You can try and play the liberal vs conservative card regarding zionism, but it don’t apply. A liberal zionist is the same thing as a conservative zionist and both are very similar to non-zionist reactionaries. There is a difference between rightwing and leftwing opposition to zionism. The former is upset about their loss of prominence, the latter wants to see off both capitalism and zionism. Capitalism and zionism are digits on the same hand, while the left political/economic spectrum is a different hand altogether.

Such ‘jews’ have been severely hurt by other ‘jews’ and soon as ‘jews’ beg his forgiveness [such as chomsky's] his ‘jewishness’ wld return to him instantly.
However, this malady appears pandemic and not just ‘jewish’.

Thu Oct 28, 11:43 am ET
Report: 25 states considering Arizona-style immigration laws
By Liz Goodwin

n immigrant-rights group has released a report (PDF) predicting that 25 states may try next year to pass anti-illegal-immigration laws similar to Arizona’s controversial legislation.

The number of states considering legislation modeled after SB1070, the bill that Arizona GOP Gov. Jan Brewer signed into law this spring, is apparently growing: Earlier, pro-enforcement groups said 22 states were considering the bill, the Washington Independent’s Elise Foley notes.

The new efforts are going forward even after a federal judge ruled key parts of the Arizona law unconstitutional and enjoined its enforcement in Arizona in July. That decision is now under appeal before the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court.

[Rewind: Mexican government slams Arizona immigration law]

Georgia, Mississippi, Oklahoma and South Carolina are most likely to pass a similar law next year, the new report says. Tennessee, Utah, Florida, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Texas, Arkansas, Indiana, Colorado, Virginia, Minnesota, Missouri, Idaho and Kansas made the report’s “maybe” list. In Maryland, Nevada, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Michigan, Ohio and Rhode Island, the legislation is seen as less likely to pass.

The report notes that from 2006 to 2008, municipalities passed a host of local laws and statutes cracking down on employers hiring illegal immigrants.

This next wave of legislation, the report says, will be aimed at getting local law enforcement to check immigration status in routine police stops, as SB1070 mandates.

Lawmakers may be influenced by how the Ninth Circuit rules on SB1070, and how the Supreme Court rules on the state’s 2007 employer-sanction law passed. Finances may also influence local politicians’ decisions, as more immigration-related arrests and court battles end up costing cities and counties that adopt such rules.

[Rewind: Baseball alarmed by Arizona's policy]

One industry stands to benefit from such laws. In Arizona’s case, the private prison industry helped guide the process that made SB1070 law and even gave the legislation its name while working with legislators, NPR reports. Thirty of the cosponsors to SB1070 later received money from the private prison industry or its lobbyists.

(Photo of Colorado students protesting Arizona’s law in April: AP)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101028/us_yblog_upshot/report-25-states-are-considering-arizona-style-immigration-laws

The goatbuggers will have WW3 in Southwest Asia, but god forbid they allow a Mexican in the usa without a goodly amount of baksheesh.

White supremacy in the usa has been supported and and continued by zionist, along with the other fascist lowlife who get their marching orders from these bigots. Both israel and zionism are all about white supremacy and pitching cultural clashes designed to benefit zionazi inc. You keep the ignorants (which you create and encourage) fighting against each other over crumbs, while keeping them ignoring you. That’s how zionism operates. Seems to have done a thorough number on you, as well. The things key into the latent bigotries of their “marks”, and then add in steroids. All of these racist freakshows in the usa are promoted/sponsored by zionazi, inc. This is what has kept the shite going since the 70′s. These were all dead and dying movements then, but were propped up and injected with massive amounts of cash and “marketing advice” to keep them a factor, mostly by zionist money bags and their assorted bumplugs.

And I’ll repeat, every one of those arizonaian bigoted politicos pushing this racist nonsense is under the thumb of zionazi, inc. That’s how politics work in your sacred usa. None of this racist shite would still be happening without zionist manipulation and control of the american political scene.

Selling this as a race problem – is a leftwing lie!

Bill Clinton during his entire presidency never used anything except PERSIAN GULF, its real name, so Bush and Obama who has done the same up to now. She hit the bottom of the trash can when followed the instruction of the 5th column, the zionist lobby and changed the name to create a divisive tool between Arabs and Iranians.
Shame on petty people who do anything to stay in power. Down with petty people, black and white.

https://secure3.convio.net/niac/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=168

Tell Secretary Clinton: Referring to Persian Gulf as “Arabian Gulf” Only Fuels Ethnic Tensions
(source: NIAC)
Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Playing with ethnic tensions is not a strategy for stability in the Middle East.

But last week, the State Department broke longstanding protocol and used the politically and ethnically charged term “Arabian Gulf” instead of “Persian Gulf”.

The term was used in prepared remarks announcing a $60 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia intended to “stabilize the region.”

But such an inaccurate, ethnically divisive term will only fuel regional tensions and increase instability.

Tell Secretary Clinton that the Persian Gulf is not the “Arabian Gulf” and playing with ethnic tensions is not a strategy for stability.

The Persian Gulf has been known by that name for over 2,500 years. It’s been recognized by the United Nations and the US State Department as the correct name for decades.

The term “Arabian Gulf” first appeared fifty years ago as Pan-Arabism propaganda aimed at unifying Arabs against Iranians, Israelis, and other non-Arabs in the Middle East. Saddam Hussein later co-opted the term to exploit ethnic rivalries in support of his regional ambitions. Later, Osama Bin Laden adopted the term in an attempt to boost his appeal.

The use of such an ethnically divisive term by the State Department during the announcement of one of the largest arm sales in history sends the wrong message.

Yesterday, NIAC sent a letter to Secretary Clinton, urging her to correct the record and reiterate that the “Persian Gulf” is the appropriate name.

Join us in calling on Secretary Clinton to correct the record and to instruct the State Department to uphold longstanding protocol when discussing the Persian Gulf >>

Attempting to merge Zionism with white supremacy, and oppose the former as though it is an instance of the latter, have been unsuccessful. It’s time to say Western societies in general have moved away from overt racial discrimination. Israel, not.

Looks like israeli apartheid policies are slowly being imposed on the usa by their zionist minions (10 to 1 that every one of these arizona politicos have zionist puppetmasters – in the usa as a whole, it’s like 95% zionist quisling). Anew “clash of cultures” for these bigots to sell with their media.