Comments on: Deconstructing the Israeli Narrative

By: maggie

maggie — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:17:52 +0000

“Somehow, and in some way, someone took advantage of the Allies victory in World War I….”

wow, someone did a lot of research… what a lame article!

By: Mulga Mumblebrain

Mulga Mumblebrain — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:03:41 +0000

The decrepit one repeats one of the vilest slurs of all Zionazi hate speech. The foul assertion that the Palestinians do not love their children properly was first used, I think, by that detestable creature Golda Meir, decades ago. It is a typical Zionazi slur, dredged up from the psychopathic depths of minds riven by hatred and contempt. Of course we all know from daily exposure over decades that in this Judeofascist dominated Western world, the Chosen Herrenvolk can say whatever they like, no matter how vile, how demeaning, how de-humanising about their victims. And to refute these lies and slanders invites being vilified yourself as an ‘anti-Semite’. I confess, decrepit. When a Jew is the type you represent, vicious, racist, arrogant to the point of narcissistic delirium and far beyond, I am ‘anti’ them, and proud of it. When a Jew is a decent human being, who acknowledges the basic equality of all the tribes of humanity and the fact that all people, everywhere, love their children, then not only do I accept them fully as my equal as a human, but they have my unstinting admiration for standing against the tide of racism, viciousness, sadism and racialist contempt that has their tribe, and odious individuals like decrepit, by the throat. The real truth decrepit is that there will only be peace in the Middle East when the evil fraction of Jewry loves their children more than it loves killing and maiming the children of the Palestinians.

By: deceschi

deceschi — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:01:44 +0000

B….y99, the problem is that the Palestinians want only one state of Palestine in Middle East. From the moment that their desire for peace will prevail on the dream of revenge and reconquest, of which you are faithful spokes(wo)man, we can start to talk seriously about a viable state Palestinian with open borders. But as long as Palestinians and Arabs hate Israel more than love their children, it will be difficult to reach that common goal. So I suggest them to stop the double talk, to drop the charade of peace and to speak straight and seriously with those who are nolens volens destined to be the neighbors. History teachs that the wheel of History can not be rolled over backwards. The sooner they understand this the better for them and the real chance of a own state. There is nothing that can really help them if they do not deal with the concerned counterparty. Everything else belongs to the world of dreams. Keep dreaming and “your” claimed state will remain a dream.

By: B99

B99 — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:58:29 +0000

dizzy – peace in the middle east means a state of Palestine, a viable state, no strings attached – right now. Anything else is just zionism being racism as usual.

By: deceschi

deceschi — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:53:58 +0000

mulgi, your paranoia towards Jews and the Jewish homeland in Middle East looks more and more like that one of a certain little guy in Teheran, same discours of cospiracy, same pattern of hatred. The world experienced already in WWII where hate against Jews can lead. Don’t you think you are a bit pathetic and an anachronism in person? How you and your species of dinosaurs will able to survive when – as all decent people hope – once there will be a true durable peace between Israeli Jews and Palestinian Arabs in Middle East? Will you then finally evolve yourself to a new more developed living form?

By: bozhidar balkas vancouver

bozhidar balkas vancouver — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:23:25 +0000

Jewstorical record starts at many opportune times. It may start at the time when arab world and pal’ns wldn’t not recognize israel but not at a time when it had been known from 1897- 1922 that humane solution had not been available in the conflict of the christo-talmudniks and palestinians.

In fact, once a side wants- and not solely engages in- a war, a crime had been commited.
Such crime cannot but be defended but with crimes. But these points of time do not exist for ?all jewstorians.

For them it is important that pal’ns wave these crimes away, recognize israel and israel wld ensure that no harm comes to pal’ns.
That had been said in ’17 also. Brits and ‘jews’ ‘promised’ that no harm wld come to locals by establishing a home euro-khazarians in palestina.

Americans have behaved like that towards red people. They made thousands of promises to them but their land and numbers shrank.
Eventually what remained was confined i reservations.

Pal’ns have been going thru the same or simialr process. And ‘jews’ are close to the end of it and will have done it as soon as US gives ‘jews’ the permit.
tnx

By: Mulga Mumblebrain

Mulga Mumblebrain — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:21:57 +0000

Bernmorn, please don’t be so disingenuous. Israel is a tiny region, and the Jews a tiny tribe, but the power elite of the Jews, the business leaders who dominate the Western media and politics, particularly in the US, where the ‘House Negro’ Obama is a long bought and sold servant of their power, and the religious/military/intelligence establishment of Israel, whose tentacles extend from one end of the earth to the other, are driving Western policy as surely as night follows day. To deny that Israeli power drives the War of Terror against the Moslem world, plus much, much, more besides, is simple mendacity, which, I imagine explains the decrepit one’s support for you.

