Israel Is the Most Immediate Threat to the Future of the Planet

Interview with Jeffrey Blankfort

Jeffrey Blankfort is an American photojournalist, radio producer and Middle East analyst. He is a well-known pro-Palestinian activist whose articles and writings have appeared on many progressivist publications.

He currently hosts radio programs on KZYX in Mendocino, CA and KPOO in San Francisco. Blankfort was formerly the editor of the Middle East Labor Bulletin and co-founder of the Labor Committee of the Middle East. In February 2002, he won a lawsuit against the Zionist organization Anti-Defamation League (ADL) which was found to have been spying on the American citizens critical of Israel and its expansionistic policies.

Jeffrey joined me in an exclusive interview to discuss the influence of the Israeli lobby on the decision-makers of the U.S. government, Israel’s illegal, underground nuclear program, the prospect of Israeli – Palestinian conflict and the imminent threat of an Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Blankfort is quite outspoken in his criticism of the apartheid regime of Israel and believes that Israel is the most immediate threat to the future of our planet.

Kourosh Ziabari: In your article “The Israel Lobby and the Left: Uneasy Questions”, you elaborately explore the dominance of the Israeli lobby over the U.S. administration and cite good examples of the influence of well-off Zionists on the multinational companies and mainstream media in America. My question is what are the root causes of this enormous power and immense wealth which the Zionists have possessed? How did the Jews take over the vast resources of power and money that has made them capable of framing, modifying and overturning the political equations in the United States?

Jeffrey Blankfort: That question requires a long and complicated answer. In short, an important, well organized segment of the American Jewish community emerged after World War II that has been dedicated to the establishment and prospering of a Jewish state in historic Palestine in which the lives and well being of the indigenous Palestinian Arabs were of no consequence.

That this segment did not — and has never — represented the majority of American Jews has been more than been made up for by its concerted activity on Israel’s behalf in every critical sector of U.S. society and at every level of the nation’s political life. Its success would not have been possible, however, were it not for the fact that within its ranks have been a sizeable number of wealthy Jewish businessmen who have been quite willing to expend the funds necessary to either purchase the support of the U.S. Congress as well as virtually all of the state legislatures or intimidate Israel’s would-be critics into silence.

Well before the birth of the first Zionists, Jewish bankers and capitalists had established themselves in Europe and the United States so it was not surprising that a number of them, beginning with Lord Rothschild in the early part of the century, became supporters of the Zionist project. Now, far and away, they make up the largest segment of individual donors to both political parties.

The media, as could be expected, was one of its primary targets, and that avowedly pro-Israel interests, although not exclusively Jewish, such as Rupert Murdoch, now thoroughly dominate it at every level is, unfortunately, proved on a daily basis.

While there should be no question that this Israel support network, euphemistically described as a “lobby,” has been a major force in shaping U.S. Middle East policies overall, and the determinant factor in dealing with the Israel-Palestine conflict, its power has its limits. While it was able, through its agents in the White House and the Pentagon, to push the U.S. into a war on Iraq, it has yet to get Washington to bomb Iran or, apparently, to sanction an Israeli attack on its nuclear facilities. It is clear that there are important elements within the Pentagon as well as the intelligence agencies which know that an attack by either the U.S. or Israel on Iran would more likely than not lead to a global catastrophe.

KZ: In your articles, you’ve alluded to the conflicts and struggles between the U.S. and Israel administrations during the past decades in which U.S. Presidents, starting from Richard Nixon, tried to curb the expansionistic policies of Israel and bring about an improved living condition for the oppressed nation of Palestine. Should you believe that there have been such efforts on the side of U.S. administration, what has led to their failure, having in mind that they’ve repeatedly proclaimed their commitment to the security of Israel?

JB:There has not been the slightest interest on the part of any US president, I suspect, in improving the living conditions for the Palestinians. Halting Israeli expansion and getting Tel Aviv to withdraw from all the territories it conquered in 1967 has been seen as being in the U.S. national interest.

All the past efforts have failed because none of the presidents have been willing to spend the domestic political capital that would be necessary to force an Israeli withdrawal and particularly so when they know their efforts will be opposed by the overwhelming majority of both houses of Congress irrespective of party affiliations as well as by the Zionist dominated media.

The only one who made a serious effort and who was willing to confront the Zionist network and Congress was George Bush Sr., when he denied Israel its request for $10 billion in loan guarantees in 1991 and again in 1992 but even he was eventually forced to surrender.

KZ: Israelis are used to employing the label anti-Semitism to defame and vilify whoever dares criticize their belligerent, aggressive policies and actions. They accuse whoever criticizes them of being anti-Semitist. This makes the politicians and opinion-makers hesitant and demoralized in talking of Israel negatively. Is there any solution to reveal the futility of the anti-Semitism label and educate the public that the criticism of Israel is different from criticizing Judaism?

