<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obamacare Targets Entitlements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obstreperous</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57681</link>
		<dc:creator>Obstreperous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 23:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57681</guid>
		<description>Ah, Pharma...the most misunderstood aspect of medical care.
1) Pharma is dying...began in the early 1990s.  We will regret it.
2) &quot;indigenous people never die of...&quot;  Yes they die of infectious disease as did the rest of the world just a century ago.  Your mom or grandmother may remember siblings and relatives dying in infancy at a regular rate.  Mine does.  The combination of public health measures and pharma has increased the lifespan so that industrialized nations deal more with age (osteoporosis) and lifestyle diseases (e.g., cancer from smoking, obesity related diabetes and cardiovascular problems).  Cancer (lifestyle, carcinogen exposure, sunlight)...live long enough &amp; yep, you&#039;ll probably have to deal with a cancer.
3) 25% of current drugs have a natural product origin.  ~75% or those had a known ethnobnotanical use.  That does not mean that those plants are the safest drug.  There was a lot of digitalis toxicity until the dose could be standardized...those evil phara folks.  Even if you drug is a plant...don&#039;t take it if you don&#039;t need it.  (Paracelsus paraphrased: All things are poison and nothing is without poison; only the dose makes the difference.).  Interesting that some will be in awe of shamans of yesteryear that they never knew yet disprespect the shamans of today that are dedicating their lives to improving the human condition.  Just curious how folks think.
4) People take too many drugs...not beacuse of Pharma.  People do not take sufficient responsibility for their own health; hence, the large perncetage of lifestyle derived disease.  People also visit doctors too much for their own unhappiness and their ability to deal with their children.  Yes there is a need for psychiatric drugs, but the statistics of the number of people taking them indicates usage in unnecessary circumstances.
5) Getting back to point 1...what&#039;s so great about Pharma?  Properly applied chemotherapeutics can prevent the need for more serious medical care and improve quality of life in may circumstances.  With no ability for Pharma to pay for the government mandated costs of drug testing there will be no new therapies.  New conditions, new infections, no therapies.  We go back to heath care of almost a century ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Pharma&#8230;the most misunderstood aspect of medical care.<br />
1) Pharma is dying&#8230;began in the early 1990s.  We will regret it.<br />
2) &#8220;indigenous people never die of&#8230;&#8221;  Yes they die of infectious disease as did the rest of the world just a century ago.  Your mom or grandmother may remember siblings and relatives dying in infancy at a regular rate.  Mine does.  The combination of public health measures and pharma has increased the lifespan so that industrialized nations deal more with age (osteoporosis) and lifestyle diseases (e.g., cancer from smoking, obesity related diabetes and cardiovascular problems).  Cancer (lifestyle, carcinogen exposure, sunlight)&#8230;live long enough &amp; yep, you&#8217;ll probably have to deal with a cancer.<br />
3) 25% of current drugs have a natural product origin.  ~75% or those had a known ethnobnotanical use.  That does not mean that those plants are the safest drug.  There was a lot of digitalis toxicity until the dose could be standardized&#8230;those evil phara folks.  Even if you drug is a plant&#8230;don&#8217;t take it if you don&#8217;t need it.  (Paracelsus paraphrased: All things are poison and nothing is without poison; only the dose makes the difference.).  Interesting that some will be in awe of shamans of yesteryear that they never knew yet disprespect the shamans of today that are dedicating their lives to improving the human condition.  Just curious how folks think.<br />
4) People take too many drugs&#8230;not beacuse of Pharma.  People do not take sufficient responsibility for their own health; hence, the large perncetage of lifestyle derived disease.  People also visit doctors too much for their own unhappiness and their ability to deal with their children.  Yes there is a need for psychiatric drugs, but the statistics of the number of people taking them indicates usage in unnecessary circumstances.<br />
5) Getting back to point 1&#8230;what&#8217;s so great about Pharma?  Properly applied chemotherapeutics can prevent the need for more serious medical care and improve quality of life in may circumstances.  With no ability for Pharma to pay for the government mandated costs of drug testing there will be no new therapies.  New conditions, new infections, no therapies.  We go back to heath care of almost a century ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57674</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57674</guid>
		<description>Obstreperous, Universal human needs are not, by the way, ideals. These are met or not. They are dynamic and so always in flux as our community needs change from childhood to adults; but they are embedded in our being.

dan e, concerning Pharma, it strikes me as interesting that many indigenous people never die of degenerative illnesses such as cancers, diabeties, heart disease, MS, etc. These are all Western/US illnesses and Pharma and the great non-profit fundraisers are claiming to be working on &quot;cures&quot; for these tragic illnesses and killers of our time.

