http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=193241&utm_source=

Jerusalem Post 10/29/2010

Report: Foreign Ministry prevents Geneva Convention meeting
By JPOST.COM STAFF

The Foreign Ministry has succeeded in preventing a meeting of states which have signed the Geneva Convention, which could have resulted in a public statement that Israel has violated the charter during Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip during 2009, Army Radio report Friday.

According to the report, Israeli embassies in Switzerland, New York and various European capitals with help from Washington, were able to diplomatically prevent the meeting in Switzerland. It was expected that the meeting would conclude that Israel did not do enough to prevent Palestinian civilian casualties during the 2009 war in Gaza.

Sources close to Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman also succeeded in preventing the establishment of the victim’s compensation fund of those injured in Cast Lead, which was decided by the UN Human Rights Council.

Killing of Palestinian kids continues in the “buffer zone”

The term “buffer zone”, of course, being a sanitised term for illegally-controlled Palestinian land.

http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=329481

“Ahmad Abu Hashish attended school until the 10th grade, and had been collecting scrap in the border area for about a month when he was shot. He said he earned about 30 shekels a day.

Physicians at Kamal Edwan informed him that his bones were shattered. After spending 20 days completely immobile in his family’s camp, he is to return to the hospital to see if the leg has healed enough to install a prosthesis.

He told Ma’an that once his leg heals, he’ll have no choice but to return to collecting gravel: “I have to go back. There’s no work.”

Asked why he thought Israelis shot him, he said, “Really, I don’t know.”

While Ahmad gave his testimony, lying on a blanket on the dirt floor of the tent, the sound of gunfire and exploding tank shells could be heard, coming from the border area.

Information gathered by aid agencies, the UN, rights groups, shows that Ahmad Abu Hashish’s story is far from unique.

According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, eight Palestinians, all civilians, were shot by Israelis soldiers along the border in September alone. Six of these were workers collecting construction scrap. In a separate incident in the border area, Israeli tank shells killed a 91-year-old shepherd, and two boys, aged 16 and 17.

Bassam Masri, head of orthopedics at the Kamal Edwan hospital, told the British newspaper The Guardian earlier in October that around 50 people have been treated for gunshot wounds suffered in or near the buffer zone while collecting rubble in the past three months.

The Israeli military has publicly declared a 300-meter no-go zone on the Gaza side of the Green Line, but a UN study released in August, based on more than 100 interviews, shows that “Since late 2008, Palestinians have been totally or partially prevented from accessing land located up to 1,000-1,500 meters from the Green Line (depending on the specific area).”

These restrictions mean that 17 percent of the total land area of the already tiny Gaza Strip, and 35 percent of its agricultural land, is off-limits to Palestinian use. This in turn has contributed to a variety of humanitarian problems, further damaging the economy and directly affecting more than 113,000 people who live or work in or near the border.

Confusion about the boundaries of the exclusion zone persists. “Despite the potential for civilian casualties, the Israeli authorities have not informed the affected population about the precise boundaries of the restricted areas and the conditions under which access to these areas may be permitted or denied.”

Regardless of the actual size of the buffer zone, rights advocates say the ongoing shootings of civilians are unacceptable.”

http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m71366&hd=&size=1&l=e

Of course this site’s regular zionazis will keep on saying: “Bullshit”…

http://www.pchrgaza.org/portal/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7085:spanish-authorities-refuse-to-grant-avi-dichter-immunity-&catid=36:pchrpressreleases&Itemid=194

We need to chew on this postulate or even affirmation that 30 mn americans think egzactly the same as a few mn jews. tnx

I had to raise these issues. I believe that this is my duty…

Peace Gilad

I hardly comment on Blogs… but thought that a clarification is important.

If you want to engage in a dialogue with me you will have to do your homework.

