<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Hit Men and the Next Drowning of New Orleans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrimper</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-56381</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrimper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-56381</guid>
		<description>This is a most interesting piece.
One of the big experts investigating the wake of Katrian was Bob Bea of U C Berkeley. He was Shell Oil&#039;s top engineer in the Gulf, before he floated out to U C  Berkeley. His first engineering  job  was working for the Corps of Engineers.
One of the hit job slants on van Heederen is he is not a design engineer.
However, nobody disputed van Heddeern&#039;s modeling on the major surges of water from storms, his excleent work in that area.
The forces that produces on man made structures..
I now see all the Shell Oil platforms laid waste by CAINS, and Bea giving his spin on risk assessments.(in some engineering articles).
Bea&#039;s colleague at U C Berkeley wrote a long letter framed as a complaint against the major Engineering Association in America, and blasting it on coverups. He actually used the word &quot;murder&quot; in hs long letter( Letter of  Dr Ray Seed). Google it up, he ended his letter with it may get in untrustworthy hands like some CLUB  thing, he was doodling with.
Nothing came of Seed&#039;s ethics compalint, it was just laughted off by the big honcho&#039;s in the Engineering Society.
Some focusing soley on soil dynamics, some focusing on sheet piling, none of that goes to the bigger picture.
Here is a question for Greg, or AMERICA @ Large: how many billions did Shell Oil wire off to its offshore accounts from the Gulf Production, (out in the coast off from New O), while the Bush/ Cheney Administration put the kabosh on MMS collection vast  royalites, while a vast scandal was going on in the Dept of Interior, as now the ex Bush Secretary of Interior is now under investigation for criminal deeds(alleged), it is still under investigation. She went to work for Shell Oil, after leaving  the Bush Administration.
Greg you need a part 3, 4, 5, 6 there is so much here of unplowed ground, still to uncover...................................................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a most interesting piece.<br />
One of the big experts investigating the wake of Katrian was Bob Bea of U C Berkeley. He was Shell Oil&#8217;s top engineer in the Gulf, before he floated out to U C  Berkeley. His first engineering  job  was working for the Corps of Engineers.<br />
One of the hit job slants on van Heederen is he is not a design engineer.<br />
However, nobody disputed van Heddeern&#8217;s modeling on the major surges of water from storms, his excleent work in that area.<br />
The forces that produces on man made structures..<br />
I now see all the Shell Oil platforms laid waste by CAINS, and Bea giving his spin on risk assessments.(in some engineering articles).<br />
Bea&#8217;s colleague at U C Berkeley wrote a long letter framed as a complaint against the major Engineering Association in America, and blasting it on coverups. He actually used the word &#8220;murder&#8221; in hs long letter( Letter of  Dr Ray Seed). Google it up, he ended his letter with it may get in untrustworthy hands like some CLUB  thing, he was doodling with.<br />
Nothing came of Seed&#8217;s ethics compalint, it was just laughted off by the big honcho&#8217;s in the Engineering Society.<br />
Some focusing soley on soil dynamics, some focusing on sheet piling, none of that goes to the bigger picture.<br />
Here is a question for Greg, or AMERICA @ Large: how many billions did Shell Oil wire off to its offshore accounts from the Gulf Production, (out in the coast off from New O), while the Bush/ Cheney Administration put the kabosh on MMS collection vast  royalites, while a vast scandal was going on in the Dept of Interior, as now the ex Bush Secretary of Interior is now under investigation for criminal deeds(alleged), it is still under investigation. She went to work for Shell Oil, after leaving  the Bush Administration.<br />
Greg you need a part 3, 4, 5, 6 there is so much here of unplowed ground, still to uncover&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-56354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-56354</guid>
		<description>Brownie, the Colorado ex horse judge, had nothing to do with levees, or floodgates. FEMA had nada to do with constructing any levees in N O. B99 is all wet whipping the Brownie horse.  He might make more hay by asking: what is the purpose of a floodgate, a different animal than a levee. Ergo: floodgates not in pre August 2005, contrasting, put in post 2005, after Katrina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brownie, the Colorado ex horse judge, had nothing to do with levees, or floodgates. FEMA had nada to do with constructing any levees in N O. B99 is all wet whipping the Brownie horse.  He might make more hay by asking: what is the purpose of a floodgate, a different animal than a levee. Ergo: floodgates not in pre August 2005, contrasting, put in post 2005, after Katrina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-56350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-56350</guid>
		<description>My town won&#039;t be next, or will most places in America. The local levee boards used political influence to stop the floodgates being construted, that would have stopped surging waters going up the canals That happened in the 1990&#039;s, &amp; some in New Orleans are still trying to cover that up today, some with connections to ACORN. Igor got the shaft, a raw deal LSU wants lots of federal booty. It is prostituting itself. Greg is correct on that, and the Corps in D C are hit men, but they operated with influence peddlers from La I have seen first hand how corrupt the Corps is in D C, it is so bad Greg only skimmed the surface, but he is on the right tract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My town won&#8217;t be next, or will most places in America. The local levee boards used political influence to stop the floodgates being construted, that would have stopped surging waters going up the canals That happened in the 1990&#8242;s, &amp; some in New Orleans are still trying to cover that up today, some with connections to ACORN. Igor got the shaft, a raw deal LSU wants lots of federal booty. It is prostituting itself. Greg is correct on that, and the Corps in D C are hit men, but they operated with influence peddlers from La I have seen first hand how corrupt the Corps is in D C, it is so bad Greg only skimmed the surface, but he is on the right tract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53512</link>
		<dc:creator>b99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53512</guid>
		<description>Bob - The actual levee height is secondary to knowing how secure they are.  The Army Corps did a poor job in construction, the Feds did a lousy job of allocation of funds, the feds and local gov&#039;ts did a lousy job of looking out for our citizenry.  The almost certainty of such a disaster was predicted well in advance, and as the storm bore down on the Gulf Coast NOAA chief sat with Bush Administration.  They went golfing and shopping and the local officials turned to god or something.  The Bushies withheld info in the hopes that the storm would not hit New Orleans and  thus spare themselves embarrassment.  The storm cooperated but the patient died from complications. And why would it be ludicrous for Bushies to conspire?  Remember, this is a group that appointed a crony - a friendly horse judge, to head up the operation.

