Platform 2010: A Voice Against Violence

Among the praise I have received are compliments on my ability to articulate my message elegantly and understandably, to not waver or panic in front of a microphone or television camera, and to stand firm on the issues that mean most to me. I have also been told that I have broad appeal for someone who is unequivocally to the left, as is attested by my concerted effort to reach out to anti-war conservatives, for example.

The criticisms I have received are that often I can come off as too negative or angry. In reviewing video and images from the campaign earlier this year, I must admit that I have given off a negative aura on several occasions. I whole-heartedly agree that it is important that I don’t allow my valid criticisms of mainstream politics affect my personal demeanor: that I don’t let my anger at greedy bankers affect my overall composure.

Another criticism is that I get too caught up in the individual issues and fail to package them into a coherent vision for the future of this country. In this realm, I must admit that I too often assume that people know where I am coming from. Many activists in my midst have read many of the same authors and tend to get their news from similar sources and have generally supported similar candidates and political movements. However, in running for Congress, it is necessary that I reach outside of my base and appeal to the vast majority of Americans who are not political junkies.

Rather than merely trash mainstream politicians for being shills for banks, insurance companies and military contractors, I should explain precisely what sets me apart, and what values I will espouse as an elected member of Congress:

First and foremost, I will stand for liberty and democracy, those two heralded values of the western liberal tradition. I do not believe that the western tradition was built purely around empire and conquest. While the preeminent powers most certainly committed heinous crimes in the developing world and elsewhere, I also believe they invaluable contributed social, cultural and political ideals. I believe the former was inconsistent with the latter.

In this spirit, I will stand as an ambassador of peace. I believe that it is inconsistent with the Western liberal tradition to take peoples’ lives as part of our foreign policy. I am also appalled by the seeming lack of appreciation for human life in our political elite, and increasingly throughout society. Martin Luther King Jr correctly observed that “my country is the greatest perpetrator of violence in the world.” For making this observation, he was vilified and branded a “radical.” In my mind, there is no clearer demonstration that our country suffers from a serious ailment of violence than when a great leader is disparaged for admonishing his country for its violent ways.

We must recognize violence as the great American epidemic. From the streets of Baghdad to the streets of Chicago, violence is a problem that is tearing this nation apart at the seams. If we do not usher in a new generation of leadership ready and willing to tackle this epidemic, we will rapidly descend into a state of thorough irrelevance.

I ask that we all take the time to reflect on this problem and internalize it: to address the inner violence, that desire to bring emotional or physical harm to others regardless of any provocation, and to conquer it, so that together we can overcome the overarching problem of our nation’s domestic and military violence.

I reiterate: violence is the great American epidemic. Violence is the problem behind so many of our other problems. Violence was the problem when we attempted to repress Communism by fighting doomed proxy wars throughout the globe. Violence was so vividly the problem when we thoroughly devastated Vietnam and lost over 50,000 of our own in a useless war of aggression and Empire. Violence, too, was the problem when we attempted to expand that ill by invading Cambodia and Laos.

Violence was the problem when we decided to dictate the future of Latin America by installing murderous dictators in Chile and Guatemala, while fighting and funding violent civil wars in Nicaragua, El Salvador and Columbia. Violence has been the American mark left on Latin America: a tradition of violence rooted in this misguided sense of superiority by our political and economic Elite.

Violence, too, was the problem on 9-11, when authoritarian religious zealots brought their backward sense of vengeance down on 3,000 innocent civilians. This act continued a cycle of violence in our relationship to the Arab world, with whom the American Empire had intertwined in dangerously injurious military and economic relations for decades. In the weeks after that horrific moment in American history, we could have risen to a new level of clarity and given power to a new movement to rescind violence in all of its forms.

Instead, the cycle continued and it perpetuates today. In 2001, we were told that the terrorists would have been defeated by now, and that we would be basking in the serenity of a perpetual peace. This is the same lie that war propagandists have shuffled around for time immemorial: that once we fight this last war, an era of peace will arrive. I see no difference between this sickly way of thinking and that of an alcoholic who assures his loved ones that tonight will be his final drink.

In order to rid our society of this malady, we must see the primary function of our lives as peace-makers. Surely, everyone must work to pay the bills, and they should undoubtedly be content in their careers. However, your prime human function on this planet is not as a paid servant of this or that employer. Your primary function is as a fellow ambassador of peace. Your essential duty is to wage peace at all opportunities, to expose and reprimand the war-makers, and to remain confident and adamant in even the most trying times. As a peace maker, you will be almost perpetually challenged: like Martin Luther King Jr, being branded a radical, you will be accused of anti-American sentiment, you will be called a coward or a Communist, and you will be disparaged and belittled.

