I say that if had been connected in any mode with anything ‘jewish’, i’d be deeply ashamed and embarassed if i only deemed self a “jew”, let alone proclaimed it!

Similarly, a person who deems or calls self “Muslim” rather than first of all human and thereafter a lebanese, iraqi, et al also is firmly wedded to a cult.
Christianity, to me, appears an ideology similar to islam and mosheism.
All three compare well with mein kampf.

Btw, einstein either lied or was not aware that hitler offered ‘jews’ madagascar as a homeland or country! UK offered then uganda. USSR gave them birobidjan.
Of course going to those places wld have meant not much support for them even from ‘jews’ let alone christians; so, rejecting those places. tnx

It is this human nature which is so important, not simply the fabrication of systems. Peeling off these ideological layers we see what we are, what we need, or think we need and what we want or think we want.

There is great tension between what we need because there are contradictions which are not put to rest simply by changing a system. The human consciousness continues its struggle.

But social”ism” as in what is communially ours and that which is private are certainly one of the cruxes of the issue. The interedependence not only of the species (homo sapiens) but of all of life and non-life no the planet cannot be avoided. It is the unavoidable unnegotiable truth at all levels of consciousness.

On a recent interview with the author Michael Scammell on the topic of Arthur Koestler you see him aligning with Zionism (this is prior to talk about Palestine) and then renouncing it. This I think was common for many Jewish intellectuals. The thought of a solution to the wandering Jews in the midst of non-Jews seemed to point toward a nation-state of Jews.

But Koestler was for a time a die-hard Communist and then walked away from that remaining always on the left however. There is nothing wrong with the attraction on one level and then determining that from a certain set of principles that attraction is wrong in some way – morally, ethically, soically, economically, etc.

Point, I don’t think Einstein was a Zionist but one’s life follows a trajectory of twists and turns. Who among us has not changed in some way what they held to be certain? Einstein’s primary guiding principle was world peace it was a natural human and logical conclusion. Nation-states (before them city-states) have held claim to conflict and war. In his life he would not stand for such a deep and unreconcilable contradiction with Zionism, which is nothing if not a chauvinist ideology.

If what you allege is true, why does a democracy, the only one on the ME, believe in summary execution? That is a rhetorical question by the way.

I thought you had a legal system. This murderous barbarism (there is no other way to describe it) is identical to that of the Nazis who perpetrated their foul acts, putting fear into the local populace by acts of wanton murder and brutality.

Here are some of the latest atrocities, carried out in the dark of the night needless to say, by the terror squads of the terror state as reported by an American visiting the remnants of Palestine. The report is darkly illuminating, disturbing and moving.

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/01/09/impressions-of-israeli-executions-in-the

Jacob

“This is a time when there seems to be a particular need for men of philosophical persuasion—that is to say, friends of wisdom and truth—to join together…We Jews should be, and remain, the carriers and patrons of spiritual values. But we should also always be aware of the fact that these spiritual values are and always have been the common goal of mankind.”

e
http://wearewideawake.org/

Or did he think that semites were also that stupid to allow any immigration into palestine by white europeans? Or did not know that immigration of white people was allowed by League of Nations and later by UN; which was dominated by communist and fascist lands and empires.

I think einstein was, if accurately quoted, a hypocrite; he jsut cldn’t wrestle dwn his jewishness. And ?all ‘jews’ seem to have that problem.
Even atzmon had once said that he has to fight his own jewishness. It appears nigh impossible to give up a cult! tnx

Einstein being a scientist was no twister of terms. He understood clearly the terms of his own ideology. Einstein was a socialist and he wrote the opening for the Marxist journel “The Monthly Review” in 1949 entitled “Why Socialism?”

Is there really more to say on this topic than that?

“I should much rather see reasonable agreement with the Arabs on the basis of living together in peace than the creation of a Jewish state. Apart from the practical considerations, my awareness of the essential nature of Judaism resists the idea of a Jewish state with borders, an army, and a measure of temporal power no matter how modest. I am afraid of the inner damage of Judaism will sustain – especially from the development of a narrow nationalism within our own ranks, against which we have already had to fight without a Jewish state,” – Albert Einstein in ‘Out of My Later Years’.

Palestine – Silent no more….
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/palestine-silent-no-more/

Since there were only few serbs in slovenia, yugoslav army withdrew from there after just a week of some skirmishes. I am not sure whether serbs have fooled so many leftitst or whether their allegience to serbia since even before WW1 blinded them to what had been obvious to us: fascist serbs out to steal land while having vast military superiority!
The Left always believed that only serbs were partisans and/or communists.
Actually, croatia had stronger communist party than any republic even before WW2.
During WW2, of eleven partisan corps on yugoslv soil, 5 were operating in croatia, according to croat historian, stjepan antoljak.
Curioso appears that the head of communist party of croatia, andrija hebrang, a ‘jew’, had been executed by tito for demanding or working on for independence for croatia.

I shld be noted that the croat fascist puppet gov’t controled very little of bosnia and croatia. On the other hand, serb fascist puppet gov’t had controled almost all of the serbia. Its army, called chetninks [troopers] were actually fighting partisans along with germans and ustashe, the croats.
It was very near the end of war that croat domobrans [home guard] and chetniks en masse joined partisans.

So, it is very difficult to believe that ustashe have slain- by serb account, 1,5oo,000 serbs- and by british acc. 3oo-700.
There was much free territory for serbs and `jews` to go to. Also half of croatia had been occupied by italy until sept `43. And italy had refused to deliver `jews` to germans.
So, `jews` cld have fled to croatia controled by italy.
Serbia and some croatian serbs were allied to italy. Thus, most serbs cld have fled to serbia and parts of croatia. Or simply joined partisans.

The problem is that the croat story never got to west or to the Left. It seems they only heard one side. tnx
And serbs finally and deservedly lost even kosovo. tnx

It had been croat and slovenian intelligencia which propagated unity of south slavs; so as to avoid possible warfare by serbs to achieve their goal of annexing parts of croatia, bosnia, and macedonia.

Soon after set up of yugoslavia, croats learnd that serbs were not abandoning their goal.
And indeed, in ’91, having been much stronger military, attacked croatia and bosnia in ’93.
Initially, ?all leftists and rightists had supported serbs, but by early ’94 US changed its mind. Canada, a yr+ later, also turned against serbs.
However, serbs do have a de facto state in bosnia!