<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Audacity of Failure: The 4-year Presidency of Barack Hoover Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard fle-man</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59821</link>
		<dc:creator>richard fle-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59821</guid>
		<description>mike is trying to decode financial-speak excuses for not helping working people.he is pointing out that there could be a political cost to obama if he adheres to deficit-hawk,budget cutting,starve the people policies.try to read and comprehend what he has actually written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mike is trying to decode financial-speak excuses for not helping working people.he is pointing out that there could be a political cost to obama if he adheres to deficit-hawk,budget cutting,starve the people policies.try to read and comprehend what he has actually written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59796</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59796</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Americans are even told anymore if it&#039;s global warming or just climate change.   Palin 

    I heard someone say Palin can help bring back the GOP to it&#039;s glory.  I have to say James Inhofe two day&#039;s ago kind of said the same thing.  I don&#039;t think Americans are even told anymore if it&#039;s global warming or just climate change, what does that mean is it new speak what does that mean?  B99 still time and man anything but easy if we try. If we try boring it will not be and let me add got to be better than the strangeness we all feel now is it football season or baseball I know its time for basketball. It&#039;s basketball season right. I know a tour to the Arctic to see the ice melt then off to Vegas nice cup of coffee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Americans are even told anymore if it&#8217;s global warming or just climate change.   Palin </p>
<p>    I heard someone say Palin can help bring back the GOP to it&#8217;s glory.  I have to say James Inhofe two day&#8217;s ago kind of said the same thing.  I don&#8217;t think Americans are even told anymore if it&#8217;s global warming or just climate change, what does that mean is it new speak what does that mean?  B99 still time and man anything but easy if we try. If we try boring it will not be and let me add got to be better than the strangeness we all feel now is it football season or baseball I know its time for basketball. It&#8217;s basketball season right. I know a tour to the Arctic to see the ice melt then off to Vegas nice cup of coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59713</link>
		<dc:creator>B99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59713</guid>
		<description>Hawkins - Don&#039;t believe the hype - Copenhagen is not the last chance - the last chance was likely more than 30 years ago when Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the roof of the White House.  Taking them down was one of Reagan&#039;s first moves as president.  We&#039;ve been cascading downward ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hawkins &#8211; Don&#8217;t believe the hype &#8211; Copenhagen is not the last chance &#8211; the last chance was likely more than 30 years ago when Jimmy Carter put solar panels on the roof of the White House.  Taking them down was one of Reagan&#8217;s first moves as president.  We&#8217;ve been cascading downward ever since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Smith</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59712</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59712</guid>
		<description>b99 - you may be right about the character of capitalism. I typically go for a more specific &quot;late capitalism&quot; version just because so many people have a hard time questioning the &quot;free market,&quot; so I give them an out.

I&#039;m also afraid that I agree with you about the coming meltdown of society. I&#039;m not as convinced as you that totalitarian regimes will have any success, though they no doubt will pop up here and there. But this really is the reason I made the point I did about Mr. Whitney&#039;s article. Even so called &quot;progressives&quot; have a hard time seeing any solution other than rebuilding the failed economy of the recent past. Shouldn&#039;t we be using this time as an opportunity to explore new options? You are right, that we won&#039;t, but that doesn&#039;t change the validity of the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>b99 &#8211; you may be right about the character of capitalism. I typically go for a more specific &#8220;late capitalism&#8221; version just because so many people have a hard time questioning the &#8220;free market,&#8221; so I give them an out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also afraid that I agree with you about the coming meltdown of society. I&#8217;m not as convinced as you that totalitarian regimes will have any success, though they no doubt will pop up here and there. But this really is the reason I made the point I did about Mr. Whitney&#8217;s article. Even so called &#8220;progressives&#8221; have a hard time seeing any solution other than rebuilding the failed economy of the recent past. Shouldn&#8217;t we be using this time as an opportunity to explore new options? You are right, that we won&#8217;t, but that doesn&#8217;t change the validity of the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadbeat</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59702</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadbeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59702</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;American people don’t care about climate change bottom of the list in the polls it’s the spending and jobs and so it goes.&lt;/i&gt;

Right now many American are concerned with the immediate survival -- food, housing, education, health care, taxes and debt.  If those issues were alleviated then climate change would be taken more seriously.  

