he has no RIGHT to carry out that revenge on other weaker kids. Violence produces more violence.

There is only one Proper Authority that will justifiably bring to ruin those ruining the earth...........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Proper Authority &#8211; A war must be declared by a proper authority. The proper authority in the case of the Iraq and Afghan wars was the United Nations.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no human &#8220;proper authority&#8221; for war &#8211; definitely not the UN, which is a nice way of referring to Anglo-America and is a farce anyway. A nation or group of people that is being attacked certainly has a right to self defense, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that they have the &#8220;proper authority&#8221; to wage war. This just keeps the tit-for-tat wheel of revenge rolling as it has during all history. As the last century clearly showed, the (jewish) kid that got beaten up has an understandable reason for revenge when he grows older, but he has no RIGHT to carry out that revenge on other weaker kids. Violence produces more violence.</p>
<p>There is only one Proper Authority that will justifiably bring to ruin those ruining the earth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2011/02/a-just-war/#comment-81171</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=29437#comment-81171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[however, there shld never be collective punishment when a few individuals break an international law.
thus, even if iraqi govt had indeed obtained one or more nuclear bombs, aggression against iraq wld have been a criminal act.

all one needs to do is to put price on heads of individuals who manufactured the bombs and then send in hunters for them if they wld not destroy the bombs or appear before world court-- provided, of course, it wld not be in service of  u.s. and other lands.

and nevertheless, only after u.s., et al wld do away with ALL their weapons of mass destruction.

and even then, u.s.-- at least-- wld remanufacture or hide some wmd. which brings us back to the accepted dictum: right of a folk to bear arms. it is an universal right and jsut u.s., israeli, or russian right! 

in a lawless world, one wld be foolish not to arm self.  let&#039;s face it, ?all european lands r armed to the teeth and with wmd? and the cause for it is? but, of course, to have it their way and grab more land-resources anyway they can! tnx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>however, there shld never be collective punishment when a few individuals break an international law.<br />
thus, even if iraqi govt had indeed obtained one or more nuclear bombs, aggression against iraq wld have been a criminal act.</p>
<p>all one needs to do is to put price on heads of individuals who manufactured the bombs and then send in hunters for them if they wld not destroy the bombs or appear before world court&#8211; provided, of course, it wld not be in service of  u.s. and other lands.</p>
<p>and nevertheless, only after u.s., et al wld do away with ALL their weapons of mass destruction.</p>
<p>and even then, u.s.&#8211; at least&#8211; wld remanufacture or hide some wmd. which brings us back to the accepted dictum: right of a folk to bear arms. it is an universal right and jsut u.s., israeli, or russian right! </p>
<p>in a lawless world, one wld be foolish not to arm self.  let&#8217;s face it, ?all european lands r armed to the teeth and with wmd? and the cause for it is? but, of course, to have it their way and grab more land-resources anyway they can! tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
