Exactly.

“I’m also sympathetic to science and math.”

Imho it’s quite natural that people who are “sympathetic to science and math” are skeptic about what the holocaust religionists preach.
It’s typical of zionazis to demonize anyone who dares to not believe what the zionazis preach:
1) they immediately accuse him/her of being “a Nazi”, “a holocaust denier”, “insane”, an irrational Jew-hater (they “promote hatred for people”)
2) they may criticize some Jewish actions but at the same time they will accuse anybody else who dares to not like the barbarity perpetrated by quite a few Jews and supported by most of them of “Jewish conspiracy”: “I wanted to say that while there are many media enterprises that are run by Jews, it is a prejudiced theory peddled by neo-Nazis and assorted racialists to say that the mainstream media is a Jewish conspiracy, meaning a conspiracy by the Jewish religion and its adherents to control…well…everything from the American Empire’s wars to the media to Indonesia” – a beautiful example of zionazi “argumentation”. It’s normal for a zionazi to suffer from the illness called Jew-blindness, ie not to see the zionazification of the world that is marching on. Just look at his use of the foggy “many” in “many media enterprises that are run by Jews”. Let me be more concrete: Is it the expected 2% of the US media? Imho it’s an obvious fact that it’s nearer to the percentage 100%-2%=98% than to 2%…

Kalidas said:
“I’m also sympathetic to science…”

If that were true, why are you supporting a holocaust denier and neo-Nazi? Actually, I don’t expect a genuine answer, I just want this question to be out there.

“On this board a “zionazi” is anyone who does not believe in the Jew conspiracy theory to control the world.”

Another typical product of a zionazi brain…

On this board a “zionazi” is anyone who does not believe in the Jew conspiracy theory to control the world.

Maybe I should have been more clear. I wanted to say that while there are many media enterprises that are run by Jews, it is a prejudiced theory peddled by neo-Nazis and assorted racialists to say that the mainstream media is a Jewish conspiracy, meaning a conspiracy by the Jewish religion and its adherents to control…well…everything from the American Empire’s wars to the media to Indonesia. Also, it is simply insane (unless you are a neo-Nazi) for you to be sympathetic to Ernst Zuendel – you cannot claim ignorance anymore. Put everything in context.

Mr. Rand only added to my conviction that he and his gang of 2% are the 21st century neo-Nazis, not so existentially speaking, of course.

Excuse me while I go wash my hands.

What a beautiful example of perfected zionazi blather and hubristic zionazi mendacity..

“What are you suggesting? That I (gasp) am not basing my opinion on (kosher) news sources? That I perhaps possess such radical subversive a thing as an independent thought? Guilty again. Off to the gulag again!”

If you’re sympathizing with the points of view of white supremacists, then no, I would say not only do you not have independent thought, but I have to question your sanity. Hate is controlling the minds of the neo-Nazis, which is why they have this idea that all media is controlled by Jews unless it parrots the ideas of other neo-Fascists. Now I have no doubt that most mainstream media is controlled by Anglo-Saxon/’White’ people, which includes most American Jews and Christians, but to say that it is a Jewish conspiracy directly emanates from the hatred being spread by racialists and other instruments of oppression and disinformation. The resurgence of 1990s militias in the USA with a nativist bent and the recent influx of nativism in Europe is indicative of the power of racial and prejudiced rhetoric. Prejudice should be eliminated not spread; whether it’s anti-Jewish, anti-Palestinian, or the crude “white pride” people who are pushing the idea that the discrimination and pain inflicted upon people of color, historically and currently, is justifiable and requires no rectification.

All prejudice should be eliminated through acceptance, healing, and dialogue. We need to open our minds and be more sensitive to the plights and struggles of people of color in a world whose powerful circles are dominated by wealthy White males.

Then your definition is incorrect, especially the “pacifist” part. Moreover, he is not a “human rights activist”, he doesn’t care about anyone’s human rights. Zuendel is a neo-Nazi and holocaust denier, revered in right-wing/White nationalist circles. As far as free speech goes, he only wants to protect the speech of neo-Nazis and other holocaust revisionists and considers any mainstream or left-of-Klan perspective on race relations as being “politically correct”. If you are genuinely concerned with the human rights of Palestinians, or anyone in fact, he is not the person you should embrace. He is not sensible and he only promotes hatred for people. So I’m not buying into any of this propaganda. White people should help to heal and rectify the damage that we have done to people of color throughout history and the privilege that is retained because of it. Sympathizing with hatemongers is completely contrary to any positive action for the human rights of minorities, as well as basic common sense.

Also, I have never heard of James Ennes before now, so chances are that I probably have never called him a neo-Nazi. But after researching him a bit, allow me to say that under no circumstances do I have any evidence that he is; as such, I do not believe that he is a neo-Nazi or anti-Semite. Indeed, I believe I made a post stating that the USS Liberty crew were victims of Israeli terrorism.

Exhibit “B” “rather suggestive of the origins of his opinion.”
What are you suggesting? That I (gasp) am not basing my opinion on (kosher) news sources? That I perhaps possess such radical subversive a thing as an independent thought? Guilty again. Off to the gulag again!

Oh, wait a minute. I forgot for a second there.. It’s Mr. Rand and his compadres who are the subversives, the progressives, the champions of freedom and justice, are they not?

Remember that it wasn’t so long ago that the powers that be (and Mr. Rand?) were referring to James Ennes, the author of Assault on the Liberty as an “anti-Semite, a racist and a Nazi.

Here’s my definition of Ernst Zundel:
A famous free speech advocate, pacifist, human rights activist and holocaust skeptic. All perfectly legitimate, some might say, admirable traits.

Just because you, Mr. Rand, and/or the tribal members of the existentialists ‘r’ us club pronounce someone a this or a that doesn’t mean it’s so.
In fact any thinking person who lives in a world of reality and facts might easily derive the opposite of what you say. And the opposite is that this club’s tribal members and their supporters are the neo-Nazis.

As for the incredibly lame question of why Canada’s shame…
Just for starters Ernst could arguably be considered, in a round about way, the first inmate of Guantanamo North.

“We should fly the Canadian flag at half staff, to mark the death of Freedom of Expression for all Canadians. Canada has jailed and tortured, for two years in solitary confinement, a resident of our country, at the bidding of vindictive Jewish organizations, and without ever charging the man with a crime.”

Shame! Shame! Shame! on Canada!

And shame on you

“Harper is a US puppet”

Harper is a hardcore zionazi…

kalidas said:
“Ernst Zundel single handedly exposed Canada’s fake peace and justice personna.”

A neo-Nazi, correct?

“That [Zuendel] wasn’t a Canadian citizen only adds to the dishonor of Canada’s shame.”

That a White Nationalist/Nazi, who happened to also have Jewish grandparents, wasn’t a citizen of Canada adds to Canada’s “shame”? Why is that?

Why?