However as we&#039;ve seen with the health care debacle the ruling class don&#039;t care about what the American people want anyway and so long as they can continue to profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>American people don’t care about climate change bottom of the list in the polls it’s the spending and jobs and so it goes.</i></p>
<p>Right now many American are concerned with the immediate survival &#8212; food, housing, education, health care, taxes and debt.  If those issues were alleviated then climate change would be taken more seriously.  </p>
<p>However as we&#8217;ve seen with the health care debacle the ruling class don&#8217;t care about what the American people want anyway and so long as they can continue to profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59697</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59697</guid>
		<description>The consequences of a six degree Celsius rise in temperature was outlined in the Independent on the basis of Mark Lynas research: 
 
 
 
It would cause a mass extinction of almost all life and probably reduce humanity to a few struggling groups of embattled survivors clinging to life near the poles. 
With the tropics too hot to grow crops, and the sub-tropics too dry, billions of people would find themselves in areas of the planet which are essentially uninhabitable. This would probably even include southern Europe, as the Sahara desert crosses the Mediterranean. 
As the ice-caps melt, hundreds of millions will also be forced to move inland due to rapidly-rising seas. As world food supplies crash, the higher mid-latitude and sub-polar regions would become fiercely-contested refuges
Professor Le Quéré&#039;s conclusion is frightening, &quot;The Copenhagen conference next month is in my opinion the last chance to stabilise climate at C above pre-industrial levels in a smooth and organised way,&quot; 
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-a-climate-change-warning--we-ignore-at-our-peril-1822427.html
 
We have long known that, unchecked, climate change is likely to result in a serious reduction in global agriculture, chronic drought, rising sea levels and the mass displacement of populations. But the implications of a 6C rise are more disastrous still. They include the acidification of the oceans, the loss of all polar ice and the combustion of the rainforests. It is doubtful that mankind could survive such a catastrophe.

   That&#039;s last chance to stabilise climate and any spending just might want to have a focus in mind.  A total focus.  In a smooth and organised way is that what we see?  I watched Sen Inhofe today on the floor of the Senate talk about climate change and was it smooth and organised what he said yes if you enjoy total illusion. bullshit. 

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. The Earth is about to change weather me you Inhofe Obama rich poor young old like it or not. In about ten years right in our face in twenty years the beginning of survival. Spend all you want but if not focused the rest is academic. A Herculean effort kind of like a war and should be easy to see if we try. Still time maybe and today Inhofe said the American people don&#039;t care about climate change bottom of the list in the polls it&#039;s the spending and jobs and so it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The consequences of a six degree Celsius rise in temperature was outlined in the Independent on the basis of Mark Lynas research: </p>
<p>It would cause a mass extinction of almost all life and probably reduce humanity to a few struggling groups of embattled survivors clinging to life near the poles.<br />
With the tropics too hot to grow crops, and the sub-tropics too dry, billions of people would find themselves in areas of the planet which are essentially uninhabitable. This would probably even include southern Europe, as the Sahara desert crosses the Mediterranean.<br />
As the ice-caps melt, hundreds of millions will also be forced to move inland due to rapidly-rising seas. As world food supplies crash, the higher mid-latitude and sub-polar regions would become fiercely-contested refuges<br />
Professor Le Quéré&#8217;s conclusion is frightening, &#8220;The Copenhagen conference next month is in my opinion the last chance to stabilise climate at C above pre-industrial levels in a smooth and organised way,&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-a-climate-change-warning--we-ignore-at-our-peril-1822427.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-a-climate-change-warning&#8211;we-ignore-at-our-peril-1822427.html</a></p>
<p>We have long known that, unchecked, climate change is likely to result in a serious reduction in global agriculture, chronic drought, rising sea levels and the mass displacement of populations. But the implications of a 6C rise are more disastrous still. They include the acidification of the oceans, the loss of all polar ice and the combustion of the rainforests. It is doubtful that mankind could survive such a catastrophe.</p>
<p>   That&#8217;s last chance to stabilise climate and any spending just might want to have a focus in mind.  A total focus.  In a smooth and organised way is that what we see?  I watched Sen Inhofe today on the floor of the Senate talk about climate change and was it smooth and organised what he said yes if you enjoy total illusion. bullshit. </p>
<p>Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. The Earth is about to change weather me you Inhofe Obama rich poor young old like it or not. In about ten years right in our face in twenty years the beginning of survival. Spend all you want but if not focused the rest is academic. A Herculean effort kind of like a war and should be easy to see if we try. Still time maybe and today Inhofe said the American people don&#8217;t care about climate change bottom of the list in the polls it&#8217;s the spending and jobs and so it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadbeat</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59685</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadbeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59685</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s only deficits incurred to help working Americans that get them all moralistic.&lt;/i&gt;

