US-Israel vs Iran Nuclear Chess Game

Since 2003 Iran has been coerced into playing a nuclear chess game against US and Israel. Western media outlets have been playing the part of cheer leaders for the American Israeli side, preparing the observing masses for the expected American Israeli “checkmate” move against Iran. Not a single day passes without the description and analyses of a tactical move, with each analysis ending with the question of when, rather than if, the Israelis would bomb Iranian nuclear facilities.

The Israeli moves

In their annual meeting, on February 18th 2009, The Israeli military leaders had officially declared Iran as their number one strategic enemy in the region, and that the alleged Iranian nuclear arms program constitutes an “existential threat” to the state of Israel. They declared the elimination of the Iranian nuclear threat a top priority for the Israeli military and political leaderships.

Yet the Israelis seem to differ in the method of dealing with the Iranian threat. One group, represented by Barak, Netanyahu, Olmert, and Lieberman, called for a military strike on the Iranian nuclear facilities. Such strike, they claim, would at least set the Iranian nuclear program back by ten years. They site Israel’s bombing of Iraq’s Osirak nuclear facility in June 1981, and the bombing of alleged Syrian Al-Kibar nuclear facility in September 2007 as safe and effective solution to any nuclear threat. They claim that since Western countries, especially US, and the neighboring Arab states are opposed to Iran’s nuclear program, Israel’s attack would receive tacit approval, and similar to Iraqi and Syrian bombings Israel would not face any military or political consequences.

The second group, represented by the Israeli intelligence agencies, warns that Israel, alone, is not capable of dealing with the Iranian nuclear threat, and is in dire need of American help. They remind the Israelis of the events of previous wars such as 1973 war against Egypt and 1982 and 2006 wars against Lebanon, both countries are not as strong as Iran. They recommend that Israel should be only a partner in a joint military strike against Iran.

Third group, represented by Israeli President Shimon Perez, seemingly wants a political solution. Perez stated to George Mitchell, the American special envoy to the Middle East, last April 2009 that Israel has no plans to strike Iran. He urged for an international alliance against Iran to be formed in order to politically deal with the Iranian nuclear program.

Despite Perez’s seemingly political approach the Israeli military leaders are preping the army for a coming strike against Iran. They have purchased and acquired the most sophisticated American fighter planes, 100 advanced LJDAM (Laser Joint Direct Attack Munition) smart bombs, and small tactical (nuclear) bombs. The Israeli army has been testing the Arrow interceptor missile defensive shield in the Mediterranean Sea as well as in the American missile range in the Pacific Ocean west of California. The Israeli air forces sent their F16C fighter jets to participate with the Americans in war exercises, named Red Flag, at American Nillis Air Force base in Nevada, and their C130 Hercules aircraft to compete in the Rodeo 2009 competition at McChord Air Force base in Washington.

The Israeli navy has sent one of its six Dolphin class nuclear missiles carrier submarines accompanied by two Saar class missile boats through Suez Canal ostensibly heading towards the Persian Gulf.

Israeli leaders are crying wolf everywhere they go. Distorting Ahmadinejad’s speeches they declared him the new Hitler, who wants to wipe Israel off the map. They accused Iran of sponsoring terror by arming Hezbollah and Hamas. They keep claiming that Iran is only few months away from building its first nuclear bomb and such a weapon in the hands of the mad Mullahs is an existential threat to Israel. Such a threat, they keep claiming, endangers the whole region including the oil producing Gulf States, and could expand to endanger the rest of the world.

The American moves

The American administration, on the other hand, seems to favor a diplomatic solution for now. Yet like the previous Bush administration the Obama administration has also declared that all options, including a nuclear military strike, are still on the table if Iran did not respond positively to the diplomatic solution. Obama is also pressuring Israel to freeze its illegal settlements in Palestinian occupied territory, at least for the time being, in order to gain the support of Arab countries (Egypt, Jordan, and Gulf States). Putting Israel, the American watchdog in the region, on a leach has always worked to garner the Arab support for attacking a neighboring country.

Although a US National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 concluded that Iran had abandoned its nuclear arms research program in 2003, Obama issued a deadline of mid September for Iran to respond to the American offer. He had also warned Israel not to surprise his administration with a strike against Iran that might sabotage his diplomatic approach, and could drive the whole region into wider conflict.

