<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the Other 0.00000003 Percent Lives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Byron</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-49340</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-49340</guid>
		<description>What did Warren Buffet&#039;s &quot;tenement farmers&quot; grow on 40 acres? Microwheat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did Warren Buffet&#8217;s &#8220;tenement farmers&#8221; grow on 40 acres? Microwheat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jules</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47916</link>
		<dc:creator>jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 02:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47916</guid>
		<description>very suprising that Michael Bloomberg networth grew from 4 something billion dollars to $20 billion when so called the market has crashed in 2007. on what tree did that money grow....unfortunately guy like Bloomberg never create/invented anything to show for the money. it is a little disturbing that  only one litle ethnic group on planet earth knows how to make money grow and grow fast while every body else is suffering. if you believe the mainstream media they would have you think that Oprah is the richest person on planet earth....Fed reserve Bank,goldman Sachs,salomon brothers,Amex,Lehman,Bear stern,junk bonds,Hollywood movie industry, the mainstream Media,Casino just to name a few.
who is really in controll in USA? How much power dos President Obama has?
is he being used as a popert untill the next 4 years? a fondamental rule of the capitalism system is demand and supply...demand for oil has decline in all aspect but the price goes up from $33 to $74 in 2 1/2months? why USA can print bond note which is an IOUs but can not print it own money? our National debt is $11 +trillion dollars out of it we owed China $800 billion and that&#039;s freak every body out but there is no mention of the $5 trillion that the govenrment owed to the Fed Bank. what did the nation bought for that money? is the Federal Reserve Bank a private bank or a government instutition? who choose our presidential candidate every 4 year? in USA show me a thinker,an inventor and I will show you some one with not many billions dollars then name me some one with many billions then I will point you toward a sales man. how much money does inventor of windows has by now we must know it is not Bill gate, the inventor of apple, and I go on and on....this is USA keep leaving the dream ( the land of the free).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very suprising that Michael Bloomberg networth grew from 4 something billion dollars to $20 billion when so called the market has crashed in 2007. on what tree did that money grow&#8230;.unfortunately guy like Bloomberg never create/invented anything to show for the money. it is a little disturbing that  only one litle ethnic group on planet earth knows how to make money grow and grow fast while every body else is suffering. if you believe the mainstream media they would have you think that Oprah is the richest person on planet earth&#8230;.Fed reserve Bank,goldman Sachs,salomon brothers,Amex,Lehman,Bear stern,junk bonds,Hollywood movie industry, the mainstream Media,Casino just to name a few.<br />
who is really in controll in USA? How much power dos President Obama has?<br />
is he being used as a popert untill the next 4 years? a fondamental rule of the capitalism system is demand and supply&#8230;demand for oil has decline in all aspect but the price goes up from $33 to $74 in 2 1/2months? why USA can print bond note which is an IOUs but can not print it own money? our National debt is $11 +trillion dollars out of it we owed China $800 billion and that&#8217;s freak every body out but there is no mention of the $5 trillion that the govenrment owed to the Fed Bank. what did the nation bought for that money? is the Federal Reserve Bank a private bank or a government instutition? who choose our presidential candidate every 4 year? in USA show me a thinker,an inventor and I will show you some one with not many billions dollars then name me some one with many billions then I will point you toward a sales man. how much money does inventor of windows has by now we must know it is not Bill gate, the inventor of apple, and I go on and on&#8230;.this is USA keep leaving the dream ( the land of the free).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47694</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47694</guid>
		<description>yes the world resources has been coming to an end for sometime now. Somehow it keeps on going quite nicely and as far as politics go, tyrants will continue to kill millions while millions cheer them on, and the poor will hate the rich and visa versa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes the world resources has been coming to an end for sometime now. Somehow it keeps on going quite nicely and as far as politics go, tyrants will continue to kill millions while millions cheer them on, and the poor will hate the rich and visa versa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47690</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47690</guid>
		<description>what would YOU do in their shoes? Not much differently, I’ll bet.  

