<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ElBaradei Foes Leak Stories to Force His Hand on Iran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/elbaradei-foes-leak-stories-to-force-his-hand-on-iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/elbaradei-foes-leak-stories-to-force-his-hand-on-iran/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/elbaradei-foes-leak-stories-to-force-his-hand-on-iran/#comment-53009</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10099#comment-53009</guid>
		<description>Having just &quot;planted&quot; a story claiming fraud in the Afghan election, Gareth Porter now &quot;plants&quot; a story hostile to Iran. I knew this election fraud thing was in fact directed at Iran!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just &#8220;planted&#8221; a story claiming fraud in the Afghan election, Gareth Porter now &#8220;plants&#8221; a story hostile to Iran. I knew this election fraud thing was in fact directed at Iran!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hass</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/elbaradei-foes-leak-stories-to-force-his-hand-on-iran/#comment-53008</link>
		<dc:creator>hass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10099#comment-53008</guid>
		<description>Iran&#039;s consideration of the IAEA request for more cameras does not constitute &quot;stonewalling&quot; -- Iran was under no legal obligation to allow more cameras at all anyway.

And how is Iran supposed to refute documents that it is not allowed to see?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran&#8217;s consideration of the IAEA request for more cameras does not constitute &#8220;stonewalling&#8221; &#8212; Iran was under no legal obligation to allow more cameras at all anyway.</p>
<p>And how is Iran supposed to refute documents that it is not allowed to see?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