JB: The allegation of “anti-Semitism” leveled against critics of Israel does not carry the weight it once did but it still is extremely effective, particularly, when the accused is employed by the mainstream media as we have seen recently in the case of Helen Thomas, Octavia Nasr and Rick Sanchez, and in the film industry which has long been a Zionist bastion and which was brought into existence by Jews in the last century, although none at the time were Zionists.

The power of the accusation of anti-Semitism to bring public figures to their knees will continue to exist until there is a sufficient number of prominent Americans who are willing to challenge it. When that will be I won’t begin to speculate.

KZ: Although undeclared, it’s confirmed by the Federation of American Scientists that Israel possesses up to 200 nuclear warheads. Being a non-signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Israel has never allowed the IAEA to probe into its nuclear arsenal. We already know about the destiny of Mordecai Vanunu who swapped his freedom with the expression of truth. What’s your viewpoint about the destiny of Israel’s nuclear program? Will Tel Aviv continue enjoying immunity from responsibility?

JB: As long as the Zionist support network controls Congress and as long as no American president as the courage to even mention the existence of Israel’s nuclear weapons, and while the U.S. continues to hold the purse strings to the UN, Israel will continue to enjoy both immunity and impunity. Had the leadership of the now non-existent anti-nuclear movement in the US, like the “peace movement” not been also Zionist-dominated, there might have been some debate on the issue but because it was, the subject was considered off limits.

KZ: Let’s turn to Iran. Iran’s is being portrayed by the U.S. mainstream media in a distorted and hypocritical way. Many Americans who even hadn’t heard the name of Iran before are now exposed to a horrifying and dreadful image of the country presented to them by the Zionist-led media outlets. They aren’t aware of the historical civilization of Iran and its unique cultural, social features. How is it possible to unveil the concealed realities of Iran for the Americans who don’t find the proper opportunities to get familiarized with the misrepresented Iran?

JB: Most Americans would have a problem finding Iran or any other country in the Middle East, or for that matter, anywhere in the world on a map. They are, for the most part, what can be called “geographically challenged,” as well as historically challenged. There is no antidote to that on the horizon which is why Washington is able to get away with making war on countries and peoples that have never done them harm. If there was a military draft as there was during the Vietnam War, neither the war in Iraq or Afghanistan would have gone on as long as they have and there would be opposition to an attack on Iran.

When Nixon cleverly halted the draft of 18-year olds in the early 70s, that took the backbone out of the anti-war movement and that is the reason that as hard pressed as the U.S. is today to maintain an army large enough to fight multiple wars, Washington will not bring back the draft. Hiring private contractors became the alternative. Without the fear of 18-year olds that they will be taken into the army, there is no anti-war movement and there is none worthy of the name at this moment in the United States.

KZ: Many people around the world have come to believe that the media in the United States are unrestrictedly free and can express whatever they want to, without any impediment or obstruction imposed on them by the administration. It’s almost accurate to say that the U.S. government does not have any direct involvement in the media-related affairs; however, there seems to be an implicit pressure on the media not to cross the red lines and violate the unwritten laws, including criticism of Israel. Can you elaborate on this more precisely?

JB: It is not the government that prevents criticism from Israel in the media but fear of the repercussions that are guaranteed to follow any genuine criticism be it written or in cartoon form in the U.S. media, even when that criticism is leveled by a Jewish journalist. There are several organizations, most prominently the Anti-Defamation League, CAMERA, and HonestReporting which are able to unleash at a moment’s notice a torrent of emails and letters to the editor, and in certain cases, visits to the offices of an offending newspaper, to make sure those in the media know what they can and cannot write. Since there is no corresponding pressure from Israel’s critics in the public, most editors choose to avoid a fight.

There was a time when a number of columnists in the mainstream press did write critically of Israel and got away with it. But that was 20 years ago and they are no longer around

KZ: As the final question, what’s your prediction for the future of Israel? Will it continue to determine the U.S. foreign policy and rule the American politicians? Is it capable of maintaining the blockade of Gaza? After all, will Israel succeed in surviving politically?

JB: As long as Israel’s supporters, or agents in the U.S., are able to control the U.S. Congress and intimidate whoever happens to be president and as long as those same forces dominate the media there will be no change in the U.S. or in the situation in Gaza. The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, while slowly growing in the U.S., does not have the intensity that it has elsewhere and its targets are limited to what Israel and U.S. companies do in the West Bank so, realistically, there is unlikely to be any meaningful pressure coming from the U.S.