Afterall where do most of these pharmaceutically concocted drugs come from but nature, the patents/privatization of what is available (or could/should be) to all?

What holds us hostige is not Big Pharma, but our inability to think outside this box that even makes Pharma relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obstreperous, Universal human needs are not, by the way, ideals. These are met or not. They are dynamic and so always in flux as our community needs change from childhood to adults; but they are embedded in our being.</p>
<p>dan e, concerning Pharma, it strikes me as interesting that many indigenous people never die of degenerative illnesses such as cancers, diabeties, heart disease, MS, etc. These are all Western/US illnesses and Pharma and the great non-profit fundraisers are claiming to be working on &#8220;cures&#8221; for these tragic illnesses and killers of our time.</p>
<p>Afterall where do most of these pharmaceutically concocted drugs come from but nature, the patents/privatization of what is available (or could/should be) to all?</p>
<p>What holds us hostige is not Big Pharma, but our inability to think outside this box that even makes Pharma relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan e</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57672</link>
		<dc:creator>dan e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57672</guid>
		<description>The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex: A Deadly Fairy Tale 


By Dr. Doug Henderson and Dr. Gary Null
 
URL of this article: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;aid=15758
 
Global Research, October 21, 2009 
Progressive Radio Network - 2009-10-20 


It has been a particularly bad month for the pharmaceutical industrial complex in its ongoing litigations in American courts. Among the main pharmaceutical headlines, Merck’s Gardasil vaccine for HPV, now being widely administered to pre-teens, was found to be linked to amyltrophic lateral sclerosis, commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease; following a $1.4 billion fine in promoting one of its blockbuster drugs Zyprexa off-label, deceptive correspondence was uncovered by Eli Lilly gaming the system again by promoting another one of its drugs, Cymbalta, off-label for fibromyalgia; AstraZeneca was fined $160 million for scamming the Medicaid system in Kentucky after being fined $215 million for ripping off Alabama; Glaxo lost a Pennsylvania trial for failing to warn doctors and pregnant women of the dangers of its antidepressant drug Paxil related to birth defects; and Pfizer scored a record-breaking fine of $2.3 billion for illegally marketing several drugs over the years: Bextra, Zyvox, Geodon and Lyrica. These kinds of charges, among the many others, have become a habit for drug makers for the past dozen years. 

 

When we speak of the pharmaceutical industry complex, it does not refer solely to private drug manufacturers. The complex, like a Matrix that holds captive the health of the nation in medical slavery by its own design and manipulation, is a consortium, a spiders’ web woven with financial attachments throughout the medical profession. In addition to the pharmaceutical and medical device firms, this complex includes every government health agency—the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and or course the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)—as well as drug lobbying firms now employing a large number of former Congresspersons, insurance and HMO companies, all of the leading professional medical associations such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the majority of medical schools and their research departments who are heavily funded by drug money, many of the most prestigious medical journals, and ultimately all of this filtering downward to the physicians who diagnose our illnesses and prescribe our medications and treatments. 
SNIP -- long article follows, see the URL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex: A Deadly Fairy Tale </p>
<p>By Dr. Doug Henderson and Dr. Gary Null</p>
<p>URL of this article: <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&#038;aid=15758" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&#038;aid=15758</a></p>
<p>Global Research, October 21, 2009<br />
Progressive Radio Network &#8211; 2009-10-20 </p>
<p>It has been a particularly bad month for the pharmaceutical industrial complex in its ongoing litigations in American courts. Among the main pharmaceutical headlines, Merck’s Gardasil vaccine for HPV, now being widely administered to pre-teens, was found to be linked to amyltrophic lateral sclerosis, commonly known as Lou Gehrig’s disease; following a $1.4 billion fine in promoting one of its blockbuster drugs Zyprexa off-label, deceptive correspondence was uncovered by Eli Lilly gaming the system again by promoting another one of its drugs, Cymbalta, off-label for fibromyalgia; AstraZeneca was fined $160 million for scamming the Medicaid system in Kentucky after being fined $215 million for ripping off Alabama; Glaxo lost a Pennsylvania trial for failing to warn doctors and pregnant women of the dangers of its antidepressant drug Paxil related to birth defects; and Pfizer scored a record-breaking fine of $2.3 billion for illegally marketing several drugs over the years: Bextra, Zyvox, Geodon and Lyrica. These kinds of charges, among the many others, have become a habit for drug makers for the past dozen years. </p>
<p>When we speak of the pharmaceutical industry complex, it does not refer solely to private drug manufacturers. The complex, like a Matrix that holds captive the health of the nation in medical slavery by its own design and manipulation, is a consortium, a spiders’ web woven with financial attachments throughout the medical profession. In addition to the pharmaceutical and medical device firms, this complex includes every government health agency—the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and or course the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)—as well as drug lobbying firms now employing a large number of former Congresspersons, insurance and HMO companies, all of the leading professional medical associations such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Psychiatric Association (APA), the majority of medical schools and their research departments who are heavily funded by drug money, many of the most prestigious medical journals, and ultimately all of this filtering downward to the physicians who diagnose our illnesses and prescribe our medications and treatments.<br />
SNIP &#8212; long article follows, see the URL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57669</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57669</guid>
		<description>Work Does Not = Wealth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Work Does Not = Wealth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57667</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57667</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the dollar disappearing unless there is a complete and utter collapse.

