<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Use Are Inquiries?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/what-use-are-inquiries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/what-use-are-inquiries/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:40:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Andrews</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/what-use-are-inquiries/#comment-77661</link>
		<dc:creator>John Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 08:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=25934#comment-77661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty good piece, Lesley, but you seem to be under the impression that at some time in the past Britain was a decent, upstanding country. (You conclude : &quot;Nothing less will suffice if this country is to regain even a little of its reputation.&quot;) 

Whilst British government hasn&#039;t been bad, relative perhaps to the present Saudi government, Mugabe&#039;s government or Hitler&#039;s government, that doesn&#039;t mean its &#039;reputation&#039; is anything worth regaining.

Britain&#039;s &#039;reputation&#039; is almost entirely a product of its own government&#039;s PR, which is possibly not the most objective standard of measurement; and I think you&#039;ll find that in spite of all that PR, in fairly large chunks of the planet our government is reviled almost as much as the US government now is, and for pretty much the same reasons. And d&#039;you know what? Apart from the fact that it has a long-established aversion to the truth being discovered, it couldn&#039;t care less.

Inquiries do provide a small service: they do reveal a little more of the truth than we might otherwise discover. But as an instrument of justice, as a tool for punishing previous wrongdoers and hence causing current wrongdoers to pause for thought, they are entirely useless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty good piece, Lesley, but you seem to be under the impression that at some time in the past Britain was a decent, upstanding country. (You conclude : &#8220;Nothing less will suffice if this country is to regain even a little of its reputation.&#8221;) </p>
<p>Whilst British government hasn&#8217;t been bad, relative perhaps to the present Saudi government, Mugabe&#8217;s government or Hitler&#8217;s government, that doesn&#8217;t mean its &#8216;reputation&#8217; is anything worth regaining.</p>
<p>Britain&#8217;s &#8216;reputation&#8217; is almost entirely a product of its own government&#8217;s PR, which is possibly not the most objective standard of measurement; and I think you&#8217;ll find that in spite of all that PR, in fairly large chunks of the planet our government is reviled almost as much as the US government now is, and for pretty much the same reasons. And d&#8217;you know what? Apart from the fact that it has a long-established aversion to the truth being discovered, it couldn&#8217;t care less.</p>
<p>Inquiries do provide a small service: they do reveal a little more of the truth than we might otherwise discover. But as an instrument of justice, as a tool for punishing previous wrongdoers and hence causing current wrongdoers to pause for thought, they are entirely useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/what-use-are-inquiries/#comment-77604</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=25934#comment-77604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i do not think that interpreting u.k invasion of iraq is a right thing to do.  in any case, whatever interpretation lawyers come up with, legal, illegal,  or 
no opinion, the effects of the invasion are the same.
it  shocks all peace-loving people even to think about any aggression as even illegal; why not simply put the war criminals, blair and bush, et al in dock and imprison them for crimes committed?
the inquiry needed wld be to judicially determine what the invasion caused. tnx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do not think that interpreting u.k invasion of iraq is a right thing to do.  in any case, whatever interpretation lawyers come up with, legal, illegal,  or<br />
no opinion, the effects of the invasion are the same.<br />
it  shocks all peace-loving people even to think about any aggression as even illegal; why not simply put the war criminals, blair and bush, et al in dock and imprison them for crimes committed?<br />
the inquiry needed wld be to judicially determine what the invasion caused. tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
