What is good for the Goose… My I suggest you do the same then.

You ask for evidence, and show not a single bit of proof to your accusations of criminal acts by thousands of your fellow Americans, out side of you own amble ignorance of how a controlled demolition is done and a few youtube links, you are sad indeed.

‘People who design the look of fast food restaurants (Richard Gage) are not impressive experts’

i suggest you review what they have designed…BUT wait a minute…what have U desiged, dave? Nothing! You may lack integrity and perception, but your a genius when it comes to chutzpah!

Thanks for putting yourself outside the debate! Come back when youve designed even a dog house!

‘And yet I and the rest of the debunkers are smarter and a better man than you and the rest of the truther loons will ever be’

You may like to puff yourself up little man, but,as above,you keep pricking self-esteem…what have u designed or even done thats intellectually memorable?

‘Going through life as a gullible boob is nothing to proud of’

I agree…pity you cant help exemplifying that!

‘Big problem thermite is useless for cutting steel even on a small scale’

youre wasting your 10 watt intellectual power by not backing it with some evidence…Dave…

These dopes thought they would build a TRUTH sign out of steel and use thermite to cut it apart at burning man. Never mind the fact destroying “TRUTH” is rather poor symbolism.

Big problem thermite is useless for cutting steel even on a small scale. Try as the may they could NOT figure out a way or find anyone who could cut vertical beams with the stuff. All they could do is set off 70lbs of thermite on a small piece of steel, and it’s not even clear they cut that.

Needless to say the TRUTH still stands, controlled demolitions with thermite is unworkable. that is the truth. But it was good for a laugh none the less.

And exactly how many of these “Architects” have done something as complex as do the structural engineering of a building over 10 stories? ZERO. You do know architects merely design how buildings look not the important structural work. People who design the look of fast food restaurants (Richard Gage) are not impressive experts.

Brian, how much thermite do you think it would take to cut even a single column in the WTC? I know, because I studied the subject and if you did to, you would realize what a joke the thermite scam is. But than I know more that you on the subject.

cant you get anything right,Dave? What a pussy!

And yet I and the rest of the debunkers are smarter and a better man than you and the rest of the truther loons will ever be. And that is the point, truthers as people are rather dumb, easily fooled and seem to proud of how little they know. Pretending they are heros for truth is a way to fill their useless lives. I have yet to find a truly smart one.

Going through life as a gullible boob is nothing to proud of, and 20 year from now I can say I told you so.

hes gotten most of it right…But then youd need to actually review his work to understand this.

‘It’s not like Jones has designed or built a skyscraper, Funny how the people who do see NOTHING unusual about the collapse, ‘

funny how youve never heard of AE9-11:

http://www.ae911truth.org/
many of whoes members are architects…
AND when did u last design a skyscraper….or anything?

‘The kind of people who believe these conspiracy theories are by their very nature fancy prone types. ‘

very scientific,dave.

‘He has to push the imagined Nano Thermite thing because the use debunkers quickly pointed out how unworkable the thermite idea was’

really, dave? I dont see you posting evidence of how unworkable it is…

cant you get anything right,Dave? What a pussy!

It’s not like Jones has designed or built a skyscraper, Funny how the people who do see NOTHING unusual about the collapse,

The kind of people who believe these conspiracy theories are by their very nature fancy prone types. Be it nature or nurture a certain percentage of people are ripe to be suckers. And it come as no surprise truthers do have a propensity to buy into other loony ideas. Just look at the chemtrail kooks, Fake moon landing people.

Could have been a good thing in the old days to have lots of people blindly following the dogma of the group, you sure did not want a bunch of debunkers telling you, how full of crap your were.

right, dave…unorthodox ideas are usually an embassement to orthodox educational establishments…

‘Found iron Oxide (aka Rust) and Aluminum Oxide (aluminum dust) at ground zero, where a huge building made of rusting steel and which was clad in aluminum! WHAT A GENIUS!’

he did what you havent done:analysed the evidence…

‘Interpreted archaeological evidence from the ancient Mayans as supporting his faith’s belief that Jesus Christ visited America! Can you say KOOK?’

Isaac Newton was into alchemy and biblical phrophecies…Jones is in good company!

‘In addition to his scientific work (Newton would have said as a part of his scientific work), he devoted a substantial portion of his enormous energy to the study of the Bible and Biblical texts and history. He read the Bible daily throughout his life and wrote over a million words of notes regarding his study of it.

Isaac Newton believed that the Bible is literally true in every respect. Throughout his life, he continually tested Biblical truth against the physical truths of experimental and theoretical science. He never observed a contradiction. In fact, he viewed his own scientific work as a method by which to reinforce belief in Biblical truth.’
http://www.reformation.org/newton.html

The man was relieved of his teaching duties and placed on “paid leave” from Brigham Young University. He was an embarrassment to a school of higher learning.

Found iron Oxide (aka Rust) and Aluminum Oxide (aluminum dust) at ground zero, where a huge building made of rusting steel and which was clad in aluminum! WHAT A GENIUS!