This is no dead horse.  Nor should it be.  If lessons are not learned, your town may be next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; The actual levee height is secondary to knowing how secure they are.  The Army Corps did a poor job in construction, the Feds did a lousy job of allocation of funds, the feds and local gov&#8217;ts did a lousy job of looking out for our citizenry.  The almost certainty of such a disaster was predicted well in advance, and as the storm bore down on the Gulf Coast NOAA chief sat with Bush Administration.  They went golfing and shopping and the local officials turned to god or something.  The Bushies withheld info in the hopes that the storm would not hit New Orleans and  thus spare themselves embarrassment.  The storm cooperated but the patient died from complications. And why would it be ludicrous for Bushies to conspire?  Remember, this is a group that appointed a crony &#8211; a friendly horse judge, to head up the operation.</p>
<p>This is no dead horse.  Nor should it be.  If lessons are not learned, your town may be next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53511</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53511</guid>
		<description>Good morning All:

b99, that storm dumped up 15 inches of rain in areas north of New Orleans, all that rain flowed into the lakes and canals. It had to go somewhere. How high do we build the levees to withstand that type of storm? Maybe it would be cheaper to raze most of New Orleans and relocate many of the inhabitants to other areas. Just a thought. Besides I&#039;ll bet that van Heerden keeps his job, his contract expires next year, and he&#039;s appealing it&#039;s non-renewal. From what I&#039;ve read, he got involved in office politics, and offended a couple of the bosses. They retaliated, like the children they are, and fired him. Why? Because they can. If he did predict the topping of the levees before the storm I commend him, but to say in the article that the Bush administration was conspiring to withhold vital information from local authorities is ludicrous. Time to go beat a new dead horse. Have a great labor day weekend. Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning All:</p>
<p>b99, that storm dumped up 15 inches of rain in areas north of New Orleans, all that rain flowed into the lakes and canals. It had to go somewhere. How high do we build the levees to withstand that type of storm? Maybe it would be cheaper to raze most of New Orleans and relocate many of the inhabitants to other areas. Just a thought. Besides I&#8217;ll bet that van Heerden keeps his job, his contract expires next year, and he&#8217;s appealing it&#8217;s non-renewal. From what I&#8217;ve read, he got involved in office politics, and offended a couple of the bosses. They retaliated, like the children they are, and fired him. Why? Because they can. If he did predict the topping of the levees before the storm I commend him, but to say in the article that the Bush administration was conspiring to withhold vital information from local authorities is ludicrous. Time to go beat a new dead horse. Have a great labor day weekend. Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53449</link>
		<dc:creator>b99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53449</guid>
		<description>Bob - So you are validating Palast&#039;s point that van Heerden&#039;s warning that the levees could not hold went unheeded.  Storm surge certainly went up the canals - and if the surge did not effect Ponchartrain the lake certainly overflowed from rain. Either way....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; So you are validating Palast&#8217;s point that van Heerden&#8217;s warning that the levees could not hold went unheeded.  Storm surge certainly went up the canals &#8211; and if the surge did not effect Ponchartrain the lake certainly overflowed from rain. Either way&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53447</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53447</guid>
		<description>Hi all:
b99; Power lines get taken out by storms all the time, for example by falling branches, or up rooted trees. that is called minimal damage. It doesn&#039;t take out the entire grid, it knock parts of it out, which may effect thousands of customers. Happens every year in the Midwest. Flooding on the other hand, knocks out substations, and requires the power grid to be shut down due to safety concerns.