At the same time Obama’s administration had sent Iran many hostile messages such as American determination not to allow Iran to build its bomb, expressing America’s strong support and commitment to the security of Israel, supplying Israel with the most advanced weapons and fighter planes, conducting joint military training with the Israelis in preparation for possible strike, having many congressmen and military experts stating openly that an Israeli strike is the only and best solution, sending American aircraft carriers to the Persian Gulf to flex its muscles in war games, and openly broadcasting America’s own military preparation to strike Iran such as accelerating the development of the largest bomb ever dubbed “MOP”; Massive Ordnance Penetrator. With its 20 feet long, 30,000 pounds weight, and 5,300 pounds of explosives this bomb is designed to penetrate through 200 feet of hardened surfaces before detonation in order to destroy underground structures such as the Iranian Natanz nuclear facility.

The Iranian moves

Iran, on the opposite side, is adamant on exercising its own legal right of developing its own peaceful nuclear program similar to any other nuclear member countries in the NPT. Since 2003 Iran had been harassed by the Bush Administration over its nuclear program. Being a member of the NPT the IAEA was sent several times to inspect Iran’s nuclear facilities, but found no evidence of a nuclear weapons program. Refusing to accept the outcome the Bush administration pushed the UN to impose economical sanction on Iran until it suspends its nuclear program.

In order to address any concern about its nuclear program Iran offered to place additional restrictions on its enrichment program including ratifying the Additional Protocol to allow more stringent inspections by the IAEA, open its nuclear program to foreign private and public participation, and allow the participation of foreign representatives within its Natanz facility among others. But the Bush administration rejected the Iranian offer, pushed the UN to impose the sanctions, and in a threatening move sent American military fleet into the Persian Gulf.

Putting Iran under real existential threat, being surrounded on the four sides by American troops, and continually being threatened by the Israelis and the Americans of being hit by nuclear bombs, Iranians had no choice but to exhibit their deterring muscles through their own war games on land, sea, and air. They also purchased the most sophisticated Russian missiles, and recently had joined the Russian navy in their military maneuvers in the Caspian Sea dubbed “Regional Collaboration for a Secure and Clean Caspian”.

Besides Russia the Iranians formed an alliance with Syria and Turkey, and gained the support of the Non-Aligned countries, and lately signaled its readiness to improve cooperation with North Korea.

As for the threat of the Israeli strike the Iranians warned that such a strike would only come as a joint effort with the US, and that Iran’s “firm and precise” response would reach all American assets in the Gulf region and the Israeli nuclear sites.

The real intentions behind the moves

Israelis know very well that they cannot strike Iran. They fully recognize that decisions concerning the Iranian issue are exclusively American due to Iran’s strength and geopolitical importance in the region. Iran is a large and a strong military country. Economic sanctions did nothing but helped Iranian rely on their own resources. The threats of possible attacks forced the Iranians to strengthen their military forces. Netanyahu’s “Iran first”, “Israel’s existential threat”, and “striking Iran” messages are directed towards the international political community first and towards the Israeli population second.

With the convening of the UN General Assembly this September, Netanyahu is trying to divert and engage the Assembly’s attention into the alleged Iranian nuclear threat. He hopes that such diversion would not give the Assembly enough time to discuss Israel’s war crimes and human rights violations in Palestine and especially in Gaza Strip as reported by Human Rights Watch groups. Netanyahu’s “Iran first” message is also meant to freeze re-opening any peace negotiations with the Palestinians and to escape American and European pressure to suspend colonial settlements in the West Bank.

Internally Netanyahu, like all previous Israeli Prime Ministers, is manipulating the media to bombard the Israeli population with a propaganda campaign filled with the images of the monstrosity of the enemy (Israel’s existential threat) to incite the feelings of fear and hatred of others and of elitecism (God’s chosen people) to unite and to rally the Israelis behind his leadership.

Israelis have come from different countries with different nationalities, social norms, backgrounds, and political ideologies. To unite them together Israeli leaders resort to tactics of fear, hatred, elitecism and war to create some type of national bond among them.

