as i have stated numerous times, one cannot or shld not hate a ‘jew’ or even his/her ‘jewishness’- one can and shld hate some of what they do and say.
i did say that we will stop abhoring ‘jews’ when they stop persecuting pals. I shldn’t included self in the hate of ‘jews’. I do not hate ‘jews’ as bipeds, but only their misdeeds.
but then again, it may be a myth that one can like a criminal and at the same time hate his/her crimes.

re ultranat’sm, the words theft or imperialism wld have clarified the problem.
you’re right, your ‘explanation’ of wandering ‘jew’ [a pole, russian with the cult] does not end abhorence of the quality called “jewishness” nor of much of what is in mosheism or judaism [christianity]
tnx

‘Wandering Jew’ is an expression. It refers to Jews in the diaspora which until Israel was established meant all but a handful of Jews living in Palestine. It is the existential condition of Jews over the last 2000 years or so and extremely important to their outlook on history. The Jewish status in Europe is in some measure a result of how they saw themselves and how others saw them. As non-Christians, they did not meld into the almost entirely Christian population. As being the ‘killers of Christ’ they were persecuted. With a very well-developed sense of intellectual pursuit (and an almost total abandonment of physical labor) they were mistrusted. The more different Jews were from others the more they were isolated from the native population, and the more the natives regarded them as a different people the more the isolated themselves – it was mutually reinforcing. This can be annoying, but should not result in genocide.

The sooner Jews stop persecuting Palestinians the better and safer we will all be. But it seems from your tone that this will not end your abhorrence of Jews.

for only thus can we gain an understanding of how/why/when or if a homogeneous people became indepedent or ultranat’c.

regarding norway, slovakia, latvia, estonia, ukraine, lithuania, ‘stans, et al, i think we need not dwell upon them much; except to say, it was a good thing.

i have left croatia, slovenia out, not because croats, slovenes, et al did not deserve independence as much as all the lands i listed above, but because both left and the right opposed splitup of yugoslavia, but not on any panhuman principle but on expediency, rationalization, etc.

rationalization post ’35 went on like this: serbs and croats are one people; they speak the same langauge; they are in tribal stage at that time, etc.
meanwhile the facts of much import was always omitted: Croats had in tenth century the oldest kingdom in europe. Serbs have established own kingdom a century later.
serbs were orthodox, croats catholics.
the two kingdoms never ever waged war against each either. They had their first war in ’91; serbs were aggressors, mainly because of serb pop strewn all over croatia; most came to croatia in 17th century at behest of austrian empire.
leftists still lament break up of yugolsavia and feel sorry for serbia even tho she may be most responsible for break up of that empire; in the main, beacause serbia was after greater serbia.
it lost kosovo only because of her pursuit for greater serbia and because it abrogated kosovo independence that tito had given kosovars.
unilateral dissolution of kosovo in ’87 passed on without a whimper from other republics. It signified break up which all republics wanted.
what the role of US had been in this break up, i cannot tell.

now a bit ab. wandering ‘jew’ who later came to the notion that he too has a right to a country.
the word “wandering” contains some assumptions or even propaganda. I do not know that ‘jews’ wandered. It contains a hidden assumption that ‘jews’ had no place or country to reside in.

i’d like to hear more ab. this from historians. It may be noted, that it is actually the sense of ‘jewishness’ in e. europe which alienated and annoyed all people who had to endure such cultishness.
can one imagine a person in US who wld say or imply, I am no longer an american; i am from now on only a Koreshi, levite, buddhist?
how wld people feel in the presence of people who followed jones cult?
isn’t that why some 700 followers of his cult went to guainna and en masse comitted suicide rather that return to US?
persecutors are persecuted. As soon as ‘jews’ stop persecuting pals the sooner we will stop abhoring ‘jews’.
there is no other way. tnx

Europeans had two streams of thought about the other peoples of the world. One was that they were a lesser people who could and should be exploited for the benefit of the master people – Europeans. The second stream was that other peoples had full potential to be as civilized as Europeans, but it would take a massive civilizing effort to bring them up to par. It was not so much that they were inferior so much as they had flawed cultures. With some effort, one could make an Algerian or Senegalese as French as a native Parisian. In the meantime, the colonizers will relieve them of their resource burden.

Yes, the UN was morally bankrupt then – and it is still very deeply flawed. But though almost all the nations of the world routinely vote to end the occupation, no one offers up the resolution that Israel be dissolved.

however, i am not saying that egyptians, palestinians, and arab speaking divergent peoples were duped by balfour’s or League’s words.
they saw the writing on the wall.

canaanitic-shemitic peoples were never stupid and are not stupid now.
it may be that at one time that 95% of people in christian lands thought of arabs as stupid, primitive, etc.

they acquired these beliefs because media only published pieces and letters that demeaned arabs and told lies ab. them.
i have written hundreds of letters to n. amer media as well to US, UK, french, and german, and canadian gov’ts; refuting these lies.
only one of my letters had been published: in vcr province a decade ago.
the province now is owned by strongly zionistic asper family. I no loger reead it nor any privately-owned publication.
tnx

but they cld not even resist euros with cult let alone disobey those evil empires and other christian lands.

And it should be noted that the plan to evict the Palestinians from the country was long in the works. It is known as Plan D (Dalet) and was drawn up over a period of time by a host of soon-to-be Israeli notables in a house in Tel Aviv.

The central argument regarding the Egyptians holds true. With a few notable exceptions neither the Egyptian army nor the other Arab forces conducted major incursions into territory set aside by the UN for the Jewish state. The same cannot be said to be true of the forces of the Yishuv – they defending ‘Jewish’ territory, they then began over running Arab territory, all the while evicting more than 700,000 native inhabitants. As Chaim Weizmann called it: – “The miraculous cleaning (cleansing) of the land.” Maybe the first time the ethnic cleansing phrase has ever been used – and used as a positive.