What Israel does, however, may produce changes that are unpredictable at the moment. Having twice been defeated by Hezbollah, Israeli officials keep threatening another war on Lebanon and since the U.S., Europe and the UN have let them get away with all their previous wars on Lebanon, they are likely to try again.

Unlike the Palestinians, the Lebanese are able and willing to aggressively fight back as the Israeli soldiers know all too well, from their resistance to occupation and their halting of the vaunted Israeli wehrmacht in 2006. Should Israel find a way to attack Iran, the repercussions from that might be sufficient to send Israel on the road to what will ultimately be viewed as self-destruction. At the moment, thanks to the unconditional backing by the U.S. for all it crimes, and given its arsenal of nuclear weapons, I consider Israel to be the most immediate threat to the future of the planet.

Kourosh Ziabari is an Iranian freelance journalist and media correspondent. His articles have appeared on a number of media outlets and newspapers. He is a member of Tlaxcala Translators Network for Linguistic Diversity. Read other articles by Kourosh.

27 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. bozh said on October 25th, 2010 at 7:53am #

    At this time i want to point that it is the interpreters of the constitution [and which constitution legalized and appoints] that solely rule america.
    Suppose that this set of ‘laws’ [caveat, false symbol or diktats] does now always govern US?? Or does some times and not at other times?

    And suppose a set of people rule america? And suppose we find out to what degree and in what egzact manner?
    And another bunch at another time rules america? We know that capone, luciano, siegel, lansky, et al also ruled america to an unknown degree-means-ways!

    Usually such people have money. Then one can conclude money rules america and as per intent of the set of diktats, imposed from up and on dwn?

    And suppose falwell, robertson, swaggard, et al did or did not rule america? And suppose US labor at this time does and does not rule america?

    I can tell u that i don’t rule canada; not an iota. Is it because i do not give a penny to our three major coffee partiers?
    Oh my devil? Am i ever mixed up!! Help! tnx

  2. MichaelKenny said on October 25th, 2010 at 9:17am #

    A good analysis, but with a few weaknesses. First of all, Mr Blankfort presupposes that American power is eternal, whereas it is collapsing, brought down, in fact, by the very Israel Lobby that is misusing it. The Lobby’s strategy, namely, as Israel-dominated America in an America-dominated world, is falling apart, not because it it losing control of America, but because America is losing control of the world. Secondly, I don’t see why an attack on Iran would be a “global catastrophe”. At attack would actually suit Iran, which would be transformed overnight into a victim, thereby giving the coup de grace to US power and provoking the collapse of Israel. I think it because the US elite, and even more so, the much more lucid Israeli elite, realise the above that no attack has taken place. Finally, I think that who funds the UN is totally irrelevant inasmuch as the UN essentailly adopts resolutions which have little effect one way or the other and the US veto is unrelated to funding. The UN does not wage war to enforce its resolutions. It will never again make the Gulf War mistake of authorising a member to act more or less at will in its name.

  3. bozh said on October 25th, 2010 at 9:22am #

    Suppose there are nukes in israel? How has it made them in a country in which people cldn’t make a spoon, if left to own devices?

    The most plausible answer appears that US had placed them there in order to cow arab world into submission.
    Two acts of war–one on ossirak reactor and the other in syria and arab complete silence about it, mean what?
    And the fact that the strongly asocialistic arab countries are now uniting with comrades in US, shows that nukes or no nukes in israel are working for US and europe just fine.

    And i do not think that US warlords and masters of own and ‘jewish’ peoples [?200 of them] are that benevolent to let a cult own nukes!
    For US there can be only one cult; it will never tolerate another. And neither wld a christian or muslim one!

    However it may be, i do not know how israel cld send without anyone noticing, say, 5k jets laded with nukes to destroy china, japan, india and other goyim lands?
    tnx

  4. shabnam said on October 25th, 2010 at 10:35am #

    {I don’t see why an attack on Iran would be a “global catastrophe”. At attack would actually suit Iran, which would be transformed overnight into a victim, thereby giving the coup de grace to US power and provoking the collapse of Israel.}

