<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guess Who Wants to Kill the Internet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markgm</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/#comment-69406</link>
		<dc:creator>Markgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=18924#comment-69406</guid>
		<description>As a systems engineer, I do get bothered when I see the lay-hype over computers not being secure against the evil hackers of the world.   I think it gets rediculous.  In fact, there are modern encryption schemes and security protocols that prevent well implemented systems from being hacked.   But I watched on the Katie Couric news a few weeks ago where their &quot;expert&quot; said that no computer in the world was safe. 

The US federal govt is not safe.  Swiss banks are not safe.  A professor from princton with a bowtie can say that no computer is ultimately secure, which is a philosophical statement, but to also omit the corresponding reality - that no thing on earth is absolutely safe, which cuold also be said when applying the same philosophy.   They don&#039;t tell the layperson that.  They only use scare tactics. 

Th best hackers in the world are in Intel, period.  The US govt wants Intel, or perhaps Intel prods the govt, to give them access to key points within the overall infrastructure, such as within the ISPs, and at their doors, and in places where they may make well-secured systems vulnerable to attacks by them - by the Intel community itself.   Call it NSA, CIA or Mossad or MI6, whatever you like, but these are the biggest threats to the security of enterprise systems. 

Just my two cents - Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a systems engineer, I do get bothered when I see the lay-hype over computers not being secure against the evil hackers of the world.   I think it gets rediculous.  In fact, there are modern encryption schemes and security protocols that prevent well implemented systems from being hacked.   But I watched on the Katie Couric news a few weeks ago where their &#8220;expert&#8221; said that no computer in the world was safe. </p>
<p>The US federal govt is not safe.  Swiss banks are not safe.  A professor from princton with a bowtie can say that no computer is ultimately secure, which is a philosophical statement, but to also omit the corresponding reality &#8211; that no thing on earth is absolutely safe, which cuold also be said when applying the same philosophy.   They don&#8217;t tell the layperson that.  They only use scare tactics. </p>
<p>Th best hackers in the world are in Intel, period.  The US govt wants Intel, or perhaps Intel prods the govt, to give them access to key points within the overall infrastructure, such as within the ISPs, and at their doors, and in places where they may make well-secured systems vulnerable to attacks by them &#8211; by the Intel community itself.   Call it NSA, CIA or Mossad or MI6, whatever you like, but these are the biggest threats to the security of enterprise systems. </p>
<p>Just my two cents &#8211; Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/#comment-69383</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=18924#comment-69383</guid>
		<description>There are several fantacies: fantacy island, american dream [with a bit of american nightmare], &#039;jewish&#039; dream or &#039;jewish&#039; fantacy, and fantacy basement.
The fantacy basement is by far more realistic and pleasing.

But fantacy america may come to pass. Jewish fantacy to take over all banks on behalf of US fantacy or dream, also may come about.
I know, i know, there is actually no money in the banks; so, why am i talking ab &#039;jweish&#039; dream?
Well, i am hoping james petras, max shields, or deadbeat wld explain the riddle of an empty building full of &#039;jews&#039;. 

So what if american fantacy fails? Well, one enjoys it while it lasts! And the prize is just too priceless not to dream ab having it.
And it costs the dreamers not a penny. And all  their duaghters and sons safe in the fantacy basement or on fantacy island.
And only &#039;lowlife&#039; paying for all of their wars: bodily and monily!

