O Canada, What Are We Doing?

Three weeks ago the Honduran military forcibly removed elected president Manuel Zelaya and dumped him in Costa Rica. The coup government then shut down numerous media outlets, imposed a curfew and killed at least a handful of demonstrators.

Despite the threat of military violence, hundreds of thousands of Hondurans have marched, gone on strike and blocked highways to reverse the coup. Almost every country and major institution in the world has condemned the coup. But the Canadian government seems to support it.

Foreign Affairs remained silent in the hours after Zelaya was kidnapped by the military. Eight hours after Zelaya’s ouster a Foreign Affairs spokesperson told Notimex news agency that Canada had ‘no comment’ regarding the coup. It was not until late in the evening, after basically every country in the hemisphere denounced the coup, that Ottawa finally did so.

Canada, reported Notimex, was the only country in the hemisphere that did not explicitly call for Zelaya’s return to power. Unlike the World Bank and European Union, Ottawa has not announced plans to suspend aid to Honduras, which is the largest recipient of Canadian assistance in Central America. Nor has Ottawa mentioned whether it will exclude the Honduran military from its Military Training Assistance Program.

At a special Organization of American States meeting a week after the coup, Canada’s minister for the Americas, Peter Kent called for Zelaya to delay his planned return to the country claiming the “time is not right.” On Sunday, after the coup government refused to consider the return of Zelaya as proposed by mediator Costa Rican President Oscar Arias, Kent again called on the elected president not to reenter his country. “A return to Honduras prior to a negotiated resolution is strongly discouraged.”

Kent has yet to denounce the coup government for killing peaceful protesters and arresting thousands, but he did respond to Zelaya’s recent comment that Hondurans had the right to “insurrection” against an illegitimate government. On Sunday Kent said, “we call on all parties to condemn any and all incitement to violence in this ongoing crisis.”

This was just Kent’s most recent attack against Zelaya. At the special OAS meeting two weeks ago Kent said “there has to be an appreciation of the events that led up to the coup,” blaming Zelaya for clashes with the army, Supreme Court and Congress. Before the coup Kent criticized Zelaya’s plan for a non-binding public poll on whether to hold consultations to reopen the constitution. “We have concerns with the government of Honduras,” he said in early June. “There are elections coming up this year and we are watching very carefully the behaviour of the government and what seems to be an attempt to amend the constitution to allow consecutive presidencies.”

This is parroting the U.S. (and Honduran) neo-conservative argument that an elected president can be made illegitimate if he consults with the population as to whether or not it wishes to change the constitution. If this were to stand, then Hondurans would forever be captive to a constitution written by a right-wing, military-backed government.

Ottawa’s hostility is likely motivated by particular corporate interests and Zelaya’s support for the social transformation taking place across Latin America.

From 1996-2006 Canadian companies were the second-biggest investors in Honduras. Zelaya’s move earlier this year to raise the minimum wage by 60% could not have gone down well with the world’s biggest blank T-shirt maker, Montréal-based Gildan, which employs thousands of Hondurans.

Likewise, announcing that no new mining concessions would be granted during his term could not have made Zelaya popular with Canada’s powerful mining sector, which has some 1,300 properties in Latin America. An interesting note in this regard is that Vancouver-based, Goldcorp Inc., which runs a controversial open pit, cyanide-leeching gold mine in the country, provided buses to the capital, Tegucigalpa, and cash to former employees who rallied in support of the coup, according Rights Action.

More broadly, the Harper government opposes Zelaya’s gravitation toward the countries leading the push toward a more united Latin America. A year ago Honduras joined the Venezuelan led ALBA, Bolivarian Alliance for the People of Our Americas, which is a fast growing response to North American domination of the region.

Canadian corporations, with more than $100 billion invested per year in Latin America, cannot be pleased.

Since touring South America two years ago, Harper has worked to stunt the region’s growing rejection of capitalism and U.S. dependence. In March Harper referred to the far right Colombian government as a valuable “ally” in a hemisphere full of “real serious enemies and opponents.” And after answering questions regarding Venezuela in April he said, “I don’t take any of these rogue states lightly.”