A. Can you suggest to me and the rest where and when exactly did I “criticize” the Pro-Palestinian Solidarity Movement? I don’t remember coming on record with such a statement!
B. I do not equate Zionism and Jewish Left… I basically prove beyond doubt that a Zionist paper is far more tolerant than my Jewish ‘leftist’ detractors. If you want more evidence I am happy to provide it.
C. If you are familiar with 90% of my articles, you should know that I differentiate between “Jewish Left” (a tribal exclusive affair) and Leftists who happen to be Jewish by origin (totally innocent category). You have to ask yourself whether you are a Jewish Leftists or a Leftist who happen to be a Jew.
I have no problem with the 2nd category!!
Also your comrade, are they of the former or the later category?
D. If you are a Leninist as you suggest, you should also be familiar with Lenin criticism of the Bund (1903). I accept Lenin’s criticism, what about you? If you don’t accept it, what makes you into a Leninist?

All the best
Gilad

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/gilad-atzmon-proud-to-be-a-self-hating-jew/

Thank you Mr. Atzmon to say that.

Iranian socialists in 1950s and 1960s were strong supporters of Israel against ‘backward Arabs’ which may still be with few Iranian ‘lefties’ not all. The reason behind this, beside the Iranians prejudice against Arab due to the invasion of Persia by Arabs where let the demise of Sassanid in 7th century, is that Iranian socialists were fed misleading information by the socialists in the West especially the socialists in France. These Iranian socialists became anti Stalinists, viewed the Stalinist Tudeh Party put the interest of Soviet Union ahead of Iran’s interest, therefore, they turned to European socialists, mainly, French left dominated by Jean Paul Sartre.

Jalal Al-e-Ahmad, a socialist during 1950s and 60s was in contact with the Socialists in France including the Iranian socialists who supported Israel against Arabs and they were interested in kibbutz where they translated many articles on Kibbutz into Persian and printed them in their journal.
They believed that since the Zionist movement was shaped in the West then it should be ‘progressive’. The Iranian socialists’ views on Israel and Zionism were shaped by French socialists, majority of whom were Jewish.
The Iranian socialists translated articles on Kibbutz and painted Israel in a good light, because the socialists in the West were giving misleading information about Israel and Zionism to hold world public opinion against Palestinians in support of Israel.

Jalal Al-e-Ahmad (December 2, 1923 – September 9, 1969) was a prominent Iranian writer, thinker, and social and political critic. Al-e-Ahmad joined the Tudeh Party, pro Stalin, along with his mentor Khalil Maleki shortly after World War II. Following the 1953 Iranian coup d’état Al-e-Ahmad was imprisoned for several years and “so completely lost faith in party politics.
Jalal was invited to Israel in 1963 by the Israeli government where he accepted. This journey, where he wrote a critical essay about realities of Israel as a racist and apartheid in 1964 named: “Safar be Velayat-e Esrael” (A journey to land of Angel of death) سفر به ولایت عزرائیل . From then on he turned against Israel and called Israel a racist state and an extension of the US imperialism in the region; he became supporter of the Palestine struggle against Israel. Then, he asked the Iranian socialists in France to stop writing and printing articles about Kibbutz. Many Iranian opposition groups hate Al e Ahmad because he exposed opportunist intellectuals who said nothing against Israel, but they were ready to condemn Palestinians as ‘backward’ Arabs.

The following is a rough translation of a letter ( 2/3 of it) written by one of Jalal Al Ahmed’s friends who was in France when the socialists held meetings to raise money in support of Israel against Palestinians and ‘backward Arabs’. This letter was written in 1968, after 1967 war, to Al e-Ahmad by one of his friend in France shows that the ‘left’, many of whom were JEWISH, supported ISRAEL AND ZIONISM.