The US wants to control all the energy resources in the Middle East and South East Asian regions. The US has firm footings in the Gulf States, and after the collapse of the Soviet Union it started expanding in South East Asia starting with Afghanistan, jumping to Iraq then back into Pakistan. Now Iran is left in between as a gab in the US continuum presence.

The US wants also to control and manipulate the nuclear technology. After securing Indian and Pakistani nuclear bombs and facilities, the US is now directing its attention towards North Korean and Iranian nuclear facilities. It seems hypocritical of the still nuclear arms producing US to deny the Iranians peaceful nuclear technology. This is especially so since the US had agreed to provide India with nuclear fuel for its reactors, and had entered into agreements with Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan to help them build their own peaceful nuclear facilities.

The US knows very well that it could not stop Iranian nuclear program especially with the present Iranian government. To delay Iranian nuclear program the US is threatening to use the UN to impose economic sanctions not only on Iran alone, but also on countries who would continue dealing with Iran on any level especially those selling refined oil products to Iran. The effectiveness of such sanctions is still to be seen since a lot of countries have trade and business dealings with Iran.

The endgame

Since the US is heavily involved in at least three open military confrontations, and since many of the American military assets are sitting ducks in the Persian Gulf region for possible Iranian retaliatory strike, and since Iran is a large country that is not weak militarily or been weakened yet by economical sanctions, and since Iran might withdraw from the NPT and might pursue an accelerated nuclear military program if faced with more pressure and more existential threats, the US has no viable solution but to accept Iran as a nuclear country compliant to the NPT and subject to IAEA monitoring.

The nuclear threat or attack of the US, a nuclear country, against Iran, a non-nuclear country, would be a fatal attack on the NPT itself. Other NPT-member countries might withdraw from the treaty and start developing their own nuclear arsenals as a deterrent weapon against nuclear threats from nuclear countries. The NPT would be annulled and nuclear proliferation would become world spread.

An attack, even surgical, on Iran would not happen for it has a catastrophic consequences on the whole world. A draw seems to be the most reasonable endgame.

Concluding remarks

Accepting Iran as a nuclear country would not stop the US and Israel from supporting terrorist attacks within Iran as they have been doing for the last six years. The two countries have been supporting terrorist organizations such as Mujahedeen Khalg, Jundallah, and Kurdish groups within Iran. These terrorists are responsible for attacks against Iranian military targets, interrupting power and communication lines to the nuclear facilities, and assassinations of some Iranian nuclear scientists such as Ardeshire Hassanpour. The US will also continue funneling American tax money to the Iranian opposition, as was done during the Iranian election (as confessed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in an interview with CNN’s reporter Fareed Zakaria) to topple down, to weaken, and to hinder the operation of the Iranian government.

Meanwhile the US is planning to take full advantage of the Iranian threat in the region in order to strengthen its grip on the oil producing Gulf States, and to siphon their oil money into the budgets of the American military companies under the guise of security. Hillary Clinton touched briefly on that plan during a televised interview in Thailand stating that nuclear Iran could be contained by an American so-called “defensive nuclear umbrella” over the region. The notion of this nuclear umbrella, if there is such a thing, was the brainchild of Patrick Clawson, deputy director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, and Dennis Ross, then senior editor of Middle East Quarterly in 2004. Of course such an umbrella would be developed, built, and paid for by oil money from the Gulf States.

Clinton in her remark had acknowledged the inevitability of Iran, faced with existential nuclear threats from both US and Israel, gaining a nuclear arsenal, and the inevitable American acceptance of this fact.

Dr. Elias Akleh is an Arab writer of Palestinian descent, born in the town of Beit-Jala and now living in the US. He can be reached at: eakleh@ca.rr.com. Read other articles by Elias.

24 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Rapture Forums said on September 2nd, 2009 at 5:12pm #

    I believe Israel is going to be left with no option but to strike Iran. As the article states Iran is playing a game of chess with the international community and unfortunately there is only one language they understand – force. And that I’m afraid is what is going to have to happen to stop Iran.