The recent announcement that Canada would shift ‘aid’ from Africa to Latin America is part of an attempt to slow the region’s transformation. The region’s most pro-capitalist governments, in Colombia and Peru, will benefit from this increased aid as will regional civil society groups whose views most closely align to Ottawa’s.

Supporting the coup in Honduras is a continuation of this policy; an attempt by Ottawa to block Latin America’s leftward shift.

Yves Engler is co-author of the recently released New Commune-ist Manifesto — Workers of the World It Really is Time to Unite, a rewriting of the original designed to spark debate about a new direction for the Left and union movement. For more information go to www.newcommuneist.com. Read other articles by Yves, or visit Yves's website.

7 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Jeff said on July 23rd, 2009 at 3:27pm #

    How convenient that The Government of the United States (Not “The United States for America) use Canada as a sounding board for ventures it does not wish to engage. The British Government uses Canada for the same goal. Canadians have been duped into the fallacy of a country which is “multicultural”. No, we are an experiment “of the elite, for the elite, by the elite”. Stop using “we Canadians” whom actually see passed the dark smoked glass. The Government of the United States and the Parliament of Great Britain have used our country from the very day the “Corporation of Canada” was brought into existence with the “British North America Act”. Canada is a puppet country, the individuals used to to reflect what is always wrong. Look to the health care issue the US is now engaged in. Maybe America DOES need a reality check. Before you call the kettle black, look to whom is causing the soot.

  2. john andrews said on July 24th, 2009 at 4:49am #

    The British popular media have completely ignored Honduras – as far as they’re concerned nothing happened there, and most Brits are therefore totally unaware of the coup. You can understand the problem – what with dying popstars, fictitious ‘pandemics’ and illegal wars in distant deserts to concentrate on, there’s just no room for a trifling irrelevance such as snuffing out democracy.

  3. Stephanie said on July 24th, 2009 at 12:57pm #

    Jeff I could not agree with you more. I have believed that we in Canada have long been on strings of the US and GB. I feel we have no real “voice”, no true identity and that is very sad. I see nothing wrong with a “multicultural” society but -and a big but – it proves nothing, nothing at all.

    Thank you Yves for your post and opinion. Maybe some will wake up and smell the coffee!

  4. bozh said on July 24th, 2009 at 1:43pm #

    methinks that, in order for plutos to have an easy time in ruling masses in US/canada, they imported hundreds of ethnicities.
    if US had been composed of, let’s say mexicans, english and french, they wld have had heck of a time keeping peace btwn three major ethnic groups and thus having strong control of the serfs.

    in canada, quebec wld have separated long ago if canada had not allowed immigration of many ethnicities into quebec and the other provinces.

    anomaly to this rule of thump is that ‘jews’ in US and canada have, or seem to have, greater control than any other ethnic group.
    ‘jews’ are richer that any other group [causes for it is not studied; and i am not positing any] and use money to promote selves and their jewishness.
    many ethnic groups don’t- or don’t have money to- spend on selfpromotion.
    however, it is not documented well enough to prove that ‘jews’ change to any significant degree uncle sam’s plans. tnx

  5. Russell Olausen said on July 24th, 2009 at 3:55pm #

    Who ever is running the Corporation known as Canada is mainly unknown to the disparate people, known to the world as Canadians. Our image makeover is being crafted somewhere beyond our geographic boundaries and our best guess is the Jerusalem, London, Washington, axis.Our older sibling country controllers see us as big enough to give the odd proxy style kick in the pants to various little twerps that it would be too demeaning to have to handle themselves.Please understand the average Canadians plight, the cost of tatoos, brass knucles and nose rings has played into our identity crisis but as soon as we have the tools to fly the colours we will be our masters favourite flunky.Oh, don’t forget Paris, we will soon give them a gift, courtesy of U.N. instructions. P.S. It is still a great place to live but not as safe for Pollyanna’s as it used to be.

  6. kalidas said on July 26th, 2009 at 12:28pm #

    “O Canada, What Are We Doing?”

    O Canada, what have you DONE?

    Ernst Zundel could answer that one..

  7. fekkkkog geoooore said on August 1st, 2009 at 11:09pm #

    Great article.

    And to kalidas: Remove yourself from the gene pool, dolt.