    Are you crazy? Iran IS A VICTIM OF JUDEOFASCISTS AND US IMPERIALISM since the Iranian revolution. An attack on Iran brings WWII and you should send your children to die for the interest of the Judeofascists. Where have you been? Aren’t Iraq, Sudan, Afghanistan and Somalia victims of Judeofascists and their supporters? Has Israel collapsed yet?
    Israel with its fifth columnists are trying to partition southern Sudan from the rest of the country with the help of Black puppets including black ‘opposition groups’ who ARE SILENT AGAINST ISRAEL AND ZIONIST PLOT AT THE HORN OF AFRICA.
    This strategy, according to ODED YINON, is executed to control Red Sea and its water way including Suez Canal to weaken Arab autonomy around the sea and to steal natural resources including WATER. The Zionists started intense propaganda campaign against the Sudan since Clinton administration, fully controlled by the Jewish lobby, a fifth column and no one pays any attention including phony Arab and Iranian ‘intellectuals.’ Charles Jacobs, a Zionist liar, started ‘Child Slavery’ hoax campaign with the help of a reactionary Black Priest, Eugene Rivers, to force a referendum on the Sudan for the coming January 2011 where Zionist slaves, Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton and Sudan Rice are pushing to go through to execute yet another Judeofascist’s plot in the Sudan. The zionist rulers have put a lot on each one’s plate to keep them busy with manufactured terror which is design and implemented by ISRAEL AND US AND THEIR PUPPET SAUDI ARABIA to push the ignorant population of the West to cooperate with the expansionist policy of the Judeofasdists in Islamic countries from Mauritania to Afghanistan and beyond. Final goal of Zionists is world domination according to the ‘protocol’ using TERROR of all kind including phony information ‘LEAKS” at the right moments.
    As Shamir wrote:

    {Indeed, if the Protocols would have no relation to reality, they probably wouldn’t be as popular as they are. The Jews are sufficiently powerful to dream of domination, and some do. Apparently some Jewish ideas found their way into the text. Other thoughts are ascribed to the Jews on the basis of “qui bono”.}

    http://www.israelshamir.net/English/Elders_of_Zion.htm

  5. teafoe2 said on October 25th, 2010 at 11:52am #

    The book published as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was of course plagiarized from a work of fiction published several decades earlier, a novel in French by a French author whose name and the original titles will come up as soon as you google “Protocols”.

    I haven’t read it, but my impression is similar to I. Shamir’s. My guess, and this is speculation, is that the writer who converted the novel into the fictional “Protocols” book probably noted that the scenario outlined in the novel corresponded to something in the writer’s experience while providing a handy vehicle for the writer’s imagination.

    My guess may or may not be close to what happened, but one thing is indisputable: there is a concerted effort on the part of all components of the Zionist Power Network to maximize the wealth and power of same; first of the “State of Israel”; next of the Zionist Fifth Column in the US, followed closely by the Zionist Fifth Column operating in the EU countries.

    No willingness to accept “conspiracy theories” is required, since the Zionists are quite open about their intentions. The Logic of Power dictates the actions of all entities which have gained a share of power; in pre-capitalist societies the imperative was to maximize A)control of productive territory and B) military potential. The same Logic functions under capitalist conditions to focus on accumulation of money capital, so that the order of priorities tends to become C), B), A).
    Adding the Zionist Vision as the top priority changes the way C/B/A are seen, but does not negate their impact. So far, the Zionists have been getting away with putting them in second place, often by finding ways to combine them with moves intended to first of all promote said Vision.

  6. 3bancan said on October 25th, 2010 at 12:16pm #

    MichaelKenny said on October 25th, 2010 at 9:17am #

    “American power is (…) collapsing”

    Typical zionazi hubristic mendacity. Cf. this:

    http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m71034&hd=&size=1&l=e

    “At attack would actually suit Iran, which would be transformed overnight into a victim, thereby giving the coup de grace to US power and provoking the collapse of Israel”

    In the same vein, MichaelKenny aka zionazi genocidal psychopath wants to convince us that the invasion and destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan and the genocide perpetrated there – as in Palestine – “suit(ed)” the Iraqis and Afghans – and the Palestinians…

  7. Deadbeat said on October 25th, 2010 at 2:15pm #

    How is it that the pseudo-Left likes to report on the money behind the Tea Party but fails to look at the money behind Zionism that affects both political parties and dominates the political economy.

  8. Max Shields said on October 25th, 2010 at 2:34pm #

    MichaelKenny point well taken in terms of the US collapse and at least part of the cause, though this empire has literally run out of gas.

    As far as what would happen if Iran was attacked, the scenario played out would say this would not be a situation likely to be contained, and therefore the volitility of such an invasion would be catastrophic. Most of the US invasions have spilled over into surrounding nations, but one can imagine a flame ignited throughout the region and hence, it deters such action.

  9. 3bancan said on October 25th, 2010 at 3:04pm #

    Max Shields said on October 25th, 2010 at 2:34pm #

    ” the volitility of such an invasion would be catastrophic”

    Imho the effect would/will be the same as it was/is concerning Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and other places: MichaelKenny is right in saying that it wouldn’t/won’t be a “global catastrophe”, not for the reasons he cites but because the influence and grip exerted by the zionazis on the world is growing and not collapsing…

  10. bozh said on October 25th, 2010 at 3:14pm #

    yes i have noticed the “iran wld welcome an attack”, but i almost always never talk to this guy, i decided to leave it!
    The least one can say about that comment is that it is wrong. perhaps the man just wanted to annoy everybody.