By: deceschi

deceschi — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:40:57 +0000

Indeed, Bernborn, you say it. These people are obsessed. And we don’t need to mention what kind of demonic virus they are obsessed with. It’s quite obvious.

By: mary

mary — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:38:34 +0000

Quite right B99. And look what flowed from that act, whether or not it was an inside or an outside ‘job’ – the desecration of lands and peoples and the destabilization of the whole of the Middle East and beyond in the War on Terrrrr.

On the TV at the moment, the Conservative leader David Cameron is making the closing speech of their annual conference. He opened by promising more troops and equipment in Afghanistan and announcing that he will make the retiring chief of the British Army, General Dannatt, a Minister for Defence in the House of Lords if the Conservatives form the next government in 2010. He brought the rabble to its feet by asking them to show their gratitude ‘to our brave troops’. This applause lasted for many minutes. The party’s slogan is ‘Ready for Change’. There will be no change if they are elected which seems likely.

PS The position of the Palestinians was never mentioned nor was the Middle East referred to which is strange as I think that a resolution of the conflict there is the crux of all our problems. Cameron is a member of the Conservative Friends of Israel lobby group in the House of Commons needless to say.

By: b99

b99 — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:02:11 +0000

bernmorn – 9/11 came out of that fraction of the world’s land.

By: kalidas

kalidas — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:59:42 +0000

AKA ponerology.

By: dan e

dan e — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:15:37 +0000

“socialism in one blood” — the absurdity of Zionist self-lying would be funny if it wasn’t so deadly.

By: Bernmorn

Bernmorn — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:42:28 +0000

There are really so many problems and so many people in this world. The obsession with a fraction of a fraction of the world’s piece of land, and a fraction of a fraction of its inhabitants definitely proves that it is a very sick obsession.

By: b99

b99 — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:55:50 +0000

And an excellent expository article by Mr. Lieberman.

By: b99

b99 — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:54:53 +0000

The 19th century Jewish migrants to Palestine were religious ‘zionists’ – their goal to live and die in the land of their spiritual ancestors. For most Jews in the Pale of Russia, however, Zion was not an actual piece of land – never mind one constituted by an earthly state. One could imagine and dream of Zion – a sort of Nirvana, in Russia, or America, or where ever – it meant escaping this painful and unfulfilling life on earth. It did not mean a Knesset.

The political Zionist project, on the other hand was an effort to establish a nation-state for Jews. It was a colonial undertaking, and required a colonial sponsor with the ultimate goal of declaring independence for this Jewish state (presented non-threateningly as a ‘national home for Jews’). It arose in the atmosphere of ultra-nationalist and racialized fervor that generated 19th century European state-building, colonialism, and imperialism. Though it had the trappings of emergent Russian and Soviet communism, it was philosophically more aligned with the reactionary elements that contested Bolshevism in Eastern and Central Europe – that is, the ‘blut und boden’ – my race above all others – ideology that permeated that region at that time. (This is what enabled Jews in Palestine and Israel to set up ‘socialist’ institutions such as the kibbutz – an institution restricted to Jews-only, and no Arab has ever been invited to join a kibbutz – a veritable ‘socialism in one blood’ – an oxymoron if there ever was one.) That the manifestation of Zionism on the ground in Palestine was about to fail is now but a footnote, events in Europe, being capitalized upon by Zionists more interested in a land-grab than in the existential condition of European Jews, the course of history was reset to the ticks of a time-bomb.

By: dan e

dan e — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:57:01 +0000

like to extend appreciation to Dan L for this insightful article, and to Mulga for highly articulate and informed comments. Wd like to extend something else to bovine excrementalists Mebozo and D Creptsy, and I don’t mean a Ten Foot Pole. not even a Littauer:)

By: Mulga Mumblebrain

Mulga Mumblebrain — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:41:22 +0000