Wrong at least in my shoes as in my younger day&#039;s I was there and it isn&#039;t pretty always&#039; looking and a total waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what would YOU do in their shoes? Not much differently, I’ll bet.  </p>
<p>Wrong at least in my shoes as in my younger day&#8217;s I was there and it isn&#8217;t pretty always&#8217; looking and a total waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47685</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47685</guid>
		<description>Big Mike - A Palestinian that converts to Judaism is a Jew and so that wouldn&#039;t count any more than other Arab Jews count (as being a kibbutz invited Palestinian).  But hey, Palestinian Muslims/Christians converting to Judaism are a very rare breed and it is probably safe to say none has joined a kibbutz.  In any case, the record is that no Palestinian has ever been asked to become a member of a kibbutz.  That would go against the founding ideal of (racial) &#039;purity of labor.&#039;  Certainly, they&#039;ve since been hired for their cheap labor - but membership - no. 
The reason I raise the issue is that Israel gets a free ride on that &#039;noble&#039; institution - one that contributes little if anything to the economy these days.  So whenever someone mentions Kibbutz, or making the desert bloom, or Israel as a light unto nations, or other such cliches - I make sure to intrude on the conversation.

As far as the rich go - tax them at 80%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Mike &#8211; A Palestinian that converts to Judaism is a Jew and so that wouldn&#8217;t count any more than other Arab Jews count (as being a kibbutz invited Palestinian).  But hey, Palestinian Muslims/Christians converting to Judaism are a very rare breed and it is probably safe to say none has joined a kibbutz.  In any case, the record is that no Palestinian has ever been asked to become a member of a kibbutz.  That would go against the founding ideal of (racial) &#8216;purity of labor.&#8217;  Certainly, they&#8217;ve since been hired for their cheap labor &#8211; but membership &#8211; no.<br />
The reason I raise the issue is that Israel gets a free ride on that &#8216;noble&#8217; institution &#8211; one that contributes little if anything to the economy these days.  So whenever someone mentions Kibbutz, or making the desert bloom, or Israel as a light unto nations, or other such cliches &#8211; I make sure to intrude on the conversation.</p>
<p>As far as the rich go &#8211; tax them at 80%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47684</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47684</guid>
		<description>RG - Have you started the revolt yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RG &#8211; Have you started the revolt yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Ray</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47683</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47683</guid>
		<description>RG the LG,  I have my large towel and am right behind you. 

DON&#039;T PANIC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RG the LG,  I have my large towel and am right behind you. </p>
<p>DON&#8217;T PANIC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rg the lg</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47680</link>
		<dc:creator>rg the lg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47680</guid>
		<description>Trouble in River City ...

&quot;76 trombones ...&quot; maybe that is why I am such a gad fly ... I played, not very well, trombone in High School.  We were every band directors nightmare ... we could out &#039;blat&#039; the best of  &#039;em.

Seriously though, I need to harp on an old note:  what we need is a much smaller population, world wide.  I figure (being partially mathematical in my thinking &amp; liking to create computer models using stuff like NETLOGO) that one quick solution would be to have Israel Nuke us.  They have a bunch of stuff available and would wipe out enough Americans to reduce the total population of our greed-heads to make the number more earth friendly.  Let&#039;s say about 85% of all Americans dead ... and our carbon load would drop significantly world wide.  (that would solve twin problems: get rid of us and cut off the money-supply for Israel ... ) Then the world could take out China ... and THEN maybe the rest of the world would get the message and abort every pregnancy above one?

Face it ... that just might work!

Of course the solution is brutal ... but admit it ... the current situation ain&#039;t no cup of tea for those on the bottom of the heap.  (Here, I am NOT talking about you and me and other readers of this space ... I am talking about the folks who live in cardboard or worse where it rains a lot.)

Plus, folks like the rapacious greed heads who started this line of responses (from the Kochs to the Gates) would have fewer people to screw over ... and thus, it would take less time for them to sink back to the levels of pond-scum their ancestors clearly were.  That would be poetic justice ... only it wouldn&#039;t happen nearly fast enough.

I have been called a misanthrope before ... and en masse it is true ... but the fact we face is that we don&#039;t like to admit we are part of the problem.  We are complicit ... we allow the rich to get richer.  I suspect a large percentage of the people who have responded to this actually go to Wal-Mart, or their computer runs on MicroSoft ... and THAT is why there are Waltons and Gates.  Because you and support them ... !

Hate the fuckers?  Sure, that will do a great deal in absolving you of your complicity.  But here is the ultimate question for each of us hairless apes:  what would YOU do in their shoes?  Not much differently, I&#039;ll bet.

Finally, I like the idea of hairless apes.  Why?  Think about the hairless dogs ... pretty ugly, no?  Well, hairlessness is an aberration in the mammal world ... and maybe THAT is worth considering.  We are an aberration.  Aberrations do not last long ... so maybe we ought to do the rest of life a favor and self-destruct?  Or, are we not already doing that?

