<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Intelligence Found Iran Nuke Document Was Forged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/12/u-s-intelligence-found-iran-nuke-document-was-forged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/12/u-s-intelligence-found-iran-nuke-document-was-forged/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryb</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/12/u-s-intelligence-found-iran-nuke-document-was-forged/#comment-63283</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=13292#comment-63283</guid>
		<description>These are the Board members of The Atlantic Bridge
http://www.theatlanticbridge.com/who_we_are.php
Note Lieberman there.

Their Aim
The Atlantic Bridge was founded by Dr. Liam Fox MP in 1997 with the simple aim of ‘Strengthening the Special Relationship’ exemplified by the Reagan-Thatcher partnership of the 1980s. It is our firm belief that the promotion of close and strong relations between the United Kingdom &amp; United States, which is at the heart of ‘Strengthening the Special Relationship’, provides public benefit on both sides of the Atlantic. Our goal is to act as the natural and pre-eminent forum for the development of transatlantic solutions for common challenges. To those ends, The Atlantic Bridge has worked to re-establish and foster a strong, well-positioned network of like-minded people in politics, business, academia, law and journalism on both sides of the Atlantic.

How we achieve our aim

•Develop and publicize new and relevant policy ideas, building on the common thinking which underpins the natural transatlantic alliance between Britain and America.

•Further public education on both sides of the Atlantic in areas of common interest, focusing particularly but not exclusively on free trade, economics, health and science.

•By holding a series of political and social events, establish both a strong cross-fertilization of ideas and effective personal links and relationships between people of like-minded views in both the United States and the United Kingdom.

~~~~~~~
Some Newspeak there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are the Board members of The Atlantic Bridge<br />
<a href="http://www.theatlanticbridge.com/who_we_are.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlanticbridge.com/who_we_are.php</a><br />
Note Lieberman there.</p>
<p>Their Aim<br />
The Atlantic Bridge was founded by Dr. Liam Fox MP in 1997 with the simple aim of ‘Strengthening the Special Relationship’ exemplified by the Reagan-Thatcher partnership of the 1980s. It is our firm belief that the promotion of close and strong relations between the United Kingdom &amp; United States, which is at the heart of ‘Strengthening the Special Relationship’, provides public benefit on both sides of the Atlantic. Our goal is to act as the natural and pre-eminent forum for the development of transatlantic solutions for common challenges. To those ends, The Atlantic Bridge has worked to re-establish and foster a strong, well-positioned network of like-minded people in politics, business, academia, law and journalism on both sides of the Atlantic.</p>
<p>How we achieve our aim</p>
<p>•Develop and publicize new and relevant policy ideas, building on the common thinking which underpins the natural transatlantic alliance between Britain and America.</p>
<p>•Further public education on both sides of the Atlantic in areas of common interest, focusing particularly but not exclusively on free trade, economics, health and science.</p>
<p>•By holding a series of political and social events, establish both a strong cross-fertilization of ideas and effective personal links and relationships between people of like-minded views in both the United States and the United Kingdom.</p>
<p>~~~~~~~<br />
Some Newspeak there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryb</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/12/u-s-intelligence-found-iran-nuke-document-was-forged/#comment-63282</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=13292#comment-63282</guid>
		<description>The Times carried this toxic article yesterday written by Dr Liam Fox (yes a medical doctor who is supposed to &#039;Do no harm&#039;) who is the shadow Defence Minister and is likely to take office if Cameron wins this year.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6972937.ece
January 1, 2010

The world must neutralise Tehran’s toxic threat (headline)

Iran’s aggression, whether through its pursuit of the bomb or its sponsoring of terror, has to be met with sanctions that bite 

This is pure war mongering courtesy of Murdoch and see here how words are twisted.   Fox (who set up an outfit called the Atlantic Bridge for fellow like minded souls) quotes the UN chief  inspector Olli Heinonen as saying  &#039;that Iran’s nuclear activities are “not consistent with any application other than the development of a nuclear weapon”.&#039;  

Keith on medialens takes Fox apart on this -
&#039;The quote he uses is not a quote from Olli Heinonen, but from unnamed persons who claim he said that in a closed door meeting. Liam Fox claims that that was said about Iran&#039;s nuclear activity, but it was only said about a document that Olli Heinonen said the agency “did not have sufficient information at this stage to conclude whether the allegations are groundless or the data fabricated.&quot; 
How did Liam Fox manage to misrepresent that quote on two counts.&#039; 

~~~~
Congratulations to Gareth Porter who has been acknowledged by Pulse Media as one of their 20 Top Global Media Figures of 2009.
(pulsemedia.org/2009/12/31/pulse-20-top-global-media-figures-of-2009/)
 
