Comments on: Three Hours

By: Annie Ladysmith

Annie Ladysmith — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:43:57 +0000

Kalidas, yes, some are more ashamed than others, you should know.

By: Annie Ladysmith

Annie Ladysmith — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:42:24 +0000

DEADBEAT, do you have worms eating your brain you stupid Fuck.
There is a time coming when nationalism will not exist and you will see THAT IT IS ONLY THROUGH NATIONALISM THAT THE LIFE AND LIBERTIES OF THE PERSON ARE PROTECTED. But being the rotten little commie you are you could give a shit about personal liberty. But don’t worry, they are not interested in promoting deadbeat punks, you’ll end up in a gulag for sure and then you can meditate on your own lack of personal liberty.

By: Annie Ladysmith

Annie Ladysmith — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:35:41 +0000

Hue, is that a name? What hue do you come in you punk,RED. Your stupid opinion dosn’t even make sense. Can you understand English?
Try this: Fuck off.

By: Deadbeat

Deadbeat — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:56:03 +0000

Nationalism is nothing more than a cult used to divide people and to serve Capitalism.

By: kalidas

kalidas — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:47:36 +0000

Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.
Mencken

By: Hue Longer

Hue Longer — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:07:57 +0000

It’s really weird watching “Constitutionalists” on one hand think they hate their government for mixed up reasons but then hearken to a day when it was bitchen and beautiful and slaves picked the cotton and Indians were shot for squatting on Masta’s land. I don’t see any reason for them to hate the government—it’s really the same thing as the country now and then-and has nothing to do with their fantasies of it being a socialist state

By: Annie Ladysmith

Annie Ladysmith — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:53:17 +0000

Dear SPC, none of the Marxists that blog here give a shit about US forces or the US. They are only interested in being a thorn in the Zionists flesh. It’s all they EVER blog about, round in circles, like the Zionists could care less what ANTBODY thinks about them, but i digress–, the world will watch with glee as the stars and stripes burns for good, i say, lets go out with a bang. **** all the rotten, bitter Marxist trash and there will be a day when the carrion feed on their carcasses. So have your day, you Marxist, globalist pigs, you know that there was never a country who had such a flag and such an anthem, your grubby little countries groveled in the dirt when that great flag was unfurled in your good-for-nothing nowhere places. Your world will not be better without that grand flag, it will be lost. We were betrayed from within, no foreign country could ever take down America, remember that in your glee you crappy little nothings. It was the greatest country the world has ever had and with Supreme help we hope for a holy remnent to be left that will tread on the serpent and trample the young lion. Manasseh, the great nation. Joseph, who all his brothers bowed down before.

By: Sam

Sam — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:09:27 +0000

I was on a website the other day and I read a comment from some Dem kool-aid drinker Obamabot apologist disciple. The person was essentially saying that the Repugs are entirely responsible for where we are today because they vote “no” on “everything” the person said. (What a generalization!) While reading the person’s comment I thought: as a Dem “team” disciple you take no ownership or responsibility for your own Bush-enabling Democratic Party helping (with their yes votes, the silence and complicity) the Cheney/Bush regime accomplish nearly all of their goals since 2000? The Repugs and the Bush regime could not have accomplished their goals and agenda without the help of the Bush-enabling Dems. Period. Were the Bush-enabling Dems required to vote yes repeatedly to help the Cheney/Bush regime? Hell no. They did so willingly. The person didn’t say a word about their precious D “team.” It was all about the Repug “team.” Then they went on to say that “give Obama at least 3 years to clean up the mess.” I thought: So now one is supposed to give him 3 years and are you speaking about the mess that the Bush-enabling Democratic Party HELPED TO CREATE along with your “savior” Obama as a Bush-enabler when he was in the senate? But again, not a word was spoken about this person’s D “team” and their role in helping to create the mess we’re in. Then the person went on to say “look at how much Obama has accomplished in 9 months.” The person gave absolutely no specifics whatsoever. Clearly the person wasn’t talking about the continuation of the USA Patriot Act, rendition, 2 illegal wars/occupations (Iraq & Afghanistan), droning Pakistan, escalating Afghanistan, illegal spying, torture, mountain top removal, (well I could keep going on with what Obama has “accomplished” in 9 months but most of the people on here already know the long list of Obama continuing the Cheney/Bush neocon agenda).