Now u know why the A ilk of people of america cannot ever give their centennial dream. 
But u know that i wld love to be an A ilk of {even tho an old and toothless now} man and that&#039;s why  y&#039;am complaining and not because of any desirable dictum or teaching.
If they wld just fix my teeth, i wld love to become a spokeghost for US fantacy. I understand Nietzsche, the german Sorb {serb} was s&#039;mwhat duplicitous.tnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several fantacies: fantacy island, american dream [with a bit of american nightmare], &#8216;jewish&#8217; dream or &#8216;jewish&#8217; fantacy, and fantacy basement.<br />
The fantacy basement is by far more realistic and pleasing.</p>
<p>But fantacy america may come to pass. Jewish fantacy to take over all banks on behalf of US fantacy or dream, also may come about.<br />
I know, i know, there is actually no money in the banks; so, why am i talking ab &#8216;jweish&#8217; dream?<br />
Well, i am hoping james petras, max shields, or deadbeat wld explain the riddle of an empty building full of &#8216;jews&#8217;. </p>
<p>So what if american fantacy fails? Well, one enjoys it while it lasts! And the prize is just too priceless not to dream ab having it.<br />
And it costs the dreamers not a penny. And all  their duaghters and sons safe in the fantacy basement or on fantacy island.<br />
And only &#8216;lowlife&#8217; paying for all of their wars: bodily and monily!</p>
<p>Now u know why the A ilk of people of america cannot ever give their centennial dream.<br />
But u know that i wld love to be an A ilk of {even tho an old and toothless now} man and that&#8217;s why  y&#8217;am complaining and not because of any desirable dictum or teaching.<br />
If they wld just fix my teeth, i wld love to become a spokeghost for US fantacy. I understand Nietzsche, the german Sorb {serb} was s&#8217;mwhat duplicitous.tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BartFargo</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/#comment-69372</link>
		<dc:creator>BartFargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=18924#comment-69372</guid>
		<description>@bozh: If site admins want to ban certain posters for flaming, that&#039;s their right, but you don&#039;t get a free pass from being criticized (or &quot;demonized&quot; as you put it) just because you&#039;re convinced you&#039;re the only one &quot;who dares tell the truth&quot;.  Amazing how you plead for free speech on the web in one breath and then immediately contradict yourself by disallowing &quot;demonization&quot; which you find upsetting.  If you&#039;re so offended by what strangers say about you over the internet, I advise you to log off completely until you grow a thicker skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bozh: If site admins want to ban certain posters for flaming, that&#8217;s their right, but you don&#8217;t get a free pass from being criticized (or &#8220;demonized&#8221; as you put it) just because you&#8217;re convinced you&#8217;re the only one &#8220;who dares tell the truth&#8221;.  Amazing how you plead for free speech on the web in one breath and then immediately contradict yourself by disallowing &#8220;demonization&#8221; which you find upsetting.  If you&#8217;re so offended by what strangers say about you over the internet, I advise you to log off completely until you grow a thicker skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/#comment-69367</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=18924#comment-69367</guid>
		<description>With recent approval of US system of governance and structure of society by 98% of americans, the master class doesn&#039;t have to fret ab internet.
And from the sites i visited,  90% of posters are asocialistic; i.e., for inequality, US wars [if are winable and affordable]
On DV, the ruling class sends also demonizers of a few posters who dare tell the truth; while editors let them do that.

Other sites &#039;moderate&#039; comments. Moderated=not publicized. The demonization has only one purpose and very useful to master class: drive the commenter out.
Etiquete barring even insults let alone demonization is there, but editors do not delete the demonizations! tnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With recent approval of US system of governance and structure of society by 98% of americans, the master class doesn&#8217;t have to fret ab internet.<br />
And from the sites i visited,  90% of posters are asocialistic; i.e., for inequality, US wars [if are winable and affordable]<br />
On DV, the ruling class sends also demonizers of a few posters who dare tell the truth; while editors let them do that.</p>
<p>Other sites &#8216;moderate&#8217; comments. Moderated=not publicized. The demonization has only one purpose and very useful to master class: drive the commenter out.<br />
Etiquete barring even insults let alone demonization is there, but editors do not delete the demonizations! tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelKenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/#comment-69358</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelKenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=18924#comment-69358</guid>
		<description>Nothing could annoy the rest of the world more than something like this. Other countries are already angry at the extent to which the US controls the internet and its refusal to share that control via an international organisation. If the Israel Lobby want to shoot itself in the foot (yet again!), then more power to their elbows! The Lobby is obviously in total panic! That is still more good news for the Palestinians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing could annoy the rest of the world more than something like this. Other countries are already angry at the extent to which the US controls the internet and its refusal to share that control via an international organisation. If the Israel Lobby want to shoot itself in the foot (yet again!), then more power to their elbows! The Lobby is obviously in total panic! That is still more good news for the Palestinians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/06/guess-who-wants-to-kill-the-internet/#comment-69355</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=18924#comment-69355</guid>
		<description>Lieberman a 100% blubber mouth. Very sure his soul is for sale to the highest bidder among others.  One voice loud and clear as the climate bill no longer the climate bill is a joke on the human race and dear old Lieberman will be using that blubber mouth very soon. Remember we tell them they don&#039;t tell us. Calm at peace use the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack.  Oh my thoughts on Lieberman among others knowledge and defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lieberman a 100% blubber mouth. Very sure his soul is for sale to the highest bidder among others.  One voice loud and clear as the climate bill no longer the climate bill is a joke on the human race and dear old Lieberman will be using that blubber mouth very soon. Remember we tell them they don&#8217;t tell us. Calm at peace use the Force for knowledge and defense, never for attack.  Oh my thoughts on Lieberman among others knowledge and defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