  11. 3bancan said on October 25th, 2010 at 4:17pm #

    It’s obvious that “an important, well organized segment of the American Jewish community” which “emerged after World War II” (in reality a couple of decades earlier) and “has been dedicated to the establishment and prospering of a Jewish state in historic Palestine in which the lives and well being of the indigenous Palestinian Arabs were of no consequence” has been exerting “its concerted activity on Israel’s behalf in every critical sector of U.S. society and at every level of the nation’s political life”. What’s not obvious is the claim that “this segment did not — and has never — represented the majority of American Jews”. The vast majority of Jews I’ve met on the net are typical racist and supremacist zionazis, concerned only with things Jewish – just like the author of this letter:

    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/jewish-integrity-for-a-change.html

  12. mary said on October 26th, 2010 at 1:23pm #

    Livni accuses flotilla of provocation!

    Gaza flotilla was Turkish provocation: Livni to inquiry

    Tzipi Livni was a member of the previous government which tightened the blockade on Gaza

    Israeli opposition leader Tzipi Livni has accused Turkey of deliberately provoking Israel by supporting a Gaza-bound aid flotilla earlier this year.

    Mrs Livni was testifying before an Israeli inquiry into the 31 May raid that left nine Turkish activists dead.

    She accused Turkey of exploiting a “political vacuum” in order to lend legitimacy to the Hamas rulers of Gaza.

    /…..

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11619520

  13. shabnam said on October 26th, 2010 at 1:38pm #

    Is anyone going to see Livni soon? If you do, please remind her that the flotilla was in the International water. Is she going to honor Int. law or does not apply to her due to her status being part of the “chosen people’. I know “chosen people” have “unique” way of treating others. Then, I know it will fall on deaf ears.

  14. Rehmat said on October 26th, 2010 at 6:46pm #

    It’s Shimon Peres and not Recep Tayyip Erdogan who has been labeled as ‘war criminal’ by the antiwar activists in several European and non-European countries. Erdogan told Peres the truth which a 2003 EU survey said: Israel is the greatest threat to world peace. Jeffrey Blankfort in recent interview has repeated the same truth and has warned: “Should Israel find a way to attack Iran, the repercussions from that might be sufficient to send Israel on the road to what will ultimately be viewed as self-destruction”.

    Turkey beyond Israeli Hasbara
    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/10/26/turkey-beyond-israeli-hasbara/

  15. Mulga Mumblebrain said on October 27th, 2010 at 5:56am #

    mary, I saw, on Aljazeera, a report on the Zionazi Mavi Marmara whitewash, where the Israeli ‘judges’ appointed had made clear their bias and the facade of the entire operation. Their arrogance is, as ever, breathtaking. Indeed I think that our current epoch of Big Lying in everything, as evidenced by that Prince of Lies, O’bummer, the Tel Avivian Candidate, and the years of assiduous,utterly conscienceless lying by David Cameron, with his ‘Red Tory’ wheeze, behind which a uber-Thatcherite farrago of class hatred and social vengeance was, unsurprisingly, festering, may be plausibly blamed on the Zionazi example.
    I certainly do not imply that the Zionazis invented lying, or Big Lying, but their use of deliberate falsehoods, allied to vicious vilification and slandering of any who dared expose their lies, surely had something to do with the recent growth of political and ideological mendacity. I remember when a politician being caught out deliberately lying was a scandal, but today the lying is open and unapologetic, and even the most comprehensive exposure is simply denied or ignored. The Zionazi media, schooled in decades of ‘lyin’ for Zion’, is totally complicit, but they are such a force for evil, such a festering moral and spiritual ulcer of every type of human degeneracy, who can be surprised? The moral and ethical decay of society suits only the depraved and base, the best description of the Zionazis and their stooges that I can imagine.

  16. hayate said on October 27th, 2010 at 9:16am #

    Good interview.

  17. danielet said on October 28th, 2010 at 3:57pm #

    Anyone who ever interacted with Israel will recognize the period from the beginning when various factions assassinated each other and others to create the “Jewish State” they wanted. They could afford to turn their guns on each other because they had already established massive assistance from first the Hitler and later Stalin.