Got caught in the cold fusion scam.

Interpreted archaeological evidence from the ancient Mayans as supporting his faith’s belief that Jesus Christ visited America! Can you say KOOK?

Is that the best you can come up with?

Because I read books and have a deeper understanding of physics and the science of the collapse I am better able to tell fact from made up fiction. It’s called being SMART, You see if you are smart you are harder to sucker and less likely to buy conspiracy hoaxes.

————————

And presumably you think you are the only one who has “read book and have a deeper understanding of Physics”, yes? For you information, Steve Jones was a tenured Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University and his understanding of the subject is certainly much deeper than yours. In fact, judging form your posts, the only thing I can say about you is that you are a liar and a waste of space!

http://killtown.911review.org/wtc7/videos.html

wtc7 collapse timed:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4635067417438764798

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM
comparisons:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FzxcKoOVUg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5UM9q7cj7I&feature=fvw

and it doesnt take 13 seconds!

more…at 3.40 on this video, we see another known CD…same rate of collapse as WTC7
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4556787288866368337

shows fires on two floors in wtc7…thats all…not thr raging inferno you lead us to believe

‘WHY!!!! Why would the people who were going to do a “controlled demolition” on WTC7 tell reporters ahead of time that the building was going to be destroyed. Would it not cause suspicion? What was to be gained?’

this is speculation…which comes from a habit of theorising….lets wait till we have found \the terrorists,…then they can be questioned…

Here is a little critical thinking test for anyone who buys this BBC hoax.

WHY!!!! Why would the people who were going to do a “controlled demolition” on WTC7 tell reporters ahead of time that the building was going to be destroyed. Would it not cause suspicion? What was to be gained?

You see if you would believe this idea, you would also believe emails from strange Nigerians with lots of money to give away are real. I am sorry but this is just jaw dropping stupid.

here are some videos,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLHwvwJCmgk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8

‘Because I read books and have a deeper understanding of physics and the science of the collapse I am better able to tell fact from made up fiction’

try to view the facts, dave, not the theory….see my posts above

Did you read the testimonies of the people who were there?
Big fires, Gaping 20 story hole in the South face, Creaking, a budge in one side of WTC7. The FDNY saw this and reported it to everyone who was there, so the BBC knew as well.’

what big fires dave?…theres no sign of a 20 story hole…just one in a corner….why didnt building topple in direction of hole?

‘For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people.
He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.
He gave us information that helped uncover al-Qaida cells’ efforts to obtain biological weapons.
We’ve also learned information from the CIA program that has helped stop other plots, including attacks on the U.S. Marine base in East Africa, our American consulate in Pakistan, or Britain’s Heathrow Airport.
This program has been one of the most vital tools in our efforts to protect this country. It’s been invaluable to our country, and it’s invaluable to our allies.
Were it not for this program, our intelligence community believes that al-Qaida and its allies would have succeeded in launching another attack against the American homeland.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/09/15/bushs_speech_on_terror_legislation/
====================================

can view him speaking here:
at 2.40…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5JVYTxjmdc

Example: I know when truthers say Free Fall it is not true, the towers took longer, Knowing exactly how a controlled demolition is done and the work it takes allows me to know the idea you could rig a working office building for a controlled demolition is down right ridiculous. I know when exposed to heat steel “plasticity” increases. Sorry, I may have used a word YOU don’t understand.

And it appears I know more then you on the rest of the events of that day. Why is that? Why is it debunkers always know more than truthers?

BBC and the wtc 7 collapse…how did they know? Hell, if you were watching TV that day you knew that building was in danger.

DUH!!!!!!
Did you read the testimonies of the people who were there?
Big fires, Gaping 20 story hole in the South face, Creaking, a budge in one side of WTC7. The FDNY saw this and reported it to everyone who was there, so the BBC knew as well.

LIKE THIS:
“Hayden: Yeah. There was enough there and we were marking off. There were a lot of damaged apparatus there that were covered. We tried to get searches in those areas. By now, this is going on into the afternoon, and we were concerned about additional collapse, not only of the Marriott, because there was a good portion of the Marriott still standing, but also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?

Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there.

DUH! tell the FDNY it was just little fires, they knew better. Maybe they should have watched a YouTube vid?

translation..david prefers theory and conjecture to evidence. id call that the kind of a believer.

‘YEAH!!!!! YouTube is where real intellectual insight is realized!!!!!! Forget science books, factual news accounts. ‘

what factual news accounts do u mean? why drag in science bookw when you ignore videos of collapsing towers, little fire etc

here is another interesting anomaly:

BBC and the wtc 7 collapse…how did they know?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s

Controlled demolition is the only answer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo

‘Truthers did nothing but hurt the progressive cause by making true liberals look like gullible morons.’

thats because thats what they are! The ‘true liberals’ are shown to be trusting the us govt official conspiracy theory…in spite of the lack of solid evidednce to support it….