***The letter reads:***

… From Jean Paul Sartre to Eugène Ionesco who reached the obscenity to claim: “Although stateless Palestinian, for the past 20 years are in the refugee camps receiving food, half of what is necessary for a person to live, from the United Nations; yet they want to perform a task that Hitler did not do”, it means the Palestinians want the European and American Jews who are representative of the ‘Western civilization’ to be massacred in the Arab countries.
Another melancholy, Lanzmann, who is close to Jean Paul Sartre, became so mad with the imaginary Arab brutality that he said whatever came to his tongue against the Palestinians.
The Left federation and Mr. Mendès France, however, do require a special place. But Daniel Meyer was more aggressive and obscene than others. The head of the Human rights convention, Daniel Meyer according to his historic mission said: “I hate being a Socialist, I hate being a human, but I confess that I am a JEW.” (Good for you!!!)
The circus, like this, was let by these literary and political rouge individuals for the whole WEEK. I wish you were here to see Jalal. But when these individuals’ mouth foamed due to too many speeches, then the real personalities who controlled this circus entered the scene.
The political environment was ready. The entire French left (minus the communists who didn’t know what they were doing) emotionally was prepared to be taken as HOSTAGE. The bourgeois organizations and other reorganization that practices usury, were flirting with the lefties intellectuals. They started to collect signature for donation to collect money…

http://www.navaeian.blogfa.com/

One of the odd things I discovered about these “zionist anti-zionists” is that many I encountered were not from a Jewish background, yet were just as defensive when it came to criticism of zionism when such was from someone outside “the group” and not vetted as “loyal opposition”.

Another thing interesting about this piece is Atzmon’s recent experiences dealing with israeli media. The openness of that media in comparison to the zionist controlled media outside israel is something many have talked about over the years. The reason zionists can allow this in israel, but not outside israel is that they know israelis are a loyal lot. They may differ, even fundamentally differ, but their ultimate loyalty to zionism remains strong. A little dissidence helps the zionists reinforce that loyalty by working to strengthen the counter arguments and also show that people are free to differ.

But outside israel, people cant be trusted to remain loyal and most are loyal zionists only because of incessant manipulation. They cant allow any views that might undo that manipulation or challenge it, since the effects of it are not very deep and it would not take much exposure of zionist criminality and bigotry to kill those zionist manipulations outside israel. So real anti-zionist views are simply not allowed.

Otherwise this disturbed and disturbing identity is incomplete. One ends up like Gilad Atzmon; a human being, period.

Can’t have that now, can we?

In 1236, a Jew convert to Christianity, Nicholas Donin, submitted to Pope Gregory IX listing 35 charhes against the Judaism’s most holy book Talmud. The list included the insults to Jesus, his mother Mary, Christianity, spitting on the Cross and priests, the Blood Libel, hatred toward Gentiles and even animals and many foolish and revolting tales. After investigations – The Pope issued a ‘Papal Bull (Holy Directive)’ that all copies of this hateful book be confiscated and burnt in public. The Bull was also sent to the kings of England, Spain, France and Portugal for necessary action as “We are convinced this is the direction God wants us to go,” as Pastor Wayne Sapp has claimed recently why he wants to burn the copes of Holy Qur’an on September 11, 2010.

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/the-holy-vengeance/

It appears better to call ALL ‘JEWS ‘ “cultists” and compare them with all other cultists.
And we wld discover that in some salient thinking-behaving they behave-think alike or egzactly the same.
None of these cultists know god; they all just guess them. All cults r structured like an army. All r full of hatred. All disseminate lies; r prowar, etcetc.
Islam, christianity, and mosheism comprise of many ethnoses; thus, none appear tribal nor behaving as tribal.

Slav word for “tribe” is “Pleme”; derives from word “plemenit”: meaning noble, kind, honest.
I have forgotten some of my german, but do propose that the words “folk”, “volk” or “voelken” send positive message.

But even in this piece, gilad omits causative factors for events he talks about! We need to know how-why-when-where cultists became prowar, prowaging poverty-ignorance-hatred-etc.
We even need to learn how nice-honest-noble voelken became what thy became.

In this piece gilad does not say he intends to accept islam. tnx