But of course wealth creates poverty. The specific kind of wealth I mean is material. Material wealth requires privatization of the world&#039;s resources to the exclusion of the vast majority of humans. The only way that such wealth can be expanded is their the kinds of schemes Wall Street has devised which are purely speculative in nature.

There is, to be sure, an expansive, perhaps infinite, wealth which is transferable while never given away. Perhaps it shouldn&#039;t be referred to as wealth since we&#039;ve become fixated on material wealth as the be all end all. But it is based on human needs. What are those needs?

I would say they are finite, but satisfaction is infinite. These include:
subsistence, 
protection, 
affection, 
understanding, 
participation, 
leisure, 
creation, 
identity and 
freedom.

These needs are universal and they are very dynamic, interacting with one another and are reinforced either positively or negatively. When a need is satiated it can bleed into other needs, curtailing their satisfaction. These needs change over a life-time.

The only need that must first be fulfilled is subsistance in order to move to all the others. All other needs are equal in their importance to a healthy existence. An example of a negative fulfillment is, say, protection and the response of an annual expenditure of a trillion dollar military industrial war machine and 800 bases world-wide. Such an negative reinforcement works in reverse creating less protection, AND depriving other needs from being fulfilled. Our material excesses work much the same way.

If we thought of poverty in these terms it would create a much more livable sustainable world for most if not all of the world&#039;s population. But a system based on GNP, GDP and Consumer indexes is totally alien to this way of meeting human needs; and thus deprives many from fulfilling lives - Americans do poorly in the 9 areas mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the dollar disappearing unless there is a complete and utter collapse.</p>
<p>But of course wealth creates poverty. The specific kind of wealth I mean is material. Material wealth requires privatization of the world&#8217;s resources to the exclusion of the vast majority of humans. The only way that such wealth can be expanded is their the kinds of schemes Wall Street has devised which are purely speculative in nature.</p>
<p>There is, to be sure, an expansive, perhaps infinite, wealth which is transferable while never given away. Perhaps it shouldn&#8217;t be referred to as wealth since we&#8217;ve become fixated on material wealth as the be all end all. But it is based on human needs. What are those needs?</p>
<p>I would say they are finite, but satisfaction is infinite. These include:<br />
subsistence,<br />
protection,<br />
affection,<br />
understanding,<br />
participation,<br />
leisure,<br />
creation,<br />
identity and<br />
freedom.</p>
<p>These needs are universal and they are very dynamic, interacting with one another and are reinforced either positively or negatively. When a need is satiated it can bleed into other needs, curtailing their satisfaction. These needs change over a life-time.</p>
<p>The only need that must first be fulfilled is subsistance in order to move to all the others. All other needs are equal in their importance to a healthy existence. An example of a negative fulfillment is, say, protection and the response of an annual expenditure of a trillion dollar military industrial war machine and 800 bases world-wide. Such an negative reinforcement works in reverse creating less protection, AND depriving other needs from being fulfilled. Our material excesses work much the same way.</p>
<p>If we thought of poverty in these terms it would create a much more livable sustainable world for most if not all of the world&#8217;s population. But a system based on GNP, GDP and Consumer indexes is totally alien to this way of meeting human needs; and thus deprives many from fulfilling lives &#8211; Americans do poorly in the 9 areas mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57666</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57666</guid>