RG the LG

---
For those of you who have read Doug Adams, maybe the Vogons should build a hyperspace bypass through this sector of the universe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trouble in River City &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;76 trombones &#8230;&#8221; maybe that is why I am such a gad fly &#8230; I played, not very well, trombone in High School.  We were every band directors nightmare &#8230; we could out &#8216;blat&#8217; the best of  &#8216;em.</p>
<p>Seriously though, I need to harp on an old note:  what we need is a much smaller population, world wide.  I figure (being partially mathematical in my thinking &amp; liking to create computer models using stuff like NETLOGO) that one quick solution would be to have Israel Nuke us.  They have a bunch of stuff available and would wipe out enough Americans to reduce the total population of our greed-heads to make the number more earth friendly.  Let&#8217;s say about 85% of all Americans dead &#8230; and our carbon load would drop significantly world wide.  (that would solve twin problems: get rid of us and cut off the money-supply for Israel &#8230; ) Then the world could take out China &#8230; and THEN maybe the rest of the world would get the message and abort every pregnancy above one?</p>
<p>Face it &#8230; that just might work!</p>
<p>Of course the solution is brutal &#8230; but admit it &#8230; the current situation ain&#8217;t no cup of tea for those on the bottom of the heap.  (Here, I am NOT talking about you and me and other readers of this space &#8230; I am talking about the folks who live in cardboard or worse where it rains a lot.)</p>
<p>Plus, folks like the rapacious greed heads who started this line of responses (from the Kochs to the Gates) would have fewer people to screw over &#8230; and thus, it would take less time for them to sink back to the levels of pond-scum their ancestors clearly were.  That would be poetic justice &#8230; only it wouldn&#8217;t happen nearly fast enough.</p>
<p>I have been called a misanthrope before &#8230; and en masse it is true &#8230; but the fact we face is that we don&#8217;t like to admit we are part of the problem.  We are complicit &#8230; we allow the rich to get richer.  I suspect a large percentage of the people who have responded to this actually go to Wal-Mart, or their computer runs on MicroSoft &#8230; and THAT is why there are Waltons and Gates.  Because you and support them &#8230; !</p>
<p>Hate the fuckers?  Sure, that will do a great deal in absolving you of your complicity.  But here is the ultimate question for each of us hairless apes:  what would YOU do in their shoes?  Not much differently, I&#8217;ll bet.</p>
<p>Finally, I like the idea of hairless apes.  Why?  Think about the hairless dogs &#8230; pretty ugly, no?  Well, hairlessness is an aberration in the mammal world &#8230; and maybe THAT is worth considering.  We are an aberration.  Aberrations do not last long &#8230; so maybe we ought to do the rest of life a favor and self-destruct?  Or, are we not already doing that?</p>
<p>RG the LG</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
For those of you who have read Doug Adams, maybe the Vogons should build a hyperspace bypass through this sector of the universe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47654</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47654</guid>
		<description>Good one rg and let&#039;s get right into it.  The systems we use Worldwide are out of control and in just a few years trouble in river city.  Could start real tuff times in one year.  The answer so far from governments is more of the same keep using these out of control systems not to bright.  The talk on Wall Street is do we drive small cars or big cars again not to bright.  The so called leaders here in the States it&#039;s cap and trade a feel good bill that does nothing.  The masses us blame the government for the problems and we still do nothing to really change anything.  Boots no new cars take mass transit if you can cut back on everything you can eat only the basic food no meat use electric only for what you need. That&#039;s right many of us already do that and many more because they have to in the greatest nation on Earth.  It&#039;s going to be a very hard lesson to learn that we get what we need not what we want and it&#039;s not to far away.  In many way&#039;s it&#039;s better for the human mind to live in that way but not in this present system that is out of control. When the going get&#039;s tuff the rich go shopping.  Oh really well we slow it down that could be very hard to do.  Come on are things that bad yes they sure are the egg shell is about to break just the amount of forests being burned for cattle and palm oil and feed to feed the cattle is a system out of control.  When you add climate change to the mix the destruction of land starts to move much faster.  The fish in the ocean are in bad shape for two reasons us and us.  The oil and coal companies can make what they want we don&#039;t have to use it only when needed.  These food companies can open a new store everyday we don&#039;t have to eat it.  These car companies can make all the cars they want we don&#039;t have to drive them and this is not just to sent a message but a new way of thinking or the same thing happens anyway even more out of control. So are we all just consuming what we can in an out of control system until it is no more yes we sure are.  It always&#039; amazes me to watch the business people move forward knowing full well what they want to do requires another Earth then another. Tuff times ahead and all for the same reasons that have been tried before and this time a little more than tuff.  Still time and if we try boring it will not be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one rg and let&#8217;s get right into it.  The systems we use Worldwide are out of control and in just a few years trouble in river city.  Could start real tuff times in one year.  The answer so far from governments is more of the same keep using these out of control systems not to bright.  The talk on Wall Street is do we drive small cars or big cars again not to bright.  The so called leaders here in the States it&#8217;s cap and trade a feel good bill that does nothing.  The masses us blame the government for the problems and we still do nothing to really change anything.  Boots no new cars take mass transit if you can cut back on everything you can eat only the basic food no meat use electric only for what you need. That&#8217;s right many of us already do that and many more because they have to in the greatest nation on Earth.  It&#8217;s going to be a very hard lesson to learn that we get what we need not what we want and it&#8217;s not to far away.  In many way&#8217;s it&#8217;s better for the human mind to live in that way but not in this present system that is out of control. When the going get&#8217;s tuff the rich go shopping.  Oh really well we slow it down that could be very hard to do.  Come on are things that bad yes they sure are the egg shell is about to break just the amount of forests being burned for cattle and palm oil and feed to feed the cattle is a system out of control.  When you add climate change to the mix the destruction of land starts to move much faster.  The fish in the ocean are in bad shape for two reasons us and us.  The oil and coal companies can make what they want we don&#8217;t have to use it only when needed.  These food companies can open a new store everyday we don&#8217;t have to eat it.  These car companies can make all the cars they want we don&#8217;t have to drive them and this is not just to sent a message but a new way of thinking or the same thing happens anyway even more out of control. So are we all just consuming what we can in an out of control system until it is no more yes we sure are.  It always&#8217; amazes me to watch the business people move forward knowing full well what they want to do requires another Earth then another. Tuff times ahead and all for the same reasons that have been tried before and this time a little more than tuff.  Still time and if we try boring it will not be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rg the lg</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47638</link>
		<dc:creator>rg the lg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 02:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47638</guid>
		<description>Interesting ... in an earlier post to this site, I mentioned &#039;academic masturbation.&#039;  There are a lot of ideas here ... but all of them require the same thing:

