<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think Tanks and The Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/07/think-tanks-and-the-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/07/think-tanks-and-the-right/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean O'Neil</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/07/think-tanks-and-the-right/#comment-50256</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean O'Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=9185#comment-50256</guid>
		<description>to Charles Krempeaux --

If you bother to read ALL FOUR PARTS to this essay you will see the criticisms of libertarian thinking, but the point of the 4-part essay clearly is not criticising libertarian theory -- instead, it is about assessing what Ron Paul&#039;s cult means for any form of movement away from the 2-party monopoly on faux-democracy here in America.  

This is clear from a reading of the 4-part essay.

Why are you distorting the essay?  Is it because you&#039;re dishonest?  Is it because you&#039;re too dim-witted to understand the author&#039;s clear writing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to Charles Krempeaux &#8211;</p>
<p>If you bother to read ALL FOUR PARTS to this essay you will see the criticisms of libertarian thinking, but the point of the 4-part essay clearly is not criticising libertarian theory &#8212; instead, it is about assessing what Ron Paul&#8217;s cult means for any form of movement away from the 2-party monopoly on faux-democracy here in America.  </p>
<p>This is clear from a reading of the 4-part essay.</p>
<p>Why are you distorting the essay?  Is it because you&#8217;re dishonest?  Is it because you&#8217;re too dim-witted to understand the author&#8217;s clear writing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: storey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/07/think-tanks-and-the-right/#comment-50040</link>
		<dc:creator>storey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=9185#comment-50040</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t see my earlier comment up about Paul and 911.

This was a test.

Methinks this may be gatekeeper territory.

The word will spread, I guarantee it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t see my earlier comment up about Paul and 911.</p>
<p>This was a test.</p>
<p>Methinks this may be gatekeeper territory.</p>
<p>The word will spread, I guarantee it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: storey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/07/think-tanks-and-the-right/#comment-50025</link>
		<dc:creator>storey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=9185#comment-50025</guid>
		<description>I am an admirer of Dr. Paul and his efforts in the economic field re: the Federal Reserve truth movement.

When he picks up the gauntlet in the intelligence field of the 911 truth movement, acknowledging even one of the many glaring inconsistencies, e.g. the collapse of WTC Bldg. 7, he will be acknowledged as a true patriot.

If he does so, I suggest he have Jesse Ventura and a team of ex-Seals by his side, to protect him from danger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an admirer of Dr. Paul and his efforts in the economic field re: the Federal Reserve truth movement.</p>
<p>When he picks up the gauntlet in the intelligence field of the 911 truth movement, acknowledging even one of the many glaring inconsistencies, e.g. the collapse of WTC Bldg. 7, he will be acknowledged as a true patriot.</p>
<p>If he does so, I suggest he have Jesse Ventura and a team of ex-Seals by his side, to protect him from danger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spinnikerca</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/07/think-tanks-and-the-right/#comment-50011</link>
		<dc:creator>spinnikerca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=9185#comment-50011</guid>
		<description>Well, this is interesting, and I will research some of the points that make a difference to me.  However, whatever shaped Ron Paul, what he is calling for is the exact debt free Constitutional monetary system you seem to want, as well as &#039;free trade&#039; that is not globally, but individually controlled, and protection of our sovereignity.

I guess what I am saying is that even if you are right about the people who helped shape him, he seems to be going in the right direction now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is interesting, and I will research some of the points that make a difference to me.  However, whatever shaped Ron Paul, what he is calling for is the exact debt free Constitutional monetary system you seem to want, as well as &#8216;free trade&#8217; that is not globally, but individually controlled, and protection of our sovereignity.</p>
<p>I guess what I am saying is that even if you are right about the people who helped shape him, he seems to be going in the right direction now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Iliya Krempeaux</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/07/think-tanks-and-the-right/#comment-50007</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Iliya Krempeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=9185#comment-50007</guid>
		<description>This sounds like at an attempt at Ad Hominem against libertarians (or libertarian thought).  I.e., (you claim) they&#039;re associated with the &quot;right gate keepers&quot;, and the &quot;right gate keepers&quot; are bad, therefore they are bad.

If you have issue with some part of libertarian philosophy, then why not argue against it in a cogent manner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like at an attempt at Ad Hominem against libertarians (or libertarian thought).  I.e., (you claim) they&#8217;re associated with the &#8220;right gate keepers&#8221;, and the &#8220;right gate keepers&#8221; are bad, therefore they are bad.</p>
<p>If you have issue with some part of libertarian philosophy, then why not argue against it in a cogent manner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