Frances; The storm surge did most of its damage on the coast of Mississippi, it was mostly the water from lake Ponchartrain, which lies directly north of the city that did the damage in New Orleans. Check it out, the London Street canal 17th Street canal come to mind, and remember the first reports and video of the downtown area of New Orleans were quite positive, they had dodged the bullet. People were videoed walking around the streets downtown, there was damage and debris, but nothing like what happened on the Mississippi coast, which razed nearly everything in its path. That didn&#039;t happen in New Orleans.

Have a great day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all:<br />
b99; Power lines get taken out by storms all the time, for example by falling branches, or up rooted trees. that is called minimal damage. It doesn&#8217;t take out the entire grid, it knock parts of it out, which may effect thousands of customers. Happens every year in the Midwest. Flooding on the other hand, knocks out substations, and requires the power grid to be shut down due to safety concerns.</p>
<p>Frances; The storm surge did most of its damage on the coast of Mississippi, it was mostly the water from lake Ponchartrain, which lies directly north of the city that did the damage in New Orleans. Check it out, the London Street canal 17th Street canal come to mind, and remember the first reports and video of the downtown area of New Orleans were quite positive, they had dodged the bullet. People were videoed walking around the streets downtown, there was damage and debris, but nothing like what happened on the Mississippi coast, which razed nearly everything in its path. That didn&#8217;t happen in New Orleans.</p>
<p>Have a great day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53421</link>
		<dc:creator>B99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53421</guid>
		<description>And of course, Frances, almost all the autos in the wealthier neighborhoods were insured - so autos left behind were covered.  In the L9W and other neighborhoods, many did not have cars - nor gas money.  They have not come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, Frances, almost all the autos in the wealthier neighborhoods were insured &#8211; so autos left behind were covered.  In the L9W and other neighborhoods, many did not have cars &#8211; nor gas money.  They have not come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frances</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53419</link>
		<dc:creator>Frances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53419</guid>
		<description>Bob said:
&quot;the damage was caused by the flooding, do to the levees being topped in several areas and collapsing in a couple of others&quot;
Absolutely True ! 
Bob also said:  &quot;All being caused by the heavy rain falling and filling into the large lakes north of the city&quot;
Absolutely Not True !    The hurricane generated a huge storm surge (high tide) that came roaring in from the Gulf.  Which was totally expected by the way.  
 
In part one Greg Palast says:
The professor was already in trouble for saying, publicly, that the levees around New Orleans were no good, too short, by 18″. They couldn’t stand up to a storm like Katrina. He said it months before Katrina hit – in a call to the White House, and later in the press.&quot;

Ivor&#039;s dept at LSU also ran Storm Surge Computer models to show what he knew would happen.   Those models showed the overtopping of the levees that were too low.   The area where the levees were too low were in POOR neighborhoods like the 9th ward.     The people in well to do NOLA neighborhoods knew this  . . and most were not concerned . . and of course they all left in their vehicles.  

What those people did NOT expect was that the the levees in better neighborhoods would collapse  due to bad engineering .   Water exerts a huge pressure which levees that high can only withstand if they are built properly.  Which they were NOT.   It was those levee failures that lead to the flooding of areas of NOLA that were unexpected like Lakeview, etc. etc. 