  2. Shabnam said on September 2nd, 2009 at 7:25pm #

    Another zionist liar, Rapture Forums, to change the message of this article in favor of an apartheid and terrorist entity that even should not be in Palestine. I’m afraid you and people like you definitely will take this wish into your GRAVES one by one. We will see who is right. You must be nuts to ignore illegal nuclear weapons of Israel and dare to tell us ‘Iran is playing a game of chess…’ Who do you think you are? Iranian nuclear energy program is LEGAL as Al baradei said n several times and Iran has every single right to enrich for its fuel. Yet, because of Israel, a racist and terrorist entity erected on the stolen land of Palestine and due to its fifth column in the US and elsewhere in the western capital, Jewish lobby is demanding a strike on Iran by the US since Israel cannot do it by herself, where majority of Americans are against that. Instead, Americans are FED UP with Israel’s influence on foreign policy, Israel illegal Nuclear weapons, more than 250, has not signed the NPT, and continues her illegal settlements and commit genocide in Gaza and in the enamoring countries every single day.

  3. John Christopher Sunol said on September 2nd, 2009 at 9:09pm #

    This is a war of necessity rather than a war of choice, For Iran to be allowed Nuclear weapons it will be similar to Hitler obtaining Nuclear weapons in 1943 or War time Japan in 1942.

    An actual nightmare for the whole world and Isreal/US would be the very first target.

    Imagine taliban with Nukes, well the same with Iran iwth Nukes.

  4. Andres Kargar said on September 2nd, 2009 at 11:18pm #

    An Israeli military attack on Iran’s nuclear sites (even if successful)will not in any way protect the Zionazis from the wrath of the people of the Middle East. The Iranians and Arabs (and if fact the people of other countries of the world) clearly understand that Israel – not Iran – is the biggest threat to the peace in the region and that it eventually has to go the way of the racist regime of apartheid in South Africa.

    Even El Baradei admits that the Iranian “nuclear threat” is a political hype. See Reuter’s “Iran Nuclear ‘Threat’ Hyped: IAEA’s ElBaradei”,

    http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/09/02-5

  5. abraham said on September 3rd, 2009 at 1:40am #

    There is one thing Iran could not and will not accept that Israel is being looked with favor by more non muslim countries than Iran. Europe doesn’t like Iran, U.S. does not like iran. Southeast Asian countries with the exception of malaysia and indonesia do not like iran. amadinejad is all talk. pretending to be strong yet actually very weak.

  6. Shabnam said on September 3rd, 2009 at 8:19am #

    If there are few head of states, Zionist puppet, who do not like Iranian government let it be. But Israel is hated throughout the planet by its population, except those head of states who have become nothing but zionist puppet to buy the hatred of their own people for themselves. Obama, a Jewish President, who was elected by the Zionists and their fools, is losing his ‘popularity’ faster than anyone could have imagined. Palestine is stolen by the Rothschild’s, the Jewish aristocracy, who controlled the British Empire then and American empire now through control of money. A number of Rothschilds were instrumental in populating Palestine back in the late 1890s, were involved with the first Zionist Congress in Basel in 1893, and with the founding of the State of Israel, as well as financing it. Edmond de Rothschild worked closely with Lord Balfour and Lloyd George in getting the Balfour Declaration to create the State of Israel.
    For the past few centuries Western empires, British and now American, are controlled by the Jewish aristocracy, the Rothchields and its associates, to rob the world of its natural resources, the Gold, Silver, Diamond, Nickel, Oil and Gas, cupper and so on and so forth through control of elites of a country with strong WMD wanting to change the world through ‘closeness’, ‘exceptionalism’, ‘civilizing mission’, ‘democracy’ and other phony and mythical pretext to expand their influence and get the CONTROL OF THE WORLD WITH ITS RESOURCES ruling through ‘WORLD GOVERNMENT’ LOCATED IN ‘Jerusalem.’
    Nathan Rothschild, in 1815 said,
    [I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.]

    http://www.rense.com/general75/wrus.htm

  7. Annie Ladysmith said on September 3rd, 2009 at 8:33am #

    The decision has already been made between the US elite and Israel
    to atack Iran, the date has also likely been set.

    Iran is a sovreign nation with a huge opperating infrastructure. Most experts, with knowledge, agree that Iran is 10 years away from a functioning reactor. No matter, Iran refuses a crntral bank and that alone is reason enought for the International Banking cartel to wipe it of the face of the world.