I don’t know if the person whose comment I am relaying will ever come out of their Dem “team” denial/stupor and deprogram their D “team” brainwashing (which is no different than the R “team” brainwashing), but I found their comment pathetic because the person refused to take no ownership or responsibility for his own “team’s” role in creating the mess, but the comment was so very typical of the brainwashed D “team” mentality and those D “team” suckers who still trying to make excuses, apologies and defenses for these D (in this case) millionaire scum of the Earth war criminals in congress and in the White House, specifically war criminal Obama. And there’s usually one of these Dem “team” apologists/suckers/denialists on most message forums.

If war criminal Obama had a R behind his name, would these D “team” suckers be making excuses for him and saying “you have to give him at least 3 years?” And why do these suckers feel the need to rush to the defense of millionaires? Rhetorical question. It’s because these millionaires are from their “team.” Pathetic. Yet when Cheney/Bush were doing the same thing Obama is doing, these suckers were screaming about it, but when their “savior” Obama does it, they are now making excuses and instead saying, “you have to give him at least 3 years.”

I ain’t giving him anything. I didn’t vote for the war criminal to begin with because I (and others) knew what he was about because we examined his Bush-enabling voting record from the senate. He’s a fraud with a smile, and at times he’s good at reading from a TelePrompter and giving lofty but empty feel-good speeches to dupe those gullible sheep who allow themselves to be duped repeatedly.

By: Annie Ladysmith

Annie Ladysmith — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:35:44 +0000

THIS IS WHAT EVERY US SERVICE PERSON SHOULD KNOW! Your government is in the process of putting you in harm’s way BECAUSE they want to kill you. If you live to make it back you will then die of toxic vaccines or DU exposure, like thousands of US personel are finding out.

THE TRUTH IS YOU CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO TURN ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHEN OBAMA DECLARES MARTIAL LAW! There are already ‘UN’ troops training in our country that will have no qualms about taking on the militias.

Many in the Airforce Reserves have declined duty rather than take the devil’s brew of toxic ‘vaccines’ that will render your immune system useless to fight off even their “SWINE-FLU’ or whatever other crap they concoct.

The planning for our destruction has been insidious and relentless. It is trully BEYOND TREASON (get this video) and the entire government is guilty by association. They should be incarcerated and tried as war criminals on behalf of the CONSTITUION and the AMERICAN PEOPLE, who are so obliged as to keep, and to fight for, their guaranteed constituional freedoms.

YES! All you petty TYRANTS and would be DICTATORS out there. In America it is not just our opinion to fight FASCISTS, but OUR GOD-GIVEN RIGHT WHICH IS NOT ONLY EMBEDDED, NEVER TO BE REMOVED, IN OUR CONSTITUTION, BUT ALSO EMBEDDED, NEVER TO BE REMOVED, IN OUR HEARTS AND SOULS! Take our freedoms away at your own risk.

By: bozh

bozh — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:40:30 +0000

?Every prez, pol, ‘educator’, priest, ‘editor’ makes mostly tacit or explicit promises.
Thus far it had always worked for US warlords and lords of the serfs-dependencies.
Obama tacitly promises that he wld “not rush” with the decision to send more soldiers into afgh’n.

However- of what a discovery!- “not rush” may mean what? U name the date of sending the soldiers to afgh’n? Will u please?
How ab next weak? next month, year, decade? Certainly, waiting a decade wld not be rushing, wld it?

And he says that the decision to send soldiers to affgh’n is “solemn” one.
Ok kids, i am now entering his brain [one cannot scan a mind]. I am scanning and scanning it.
OK, i give up. I don’t see a thing. I also scanned uncle sam’s brain in 1800s, 1917, 1950, 1965, ’01, ’03 and once again i gave up my probings.

Folks, i am not rushing my judgments. I also am not solemnly thinking, either. When i do think solemnly, i get confused. So i think just like peasants and unschhooled do.
So don’t believe anything i say. tnx