What i said in that post, no `jew` or an inegalitarian had, as far as i know, ever said that.
In the main, because that would amount to a condemnation of US constitution; US lawlessness, chasmic difference in earnings and needs for most people being about the same or similar.
This analyses pertains also to emirates, saudis, egypt, iraq. This not being pleasing to any pious muslim, christian, or talmudnik! Oh, how i love rattling up such moodniks.
Mind u, it doesn`t take all that much for them to go ballistic; being rendered by their teachers unsane. Oh how truth hurts! tnx

ONLY A CLOSET ZIONIST JEW OR AN IGNORANT PERSON WRITES THIS RUBBISH. The 9/11 terror was designed and implement by the Zionists and the neocons in the Bush administration to frame Muslims to occupy Islamic countries and topple governments in the interest of ISRAEL to be able to control the resources. If anyone by now has not understood that these wars are NOT RELEGIOUS WARS, and the twin trade buildings were not brought down by 19 Arabs carrying $2 box cutters, but by explosive where put in place before the arrival of the airplane by those who designed it, then must get lost. He/she will never learn anything by posting comments.

And then feeling like that also teach other girls— mostly by behavior— to behave like they do.
But s`mthing precedes this phenomenon of not caring about one`s business.
Waging unknowledge, poverty, exploitation, oppression, abuse, torture, jailings, threats, etc., by clerico-plutocratic lowlife, appears a necessity in order to wage wars and the rest of the iniquities.
In an much or even s`mwhat egalitarian society, say, that of switzerland, almost all iniquities evanesce.
The problem is that most collumnists and posters on DV, and other sites appear strongly one-issuistic or inegalitarian. And never look at or study some euro lands! `
This post is highly hasbaritic, sybaritic, americanistic, talmudic, mosheic, islamic so don`t read it. tnx

The Feminist, Bella Abzug, and Marxist feminist, Betty Friedan both were supporter of the Shah, a dictator and friend of Israel, and his sister Ashraf, who burned a journalist pro Mosaddeq, toppled by the CIA/MI6 coup in 1953, to death, viewed the Iranian revolution negatively and spoke against the “veil” in an organized demonstration 2 years after the revolution, but no one condemned e de-veiling of Muslim women in the region who had to adopt western clothing according to the British Empire’s order which let many women to abandon the public sphere for years. We are fed up with double standard.
The following article shows the hypocrisy of the west and the Iranian feminist who are at the service of the Zionism and imperialism to get recognition.

http://www.stjohns.ubc.ca/pdf_files/waronterror.pdf

This feminist warmongers views FGM differently from Male Circumcision because if she views them the same then the ‘chosen people’ and other non Muslims are coming into the picture.

Thank you for introducing this work for us.

IMO clarity is found when you just cut to chase.

DB

That’s one of the better comments I’ve read here. Thanks.

Reclaiming the F Word walks a fine line between these two opposing understandings [of identity and class].

and

This approach is no more evident than it is in their failure to discuss the world’s greatest violator of human rights–imperial war. The omission of this discussion clearly weakens the book, especially at a time when both Washington and London have used women’s rights to justify their wars against Muslim nations.

It would appear this book still remains confined to 2nd-wave identity mode of thinking which means failing to examine its contradictions. You cannot walk a fine line between class and identity. One is going to give way to the other. And let’s face it the power structure clearly isn’t walking such a fine line. And it would appear from Ron’s comments that the authors fail to address the power configurations that influence today’s imperial wars and political economy — namely Zionism.

Also I thought Ron’s use of the Clinton-Lewinsky affair was rather surreal. He comments …

Those liberals who truly appreciated Clinton’s political acts and policies were forced to watch the man’s personal mistakes being used as a justification by those who hated the man and his policies to discredit both.

I guess the Liberals appreciated the following Clinton political acts:

* the largest growth of incarceration of WOMEN in U.S. history.

* terminating AFDC for the crappy TANF that forced many women onto the work roles for their benefits.

* The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children.

* The use of depleted uranium weapons on Yugoslavia

* Nafta and further withering of the job base.

* Repeal of Glass-Steagel and the ensuing banking/housing bubbles.

Clinton was a sexist, racist, sleaze bag even before Lewinsky. Thank goodness the Lewinsky affair occurred otherwise older women today may have faced cuts to their Social Security benefits.

Let’s face it. Feminism is a MIDDLE CLASS WHITE WOMEN thing. What feminists really care about is there ability to compete and grow within the Capitalist hierarchy. The REAL fine line they are walking is how to rally women at the bottom of the pyramid to make conditions better for women at the upper levels of the pyramid. Identity politics is the one of the reasons why we have an Obama Presidency today and may have a Clinton or Palin one in the future.

A Socialist society is what will bring liberation to women and that is what women should be fighting for.

“It was that movement of the 1970s–a movement known historically as second-wave feminism–that made the phrase “the personal is the political” popular…..”

One of the interesting aspects of how some elements of feminism, especially “radical” feminism, changed the views of some women was how closely they came to resembling puritans in their ways of thinking – I don’t mean that they accepted 17th century puritans views, they just duplicated the narrow-minded attitude. It fit right in with the reversals of the 80′s, where the opening up of the 60′s was consciously and deliberately reversed and narrow mindedness was heavily promoted.