Comments on: Nuclear Agency Demanding Iranian Missile Blueprints

By: Danny Ray

Danny Ray — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:32:08 +0000

Rosemary, I agree with you wholeheartedly any one who would use Nuclear bombs on people should never be allowed to make policy to any one.

Boy, I sure am glad that the bombs we used of those Japs were just Atomic.

By: rosemarie jackowski

rosemarie jackowski — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:03:05 +0000

Any nation that has used nuclear bombs to kill innocent civilians has no moral authority to dictate what any other nation’s nuclear policy is.

By: billrowe

billrowe — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:53:36 +0000

Iran is right to continue “giving the middle finger” to Israel and US illegal, hypocritical allegations and demands….

By: Shabnam

Shabnam — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:09:32 +0000

Parviz Meshkatian, an Iranian musician and composer, died of a heart attack in Tehran on 21 september 2009 at the age of 54.

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/meshkatian210909.html

By: Shabnam

Shabnam — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:40:56 +0000

The world is fed up with the Israelis’ war machine, even the American Empire. No one can tolerate Israelis’ crimes against humanity including Palestinian genocide anymore. No one can stay silent in the face of daily destruction of Palestinian houses and erection of illegal ‘jewish’ settlement on top of that. No one can stay silent on crimes of Zionism any more except the closet Zionists who present the crime of ‘Jewish State’ as ‘the US imperialism’ policy so they can keep the ball on imperialist’s land longer to divert attention from zionist expansionist policy to erect ‘the greater Israel.’
———————–
Zbig Brzezinski: Obama Administration Should Tell Israel U.S. Will Attack Israeli Jets if They Try to Attack Iran

The national security adviser for former President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, gave an interview to The Daily Beast in which he suggested President Obama should make it clear to Israel that if they attempt to attack Iran’s nuclear weapons sites the U.S. Air Force will stop them.

“We are not exactly impotent little babies,” Brzezinski said. “They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch? … We have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a ‘Liberty’ in reverse.”

The USS Liberty was a U.S. Navy technical research ship that the Israeli Air Force mistakenly attacked during the Six Day War in 1967.

Brzezinski endorsed then-Sen. Obama’s presidential campaign in August 2007, which at the time was portrayed in the media as a boost to Obama’s foreign policy cred. The Washington Post reported: “Barack Obama, combating the perception that he is too young and inexperienced to handle a dangerous world, got a boost yesterday from a paragon of foreign policy eminence, Zbigniew Brzezinski.”

Brzezinski was never an official campaign adviser, but Republicans jumped on the endorsement to push the meme that Obama wouldn’t be a friend to Israel, as Brzezinski’s views of Israel attracted criticism from some quarters in the American Jewish community.

“Brzezinski is not an adviser to the campaign,” former Ambassador Dennis Ross, then a senior adviser on Middle East affairs to the Obama campaign, said at the time. “There is a lot of disinformation that is being pushed, but he is not an adviser to the campaign. Brzezinski came out and supported Obama early because of the war in Iraq. A year or so ago they talked a couple of times. That’s the extent of it, and Sen. Obama has made it clear that on other Middle Eastern issues, Brzezinski is not who he looks to. They don’t have the same views.”
Brzezinski’s comments come within the same week that the White House distanced itself from comments made by former President Carter, who said he thinks “an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man.”

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1115891.html

By: Shabnam

Shabnam — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:42:39 +0000

A new WorldPublicOpinion.org poll of Iranians finds that six in 10 favor restoration of diplomatic relations between their country and the United States, a stance that is directly at odds with the position the Iranian government has held for three decades. A similar number favor direct talks.

However, Iranians do not appear to share the international infatuation with Barack Obama. Only 16 percent say that have confidence in him to do the right thing in world affairs. This is lower than any of the 20 countries polled by WPO on this question in the spring. Despite his recent speech in Cairo, where Obama stressed that he respects Islam, only a quarter of Iranians are convinced he does. And three in four (77%) continue to have an unfavorable view of the United States government.

“While the majority of Iranian people are ready to do business with Obama, they show little trust in him,” says Steven Kull, director of WPO.

http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafricara/639.php?nid=&id=&pnt=639&lb=

By: Shabnam

Shabnam — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:52:18 +0000

Despite persistent mass demonstrations protesting June’s disputed reelection of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a new survey of Iranian public opinion released here Saturday suggests majority domestic support for both him and the country’s basic governing institutions.

Four out of five of the 1,003 Iranian respondents interviewed in the survey released by WorldPublicOpinion.org (WPO), a project of the highly respected Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) of the University of Maryland, said they considered Ahmadinejad to be the legitimate president of Iran.
Sixty-two percent of respondents said they had “a lot of confidence” in the declared election results, which gave Ahmadinejad 62.6 percent of the vote within hours of the polls’ closing Jun. 12 and which were swiftly endorsed by the Islamic Republic’s Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Three of four respondents said Khamenei had reacted correctly in his endorsement.

http://original.antiwar.com/lobe/2009/09/19/new-poll-finds-strong-domestic-support-for-iran-regime/

By: Annie Ladysmith

Annie Ladysmith — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:30:02 +0000

US NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY?? What security do you need when you own space and can take out a target anywhere on the earth.They have deflective magnetic resonance shields that go horizontal AND verticle. What possible security is needed?? It is the rest of the world that needs security! AND HERE WE GO AGAIN, WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, PLUTONIUM LIE,LIE,LIE. They are set on turning Iran into the churning blood, guts, DU, rape and torture that is now Iraq, a country disabled and then left to die in the stew the US created. All i have is my Prayer, and i am praying night and day that the Most High God will protect the Persian people, they will have done nothing to warrant being slaughtered, and if you agree with military intervention in Iran you should find your controler and incapacitate it, and get some therapy to bring you into reality, it is possible that you can get your mind back, others have, please listen to sanity and compassion.

By: bozh

bozh — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:50:25 +0000

A good thing is that iranian missiles won’t be missiling kids of afpak. Iranian missiles may hit israel, if israel attacks iran.
And, of course, some israeli children may be killed/maimed.
Right to bear arms, and especially the ones one’s avowed and rabid enemy has, is a universal while attacking a land for any reason is not.

The only language israel understands is iranian capabilities to seriously hurt it.
No other language will force israel to behave peacefully towards iran or pal’ns. tnx