    Diaspora Jews had no chance to look at the psychotic background of Zionism, it claiming that Judaism is not a religion but a race. The driving force of these Zionists was “menschood.” Many were many Ashkenazi LaRond midgets obsessed with their manhood so they became terrorist bombers. But the advanced weaponry they obtained from the Soviets enabled them to terrorize other Jews, the British and the Palestinians. Since then Israel has been desperately trying to hide the three main issues of its Zionism:
    (1) It is based on historic lies as European Jews emanate from converted Southeast Europe peoples, not “lost tribes.”
    (2) Few Jews had any respect for the Zionists. But because after WWII the Zionists played on the guilt of American Jews over their silence when FDR was sending Jewish refugees back to Germany to face the Holocaust rather than grant them refuge and the helplessness of European Jews, the Zionists were able to bring enough of them to the Jewish State to man the Soviet weapons used to massacre helpless Palestinian peasants.
    (3) Israel fears loss of the Holocaust atmospherics of its early days when it could send Diaspora Jews on a guilt trip in order to squeeze them for money and political support. But the main thesis of Zionism is that Jews living in the Diaspora are “parasites” and must all move to Israel with all their assets. With 75% of World Jewry considering Israel nice to visit but not to live and with Israelis leaving for jobs in West once graduated from Israel’s wonderful universities, Israel’s expansion on demographic grounds seems to them inevitably a fraud as today’s settlements are 75% EMPTY!

    To squeeze World Jewry for funds and bodies, Israel has to maintain a tense state of life and death struggle with the Arabs. That is why instead of accepting the Oslo Accord Israel advocates expansion through extermination to Greater Israel. It fears that an end to Arab-Israeli conflict will cause Jews to pay it no attention.

    Exploiting the case of Soviet Jews Israel tried to get these people to populate Greater Israel. But as with other Jews, most Russian Jews deem Israel nice to visit but not to live. And so they stop off in Israel, moving on to US.

    That Zionism is a racist notion is evident from the way Mideastern Jews were abused in Israel, their children stolen and given to sterile Ashkenazi (European) Jews to raise as their own. Also, Israel not only deceived its American benefactor by going nuclear but is also a proliferator as it supplied nuclear bombs to apartheid white supremacist South Africa as its greatest ally.

    To many non-Jews in the West it seems that Zionist Jews dominate life in the West. But in fact, most Jews are breaking free of the guilt trip; after all, it was the Zionists who collaborated with Hitler and then Stalin and then the racist white regime ruling South Africa. Most Jews are bound by the Jewish Ethic and they see Israel as a vile violator of all Jewish religious principles. In service of Israel the ex-Leninist neocons are trying to bully Jews into compliance with Israel by calling any who question Israel’s polices “self-hating Jews,” the way Herzl, the founding father of Zionism called Jews who wanted to fit into Europe as loyal citizens of their nations.

    Now again, Israel is losing the Jews because it is clearly trying to exterminate Palestinians and dominate the Middle East. Israel is a garrison state totally dependent on US welfare—more US aid than any other country though it has only 6 million people. Its only real export is weapons to better kill people. Yet it’s revival of the ancient Herzl dream as the Jews-only land between the two rivers, Nile and Euphrates (about 10x the original UN-made Israel) is losing people. In its recent efforts to take-over Lebanon, Israel found that the Arabs are no longer helpless peasants but well trained resistance fighters. Israel is discovering that Iran, like all other countries in the world, is out to become a nuclear power. Worst of all, Israel finds that it lost its mystique as invincible and that no one is afraid of it.

    Most Israeli leaders have multiple-passports, just in case, and Swiss bank accounts; but the Israeli youths that do all the fighting have nowhere else to go. They are constantly made afraid of the Arabs over-running them by Zionist propaganda. Yet bit by bit they discover that their leaders are crooks and even criminals. As a result, as the Israeli right-wing journal AZURE declared: “We are losing our minds” as educated Israelis migrate to the West forever.

    Though Israelis spend their lives called on to defend the parasitic “settlers” who don’t work, don’t pay taxes and don’t serve in the army because they claim to be “religious scholars,” real Israeli sabras are reaching a point where they see no future for themselves other than forever crushing Arabs to expand Greater Israel. They also see that America is going broke and the giving Israel more cash than any other country is creating anti-Semitism among Americans. But that’s what Israel’s current masters want: an American Krystalnaht that will cause American Jews to stampede in fear to Israel with all their assets.

    All in all, the Zionist notion of its “exceptionalism” is collapsing. They realize that they are mosquitoes in a cemetery so there’s no more blood to suck. Fear of Iran going nuclear, according to a poll, indicated that 30% of all the supposedly die-hard “settlers” will leave the country as soon as Iran gets the bomb. So the fear felt by Zionists are not based on what other will do to them but how Jews will stop bleeding themselves dry to keep Israelis living like Ali Baba and his 40 thieves.