This is why I suggested that we all cleanse the inner violence before attempting to address the outer violence. It is essential that you demonstrate your capacity to remain non-violent even when violently provoked. I have often struggled with this myself, and continue to work to overcome the internal angst.

As Congressman, I will not only oppose all wars of aggression and Empire, but will also address the causes of our domestic violence. Depending on where one resides on the political spectrum, everyone has their hypothesis as to the cause of our society‘s violence: guns, video games, movies, poverty, drug use and so on. All of these enablers more so than causes. For the primary cause, again we must look inward. We must ask ourselves where the vicious cycle originates, so that we can gradually put the brakes on this violence with time.

Just as a kid who was abused is more likely to become an abuser, so too will an abused people be more likely to abuse in turn. I am suggesting that our society is violently provoked. I am saying that our country has developed a loathsome attraction to violent control and domination. We have police officers that are hired solely to run a muck in our poor communities: to flex the muscle of the state and throw the population into a state of shock, fear and despair. The rule of the street becomes violence, and so the most backward and violent elements in society take undisputed control of the neighborhood.

Meanwhile, we have an education system geared towards teaching subservience and a narrow view of morality rather than the great Western values of freedom and democracy. As a small “d” democrat first and foremost, I always look forward to dissent in my ranks. I have great admiration for those that are willing to challenge my convictions with intelligent and rigorous argument. This should be the desire of all Americans, and these values should be instilled from an early age. Instead, we wage war on youth by attempting to control what they wear, they hear and what they should fear. We attempt to mold them into “good Americans” by ignoring the core western values and instead emphasizing the malady that is ripping this nation apart.

If the relative freedom of the University years ever makes an American too upright, then surely the career years will send them hunched over again. Among developed Western nations, we are the worst, or near the worst, in all of the following indicators: amount of vacation time, health coverage, life expectancy, teen pregnancy, infant mortality, poverty and inequality. While other nations have progressed to be more healthy, affluent, equal and free, we have been pummeled into regression by the ever-violent ruling elite, whose determination to control the masses is absolutely relentless.

In order to survive, one must work. Unfortunately, in order to work in this country, one must be shackled. In some cases, one is granted reasonable and affordable health care. In others, one is dumped square into the racket that is the dastard American health insurance market. Often, one must work a year without vacation or sick time, without any union representation or recourse to file complaint, before one is “rewarded” with inadequate health insurance. Of course, the CEOs, bankers and violent militarists who manage this country wouldn’t know: most of them have never had to toil through the wreckage like the rest of us.

People are made to toil so that they will remain feebly dependent and subservient. They won’t dare question because questioning might lead to retribution and bastardization. While not physical violence necessarily, this amounts to a severe emotional violence. People’s soul, their human essence, is savagely beaten to the point that all of their precious human faculties quit functioning: their ambition, their confidence, their rationality.

Unfortunately, people replicate this behavior in their interactions with others. They seek to control and dominate, to belittle and conquer, to be the king or queen: not through merit, but by pure emotional force.

Instead of conquering others, we should all conquer the need to conquer. Instead of installing our metaphorical flag anywhere and everywhere, let us be guided by principle and reason. Let us discover those vanquished traits of ambition, confidence, and rationality, and use them to help navigate this nation back in the direction of greatness.

I believe we can stop failing by most demographic measures and instead institute a culture of success. I know that once we have overcome the epidemic of violence, we will be as capable as any of the great civilizations through time.

What separates me from the sitting Congressman, the Honorable Mike Quigley, is that I am an activist. I am not entering the electoral arena as a career move: I am doing it so as to give voice to my belief in the power of non-violence and in the valor of this fantastic Western tradition that we have inherited. I met Mike several times during the last campaign, and sincerely believe that he is an amicable person and an appreciable political leader. What’s more, he is a considerable improvement over his predecessor. However, he has not demonstrated that he is going to address the principal problem of violence in this nation. He had two chances to vote against continued war funding for these illegal and immoral wars, and he voted for the funding both times. He has had several months to rise on the floor of the Congress, or at a rally or public forum, and rally this nation to an end to these monstrous wars, but instead he has been silent. He has also been silent or near-silent on the other major issues facing the working majority of this country: ending the banker bailouts and reforming our monetary system, auditing and ultimately abolishing the federal reserve, instituting a single-payer national health care system (the only workable system), and instituting a new Workers’ Bill of Rights, to guarantee the right to unionize and collective bargain and to secure protection from out-sourcing and other ill effects’ of the neo-liberal trade regime.

I am not running to be a nice guy that might give you a listen once in a while. This campaign is about defending the core values at the backbone of this country from encroachment by the inane, objectionable and violent ruling elite.

Matt Reichel is a writer currently living in New Orleans. He can be reached at: mereichel@gmail.com. Read other articles by Matt, or visit Matt's website.