SOMEONE ELSE NEEDS TO REVOLT.

We, the contributors to this sort of dialogue, are way too cozy to take action.  

But, is it kinda fun ... maybe just like the real thing?

RG the LG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting &#8230; in an earlier post to this site, I mentioned &#8216;academic masturbation.&#8217;  There are a lot of ideas here &#8230; but all of them require the same thing:</p>
<p>SOMEONE ELSE NEEDS TO REVOLT.</p>
<p>We, the contributors to this sort of dialogue, are way too cozy to take action.  </p>
<p>But, is it kinda fun &#8230; maybe just like the real thing?</p>
<p>RG the LG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47633</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47633</guid>
		<description>I get a lot of e-mails telling me to stick to climate, that I don’t know anything about
economics. I know this: the fundamental requirement for transition to the post fossil fuel era is a
substantial and rising price on carbon emissions. And businesses and consumers must
understand that it will continue to rise in the future.  James Hansen

    We don&#039;t have to do that if it sounds to hard.  Wait do you hear that it&#039;s that laughter again where is it coming from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get a lot of e-mails telling me to stick to climate, that I don’t know anything about<br />
economics. I know this: the fundamental requirement for transition to the post fossil fuel era is a<br />
substantial and rising price on carbon emissions. And businesses and consumers must<br />
understand that it will continue to rise in the future.  James Hansen</p>
<p>    We don&#8217;t have to do that if it sounds to hard.  Wait do you hear that it&#8217;s that laughter again where is it coming from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47623</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47623</guid>
		<description>Alright Bozh let me give this a try.   Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Einstein

