Comments on: The Arrogance of Empire, Detailed http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/01/the-arrogance-of-empire-detailed/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: bozh http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/01/the-arrogance-of-empire-detailed/#comment-63722 bozh Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:54:23 +0000 http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=13715#comment-63722 I think that US always had been after more than one plot of land. Afgh'n appears to me just one of dozens more plots US wants. What makes it easier now to go for more plots than one at the same time, is the fact that world fascists r behind US. Of course, that there is no longer USSR, also helps US/nato, et al. Pashtun warlords wld be also on us/nato sides. All nato has to do, is to reach an agreement with them; leaving be or buttressing their own feudal society. US policy makers or new policy makers with no face to lose will realize this some day: partial control of afgh'n for time being will have to suffice. And especially in view that there other stans, iran, and syria to yet wholy or partially to control in order to reach wall of china. Nato/us present and future aggressions r not just ab landgrab, but also establishment of world-wide fascism and, of course, destruction of all socialism. And only china can prevent it! Fasicts know this. Thus have already started socalled cold war aginst it for not respecting some human rights. Even tho fascists respect only the right to speak- and because only they can speak, while lower classes r not ever heard! tnx I think that US always had been after more than one plot of land. Afgh’n appears to me just one of dozens more plots US wants. What makes it easier now to go for more plots than one at the same time, is the fact that world fascists r behind US. Of course, that there is no longer USSR, also helps US/nato, et al.

Pashtun warlords wld be also on us/nato sides. All nato has to do, is to reach an agreement with them; leaving be or buttressing their own feudal society.
US policy makers or new policy makers with no face to lose will realize this some day: partial control of afgh’n for time being will have to suffice.

And especially in view that there other stans, iran, and syria to yet wholy or partially to control in order to reach wall of china. Nato/us present and future aggressions r not just ab landgrab, but also establishment of world-wide fascism and, of course, destruction of all socialism.

And only china can prevent it! Fasicts know this. Thus have already started
socalled cold war aginst it for not respecting some human rights. Even tho fascists respect only the right to speak- and because only they can speak, while lower classes r not ever heard! tnx

]]>