    The Iranians are and educated people with an ancient heritage and a working infrastructure.Above all THEY ARE A NATION WITH THEIR OWN MONEY AND NO CE$TRAL BANK.
    IRANIS GUSHING WITH NATURAL RESOURCES and therin lies the candy mounting that the Demigods want to procure for themselves.
    If Iraq is any indication, and i believe it is, Iran will be destroyed in the same brutal and wicket way that Iraq was crushed to rubble.

    However, on the bright side DU will not be used as this would contaminate the very resources the Israel need to function.

    In my humble opinion, after iran is “secured”, by terrorizing the people with starvation and unlawful imprisonment, including , of course, torture by the mercenary thugs and CIA, in other words, when Iran is put in the same shameful state that Iraq is in, then they will bring the rest of their plan to the forefront.

    They may then likely move to emplement MARTIAL LAW in America and therby turn all freedom loving Americans into terrorists over-night. We can then look forward to the same treatment that the ‘saviors” of the Middle East have gushed out with impunity to the civilians in they have conquered.

    I plead and pray that Iran is left alone. It is a conservative country more interested in educating it’s children than issuing fatwas against people, which the typical Iranian completely ignores.

    Please do not invade Iran, it will be the beginning of the NWO in manical earnest. The other question: who is going to stop them??

    Dear Iranians, my heart goes out to you, i wished this Beast could be held back

  8. Annie Ladysmith said on September 3rd, 2009 at 8:57am #

    P.S. For all you folk who buy into the LIE about Iran being a nuclesr threat please remember one thing, THERE WERE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTIONS (only what the US had supplied Saddam) it was a ruse to ultimately get control of the biggest oil desposit in the ME. Are you really encouraging a war, like the one we’ve been seeing going dowm in Iraq?? If you are. you are a moran/fool/idiot, for you will be next.

  9. Shabnam said on September 3rd, 2009 at 9:30am #

    In the past few years, ElBaradei has frequently rebuffed and mocked attempts by Israel, US and EU to portray a false and alarming picture of Iran’s nuclear programme. He has in described the proponents of such propaganda as “neo-crazies”. Asked in this latest interview if Iran is keeping its nuclear programme purely civilian oriented, ElBaradei has replied:

    [Nobody is sitting in Iran today developing nuclear weapons. Tehran doesn’t have an ongoing nuclear weapons program. But somehow, everyone in the West is talking about how Iran’s nuclear program is the greatest threat to the world. In many ways, I think the threat has been hyped.]

  10. bozhidar balkas vancouver said on September 3rd, 2009 at 11:13am #

    shabnam, with respect
    First Zionist Congress in Basle was in 1897.
    Btw, i do not think any christian gov’t is a puppet of israel. After all, if it wasn’t for christian doings, palestine wld have never been even invaded let alone destroyed.

    And christian lands always wanted ‘jews’ to take by war and terror [the only way it cld have been achieved] all of palestine.
    Churchill in ’22 had said this to chaim waitzman, If you can take al of palestine that wld be OK, if you can’t partition will have to do.

    Imo, it is more likely that the christians are using ‘jews’ and particularly the ‘darkies’ [mizrahim and shephardic voelken].
    I base this conclusion on the fact that the world plutos along most christians do not any longer respect nationalism, countryhood or any laws.
    That includes israel. While a ‘jewish’ state [read please:cultish] included a fortiori included. tnx