Einstein it was said could wonder for day&#039;s, hour&#039;s, years.  What he wondered about was an abstract thought at the time.  Time is the key word here.  Scientists say your first thought is usually the right one.  Any problem or unknown when it comes to the Universe seems complex and the job is to make it simple but not simpler as it must work out mathematically the last test for us human&#039;s. Climate change the greenhouse effect 15 years ago was known by some but still an unknown what it would mean for us human&#039;s. A few probably had an idea but not for sure. You said it well the reason for that is that they are thought to attribute most of the time one cause for any event. Well they got on the job and many at NASA were put under stress by Bush and his people and for eight years it was tuff for them.  Hard to stop scientists that whole in search of the truth part but some our tuffer than others.  Not just NASA but Worldwide many on the job.  It took the last 15 years of hard work and much thinking and the last word I got was we are all in deep do do.  Remember the math the last test well it works.  We are now putting CO 2 into the atmosphere at about 10,000 times the natural rate measured back in hundreds of thousands of years.  On this path the Earth will warm and all that comes with that and the human race is in big trouble.  What we human&#039;s need to do now is make our lives as simple as possible, but not simpler in order to survive.  We don&#039;t have to and then the math becomes easer to figure.  20% of the population Worldwide uses most of the resources but with China who now want&#039;s the good life and India sort of we will need three more Earth&#039;s I did the math. The good life I&#039;ll bet we could write 10,000 words on that one.  What we have already done to the Earth the last one hundred years is not good.  We are almost there for oil well yes tar sands oh boy kind of a nobrainer water land for crops land that can grow crops fish in the sea yes I said fish in the sea.  You see it&#039;s not just climate change but the systems we use that are almost out of control where we all will start to see it soon.  The systems are out of control just oil is a big one to keep the system going like many on Wall Street like is not going to happen unless we can find another Earth somewhere.  To slowdown until we can change these systems seems wise but so far it&#039;s full speed ahead, oh well.

For Pelosi and Waxman, any moves to assuage Peterson’s concerns — or those of Democrats on Rangel’s Ways and Means panel — risk alienating lukewarm supporters of the bill. Already, the measure is drawing criticism from both the left and right, because Waxman and Markey made significant concessions to get the proposal through the Energy and Commerce Committee.

For instance, liberal environmentalists insist the effectiveness of the proposed greenhouse gas limits would be undercut by Waxman’s decision to allow more than two-thirds of the emissions allowances to be donated to electric utilities, trade-sensitive industries, oil refiners and other interests. Houston Chronicle

   Here in the States this isn&#039;t even the illusion of knowledge it&#039;s nut&#039;s.  I&#039;ll bet in as little as two years this thinking could change but you never know these people are not to bright. One thing for sure in 10 then 20 years when the fight for survival begins for real the thinking will change. To slowdown until we can change these systems seems wise but so far it&#039;s full speed ahead or is it?  The one little problem with climate change is time passed a point we probably can&#039;t stop it.  They did the math we have about 6 to 10 years to level off CO 2 we put into the atmosphere and at least here in the States that doesn&#039;t look to good.  I really do want to see the witting from the few after this monstrous absurdity of a watered down bill called cap and trade in the greatest nation on Earth becomes law if that. Just in case the math is right not on this path. This Bill and the thinking so far is simple real simple and I don&#039;t think that&#039;s what Einstein had in mind when he wrote that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright Bozh let me give this a try.   Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Einstein</p>
<p>Einstein it was said could wonder for day&#8217;s, hour&#8217;s, years.  What he wondered about was an abstract thought at the time.  Time is the key word here.  Scientists say your first thought is usually the right one.  Any problem or unknown when it comes to the Universe seems complex and the job is to make it simple but not simpler as it must work out mathematically the last test for us human&#8217;s. Climate change the greenhouse effect 15 years ago was known by some but still an unknown what it would mean for us human&#8217;s. A few probably had an idea but not for sure. You said it well the reason for that is that they are thought to attribute most of the time one cause for any event. Well they got on the job and many at NASA were put under stress by Bush and his people and for eight years it was tuff for them.  Hard to stop scientists that whole in search of the truth part but some our tuffer than others.  Not just NASA but Worldwide many on the job.  It took the last 15 years of hard work and much thinking and the last word I got was we are all in deep do do.  Remember the math the last test well it works.  We are now putting CO 2 into the atmosphere at about 10,000 times the natural rate measured back in hundreds of thousands of years.  On this path the Earth will warm and all that comes with that and the human race is in big trouble.  What we human&#8217;s need to do now is make our lives as simple as possible, but not simpler in order to survive.  We don&#8217;t have to and then the math becomes easer to figure.  20% of the population Worldwide uses most of the resources but with China who now want&#8217;s the good life and India sort of we will need three more Earth&#8217;s I did the math. The good life I&#8217;ll bet we could write 10,000 words on that one.  What we have already done to the Earth the last one hundred years is not good.  We are almost there for oil well yes tar sands oh boy kind of a nobrainer water land for crops land that can grow crops fish in the sea yes I said fish in the sea.  You see it&#8217;s not just climate change but the systems we use that are almost out of control where we all will start to see it soon.  The systems are out of control just oil is a big one to keep the system going like many on Wall Street like is not going to happen unless we can find another Earth somewhere.  To slowdown until we can change these systems seems wise but so far it&#8217;s full speed ahead, oh well.</p>
<p>For Pelosi and Waxman, any moves to assuage Peterson’s concerns — or those of Democrats on Rangel’s Ways and Means panel — risk alienating lukewarm supporters of the bill. Already, the measure is drawing criticism from both the left and right, because Waxman and Markey made significant concessions to get the proposal through the Energy and Commerce Committee.</p>
<p>For instance, liberal environmentalists insist the effectiveness of the proposed greenhouse gas limits would be undercut by Waxman’s decision to allow more than two-thirds of the emissions allowances to be donated to electric utilities, trade-sensitive industries, oil refiners and other interests. Houston Chronicle</p>
<p>   Here in the States this isn&#8217;t even the illusion of knowledge it&#8217;s nut&#8217;s.  I&#8217;ll bet in as little as two years this thinking could change but you never know these people are not to bright. One thing for sure in 10 then 20 years when the fight for survival begins for real the thinking will change. To slowdown until we can change these systems seems wise but so far it&#8217;s full speed ahead or is it?  The one little problem with climate change is time passed a point we probably can&#8217;t stop it.  They did the math we have about 6 to 10 years to level off CO 2 we put into the atmosphere and at least here in the States that doesn&#8217;t look to good.  I really do want to see the witting from the few after this monstrous absurdity of a watered down bill called cap and trade in the greatest nation on Earth becomes law if that. Just in case the math is right not on this path. This Bill and the thinking so far is simple real simple and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what Einstein had in mind when he wrote that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47600</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47600</guid>
		<description>melissa, yes to your analyses
modern rulers, such as in US,  have learned to be interdependent to quite a degree.  More so than patricians of europe who fought one another and waged wars.
At the same time, they have imparted to school children the misvalue to be [often fiercely] independent.

