“I agree with you hayate but look at whom the left-end of the spectrum is sticking their “necks” out for. Could this be part of the set up to fulfill Joe Lieberman’s dream of curtailing access to the Internet?”

No doubt about lieberman and internet censorship and no doubt there’s a set up in that respect. “Left end of the political spectrum” was a poor choice of phrase on my part, as there is support for wikileaks from right to left – outside of the neocons, of course (but then neocons are against everything except goat buggery. ;D ).

A lot of the support for wikileaks is not support for the org itself, but support for what wilikeaks represent. The whistle blowing of corruption and behind the scenes duplicity. That’s where I’m at. I think this planet could do with a lot more whistle blowing orgs.

There is also the possibility that certain people are supporting wikileaks as a way to slip in another zionist co-opter org that will deflect scrutiny of ziofascism, inc. while slyly promoting ziofascism, inc. criminal policy. There is enough known about wikileaks and the people in charge of it (this has been already extensively documented on this site), that I’m rather dubious about their motivations. I’m not comfortable with wikileaks becoming the microsoft of whistle blowing.

Thank you for your comment. I don’t want the governments to operate in secrecy like you do. However, majority of these informations were not ‘secret’ and was expected. However, the kind of information that was ‘leaked’ at specific time is suspicious to me. These ‘leaks’ have been released by a person who not only has no record of activism in his file but also has supported the official lies about 9/11 given by the establishment. He has never shown reservations against lies of the US imperialism earlier until now. He, suddenly, wants to ‘leak’ establishment’s dirty secrets. It is very strange to me indeed.

He has received ‘Awards’, like many Iranians who work with NED, from the same organizations and foundations to buy him ‘credibility’. The following line:
{Now look at the names that support WikiLeaks and Assange in a given petition :}
was misplaced and should have been after “CPD Supports Assange and Manning.” Sorry about that.

Chomsky and Daniel Ellsberg are CPD SUPPORTERS. The following can be found at CPD website:

{CPD Supports Assange and Manning
Dear Friend of the Campaign for Peace and Democracy,
CPD supports the heroic work of Julian Assange and Wikleaks — and, if he was the individual who obtained the Wikileaks cables, Bradley Manning. We hope these revelations will help to mobilize the American public against the terrible U.S. wars on Afghanistan and Pakistan. More broadly, Wikileaks can help to educate Americans about the cynical manipulations of other countries by the United States, and the need for a fundamentally new, democratic and just U.S. foreign policy.}

{http://warisacrime.org/irannews}

I agree with you Deadbeat. This like ‘ piracy in Somalia’ which was a cover for Israel and US to bring the Red Sea and Suez Canal under more control of the West, has an intention to limit freedom of speech at the Internet even further.

—————–

Critic of CPD by Phil Wilayto:

{http://warisacrime.org/content/two-petitions-two-approaches-toward-defending-iran}

Critic of CPD and its supporters by Gowans:

{http://redantliberationarmy.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/wilayto-vs-landy/}

so what happened after ellsberg’s leaks? worsening! that’s what happened!
how about the new leaks [mostly weak leaks]? what is gonna happen after the dust settles dwn?
i say, worsenings! for ‘aliens’ and many domestics! and why are so many ‘jews’ and zionists defending wikileaks?
tnx

Now look at the names that support WikiLeaks and Assange in a given petition:

As journalists, activists, artists, scholars and citizens, we condemn the array of threats and attacks on the journalist organization WikiLeaks. After the website’s decision, in collaboration with several international media organizations, to publish hundreds of classified State Department diplomatic cables, many pundits, commentators and prominent U.S. politicians have called for harsh actions to be taken to shut down WikiLeaks’ operations.

Daniel Ellsberg
Noam Chomsky
Glenn Greenwald (Salon)
Barbara Ehrenreich
Arundhati Roy (author)
Medea Benjamin (Code Pink)
Tom Morello (musician)
John Nichols (The Nation)
Craig Brown (CommonDreams)
Glen Ford (Black Agenda Report)
DeeDee Halleck (Waves of Change, Deep Dish Network)
Norman Solomon (author, War Made Easy)
Tom Hayden
Fatima Bhutto (author)
….
http://www.zcommunications.org/we-support-wikileaks-by-many-authors

Chomsky and Assange both have no disagreement with the official story of 9/11 given by the US imperialism and Zionism and call those who have reservation, conspirator theorists. How a person can trust Assange who has never shown any activity or disagreement against the establishment wants to ‘inform’ people and ‘leaks’ the ‘secrets’? Only a fool will buy the lies of imperialists/Zionists enablers.
Chomsky who is against the US imperialism was invited to US Military Academy at West Point in 2006. The media reported:

On Just War Theory and the Invasion of Iraq
57:18 – 3 years ago
From the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, Noam Chomsky talks to West Point cadets about just war theory and the invasion of Iraq. During the talk, Professor Chomsky criticizes the work of Michael Walzer, an influential proponent of just war theory and the author of the popular “Just and Unjust Wars.” Following his remarks, Professor Chomsky takes questions from the cadets about international law and the Bush administration’s foreign policy. The talk took place on April 20, 2006