Comments on: The Balance Of Power — Exchanges With BBC Journalists http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/the-balance-of-power-exchanges-with-bbc-journalists-2/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: sid wright http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/the-balance-of-power-exchanges-with-bbc-journalists-2/#comment-57409 sid wright Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:57:46 +0000 http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11308#comment-57409 the bbc is very zionist i wouldn't believe a word they say the bbc is very zionist
i wouldn’t believe a word they say

]]> By: Smiddy http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/the-balance-of-power-exchanges-with-bbc-journalists-2/#comment-57403 Smiddy Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:28:24 +0000 http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11308#comment-57403 Which is why we should all refuse to pay the license fee until this Israeli-loving-propaganda-shoved-down-our-throats issue is resolved.... maybe, since the BBC is so keen to represent the Israeli govt, they should get their funding from them and stop burdening us. Which is why we should all refuse to pay the license fee until this Israeli-loving-propaganda-shoved-down-our-throats issue is resolved…. maybe, since the BBC is so keen to represent the Israeli govt, they should get their funding from them and stop burdening us.

]]> By: bozhidar balkas vancouver http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/the-balance-of-power-exchanges-with-bbc-journalists-2/#comment-57373 bozhidar balkas vancouver Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:37:36 +0000 http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11308#comment-57373 Barbara plett said that gaddafi was rambling and often incoherent. Such statement i evaluate not only as dysphemistic but also as a condemnation. She also omits to posit which of his statements were "incoherent". And one supposes that by labeling his speech as "rambling" she wld have us believe that his speech was too long; partly, mostly, or totally devoid of any meaning. She also omits to tell us who were the people who were curious ab. parts or all of his speech and which ones were irrritated. In this connection, she goes that far to actually withhold what gadddafi actually said so that we cld not decide for selves how to label or evaluate each of hist statements. She tells us that america's reengagement with UN is a "gale of spring air". It appears an euphemism. In addition, what obama says may or most likely wld not be identical with what [not him] US wld do. Most likely US wld ignore all laws; includes UN; particular when UN deals with Israeli, nato, and US crimes against humanities.tnx Barbara plett said that gaddafi was rambling and often incoherent. Such statement i evaluate not only as dysphemistic but also as a condemnation.
She also omits to posit which of his statements were “incoherent”.
And one supposes that by labeling his speech as “rambling” she wld have us believe that his speech was too long; partly, mostly, or totally devoid of any meaning.
She also omits to tell us who were the people who were curious ab. parts or all of his speech and which ones were irrritated. In this connection, she goes that far to actually withhold what gadddafi actually said so that we cld not decide for selves how to label or evaluate each of hist statements.

She tells us that america’s reengagement with UN is a “gale of spring air”.
It appears an euphemism. In addition, what obama says may or most likely wld not be identical with what [not him] US wld do.
Most likely US wld ignore all laws; includes UN; particular when UN deals with Israeli, nato, and US crimes against humanities.tnx

]]>