Perhaps there is and this is just too sensitive for the purveyors of news to tell us.

Here’s another possibility and it involves, yep, The Usual Suspects.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/29/gordon-duff-wiki-leaks-is-isreal-like-we-all-didnt-know/

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/29/gates-assails-wikileaks-over-release-of-reports-doj-source-says-espionage-act-of-1917-in-play/

I see that the unfortunate young man Bradley Manning is being brought back from Kuwait to Virginia. God help him. What will be done to him there?

Assange said on the BBC this week that some of $1million that the general public has donated will go to give Manning legal assistance.

If Obomber can get the Nobel Prize for Peace, then Assange deserves a truckload of them.

New York Times reporters met with White House before publishing WikiLeaks story

The administration “praised” New York Times reporters for their handling of leaked Afghan war material
By Alex Pareene Salon

The White House was very upset with WikiLeaks for its decision to publish thousands of pages of classified reports and documents describing our mission in Afghanistan. But according to Yahoo’s Michael Calderone, it was very pleased with how the New York Times dealt with its semi-exclusive access to the documents.

Times Washington bureau chief Dean Baquet took reporters Mark Mazzetti and Eric Schmitt to the White House last week to brief the administration on what they planned on publishing. And they all got gold stars.

“I did in fact go the White House and lay out for them what we had,” Baquet said. “We did it to give them the opportunity to comment and react. They did. They also praised us for the way we handled it, for giving them a chance to discuss it, and for handling the information with care. And for being responsible.”

The Times redacted some information in the name of “national security” and protecting the safety of individual soldiers, but the White House doesn’t seem to have told the Times that publishing stories based on these documents would in any real way harm our troops.

So, uh … why was all of this information classified and top secret? If it’s old news, and it just confirms what “everyone” already knows, what was the rationale for keeping it classified and calling WikiLeaks all sorts of mean names for publishing it?

http://stopwar.org.uk/content/view/2011/1/

The 91,000 ‘leaks’ documents expose US propaganda lies about its military success, carpet-bombing, civilian death and US-appointed Hamid Karzai government to cover its nine-year-old war in Afghanistan conceived by the neocons (mostly Jewish) several month before the 9/11. The two main reasons for the invasion of Afghanistan were the Caspian Sea oil/gas reserves and the supply of opium. Both of the desired aims were to benefit Zionist elites and Israel in the long run. In 2010, the US taxpayers are going to pay towards Washington’s wars for Israel in Afghanistan ($65 billion), Iraq ($61 billion) and Palestine ($6 billion). The US-Canada alliance in Afghanistan is expected to cost US$22 billion to the Canadian taxpayers……….

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/wikileaks-zionist-plot-to-invade-more-muslim-lands/