in nature, nothing seems to be independent or in isolation from other  phenomena.
in any case isolation/independence is a fiction; people trying to adjust to such fiction fare poorly.
alcoholics, e.g., blame only selves because or their respective isolationist thinking. They don&#039;t take into account a multitude of factors which cause alcoholism or other maladjustments.
there&#039;s genetic pool, other people making alcohol/drinking it, etcetc., are also causative factors; along, of course, selfblame, and other people&#039;s condemnation.

you name it, and people everywhere, blame a person for it.  The reason for that is that they are thought to attribute most of the time one cause for any event.
global warming deniers illustrate this. To deniers, we humans cannot be a factor in it; the cause for global warming is a natural event that repeats itself from time to time.
For warfare or serial wars/killings, there is now just two or few  causes: &#039;terrorism&#039;, one&#039;s security, or defense of one&#039;s interest.

greed, delusion, deceptions, lust for control, hatred, intolerance, etc., applies only to people US ruling class doesn&#039;t like. tnx  





e.g.,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>melissa, yes to your analyses<br />
modern rulers, such as in US,  have learned to be interdependent to quite a degree.  More so than patricians of europe who fought one another and waged wars.<br />
At the same time, they have imparted to school children the misvalue to be [often fiercely] independent.</p>
<p>in nature, nothing seems to be independent or in isolation from other  phenomena.<br />
in any case isolation/independence is a fiction; people trying to adjust to such fiction fare poorly.<br />
alcoholics, e.g., blame only selves because or their respective isolationist thinking. They don&#8217;t take into account a multitude of factors which cause alcoholism or other maladjustments.<br />
there&#8217;s genetic pool, other people making alcohol/drinking it, etcetc., are also causative factors; along, of course, selfblame, and other people&#8217;s condemnation.</p>
<p>you name it, and people everywhere, blame a person for it.  The reason for that is that they are thought to attribute most of the time one cause for any event.<br />
global warming deniers illustrate this. To deniers, we humans cannot be a factor in it; the cause for global warming is a natural event that repeats itself from time to time.<br />
For warfare or serial wars/killings, there is now just two or few  causes: &#8216;terrorism&#8217;, one&#8217;s security, or defense of one&#8217;s interest.</p>
<p>greed, delusion, deceptions, lust for control, hatred, intolerance, etc., applies only to people US ruling class doesn&#8217;t like. tnx  </p>
<p>e.g.,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Mike</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47598</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47598</guid>
		<description>Barry99,
I actually said that a Kibbutz was the closest thing to communism that this world has ever seen. Racial profiling aside, I stand by that statement as a Kibbutz is a commune. But, your point is well taken even if the middle east argument that you are trying to start is irrelevant to this discussion thread. That being said, I think that the point you were trying to make is that the Jewish people are just as capable of racism as any other race and because of their position of power in the region they can put it to frequent and nefarious use. Thanks for the heads up on that issue and I would be curious to know if the statement was true. I imagine that in this wide world that at least one Arab has been converted to Judaism, but has he/she ever attended a Kibbutz? 