		<description>A new way of thinking on being a human. It&#039;s on the way oh yes it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new way of thinking on being a human. It&#8217;s on the way oh yes it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obstreperous</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57663</link>
		<dc:creator>Obstreperous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57663</guid>
		<description>Max,
  I agree that fragmented and competing national interests stands in the way of the type of progress as envivioned ideally; however, I do not believe in the &#039;ideal&#039; and recognize the inherenent goodness coupled with inherent imperfections in all people.
  I do not agree with the fixed pie mentality that says wealth creates poverty.  If that were true wealth could not exist since poverty is primal human condition.  Wealth is created by individual and group effort.  (Consider it the thermodynamics of economics...entropy is poverty and work is required to decrease entropy.)  Ideally group efforts are negotiated.  The world is not ideal and you protest the inequalities.  I get it and agree that social and economic justice is the goal.   Idealists believe it is a point we can achieve.  I believe it is a direction we must always be heading.
  Perhaps one of you points may come to pass.  The dollar as the basis of world trade may be going the way of the dinosaur.  Be careful what you wish for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max,<br />
  I agree that fragmented and competing national interests stands in the way of the type of progress as envivioned ideally; however, I do not believe in the &#8216;ideal&#8217; and recognize the inherenent goodness coupled with inherent imperfections in all people.<br />
  I do not agree with the fixed pie mentality that says wealth creates poverty.  If that were true wealth could not exist since poverty is primal human condition.  Wealth is created by individual and group effort.  (Consider it the thermodynamics of economics&#8230;entropy is poverty and work is required to decrease entropy.)  Ideally group efforts are negotiated.  The world is not ideal and you protest the inequalities.  I get it and agree that social and economic justice is the goal.   Idealists believe it is a point we can achieve.  I believe it is a direction we must always be heading.<br />
  Perhaps one of you points may come to pass.  The dollar as the basis of world trade may be going the way of the dinosaur.  Be careful what you wish for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57660</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57660</guid>
		<description>Again, the problem is the problem and how it&#039;s understood and treated.

Obama is limited. He sees all problems through the prism of US politics and that prism distorts the problem. The problem is vast in scope and depth and it crosses national boundaries.

The problem begins with understanding who and what we can and want to be on this planet. It is question that the current policies, institutions and political system are incapable of grasping.

So, when Obama says this and that are &quot;unsustainable&quot; he is talking in the meager narrow scope of what is within acceptable politico frameworks.  (And yes lichen you are right about shifting resources from the pathology of war to human rights and needs).

Power is concentrated away from solutions. It is a fundamental fact, an irrefutable truth. This will not be corrected through our actions, without utter collapse. Are we heading toward collapse? What has kept this menacing rogue nation afloat is the deep, and growing, interdependency that starves so many and works for so few. The dollar as the basis of world trade has a strangle hold on solutions.