Whitney hits the nail on the head here.  Economics is all about politics thus is extremely ideological.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s only deficits incurred to help working Americans that get them all moralistic.</i></p>
<p>Whitney hits the nail on the head here.  Economics is all about politics thus is extremely ideological.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hex</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59680</link>
		<dc:creator>Hex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59680</guid>
		<description>Sorrily misguided article.  

Whitney, who&#039;s your daddy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorrily misguided article.  </p>
<p>Whitney, who&#8217;s your daddy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59678</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59678</guid>
		<description>Heatlth, feeling of belonging, secure jobs is also wealth. But eating out and or eating corporate food actually deforms people. Using escalators and not steps is not wealth.
Driving cars instead of riding trolleys, bicicles, railways is not wealth. Having  a large house that cost $5-10 a yr to heat is not wealth; it is actualy a burden; at least for some people.
Add to this 200k cia agents, warships, aircraft, tanks, ammunition, artillery, soldiers, etc, etc, and one can say where is the wealth? Especiallly if you&#039;re sick but can&#039;t pay for treatment.
Sorry folks, that&#039;s as far as my knowledge goes ab mystorical economy.     

So please, i beg u, don&#039;t talk to me ab reserve currency, leverage, toxic assets, federal reserve, falling or desperately climbing US$, etc. tnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heatlth, feeling of belonging, secure jobs is also wealth. But eating out and or eating corporate food actually deforms people. Using escalators and not steps is not wealth.<br />
Driving cars instead of riding trolleys, bicicles, railways is not wealth. Having  a large house that cost $5-10 a yr to heat is not wealth; it is actualy a burden; at least for some people.<br />
Add to this 200k cia agents, warships, aircraft, tanks, ammunition, artillery, soldiers, etc, etc, and one can say where is the wealth? Especiallly if you&#8217;re sick but can&#8217;t pay for treatment.<br />
Sorry folks, that&#8217;s as far as my knowledge goes ab mystorical economy.     </p>
<p>So please, i beg u, don&#8217;t talk to me ab reserve currency, leverage, toxic assets, federal reserve, falling or desperately climbing US$, etc. tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59670</link>
		<dc:creator>b99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59670</guid>
		<description>David - I think capitalism has always relied on growth.  That&#039;s probably a good way to differentiate it from the mercantilism of post-feudal Europe. 