  11. Shabnam said on September 3rd, 2009 at 1:21pm #

    Bozh:
    Palestine is given to Jewish colonists who have no connections with either Palestine or the region because of Rothschild family’s control over the British Empire to bring the resources of the region under the Jewish aristocracy’s control (Zionists) over long period of time. Please read the link I have provided earlier under this article. Nathan Rothschild told the world in 1815: {The British Empire is controlled by Rothschild family through supply of money.} Do you think he was lying?
    Today, however, many including Gore Vidal , believe that the 5th column, Jewish Lobby , runs foreign policy of the United States not to mention Walt and his co author, many from military elite who believe Israel exerts too much influence over US foreign policy. Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes:
    [Gates is a servant of Gen. David Petraeus’s “long war” mafia, a cabal that includes Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen, senior Iraq commander Gen. Ray Odierno and Gen. Stan McChrystal, our man in the Bananastans. That makes Gates a servant of the American neocons, whose objective since the ‘90s has been permanent U.S. occupation of the Middle East. It also makes him a tool of the Israeli right, whose objective is to sucker us into bullying their neighbors for them. During a recent trip to Israel, Gates said that U.S. overtures to Iran are not “open ended.” He gave the impression that he wheedled and begged enough during the visit to stay Israel’s hand for a little while longer. “Our hope still remains that Iran will respond to the president’s outstretched hand in a positive and constructive way,” Gates said, “but we’ll see.”]
    Jeff Huber believes US is putting Israeli’s interest ahead of American’s interest and paints Gates, the secretary of defense, as a puppet of Israel, “He gave the impression that he wheedled and begged enough during the visit to stay Israel’s hand for a LITTLE WHILE LONGER.”
    Why a retired Commander write these lines?
    On the other hand the Zionist racists and terrorist such as Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman says the following with great confidence:
    [Believe me; America accepts all our decisions,] Lieberman told the Russian daily Moskovskiy Komosolets.
    or
    [The Obama Administration will put forth new peace initiatives only if Israel wants it to, said Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman in his first comprehensive interview on foreign policy since taking office.
    Have you ever heart Canada or France repeats these kind of rubbish? Forget about Saudi Arabia where
    Has injected billions of dollars into the US economy but can no say the same or close to these lines which came out of Lieberman or Sharon’s mouth.

  12. KL5 said on September 3rd, 2009 at 1:41pm #

    There is much shabnamism and unobjective puppetism on this site. It is true that where there is money, there is influence. But there is no historical evidence that W. Churchill, the father of Isreal and Arab hater, was inspired or influenced by the Rothschild Family. So you may want to revise your puppetism.

  13. Shabnam said on September 3rd, 2009 at 2:01pm #

    Those puppet who do not even read the links I have provided is better to do so first. When Nathan Rothschild told the world that I do not care which fool is the head of state because I control the money supply to the empire, therefore, I control the British Empire was not thinking about few fools who may believe him or not.

  14. MEBOSA RITCHIE said on September 3rd, 2009 at 4:01pm #

    well not much has changed since i last posted.
    sorry,mary,they blocked me for a while
    presumably too dissident
    same jew hating stuff
    how this site can claim to be for left wing views when morons like shabnam post views very similar to the far right is beyond me

  15. KL5 said on September 4th, 2009 at 2:12am #

    “how this site can claim to be for left wing views when morons like shabnam post views very similar to the far right is beyond me”

    You should not confuse Shabnams’ rigid and far-fetched nonsense with your Zionism. Nonsense can be ignored, but Zionism must be rebuked. Your childish ‘flirting’ with Mary is an indication of your fear of mature reason.

  16. MEBOSA RITCHIE said on September 4th, 2009 at 7:46am #

    i now feel rebuked so i am going to give supporting zionism.i didn’t realise how bad it was until i read dissident voice.
    as for mary–well we go back a long way -to bournemouth in england—but that’s another story for another time

  17. bozh said on September 4th, 2009 at 8:50am #

    Almost all lands use the only language they understand: military might. And if israel wld attack iran, the attack wld have proved that the only language israel knows is use of violence and almost always criminally! tnx