Melissa,
I wish that all web-based interaction could be as civil as the response that you posted. In fact, I wish that all human interaction could be so civil. Your poignant and reasoned response was received well and I thank you for being big enough to take a step back on your original message.
Republicans as collectivists?  Hmmm? I might have to ponder that one, but my original supposition was based on my close friendships with conservatives here in Orange County (a bastion of conservatism) and they all eschew the very concept of &quot;community.&quot; Note the derision heaped on Obama for his &quot;community leader&quot; skills by the Republicans at the RNC in 2007. Would you care to expound on your theory of Republicans as collectivists? I am intrigued and open to being convinced, though skeptical. I would venture to say that given their fractious behavior of late that they could use a little collectivism.

Big Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry99,<br />
I actually said that a Kibbutz was the closest thing to communism that this world has ever seen. Racial profiling aside, I stand by that statement as a Kibbutz is a commune. But, your point is well taken even if the middle east argument that you are trying to start is irrelevant to this discussion thread. That being said, I think that the point you were trying to make is that the Jewish people are just as capable of racism as any other race and because of their position of power in the region they can put it to frequent and nefarious use. Thanks for the heads up on that issue and I would be curious to know if the statement was true. I imagine that in this wide world that at least one Arab has been converted to Judaism, but has he/she ever attended a Kibbutz? </p>
<p>Melissa,<br />
I wish that all web-based interaction could be as civil as the response that you posted. In fact, I wish that all human interaction could be so civil. Your poignant and reasoned response was received well and I thank you for being big enough to take a step back on your original message.<br />
Republicans as collectivists?  Hmmm? I might have to ponder that one, but my original supposition was based on my close friendships with conservatives here in Orange County (a bastion of conservatism) and they all eschew the very concept of &#8220;community.&#8221; Note the derision heaped on Obama for his &#8220;community leader&#8221; skills by the Republicans at the RNC in 2007. Would you care to expound on your theory of Republicans as collectivists? I am intrigued and open to being convinced, though skeptical. I would venture to say that given their fractious behavior of late that they could use a little collectivism.</p>
<p>Big Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47589</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47589</guid>
		<description>Big Mike,

Thank you for your reply;  and I happen to agree with much of what you have said, believe it or not.

&quot;But, you would need to believe in “society” or “community” before any of this would make sense and Republicans do not believe in either.&quot;  -that&#039;s exactly what it all boils down to, right?          I agree with every word of that sentence, but contend that it&#039;s not only Reps that suffer from anti-social, anti-human worldviews.  I would also contend that Republicans in this country are not about empowering individuals, but are, and have been, collectivists all along. 

I agree, we have not seen democracy for quite a long time.  Instead we seem to march closer to full-blown feudalism, the collectivism of the rich.  I&#039;ll take your word for it that the platform for one head of the collectivist party parallels feudalism.  I see feudalism.    

&quot;All of that aside, I found your comment very similar to arguments proffered by many supposed Americans who would quell ideas and speech by knee-jerking the “Why don’t you just go live somewhere else if you don’t like my brand?” This is supposed to be a free society and your much vaunted Bill of Human Rights very clearly states that. I suggest that you actually read it and then take a long hard look at yourself.&quot;        VERY GOOD POINT.  I apologize.  Seriously.  Indeed, I have read the documents that describe the structure for a free society for the USA, as well as the letters, some books, and the arguments between the parties that eventually crafted the Declaration and Const.  The significance of their arguments are not lost upon me, especially regarding the need to for us to have bottom-up stucture, not top-down.  Some of those old white guys were also very adamant that the monetary system needed to remain of  We The People, not in the hands and interests of for-profit bankers.  They knew how feudalism was implemented, and they knew how tyranny and various forms of terrorism operated.  

No, the old white guys were not perfect, did not set up a flawless structure, saw the world through a veil of their own and thus contradicted themselves and destroyed others.    But we don&#039;t have to be so attached to our cultural veils, do we?  Or our naive labels, and artificial divisions that preclude unity?   Are you sure that the problem is really the idea of individuals, or is it the idea of needing groups and labels to perform righteous stand-offs with each other?  -I recognize my participation, btw.