    Under all the extremism we see today lies one principle: make Diaspora Jews think Holocaust is upon Israel or they’ll stop funding. Yet Zionists realize that in order to panic Diaspora Jews they are making enemies for Israel all over the world while the Arabs are getting stronger, smarter, better disciplined and determined to offer Israel peaceful integration as a small state. The only alternative is demographic exsanguination as more Israelis emigrate than Diaspora Jews immigrate to Israel. Israel is disappearing from within. To distract the world from this obvious fact it is massacring the Palestinians living in Greater Israel, lowering their numbers through extermination using weapons made in America.

    The Zionist never shared the outrage of World Jewry with the Nazis. On the contrary, they admired them and aped them. Now, as they become something of a Zionazi movement they will inhibit any caring felt for them by Diaspora Jews. The viciousness we see is the dying gasps of a regime of criminals. Only in peace with its Arab cousins can Israel prosper leading them in peaceful modernization as they accept Israel back into the Semitic family.

  18. Ellen Lau said on October 28th, 2010 at 5:07pm #

    This is just apologetics for the Democrats, as if the poor Obama was being ‘bullied’ by the Israelis. I get the exact same nonsense from Democrats.com, even though I’ve tried to block them many times. We have to ‘help our President’ ‘resist’ the awful Israelis, as if the US didn’t control them and supply them with all their weapons.

    All this does is hide the ball, try to divert our attention from the Democratic Party role in the atrocities.

    Tha’ts all Blankfort really has to say!

  19. shabnam said on October 28th, 2010 at 5:38pm #

    Obama is not a leader. He is a petttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttty slave of judeofasfists who want him to take US into war against Iran to expand the interest of the Judeofascists in the region. If the fools read what the enemy of humanity and a fifth column judeofascist Dennis Ross said when he spoke at the aipac, then you know who rules America Obama let to power for his black skin to deceive many including Blacks in America. He and be pushed out of office at the end of his term in 2012 by the zionists but before discarding him in the trash can, the judeofascists force him to talk nothing but war against Iran, so the next Zionist puppet can execute it with less resistance. Unless ignorant American people move into street and and demand the Zionist be thrown out of the country, nothing will be changed. No wonder these murderers were forced out of Britain multiple times. They were thrown out of every empire, multiple times.

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/1010/Ross_talks_Iran_Israel_with_AIPAC.html?showall

  20. 3bancan said on October 28th, 2010 at 9:53pm #

    danielet said on October 28th, 2010 at 3:57pm #

    There are quite a few hubristic LIES in danielet’s comment. Let me point to some of them:
    “With 75% of World Jewry considering Israel nice to visit but not to live and with Israelis leaving for jobs in West once graduated from Israel’s wonderful universities, Israel’s expansion on demographic grounds seems to them inevitably a fraud as today’s settlements are 75% EMPTY!”
    As far as I can tell the vast majority of world Jewry – the so-called “antizionist” zionists of the Chomskyite type included – support Israel. What is usually described as emigration of Jews from Israel WERE the Russian immigrants who (wanted to) move(d) to the West. The vast majority of Jews going now to the West are hasbarats – “doing good for the Jews” there in the numerous NGOs and other zionazi “institutes” and other similar organizations. The truth is that every year new genocidal Jewish nazis make aliyah to Israel in their ten-thousands. The – especially American – Jews are transferring their wealth to Israel and are taking care of new job creation in Israel. While the Palestinian birthrate is falling the Jewish birthrate is rising. The Palestinians have every day less land to live on and imho it’s the Palestinians who are emigrating in their thousands, but noone wants to speak about it. While the settler population in the West Bank is approaching half a million, danielet’s assertion “today’s settlements are 75% EMPTY” can only be compared with Bozh’s and MichaelKenny’s idioticities.

    “To many non-Jews in the West it seems that Zionist Jews dominate life in the West”
    Only a LIAR can say that. It’s an obvious fact that the vast majority of Jews are zionists and that it is the zionist Jews who “dominate life in the West”. In Israel practically all Jews are zionazis, raised in zionazi families and educated in zionazi schools. 94% of them backed the genocidal onslaught on Gaza. As to non-Israeli Jews: “Eighteen months after the massacre in Gaza and a year after the UN Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict found Israel guilty of numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity, nearly three quarters (72%) of British Jews agreed that Israel’s action in Gaza in 2008 and 2009 was “a legitimate act of self-defence”.”
    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/gilad-atzmon-british-jews-support-israeli-war-crimes.html

    “30% of all the supposedly (sic!!!) die-hard “settlers” will leave the country as soon as Iran gets the bomb”

    I’ve got the impression danielet wants to convince his reader that Iran “is getting the bomb”. Clear zionazi stuff.