  18. Mulga Mumblebrain said on September 4th, 2009 at 3:58pm #

    God-someone turned over the ‘mebosa’ stone in the Zionist mental graveyard. And it’s capitalised itself! The story folks is that the blood-crazed Zionazis have not finished the ‘Zionist Plan for the Middle East’, not by a long way. Sure they’ve had a jolly time obliterating Iraq, sending it back to the Dark Ages, assassinating its intellectual elites and setting their Western puppets against Afghanistan, Somalia and Pakistan. But there remains one great centre of Islamic resistance, Iran, that refuses to bow and scrape before the Judaic Herrenvolk. What is worse Iran supports Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shia resistance that blew apart the myth of the Israeli superman, twice, to Israel’s undying outrage.
    As we have seen over the decades Israel has taken a familiar path further and further to the racist and fascist Right. Zionism was cogently and presciently criticised by many Jews on just this basis, that Israel would become a colonial settler state like any other, based on the dispossession of an indigenous people, and exacerbating the worst chauvinistic and supremacist tendencies in Judaism. By now we know for certain that Judaic delusions of supremacy allied to familiar settler contempt for the indigenous, exacerbated by Judaic outrage and fury rooted in the Judeocide, have confected a witches’ brew of racism and fascism. The Israeli ruling elite, the military and intelligence services, increasingly dominated by religious fundamentalists, are a cohort of brutal, sadistic thugs, utterly contemptuous of international law, and determined to realise the Zionist project of an Eretz Yisrael of yet unkown extent. To do so requires destroying any Islamic resistance. Iran is next cab off the rank, being set up by the same lies and the same Zionist and ‘Sabbat Goy’ liars as prepared the world for the Holocaust in Iraq. Only thing is, Iran being more powerful, and not softened up by years of sanctions, will be a tougher nut to crack. But attempt to crack it they must-it’s in their blood, or should I say the blood of their victims. I’d say next February 28th will be a date to watch, it being Purim, the traditional date for Judaic ordained bloodbaths, celebrating, as it does, with macabre relish, the ancient Holocaust in Persia of Haman and his 70,000 odd ‘followers’. Curiously enough, that gigantic massacre was justified on the pretext of a ‘planned genocide’ against the Jews, for the authenticity of which we must rely on the testimony of the Jews, themselves, alone, a situation strangely reminiscent of today, where Judaic money-power and control of the Western media ensures that we are relentlessly brainwashed with Zionist lies and propaganda while the voice of the coming victims, in this case the Iranians, in 2002 the Iraqis, is totally suppressed. More evidence that history repeats itself, over one decade, and several hundred.

  19. mary said on September 4th, 2009 at 9:29pm #

    Mulga – Just for the record, I do not go back (or forwards) a long way with the aforementioned. He refers to a story on the Palestine Think Tank website about a crazee Orthodox Jewish woman who wanted the automatic communal lights in a block of flats in Bournemouth, where she had a second home, disconnected. The lights were disturbing her observance of the Sabbath! I happened to mention that I was brought up in Bournemouth and that is all. He is so ridiculous.

    We are told elsewhere on this site that the aforementioned has been to Israhell for a vacation (genning up on Hasbara more like) and in case his copy of the following has not been received yet, I am leaving a link here.

    The Israel Project’s Global Language Dictionary, all 116 pages on a pdf.
    http://auphr.org/docs/tip_report.pdf

    FROM THE ISRAEL PROJECT

    On behalf of our board and team, we offer this guide to visionary leaders who are on the front lines of fighting the media war for Israel. We want you to succeed in winning the hearts and minds of the public.

    We know that when you achieve your mission that you are helping both Israel and our global Jewish family. Thus, we offer these words with our sincerest wishes for your every success. May your words
    help bring peace and security to Israel and the Jewish people!

    Sincerely,

    Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi
    Founder & President

    (theisraelproject.org)

    PREFACE 3
    CHAPTER 1: 25 RULES FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION 4
    CHAPTER 2: A GLOSSARY OF WORDS THAT WORK 19
    CHAPTER 3: HOW TO TALK ABOUT PALESTINIAN SELF GOVERNMENT & PROSPERITY 21
    CHAPTER 4: ISOLATING IRAN-BACKED HAMAS AS AN OBSTACLE TO PEACE 33
    CHAPTER 5: THE LANGUAGE OF TACKLING A NUCLEAR IRAN 39
    CHAPTER 6: GAZA: ISRAEL’S RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE AND DEFENSIBLE BORDERS 45
    CHAPTER 7: PEACE: THE CENTRAL MESSAGE 59
    CHAPTER 8: SETTLEMENTS 62
    CHAPTER 9: JERUSALEM 65
    CHAPTER 10: LOAN GUARANTEES & MILITARY AID 67
    CHAPTER 11: THE SECURITY FENCE & CHECKPOINTS 69
    CHAPTER 12: THE RIGHT OF RETURN = THE RIGHT OF CONFISCATION 75
    CHAPTER 13: THE UNITED NATIONS 80
    CHAPTER 14: TALKING ABOUT ARAB-ISRAELIS 83
    CHAPTER 15: TALKING ABOUT CHILDREN AND THE CULTURE OF HATE 84
    CHAPTER 16: LESSONS TO LEARN FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA’S LANGUAGE 87
    CHAPTER 17: TALKING TO THE AMERICAN LEFT 90
    CHAPTER 18: ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COMMUNICATIONS 99
    APPENDIX I: THE TOUGHEST QUESTIONS 103
    APPENDIX II: THE HAMAS COVENANT 107
    APPENDIX III: IMPORTANT FACTS 108
    APPENDIX IV: POSTERS THAT WORK 112