Yes, perpetual growth is a losing bet.  What will likely happen however, is that the meltdown of society, whenever it passes a tipping point into free fall - will not be subject to planned alternatives.  This is a gigantic and complex contraption, the demise of which will result in ten-thousand as yet unknown outcomes.  The likelihood, I  think, is that totalitarian entities will emerge from what remains.  I&#039;d like to think that we can plan our way into something better, but we can tell by the conversation on most any subject on DV - that this is only a chance outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8211; I think capitalism has always relied on growth.  That&#8217;s probably a good way to differentiate it from the mercantilism of post-feudal Europe. </p>
<p>Yes, perpetual growth is a losing bet.  What will likely happen however, is that the meltdown of society, whenever it passes a tipping point into free fall &#8211; will not be subject to planned alternatives.  This is a gigantic and complex contraption, the demise of which will result in ten-thousand as yet unknown outcomes.  The likelihood, I  think, is that totalitarian entities will emerge from what remains.  I&#8217;d like to think that we can plan our way into something better, but we can tell by the conversation on most any subject on DV &#8211; that this is only a chance outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Smith</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59666</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59666</guid>
		<description>b99 - perhaps not capitalism per se, but certainly late modern globalized capitalism with its reliance on growth.

And that you can&#039;t &quot;imagine&quot; it is precisely why we should be thinking real hard about it. At least to my way of thinking.  Perpetual growth in a finite world is a losing bet, so we&#039;d better be coming up with some real alternatives before the choice is made for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>b99 &#8211; perhaps not capitalism per se, but certainly late modern globalized capitalism with its reliance on growth.</p>
<p>And that you can&#8217;t &#8220;imagine&#8221; it is precisely why we should be thinking real hard about it. At least to my way of thinking.  Perpetual growth in a finite world is a losing bet, so we&#8217;d better be coming up with some real alternatives before the choice is made for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Moore</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59657</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59657</guid>
		<description>Your reasoning is not sound. Inflation can happen even if no one is working. Commodities are going up in price. Actually they are shooting up. We keep hearing we are in deflation not inflation but everything we use, oil, grain, copper, silver, gold, orange juice, etc, etc are doubling in price. I mean Orange Juice is up 68% this year all while we are losing more and more jobs. The government’s inflation data is tainted to say the least. How can you exclude FOOD and ENERGY from your inflation data? Food and Energy is a huge part of what we spend our money on.  I agree that the Fed actions alone can be controlled and stimulus withdrawn but the Federal Deficit is at a point it will always be increasing. We can never pay back the deficit nor will we even try. SS, Medicare, Health Care, etc, etc all paid by printing money and it is only going to get worse as we pile more and more debt on. With over 10% out of work and the REAL economy getting worse by the day (more and more unemployed) the US cannot raise taxes. This means even more printing. More and more money is being created out of thin air. The rest of the world has always propped the US up by buying our debt but now we are trying to debase the dollar so we can become more of a producing nation instead of a consuming nation. This might sound good except the rest of the world needs us to keep consuming. If we show the world we are going in the opposite direction they will have no reason to keep buying our debt. Without foreign government buying our debt the US government will be forced to print even more because the bills are still do and we are still piling more and more entitlements on.