Independent historian and star investigative journalist for IPS Gareth Porter is known for the scholarly rigor of his research and analysis and for the frequent scoops which have undermined official propaganda. Like fellow IPSer Jim Lobe, Porter follows Amira Hass’s famous dictum about journalism in constantly monitoring the centers of power. He has been driving a truck through the carefully constructed edifice of lies and deception of successive administrations as often as they have been erected. In 2009 alone he has produced several in-depth reports casting doubt over the administration’s rationale for war in Iraq, the Taliban-al Qa’ida connection, and the alleged Iranian experiments with a ‘neutron initiator’ for an atomic bomb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times carried this toxic article yesterday written by Dr Liam Fox (yes a medical doctor who is supposed to &#8216;Do no harm&#8217;) who is the shadow Defence Minister and is likely to take office if Cameron wins this year.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6972937.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6972937.ece</a><br />
January 1, 2010</p>
<p>The world must neutralise Tehran’s toxic threat (headline)</p>
<p>Iran’s aggression, whether through its pursuit of the bomb or its sponsoring of terror, has to be met with sanctions that bite </p>
<p>This is pure war mongering courtesy of Murdoch and see here how words are twisted.   Fox (who set up an outfit called the Atlantic Bridge for fellow like minded souls) quotes the UN chief  inspector Olli Heinonen as saying  &#8216;that Iran’s nuclear activities are “not consistent with any application other than the development of a nuclear weapon”.&#8217;  </p>
<p>Keith on medialens takes Fox apart on this -<br />
&#8216;The quote he uses is not a quote from Olli Heinonen, but from unnamed persons who claim he said that in a closed door meeting. Liam Fox claims that that was said about Iran&#8217;s nuclear activity, but it was only said about a document that Olli Heinonen said the agency “did not have sufficient information at this stage to conclude whether the allegations are groundless or the data fabricated.&#8221;<br />
How did Liam Fox manage to misrepresent that quote on two counts.&#8217; </p>
<p>~~~~<br />
Congratulations to Gareth Porter who has been acknowledged by Pulse Media as one of their 20 Top Global Media Figures of 2009.<br />
(pulsemedia.org/2009/12/31/pulse-20-top-global-media-figures-of-2009/)</p>
<p>Independent historian and star investigative journalist for IPS Gareth Porter is known for the scholarly rigor of his research and analysis and for the frequent scoops which have undermined official propaganda. Like fellow IPSer Jim Lobe, Porter follows Amira Hass’s famous dictum about journalism in constantly monitoring the centers of power. He has been driving a truck through the carefully constructed edifice of lies and deception of successive administrations as often as they have been erected. In 2009 alone he has produced several in-depth reports casting doubt over the administration’s rationale for war in Iraq, the Taliban-al Qa’ida connection, and the alleged Iranian experiments with a ‘neutron initiator’ for an atomic bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulga Mumblebrain</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/12/u-s-intelligence-found-iran-nuke-document-was-forged/#comment-63174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulga Mumblebrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=13292#comment-63174</guid>
		<description>Well spake Rehmat! One must never forget for an instant that we are dealing with evil, insanely racist, psychopaths whenever we think of the racist, religiously demented fundamentalist leadership of Israel, their stooges in the corrupt US ruling class, and their lackeys in the West. Iran is suffering exactly the same campaign of lies and propaganda that Iraq did before the crucifixion of that country on the altar of Judeofascist supremacism. And, as you could have bet your life on, nowhere in the sewer of human iniquity that is the Western media is their one propagandist with the basic decency and honesty to admit it is so. Instead, like the craven curs that they are, they go along willingly, knowing, as they do, that a second&#039;s honesty, even inadvertant, would label them as an unreliable element, not 100% &#039;on-board&#039; with their Zionist owners&#039; agenda, and the cushy, over-paid life of a professional liar and hatemonger will be over.
     I would imagine that this story will simply be suppressed. That is a standard technique of this rabble of liars. Publish the Zionazi lie hysterically, push it fervently, then, when it is shown to be untrue, ignore that revelation. Just like the Zionazi traffic in stolen body parts. When first exposed this sordid business was denied by the Zionazis with hysterical outrage. Vitriol and bile were hissed and spat in all directions. &#039;Blood libel!!!!&#039; (a favourite)&#039; Boycott Sweden, boycott Ikea&#039; (how they would have preferred to carpet-bomb them! )Now, when it is revealed that the story was indeed true, the Western media sewer, loyal like pariah dogs to their owners, simply ignores the revelation.