&quot;It is all about dignity and opportunity. Two values that are quickly fading from the American way of life.&quot;   No comment, just deserves to be said again.  And again.  

bozh,

&quot;so we all speak one language but use different phonetics.
now we, by necessity, also have only one truth.&quot;   Again, so sane.   Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Mike,</p>
<p>Thank you for your reply;  and I happen to agree with much of what you have said, believe it or not.</p>
<p>&#8220;But, you would need to believe in “society” or “community” before any of this would make sense and Republicans do not believe in either.&#8221;  -that&#8217;s exactly what it all boils down to, right?          I agree with every word of that sentence, but contend that it&#8217;s not only Reps that suffer from anti-social, anti-human worldviews.  I would also contend that Republicans in this country are not about empowering individuals, but are, and have been, collectivists all along. </p>
<p>I agree, we have not seen democracy for quite a long time.  Instead we seem to march closer to full-blown feudalism, the collectivism of the rich.  I&#8217;ll take your word for it that the platform for one head of the collectivist party parallels feudalism.  I see feudalism.    </p>
<p>&#8220;All of that aside, I found your comment very similar to arguments proffered by many supposed Americans who would quell ideas and speech by knee-jerking the “Why don’t you just go live somewhere else if you don’t like my brand?” This is supposed to be a free society and your much vaunted Bill of Human Rights very clearly states that. I suggest that you actually read it and then take a long hard look at yourself.&#8221;        VERY GOOD POINT.  I apologize.  Seriously.  Indeed, I have read the documents that describe the structure for a free society for the USA, as well as the letters, some books, and the arguments between the parties that eventually crafted the Declaration and Const.  The significance of their arguments are not lost upon me, especially regarding the need to for us to have bottom-up stucture, not top-down.  Some of those old white guys were also very adamant that the monetary system needed to remain of  We The People, not in the hands and interests of for-profit bankers.  They knew how feudalism was implemented, and they knew how tyranny and various forms of terrorism operated.  </p>
<p>No, the old white guys were not perfect, did not set up a flawless structure, saw the world through a veil of their own and thus contradicted themselves and destroyed others.    But we don&#8217;t have to be so attached to our cultural veils, do we?  Or our naive labels, and artificial divisions that preclude unity?   Are you sure that the problem is really the idea of individuals, or is it the idea of needing groups and labels to perform righteous stand-offs with each other?  -I recognize my participation, btw.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is all about dignity and opportunity. Two values that are quickly fading from the American way of life.&#8221;   No comment, just deserves to be said again.  And again.  </p>
<p>bozh,</p>
<p>&#8220;so we all speak one language but use different phonetics.<br />
now we, by necessity, also have only one truth.&#8221;   Again, so sane.   Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47586</link>
		<dc:creator>bozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47586</guid>
		<description>don,
regarding the whether, global warming, cancer, our feelings, etc., one can note that these events are caused my many [un]known factors.
if there are unknown factors for global warming, we need then to discover them and then describe them in colloquial english that most people use.

is this what &quot;making things simple&quot;  means? tnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don,<br />
regarding the whether, global warming, cancer, our feelings, etc., one can note that these events are caused my many [un]known factors.<br />
if there are unknown factors for global warming, we need then to discover them and then describe them in colloquial english that most people use.</p>
<p>is this what &#8220;making things simple&#8221;  means? tnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47584</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47584</guid>
		<description>And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. 

  There’s battle lines being drawn. Nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong.

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.

A new way of thinking and soon if we wish to survive. Well just thinking would be a great start you know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. </p>
<p>  There’s battle lines being drawn. Nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong.</p>
<p>Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.</p>
<p>A new way of thinking and soon if we wish to survive. Well just thinking would be a great start you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Lee</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47572</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47572</guid>
		<description>The world is comprised of &quot;suckers&quot; and &quot;takers&quot;.  When the &quot;takers&quot; come to town, you&#039;d be smart to get on board. Lest you become a &quot;whiner&quot; which is a subsidiary of &quot;suckers&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world is comprised of &#8220;suckers&#8221; and &#8220;takers&#8221;.  When the &#8220;takers&#8221; come to town, you&#8217;d be smart to get on board. Lest you become a &#8220;whiner&#8221; which is a subsidiary of &#8220;suckers&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry99</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47567</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47567</guid>
		<description>Big Mike -  No Arab has ever been asked to be a member of a Kibbutz.  Socialism in one ethnic group is an oxymoron.  Thus, the institution of the Kibbutz is not an example of a socialist enterprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Mike &#8211;  No Arab has ever been asked to be a member of a Kibbutz.  Socialism in one ethnic group is an oxymoron.  Thus, the institution of the Kibbutz is not an example of a socialist enterprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/06/how-the-other-000000003-percent-lives/#comment-47563</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dissidentvoice.org/?p=8563#comment-47563</guid>
		<description>and there was light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and there was light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