I live in SF Bay Area and I was not surprised because I read before Katrina hit about a lawsuit  where the Army Corps had knowingly allowed incompetant construction.  

It is all  about politics, power and money,  lies, and lack of ethics.  That is why it happened and things like that will continue to happen in this country.  Sad but true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob said:<br />
&#8220;the damage was caused by the flooding, do to the levees being topped in several areas and collapsing in a couple of others&#8221;<br />
Absolutely True !<br />
Bob also said:  &#8220;All being caused by the heavy rain falling and filling into the large lakes north of the city&#8221;<br />
Absolutely Not True !    The hurricane generated a huge storm surge (high tide) that came roaring in from the Gulf.  Which was totally expected by the way.  </p>
<p>In part one Greg Palast says:<br />
The professor was already in trouble for saying, publicly, that the levees around New Orleans were no good, too short, by 18″. They couldn’t stand up to a storm like Katrina. He said it months before Katrina hit – in a call to the White House, and later in the press.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ivor&#8217;s dept at LSU also ran Storm Surge Computer models to show what he knew would happen.   Those models showed the overtopping of the levees that were too low.   The area where the levees were too low were in POOR neighborhoods like the 9th ward.     The people in well to do NOLA neighborhoods knew this  . . and most were not concerned . . and of course they all left in their vehicles.  </p>
<p>What those people did NOT expect was that the the levees in better neighborhoods would collapse  due to bad engineering .   Water exerts a huge pressure which levees that high can only withstand if they are built properly.  Which they were NOT.   It was those levee failures that lead to the flooding of areas of NOLA that were unexpected like Lakeview, etc. etc. </p>
<p>I live in SF Bay Area and I was not surprised because I read before Katrina hit about a lawsuit  where the Army Corps had knowingly allowed incompetant construction.  </p>
<p>It is all  about politics, power and money,  lies, and lack of ethics.  That is why it happened and things like that will continue to happen in this country.  Sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53404</link>
		<dc:creator>b99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53404</guid>
		<description>Bob - You say wind damage was minimal yet admit it knocked out the power grid.  

There are no unrelated problems in a disaster.

The White House  had been advised by the head of NOAA that Katrina had the potential to do grave damage to New Orleans and environs.  The Feds also knew that the levees had been breached in the wee hours but alerted no one.  Not a shining moment for the Bush Administration.  

The principal victims of Katrina were the aged.  No one looks out for the aged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; You say wind damage was minimal yet admit it knocked out the power grid.  </p>
<p>There are no unrelated problems in a disaster.</p>
<p>The White House  had been advised by the head of NOAA that Katrina had the potential to do grave damage to New Orleans and environs.  The Feds also knew that the levees had been breached in the wee hours but alerted no one.  Not a shining moment for the Bush Administration.  </p>
<p>The principal victims of Katrina were the aged.  No one looks out for the aged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Geezer Pilot</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53378</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Geezer Pilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53378</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a saying that Louisiana politicians are more crooked than the Mississippi. Federal money has been pouring into NOLA for a half century, ostensibly to repair and maintain the levees and locks. Let us not forget that lake Ponchartrain is 10 feet ABOVE sea level; lose a single retaining wall and you have the lake in your living room.

Did the duly elected officials spend that money wisely? Nah. They used it to build boat docks for themselves, or funneled it to other &quot;needy projects&quot;.