                 When Iran is attacked, probably on February 28th so that the religiously fanatic Jews may celebrate it properly with real bloodletting rather than mere re-enactments where children gaily re-create Haman&#039;s hanging, taking turns to have their necks snapped, or be the enthusiastic executioners, the vermin of the Western media mire will have blood, including that of children, up to their elbows. This example of Western media duplicity, mendacity and evil is even more rank than the charade before the onslaught on Iraq, simply because that precedent is so clear. But the swine who infest the Western media system, handpicked on entering &#039;journalism&#039; and carefully vetted thereafter to ensure no trace of basic decency or honour is ever exhibited, just total loyalty to the Boss, in most cases a Zionist Jew or simulacrum like Rupert Moloch, will sink to the occasion, then pat themselves on the back, like the self-deluding psychopaths they are, for a job well done defending &#039;Western Civilization&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well spake Rehmat! One must never forget for an instant that we are dealing with evil, insanely racist, psychopaths whenever we think of the racist, religiously demented fundamentalist leadership of Israel, their stooges in the corrupt US ruling class, and their lackeys in the West. Iran is suffering exactly the same campaign of lies and propaganda that Iraq did before the crucifixion of that country on the altar of Judeofascist supremacism. And, as you could have bet your life on, nowhere in the sewer of human iniquity that is the Western media is their one propagandist with the basic decency and honesty to admit it is so. Instead, like the craven curs that they are, they go along willingly, knowing, as they do, that a second&#8217;s honesty, even inadvertant, would label them as an unreliable element, not 100% &#8216;on-board&#8217; with their Zionist owners&#8217; agenda, and the cushy, over-paid life of a professional liar and hatemonger will be over.<br />
     I would imagine that this story will simply be suppressed. That is a standard technique of this rabble of liars. Publish the Zionazi lie hysterically, push it fervently, then, when it is shown to be untrue, ignore that revelation. Just like the Zionazi traffic in stolen body parts. When first exposed this sordid business was denied by the Zionazis with hysterical outrage. Vitriol and bile were hissed and spat in all directions. &#8216;Blood libel!!!!&#8217; (a favourite)&#8217; Boycott Sweden, boycott Ikea&#8217; (how they would have preferred to carpet-bomb them! )Now, when it is revealed that the story was indeed true, the Western media sewer, loyal like pariah dogs to their owners, simply ignores the revelation.<br />
                 When Iran is attacked, probably on February 28th so that the religiously fanatic Jews may celebrate it properly with real bloodletting rather than mere re-enactments where children gaily re-create Haman&#8217;s hanging, taking turns to have their necks snapped, or be the enthusiastic executioners, the vermin of the Western media mire will have blood, including that of children, up to their elbows. This example of Western media duplicity, mendacity and evil is even more rank than the charade before the onslaught on Iraq, simply because that precedent is so clear. But the swine who infest the Western media system, handpicked on entering &#8216;journalism&#8217; and carefully vetted thereafter to ensure no trace of basic decency or honour is ever exhibited, just total loyalty to the Boss, in most cases a Zionist Jew or simulacrum like Rupert Moloch, will sink to the occasion, then pat themselves on the back, like the self-deluding psychopaths they are, for a job well done defending &#8216;Western Civilization&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rehmat</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/12/u-s-intelligence-found-iran-nuke-document-was-forged/#comment-63167</link>
		<dc:creator>Rehmat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=13292#comment-63167</guid>
		<description>Every time Obama or Hillary Clinton refer to the unacceptability of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, they refer to non-existent Iranian weapons and ignore hundreds of Israeli nuclear warheads. The American mantra reconfirmed by Obama-Clinton is “no nuclear weapons in the Middle East”. Who can disagree with this? Who want nuclear weapons in the Middle East or anywhere else for that matter? The difficulty with the American mantra could not be more simple or compelling. It is false in its premises and false in the facts. Americans have accepted nuclear weapons in the Middle East, so long as they are Israelis. And Israel had nuclear weapons for over thirty years, hundreds of war loads and missile capable of reaching every capital in the region. Every time an American official intones the mantra that “nuclear weapons are unacceptable in the region”, the hypocrisy bell clangs. Therefore, my critical indicator of change in American policy regarding Palestine is this: Would Obama say that all nuclear weapons in the Middle East are unacceptable, including those of Israel? So far there has been a resounding silence, except the hypocrisy bell. Clang! Clang!”

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/nuclear-proliferation-and-western-hypocrisy/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time Obama or Hillary Clinton refer to the unacceptability of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, they refer to non-existent Iranian weapons and ignore hundreds of Israeli nuclear warheads. The American mantra reconfirmed by Obama-Clinton is “no nuclear weapons in the Middle East”. Who can disagree with this? Who want nuclear weapons in the Middle East or anywhere else for that matter? The difficulty with the American mantra could not be more simple or compelling. It is false in its premises and false in the facts. Americans have accepted nuclear weapons in the Middle East, so long as they are Israelis. And Israel had nuclear weapons for over thirty years, hundreds of war loads and missile capable of reaching every capital in the region. Every time an American official intones the mantra that “nuclear weapons are unacceptable in the region”, the hypocrisy bell clangs. Therefore, my critical indicator of change in American policy regarding Palestine is this: Would Obama say that all nuclear weapons in the Middle East are unacceptable, including those of Israel? So far there has been a resounding silence, except the hypocrisy bell. Clang! Clang!”</p>
<p><a href="http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/nuclear-proliferation-and-western-hypocrisy/" rel="nofollow">http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/nuclear-proliferation-and-western-hypocrisy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