    “the Arabs are getting stronger, smarter, better disciplined and determined to offer Israel peaceful integration as a small state”

    On the contrary I see the Arabs weaker and weaker and more and more accomodating to the zionazi diktat. Offering “Israel peaceful integration as a small state” is just a proof of it.

    “Israel is disappearing from within”

    blahblah

    “Only in peace with its Arab cousins can Israel prosper leading them in peaceful modernization as they accept Israel back into the Semitic family”

    Typical racist and supremacist zionazi blather…

  21. hayate said on October 28th, 2010 at 11:12pm #

    3bancan said on October 28th, 2010 at 9:53pm

    Good spot.

    Though it should be pointed out that more Russian immigrants to israel are now moving back to Russia than vice versa. IE: israel is losing population to Russia, when earlier it was the other way around. This is because a very large amount of Russian immigration was due to people wanting to escape from the massive 3rd worldisation of Russia that yeltsin’s israeloamerican/eu zionist masters brought about. Of those who immigrated to israel, it was their last choice, literally, after all other options fell through, if they wanted to get out of yeltsin’s shitehole. Many of those Russians who went to israel were not practicing Jews, or even really Jewish, it was just a ticket out of a lousy situation. Now, that things have improved considerably in Russia, many who earlier left are now returning. Especially from israel.

  22. hayate said on October 28th, 2010 at 11:21pm #

    “Of those who immigrated to israel,”

    Should have been:

    Of a great many of Russians who immigrated to israel,

  23. mary said on October 29th, 2010 at 12:24am #

    A large proportion of MPs in the House of Commons belong to either the Conservative, Labour or Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel lobby groups.
    A Register of Members’ Interests contains MANY entries similar to this one for Chris Bryant, an ex NuLabour Minister inc. a stint at the Israel friendly Foreign Office.

    10-15 September 2006, to Israel and Palestine with Labour Friends of Israel (LFI). Travel and hospitality paid for by LFI. Accommodation paid for by LFI at a rate discounted through the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Some hospitality provided by the Palestinian Legislative Council/Palestinian Authority. Travel within Israel/Palestine provided by LFI. Some travel within Israel provided by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (Registered 19 September 2006)

    Note the collusion of the PA in this operation which is not a mini holiday for the recipient of the Israeli largesse but a full on propaganda exercise including helicopter trips over the occupied territories, seminars and meetings with Israeli government members and officials and the Israeli military.

  24. 3bancan said on October 29th, 2010 at 12:50am #

    I don’t remember mary telling her readers that the Labour Party had roughly the same “choice” to elect their party leader as the Americans in Illinois have in their congressional election. The Miliband brothers have “Jewish roots”…

  25. mary said on October 31st, 2010 at 5:13am #

    Even a female American professor is humiliated and treated as a possible terrorist at a British airport on the instructions of Shabak.

    Prof. Heather Bradshaw, Distinguished Neuroscientist or Terrorist? Only Shabak Knows

    Heather Bradshaw, Indiana University professor of psychology and brain science, humiliated by El Al security personnel at directive of Shabak

    Prof. Heather Bradshaw is a distinguished neuroscientist with the Kinsey Institute at Indiania University. She studies female reproduction and the ways in which brain function impacts such processes. She was on her way to deliver a keynote address at an academic conference at the Hebrew University honoring the research of Prof. Rafi Meshulam, when a strange thing happened.

    Before flying to Israel she had stopped off at Cambridge University to deliver a series of lectures. Then she traveled to Luton for an El Al flight to Israel. I’ll let Bradshaw continue the story as portrayed in Haaretz’s Hebrew edition (and in English):

    /….

    http://networkedblogs.com/9TXRr

  26. 3bancan said on October 31st, 2010 at 5:28am #

    mary said on October 31st, 2010 at 5:13am #

    Heather Bradshaw, the distiguished neuroscientist, seems to have no qualms about supporting the illegal immoral colonial Jewish nazi state and the genocide of the indigenous population…

  27. mary said on October 31st, 2010 at 8:00am #

    I thought you would understand I was illustrating how far the Zionist tentacles reach into the UK even into airport security. Bradshaw’s crime in ignoring the academic boycott of Israel is down to her.

    By the way,with reference to your previous post, the members of the Labour party who elected Ed Miliband as leader had four other choices – his brother David, a black woman Diane Abbott, Ed Balls amd Andy Burnham. The latter three are not Jewish although Balls supports Israel and attended the 60th ‘birthday’ celebration in London, ie Al Nakba.