I&#039;m sure BigOil has degraded the protection from the delta, but let&#039;s not forget that NOLA was not drowned by a storm - it was drowned by Lake Ponchartrain after WWII era protection devices failed for lack of care and maintenance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a saying that Louisiana politicians are more crooked than the Mississippi. Federal money has been pouring into NOLA for a half century, ostensibly to repair and maintain the levees and locks. Let us not forget that lake Ponchartrain is 10 feet ABOVE sea level; lose a single retaining wall and you have the lake in your living room.</p>
<p>Did the duly elected officials spend that money wisely? Nah. They used it to build boat docks for themselves, or funneled it to other &#8220;needy projects&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure BigOil has degraded the protection from the delta, but let&#8217;s not forget that NOLA was not drowned by a storm &#8211; it was drowned by Lake Ponchartrain after WWII era protection devices failed for lack of care and maintenance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53375</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53375</guid>
		<description>The article although well written, it reads like a spy thriller, but doesn&#039;t make any sense. How is it that no local authorities had any idea the levees would collapse? Are we to believe they are that stupid? If that was so why evacuate at all? Most would have just stayed put and road out the storm, instead of picking up and leaving. The wind damage in New Orleans was minimal, in fact I read a story of  two women from my area that road out the storm in a downtown hotel room. It wasn&#039;t fun but they survived unscathed. Nearly all the damage was caused by the flooding, do to the levees being topped in several areas and collapsing in a couple of others(at least that&#039;s what the weather channel claims). All being caused by the heavy rain falling and filling into the large lakes north of the city. Adding to the problem , a portion of the power grid was  down due to wind, this knocked out the pumping system. With the effects of unrelated problems adding up, you get a disaster, in one area of New Orleans. it had nothing to do with the coast areas, which are south of the city. The storm surge didn&#039;t cause any damage in the city, at least not like it did in parts of Mississippi.  Where it wiped out whole parts of the coast line. I guess I go back to my original thought, it reads like a thriller, with intrigue and conspiracy, but not really the way things happened. Have a great day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article although well written, it reads like a spy thriller, but doesn&#8217;t make any sense. How is it that no local authorities had any idea the levees would collapse? Are we to believe they are that stupid? If that was so why evacuate at all? Most would have just stayed put and road out the storm, instead of picking up and leaving. The wind damage in New Orleans was minimal, in fact I read a story of  two women from my area that road out the storm in a downtown hotel room. It wasn&#8217;t fun but they survived unscathed. Nearly all the damage was caused by the flooding, do to the levees being topped in several areas and collapsing in a couple of others(at least that&#8217;s what the weather channel claims). All being caused by the heavy rain falling and filling into the large lakes north of the city. Adding to the problem , a portion of the power grid was  down due to wind, this knocked out the pumping system. With the effects of unrelated problems adding up, you get a disaster, in one area of New Orleans. it had nothing to do with the coast areas, which are south of the city. The storm surge didn&#8217;t cause any damage in the city, at least not like it did in parts of Mississippi.  Where it wiped out whole parts of the coast line. I guess I go back to my original thought, it reads like a thriller, with intrigue and conspiracy, but not really the way things happened. Have a great day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frances</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53191</link>
		<dc:creator>Frances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53191</guid>
		<description>Thanks Greg, 

Great stuff as usual.  I live behind a levee in SF Bay area and became obsessed with watching hurricane related scientific and news related info on the internet before, during and after Katrina.   

Ivor&#039;s honesty and expertise was immediately obvious to me and I watched his computer model run before Katrina hit and felt like I was there.   So sad about the kabosh on the computer model.  It was a fantastic technological tool that set an example for what could be done in other places . . including right here in SF Bay where sea level rise is going to be a huge issue for development allowed on filled wetlands.

Ivor&#039;s post Katrina investigation with UC Berkeley scientists put the lid on Army Corps/ government lies.    He is my number one hero &#039;cause he is such a stubbornly honest and ethical dutchman ! (Yes I know he is from S Africa, but he has those stubborn dutchman genes :&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Greg, </p>
<p>Great stuff as usual.  I live behind a levee in SF Bay area and became obsessed with watching hurricane related scientific and news related info on the internet before, during and after Katrina.   </p>
<p>Ivor&#8217;s honesty and expertise was immediately obvious to me and I watched his computer model run before Katrina hit and felt like I was there.   So sad about the kabosh on the computer model.  It was a fantastic technological tool that set an example for what could be done in other places . . including right here in SF Bay where sea level rise is going to be a huge issue for development allowed on filled wetlands.</p>
<p>Ivor&#8217;s post Katrina investigation with UC Berkeley scientists put the lid on Army Corps/ government lies.    He is my number one hero &#8217;cause he is such a stubbornly honest and ethical dutchman ! (Yes I know he is from S Africa, but he has those stubborn dutchman genes :&gt;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/08/economic-hit-men-and-the-next-drowning-of-new-orleans/#comment-53175</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=10147#comment-53175</guid>
		<description>It is Army Corps, not Army Corp.  The &quot;s&quot; is silent, but part of the word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is Army Corps, not Army Corp.  The &#8220;s&#8221; is silent, but part of the word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

