<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War as PR: Operation Moshtarak, Meaning &#8220;Together&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rehmat</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64916</link>
		<dc:creator>Rehmat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is supposed to be a publically owned multi-media company – but in reality most of its top management and decision-making positions are held by pro-Israel Jews. The latest addition to BBC executive board is Marcus Paul Agius (b. 1946) born into a Jewish family and married to the daughter of Edmund de Rothschild, the family known to be the founder of Israel.

It was Marcus, who allegedly influenced BBC decision not to broadcast British MP and former Moyor of London, George Galloway’s appeal for humanitarian aid for the Gazan victims of Zionazi thugs.

The other Jews, who are and had been occupying top positions are – Greg Dyke, Tny Cohen, Alan Yentob, Alan Bookbinder, Jenny Abramsky, etc. In his 2003 article, Thomas Sparks, reported that the Zionist Jews have an almost total grip on the media in Britain. In addition to the BBC, Jews also control ITV, Granada Plc, ITN, Angelia Television, BSkyB, etc. Furthermore, 85 million copies of Jewish-controlled newspapers are sold in Britain evert week, controlled by Richard Desmond, Rupert Murdoch, Guy Zitter, and Zionist Conrad Black and his Jewish wife, Barbara Ameil.

BBC’s Jews
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/bbcs-jews/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is supposed to be a publically owned multi-media company – but in reality most of its top management and decision-making positions are held by pro-Israel Jews. The latest addition to BBC executive board is Marcus Paul Agius (b. 1946) born into a Jewish family and married to the daughter of Edmund de Rothschild, the family known to be the founder of Israel.</p>
<p>It was Marcus, who allegedly influenced BBC decision not to broadcast British MP and former Moyor of London, George Galloway’s appeal for humanitarian aid for the Gazan victims of Zionazi thugs.</p>
<p>The other Jews, who are and had been occupying top positions are – Greg Dyke, Tny Cohen, Alan Yentob, Alan Bookbinder, Jenny Abramsky, etc. In his 2003 article, Thomas Sparks, reported that the Zionist Jews have an almost total grip on the media in Britain. In addition to the BBC, Jews also control ITV, Granada Plc, ITN, Angelia Television, BSkyB, etc. Furthermore, 85 million copies of Jewish-controlled newspapers are sold in Britain evert week, controlled by Richard Desmond, Rupert Murdoch, Guy Zitter, and Zionist Conrad Black and his Jewish wife, Barbara Ameil.</p>
<p>BBC’s Jews<br />
<a href="http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/bbcs-jews/" rel="nofollow">http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/bbcs-jews/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64908</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kalidas, with respect,
I have my understandings of what dan e said and u have yours. But i like mine a lot better than yours. tnx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kalidas, with respect,<br />
I have my understandings of what dan e said and u have yours. But i like mine a lot better than yours. tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kalidas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64905</link>
		<dc:creator>kalidas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gosh bozh, isn&#039;t it apparent to you that dan e likes you and his personal asides are truly friendly jabs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh bozh, isn&#8217;t it apparent to you that dan e likes you and his personal asides are truly friendly jabs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64893</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dan e,
u may be right! I may have been mistaken ab the ratio of kill. When fighters and civilians are included, it is certainly in favor of nato. In iraq, possibly 200k to one mn iraqis have lost their lives.
I shld have waited for reports of actual deaths before giving a figure of  one to hundred. It was my mistake; regardless whether i am proven right or wrong.

U obviously haven&#039;t carefull read my posts to accuse me of lying like foxnews.
And if u know  the actual figures, why haven&#039;t u posited them? And if i am wrong, what wld that mean? Also wrong ab everything, much else i say!?

Regarding civilian death the ratio is actually 0 to 100% in favor of americans. But, anyhow, what is ur problem with  deaths? U must have  a message?
Obviously, name caling and accusing other people of errors [and who doesn&#039;t make them] cldn&#039;t be the message.
Do u think i am a muslim and fascist? Me a fascist? I&#039;d sooner vote for a communist than any dem let alone repub. I just laughed!
But i warn u if u continue to be on personal vendetta.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dan e,<br />
u may be right! I may have been mistaken ab the ratio of kill. When fighters and civilians are included, it is certainly in favor of nato. In iraq, possibly 200k to one mn iraqis have lost their lives.<br />
I shld have waited for reports of actual deaths before giving a figure of  one to hundred. It was my mistake; regardless whether i am proven right or wrong.</p>
<p>U obviously haven&#8217;t carefull read my posts to accuse me of lying like foxnews.<br />
And if u know  the actual figures, why haven&#8217;t u posited them? And if i am wrong, what wld that mean? Also wrong ab everything, much else i say!?</p>
<p>Regarding civilian death the ratio is actually 0 to 100% in favor of americans. But, anyhow, what is ur problem with  deaths? U must have  a message?<br />
Obviously, name caling and accusing other people of errors [and who doesn't make them] cldn&#8217;t be the message.<br />
Do u think i am a muslim and fascist? Me a fascist? I&#8217;d sooner vote for a communist than any dem let alone repub. I just laughed!<br />
But i warn u if u continue to be on personal vendetta&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan e</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64888</link>
		<dc:creator>dan e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bozh, wearinell dja get this: 
&quot; Ratio of kill is in favor of nato and puppet gov’t is probably one to hundred. &quot;
Sounds like Isrealy propaganda to me, &quot;Islamo-Fascists&quot;. Right out of Histopher Critchens. The Faux News version. &amp; I was starting to think I liked you:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bozh, wearinell dja get this:<br />
&#8221; Ratio of kill is in favor of nato and puppet gov’t is probably one to hundred. &#8221;<br />
Sounds like Isrealy propaganda to me, &#8220;Islamo-Fascists&#8221;. Right out of Histopher Critchens. The Faux News version. &amp; I was starting to think I liked you:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64882</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan e,
What i said is defeatism to u, but not to me. That&#039;s the difference that makes a sit&#039;n in afgh&#039;n significantly different.