7 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Josie Michel-Brüning said on July 31st, 2009 at 9:38am #

    Dear Matt Reichel, being a German woman I could never vote for you, as I would if I could. And then, of course, I would observe your actions as closely as I could if you would keep to your wonderful ideas that you had before being elected.
    May I ask you, nevertheless, for a favour, if you will be a Congress man?
    Please, take care for the violance against Cuba also and take care of the innocent people imprisoned in your country: Mumia Abu Jamal, Leonard Peltier, and the Cuban Five being imprisoned because of having tried to prevent further violent acts against their country, having done no harm to any one.
    Their crime seems to be the unmasking of terrorists like Orlando Bosch, Luis Posada Carriles and José Basulto risking the lives of his own comrades by flying into Cuban air space despite of having been warned by the Cuban authorities and the FAA as well before.

  2. Tennessee-With-Zelaya said on July 31st, 2009 at 1:24pm #

    I THINK THAT THE US GOVERNMENT IS REALLY CRAZY AND WACKO. THE PENTAGON PLANNED TO BUILD WAR TANKS THAT LOOK LIKE DRAGONS. AND OBAMA JUST CANCELED IT. ARE THE FOLKS WHO RULE THE PENTAGON ON LSD OR SOMETHING !!

    http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_axes_pentagon_plan_to_build

    I think USA government is really wacko now, I think that The Pentagon has really lost it this time. Take a look at this link. The psychopathic Pentagon scientists are gonna build dragon-robots that look like the “Gran dragon del espacio” http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Gladiador_(robot) cartoon series

    DAMN !!!! No wonder most US citizens are addicted to drugs, alcohol, coffee and cigarettes and those who hate drugs are addicted to binge-eating on Sonic Drive Ins, Mcdonalds, Burger King, Tostitos with melted cheese, cakes, pizzas and all you can eat buffets. In order to kill stress and depression caused by living in a crazy country like USA

    I am addicted to telenovelas, coffee and weight-training which at least are healthy addictions, but i have to do it, in order to forget that i live in a crazy dystopian nation

    .

  3. lichen said on July 31st, 2009 at 2:45pm #

    In order to end violence we must start at the beginning of life; by protecting children from violence by making all corporal punishment illegal, at home and in schools; by also making circumcision, an extreme act of violence by mutilating a newborn boy’s genitals, illegal. We must also intervene to make sure children, and no one else is ever bullied by building strong communities where everyone’s human rights are respected. It is also necessary to adopt an attitude that all violence is illegal, and to report/press charges for everything; not perpetuate a culture of lawless violence by letting someone punch you in the face to prove that they are “tough” or whatever.

  4. Deadbeat said on August 1st, 2009 at 2:53pm #

    Violence, too, was the problem on 9-11, when authoritarian religious zealots brought their backward sense of vengeance down on 3,000 innocent civilians

    The jury is still out on who really was behind 9-11. The FBI doesn’t have any real evidence that implicates Bin Laden as being behind 9-11. Other people suspect the Mossad. Therefore it is incorrect to use “authoritarian religious zealots” to create a false sense of equilibrium of western violence and the oppressed of the Middle East.

  5. Shabnam said on August 1st, 2009 at 6:45pm #

    Deadbeat:
    Thank you, right on point. There are many questions unanswered on 9/11 and many people, including few officials, have pointed out that Israel knew about 9/11 before hand.
    In the following link, Susan Lindauer reveals facts on 9/11. I am surprised to see many writers still repeat the official language on 9/11 although a lot of information are out where makes Mossad a suspect.

    Lindauer: Dr. Fuisz never formally revealed his source to me. But within about 30 minutes after airplanes struck the Twin Towers , he blurted something to me over the phone.

    He told me the Israeli Mossad had advance warning about the attack. As I recall, he said it before the buildings collapsed.

    He asked me if I thought it was “an accident that a man and woman happened to be waiting on the sidewalk with a video camera, ready to record the attack.” He was highly agitated. He challenged me “how often a bystander has a camera cued up to record a car accident?”

    Then he said, “Those are Israeli agents. It’s not an accident. They knew this attack was coming. And they were waiting for it.”

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12528

  6. beverly said on August 2nd, 2009 at 8:13pm #

    No harm in being angry. It’s about time we all got mad as hell and refused to take it anymore. However, I understand your dilemma. The pundits, including those on the Left, will tag you as too angry or cynical just for speaking the truth. Watch out for them, but don’t abandon all the anger!

  7. Phil said on August 5th, 2009 at 7:27am #

    The jury is still out on who really was behind 9-11. The FBI doesn’t have any real evidence that implicates Bin Laden as being behind 9-11. Other people suspect the Mossad. Therefore it is incorrect to use “authoritarian religious zealots”

    Well, “authoritarian religious zealots” does apply to the Israeli and US govts just as much as Osama’s gang, so it’s probably still true whatever the case may be.