  20. MEBOSA RITCHIE said on September 6th, 2009 at 4:14am #

    thanks mary,i missed this.
    i shall now now download it and read it immediately.
    as regards bournemouth you have obviously forgotten,or choose to forget.
    i don’t know what you’re going on about a woman in a block of flats????
    we go back a long way,a very long way,a very very long way

  21. MEBOSA RITCHIE said on September 6th, 2009 at 4:19am #

    mugla,
    good for you for remembering purim when the jews took revenge on the evil persians(iranians)
    they also took revenge against all their enemies near and far and when it happens again, as you know it will,you and your like will not be safe,even in australia.
    being a muslim isn’t going to save you

  22. Mulga Mumblebrain said on September 8th, 2009 at 7:52pm #

    Gosh, mebosa, are you threatening me? A word of advice-I’m no 13 year old girl, lying wounded, just waiting for a Judaic hero like mebosa to empty a clip of ammo into her body to ‘confirm ze kill’. And I’m not unprepared to fight back, just like Hezollah, and they’ve whacked your Chosen Arses twice. Come on, golem, I’m waiting.

  23. MEBOSA RITCHIE said on September 11th, 2009 at 7:56am #

    israel killed 1200 hezbollah fighters in 2006
    great victory for hezbollah
    nasrallah hid in a bunker in the bekkaa for 6 weeks
    not seen much of him since
    indeed a great victory for hezbollah
    bit like hamas’s great victory in gaza–they were waiting as well and got smashed
    for nasrallah read haniyah hiding in a bunker beneath a hospital
    such scum–big mouths;good at killing each other and blaming someone else

  24. Rehmat said on September 11th, 2009 at 2:51pm #

    “US has become the power to spell the death knell for the Iranian Revolution. The defeat of Iran has become the mean to deliver a double blow to the Arabs and Muslim psyche as well as to Islamist resistance (Hizb’Allah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, etc.). The Arabs would become docile, and the Middle East would sccumb like so many dominoes,” – William Kristol, a Jewish Lobby mouthpiece wrote in 2003.

    The Iran-Israel relations were so close under the Shah’s regime that King’s bodyguards, Iranian Army and country’s security services ( Sawak) – which killed thousands of Iranian civilians and anti-Shah political activist – were entirely trained by Israeli Mossad, Shin Bet and Israeli Army. Many of Sawak’s top offials were either Iranian Jews or Israeli officials. Even the organization’s head at the time of Islamic Revolution (1979) was an Israeli military officer who escaped to Israel. Iran also helped Iraqi Jews (130,000) to migrate to the Zionist entity. Mossad used Sawak agents to incite Kurdish revolt against Baghdad. There were great monetary benefits for the Zionists in Iran-Israel friendship. Iran supplied 80% of Israel’s oil needs at lower price than the market price. Iran also invested US$1.2 billion in Israeli arms industry (code name ‘Tzur’) in 1975. After 1967 war, Zionist prime minister, Levi Eshkol, and Reza Shah Pahlavi agreed to set-up a joint oil venture, known as Trans-Asiatic Oil. In its heyday, Trans-Asiatic was an economic empire with a turn-over of billions of dollars. After 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iranian National Oil Company stopped selling oil to Trans-Asiatic, killing the Zionist hen which laid golden eggs. Zionist regime still refuses to pay Iranian share of the hundreds of millions of dollars (based on 1979 value) stolen from the joint account. Similarly, the US has stolen more than US$28 billion from Iranian banking assests…….

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/iranian-journey-from-an-ally-to-israels-enemy-no-1/