In add&#039;n, u have used two-valued evaluation: Either fight or not fight or either win or lose. There may be an infinite number of options bwtn two extremities!
On survival level one can use either-or; i.e., either to live or to die structure of language; however, mere survival being the only measure of success, i&#039;d choose survival.

Contrary to what many people say, i affirm, that pashtuns cannot win. Defeat of USSR does not offer much hope that also nato/us wld be defeated.
Soviets were beaten back because of several factors. Tajiks, pashtuns, azeris, and uzbeks fought soviets.
Arab nations and US have supported resistance fighters as well. All fascists were actually supported resistance fighters.
All fascists are now against resistance by pashtuns. Tajiks and uzbeks are also killing pashtuns.
Ratio of kill is in favor of nato and puppet gov&#039;t is probably  one to hundred.
Did u know that as recently as in &#039;75 a kurdish villager had to obtain agha&#039;s permission to leave own village.

So what is there to fight for? For fascism?!!? I say live and perhaps, just perhaps, fight another day. But they better acquire wmd! When u&#039;r dead u&#039;r of no use to anyone.
Btw, even US soldiers are innocent and also mourners of US dead soldiers.!
Anyhow, thanks for ur comment. It prodded me into saying this. This was on my mind for a long time. tnx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan e,<br />
What i said is defeatism to u, but not to me. That&#8217;s the difference that makes a sit&#8217;n in afgh&#8217;n significantly different.</p>
<p>In add&#8217;n, u have used two-valued evaluation: Either fight or not fight or either win or lose. There may be an infinite number of options bwtn two extremities!<br />
On survival level one can use either-or; i.e., either to live or to die structure of language; however, mere survival being the only measure of success, i&#8217;d choose survival.</p>
<p>Contrary to what many people say, i affirm, that pashtuns cannot win. Defeat of USSR does not offer much hope that also nato/us wld be defeated.<br />
Soviets were beaten back because of several factors. Tajiks, pashtuns, azeris, and uzbeks fought soviets.<br />
Arab nations and US have supported resistance fighters as well. All fascists were actually supported resistance fighters.<br />
All fascists are now against resistance by pashtuns. Tajiks and uzbeks are also killing pashtuns.<br />
Ratio of kill is in favor of nato and puppet gov&#8217;t is probably  one to hundred.<br />
Did u know that as recently as in &#8217;75 a kurdish villager had to obtain agha&#8217;s permission to leave own village.</p>
<p>So what is there to fight for? For fascism?!!? I say live and perhaps, just perhaps, fight another day. But they better acquire wmd! When u&#8217;r dead u&#8217;r of no use to anyone.<br />
Btw, even US soldiers are innocent and also mourners of US dead soldiers.!<br />
Anyhow, thanks for ur comment. It prodded me into saying this. This was on my mind for a long time. tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan e</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64881</link>
		<dc:creator>dan e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, come on Bozh, don&#039;t start spreading defeatism!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, come on Bozh, don&#8217;t start spreading defeatism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelKenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64877</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelKenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My problem with Mr Media and Mr Lens is that they are in no sense a &quot;media watchdog group &quot;. They merely express their own political opinions and their consequential disagreement with the line taken by certain media outlets and agreement with certain other outlets. Their claim to be some sort of &quot;neutral&quot; , &quot;objective&quot; observers of the British press scene and, by extension, to be some sort of arbiter of what is and is not &quot;proper&quot; journalism is arrogant and pretentious. Telling us that they approve of journalists who agree with them and disapprove of those who disagree with them is hadly a stunning piece of news!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with Mr Media and Mr Lens is that they are in no sense a &#8220;media watchdog group &#8220;. They merely express their own political opinions and their consequential disagreement with the line taken by certain media outlets and agreement with certain other outlets. Their claim to be some sort of &#8220;neutral&#8221; , &#8220;objective&#8221; observers of the British press scene and, by extension, to be some sort of arbiter of what is and is not &#8220;proper&#8221; journalism is arrogant and pretentious. Telling us that they approve of journalists who agree with them and disapprove of those who disagree with them is hadly a stunning piece of news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/02/war-as-pr-operation-moshtarak-meaning-together/#comment-64874</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=14465#comment-64874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to cry uncle, i think! There is no use in fighting US/nato. Mainly, because it ain&#039;t a fight! Just massacres!
In any case, whatever ensues in pashtunstan and the other regions, fascism wld still remain.
fascists in nearly all arab lands have joined fascists in the west. So it is only a matter of time whether pashtun aghas and other &#039;nobles&#039; realize: hey, we are of one kind! In add&#039;n, no land seems to give a hoot ab what is happening there. Everybody watches own ass!tnx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to cry uncle, i think! There is no use in fighting US/nato. Mainly, because it ain&#8217;t a fight! Just massacres!<br />
In any case, whatever ensues in pashtunstan and the other regions, fascism wld still remain.<br />
fascists in nearly all arab lands have joined fascists in the west. So it is only a matter of time whether pashtun aghas and other &#8216;nobles&#8217; realize: hey, we are of one kind! In add&#8217;n, no land seems to give a hoot ab what is happening there. Everybody watches own ass!tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