America need to understand that nothing in life is free. As a human born on this earth you are entitled to NOTHING. You can get anything you want but it take work. That is how it has been since the dawn of mankind. Only in the last 100 years has there even been health insurance, retirement funds, and free education. You want something in life go out and work for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your reasoning is not sound. Inflation can happen even if no one is working. Commodities are going up in price. Actually they are shooting up. We keep hearing we are in deflation not inflation but everything we use, oil, grain, copper, silver, gold, orange juice, etc, etc are doubling in price. I mean Orange Juice is up 68% this year all while we are losing more and more jobs. The government’s inflation data is tainted to say the least. How can you exclude FOOD and ENERGY from your inflation data? Food and Energy is a huge part of what we spend our money on.  I agree that the Fed actions alone can be controlled and stimulus withdrawn but the Federal Deficit is at a point it will always be increasing. We can never pay back the deficit nor will we even try. SS, Medicare, Health Care, etc, etc all paid by printing money and it is only going to get worse as we pile more and more debt on. With over 10% out of work and the REAL economy getting worse by the day (more and more unemployed) the US cannot raise taxes. This means even more printing. More and more money is being created out of thin air. The rest of the world has always propped the US up by buying our debt but now we are trying to debase the dollar so we can become more of a producing nation instead of a consuming nation. This might sound good except the rest of the world needs us to keep consuming. If we show the world we are going in the opposite direction they will have no reason to keep buying our debt. Without foreign government buying our debt the US government will be forced to print even more because the bills are still do and we are still piling more and more entitlements on.</p>
<p>America need to understand that nothing in life is free. As a human born on this earth you are entitled to NOTHING. You can get anything you want but it take work. That is how it has been since the dawn of mankind. Only in the last 100 years has there even been health insurance, retirement funds, and free education. You want something in life go out and work for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59653</link>
		<dc:creator>b99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59653</guid>
		<description>david - So you are talking about ending capitalism.  Can&#039;t imagine how that would happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>david &#8211; So you are talking about ending capitalism.  Can&#8217;t imagine how that would happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59648</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59648</guid>
		<description>Why is Mr Whitney still trying to prop up the American Empire? Who benefits from that empire? Certainly not Americans, buried under a mountain of debt and with their jobs outsourced. Certainly not the rest of the world, victims of American economic blackmail. Survival of the American Empire produces no winners and its demise produces no losers. The dollar&#039;s role as world reserve currency is the lynchpin of the empire. Yet, Mr Whitney sees the ending of that role as a &quot;danger&quot; (to whom?) and speaks of &quot;growing fear&quot; (on whose part?), all of which he first claims is a &quot;bunch of malarkey&quot; and then contradicts himself by accepting that it will inevitably occur, but only at some vague point in the future! Which is it? Absurdly, his &quot;authority&quot; for the latter proposition is the right-wing British periodical the Economist, which has spent the last 30 years peddling the very ideology which has now blown up in everyone&#039;s face! Naturally, they would claim that they were right all along! Mr Whitney is slowly but surely moving left, but he still has a long way to go before he abandons his adulation of neo-liberal gurus. He is, so to speak, an armchair revolutionary who finds himself forced to choose between his armchair and his revolution and has , so far, opted for the armchair!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Mr Whitney still trying to prop up the American Empire? Who benefits from that empire? Certainly not Americans, buried under a mountain of debt and with their jobs outsourced. Certainly not the rest of the world, victims of American economic blackmail. Survival of the American Empire produces no winners and its demise produces no losers. The dollar&#8217;s role as world reserve currency is the lynchpin of the empire. Yet, Mr Whitney sees the ending of that role as a &#8220;danger&#8221; (to whom?) and speaks of &#8220;growing fear&#8221; (on whose part?), all of which he first claims is a &#8220;bunch of malarkey&#8221; and then contradicts himself by accepting that it will inevitably occur, but only at some vague point in the future! Which is it? Absurdly, his &#8220;authority&#8221; for the latter proposition is the right-wing British periodical the Economist, which has spent the last 30 years peddling the very ideology which has now blown up in everyone&#8217;s face! Naturally, they would claim that they were right all along! Mr Whitney is slowly but surely moving left, but he still has a long way to go before he abandons his adulation of neo-liberal gurus. He is, so to speak, an armchair revolutionary who finds himself forced to choose between his armchair and his revolution and has , so far, opted for the armchair!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David A. Smith</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/11/the-audacity-of-failure-the-4-year-presidency-of-barack-hoover-obama/#comment-59647</link>
		<dc:creator>David A. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=12127#comment-59647</guid>
		<description>Should the goal really be to put back together an economy based on the imperative of growth? Or should we be taking this downturn as an opportunity to restructure our whole way of thinking about the purpose of our economy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the goal really be to put back together an economy based on the imperative of growth? Or should we be taking this downturn as an opportunity to restructure our whole way of thinking about the purpose of our economy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