John Zavesky, even more relevant, in my opinion, than the exploitation of Western guilt over the Nazi Judeocide by Finkelstein’s ‘Holocaust Industry’, is the control by Jews of the Western political, media and business establishments. I mean, it verges on the comic and grotesque that, when the US Congress votes 400 to 1 to support Israeli brutality in Gaza, that the observation that Jews control US politics is vilified as an ‘anti-Semitic canard’. Similarly in Australia when only one Federal politician from out of nearly 200 dares to refuse to salute the 60th anniversary of Israel’s birth in massacre and ethnic cleansing, and her career is then ended, her retirement forced by her party’s establishment (so grateful for the generosity of Jewish patrons) and she is defamed and vilified in the Murdoch sewer as a ‘going-away present’, to speak of Jewish ‘influence’, let alone the reality of total control, is absolutely verboten.
This is, as far as my grasp of history goes, an unprecedented position. One tiny tribe, 0.5% of humanity, controls the politics and media of the Western countries. It exercises that power with brutal effectiveness, receiving billions in tribute from its hostage hyper-power, and protection from international law, which it reviles and defiles every day. It has its puppet hyper-power carrying out its policy of destroying the Arab and other Islamic states of the Middle East, the Oded Yinon ‘Zionist Plan for the Middle East’, a process that has continued for decades already, taking millions of lives, and seems set for greater intensification, even threatening nuclear escalation, soon.
The Western media has become a simple and crude propaganda apparatus for Israel. One reads the papers, listens to the radio, watches TV, notes the 90% plus bias towards Israel, the near total absence of Palestinians, and, if seen, only Fatah collaborators allowed, and if one dares draw the plain conclusion that Jewish power is influencing the media to an almost laughable extent, once again one is spreading ‘anti-Semitic canards’.
And if one points out the dominance of Jewish power in the finance industry, the pre-eminence of Jews in Hollywood (certainly explaining the constant, unremitting depiction of Arabs and Moslems as loathsome monsters)and questions little mysteries like, where did Bernie Madoff’s loot go, and how did the SEC ignore years of clear revelations of his crookery, once again it’s the old ‘anti-Semitic canard’ line. The reality, alas, is that Jews now control the very way the Western publics think and act. In this country we are unceasingly bombarded with hate propaganda against Islam and Arabs. The propagandists are often Rightwing Likudnik type Jews, who proliferate in our media. Imported hatemongers, often crude and belligerent Israeli Rightwingers, or Islamic apostates, ever keen to please their new masters with yet more lurid demonisation of Islam and Moslems, sully these shores regularly. Often they are imported by Zionist organisations (one can just imagine the utter pandaemonium if a local Islamic group imported an anti-Jewish zealot to preach contempt and hatred of Jews)or by the Zionazis’ local Rightwing allies.When, occasionally, a Palestinian voice is allowed in an opinion page, it is invariably, I mean without exception, followed the next day by an hysterical and mendacious denunciation from some Zionist group. Needless to say, the reverse never applies.
Zionazi hatemongering is incessant, almost casual. In a piece re-published in Murdoch’s ‘The Australian’ today, from Marty Peretz, amongst the snide attacks on Obama for lack of sufficient enthusiasm in killing Muslims in Afghanistan, and for daring to appeal to the ‘human refuse’ (Marty’s touching description of black South African slum dwellers-they can’t help themselves, can they?)of the world to gain the Olympics for Chicago, he casually smears Mary Robinson, the universally admired Irish stateswoman, as a ‘cold anti-Semite’. One wonders what tiny infraction of total obeisance to the Herrenvolk precipitated that outburst. These vile and infinitely dangerous creatures, not the totality of Jewry of course, just as the Nazis did not represent the totality of Germans, but a majority, I fear, are riven with hatred for non-Jews, unless they are totally obedient, and a centuries old rage for goy crimes, real, exaggerated and invented, against the Jews. One need only look at decrepsi’s excuses for child-murder in Gaza, based on alleged crimes from centuries ago, in Yemen, or Morocco, to see how certain Jews carry a visceral antipathy for the entire non-Jewish world. At present it is the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis, Afghans, Pakistanis, Somalis paying the price of this hate and rage, but as the demonisation of Iran shows, the bloodlust is unslaked, and is unlikely ever to be so.

By: lloyd

lloyd — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:33:17 +0000

I agree with Mebosa’s question, John Hatch, but (and?) from the direction of the United Nations being the only force likely to restrain militant Israel in the foreseeable future.

And Israel is in the UN, right John?, as surely as Samantha Power is still a special assistant to Obama on international affairs.

By: MEBOSA RITCHIE

MEBOSA RITCHIE — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:42:46 +0000

Israel is not a nation, it’s a crime against humanity.

and why is that john

By: John S. Hatch

John S. Hatch — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:12:53 +0000

Israel is not a nation, it’s a crime against humanity.