Poverty is the obverse of wealth. One creates material wealth by creating poverty in its wake. That poverty exists here and throughout the globe. It shifts all balance to the centers of power. This is a fundamental principle which must be understood without leaning on ideological crutches that distort the problem, even if some ideologies concede an acknowledgement of some of the problem.There is no &quot;plug and play&quot; ideological solution; and it is a horrible waste of our resources to focus so completely on past ideologies to answer what the problem has become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, the problem is the problem and how it&#8217;s understood and treated.</p>
<p>Obama is limited. He sees all problems through the prism of US politics and that prism distorts the problem. The problem is vast in scope and depth and it crosses national boundaries.</p>
<p>The problem begins with understanding who and what we can and want to be on this planet. It is question that the current policies, institutions and political system are incapable of grasping.</p>
<p>So, when Obama says this and that are &#8220;unsustainable&#8221; he is talking in the meager narrow scope of what is within acceptable politico frameworks.  (And yes lichen you are right about shifting resources from the pathology of war to human rights and needs).</p>
<p>Power is concentrated away from solutions. It is a fundamental fact, an irrefutable truth. This will not be corrected through our actions, without utter collapse. Are we heading toward collapse? What has kept this menacing rogue nation afloat is the deep, and growing, interdependency that starves so many and works for so few. The dollar as the basis of world trade has a strangle hold on solutions.</p>
<p>Poverty is the obverse of wealth. One creates material wealth by creating poverty in its wake. That poverty exists here and throughout the globe. It shifts all balance to the centers of power. This is a fundamental principle which must be understood without leaning on ideological crutches that distort the problem, even if some ideologies concede an acknowledgement of some of the problem.There is no &#8220;plug and play&#8221; ideological solution; and it is a horrible waste of our resources to focus so completely on past ideologies to answer what the problem has become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obstreperous</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57659</link>
		<dc:creator>Obstreperous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57659</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, but really, none of this is about health care.  It is all about consolidating power and creating a Chicago-style politicrime government with just enough patronage to retain forever in power.  If health care reform was on the plate, then we would have to address cost, access and quality issues at the same time.  This should not be some ram-it-through 6 month process that ignores the views and needs of the totality being served.  It is sad that we are willing to degrade what we have of a health care system at the altar of partisan worship.  I suppose those in power would rather rule in hell than serve in heaven, because they seem to be bent on stoking up the fires for us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, but really, none of this is about health care.  It is all about consolidating power and creating a Chicago-style politicrime government with just enough patronage to retain forever in power.  If health care reform was on the plate, then we would have to address cost, access and quality issues at the same time.  This should not be some ram-it-through 6 month process that ignores the views and needs of the totality being served.  It is sad that we are willing to degrade what we have of a health care system at the altar of partisan worship.  I suppose those in power would rather rule in hell than serve in heaven, because they seem to be bent on stoking up the fires for us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lichen</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57557</link>
		<dc:creator>lichen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57557</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s quotes in this article make me sick.  Obviously, if you&#039;re looking to make cuts, cut the military budget; close the international bases, end the wars, shut down the cia, and let the government abolish the federal reserve and start printing it&#039;s own currency.  This is ridiculous; there is money, there are resources, and even if these are limited, we can overhaul the system and still make it so that everyone gets organic healthy food, clean water, clean air, guaranteed housing, single payer healthcare, free diverse good quality education k-phd...  These are all easily within our grasp.  And surely, SURELY if money is needed, the corporations and super-rich have plenty just waiting to be taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s quotes in this article make me sick.  Obviously, if you&#8217;re looking to make cuts, cut the military budget; close the international bases, end the wars, shut down the cia, and let the government abolish the federal reserve and start printing it&#8217;s own currency.  This is ridiculous; there is money, there are resources, and even if these are limited, we can overhaul the system and still make it so that everyone gets organic healthy food, clean water, clean air, guaranteed housing, single payer healthcare, free diverse good quality education k-phd&#8230;  These are all easily within our grasp.  And surely, SURELY if money is needed, the corporations and super-rich have plenty just waiting to be taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonyo</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/10/obamacare-targets-entitlements/#comment-57544</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=11395#comment-57544</guid>
		<description>Here we go again. No thought of of ever prosecuting the wall street
     thieves  and murderers. Yes, I said Murderers. People have become
     physically sick and are on their deathbed from the loss of their home.
     Job loss also causes tremendous stress in this globalization fucks its
     mother economy.  But, Obamass will cater to the banks, wall street, 
     and health insurance  companies. 

     Welfare for the privileged. Hunger, inadequate health care, and death
      for the proles. I hope I see anyone who voted for these  inbredding 
     piles of bile in trouble, I going to let them die. Anyone who respects
     them, same fate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again. No thought of of ever prosecuting the wall street<br />
     thieves  and murderers. Yes, I said Murderers. People have become<br />
     physically sick and are on their deathbed from the loss of their home.<br />
     Job loss also causes tremendous stress in this globalization fucks its<br />
     mother economy.  But, Obamass will cater to the banks, wall street,<br />
     and health insurance  companies. </p>
<p>     Welfare for the privileged. Hunger, inadequate health care, and death<br />
      for the proles. I hope I see anyone who voted for these  inbredding<br />
     piles of bile in trouble, I going to let them die. Anyone who respects<br />
     them, same fate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

