Who’s the Popinjay?

Barring British MP Galloway Puts Canada in Shameful Light

Who ever thought that Canadian politics could be so interesting? First there was the attempted coup last December, when the fractious opposition Liberals, socialists and separatists stunned the nation and joined together, almost ousting the ruling Conservatives. Now the intrepid British MP George Galloway, fresh from bringing the walls of Gaza tumbling down, is launching a land invasion of Canada from the US in a replay of the war of 1812.

The world was shocked — or rather embarrassed — this week when Canadian Immigration and Citizenship Minister Jason Kenney announced he was banning Galloway from entering Canada, as a “security risk.” Well, sort of. Kenney’s Director of Communications Alykhan Velshi explained that it was really the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA). Kenney merely chose not to overturn their decision, taken, no doubt, after long and costly sleuthing by Canada’s ace security forces. No official reason was given.

Is Galloway planning to enter Canada as part of some top-secret global terrorist operation? The more likely explanation is because of his outspoken and eloquent opposition to the war in Afghanistan and his success in breaking the siege of Gaza with the historic Viva Palestina convoy last week. He is being accused of supporting Hamas, which Canada officially considers a terrorist organization. However, his only weapon is his fiery oratory, a fine example of — to paraphrase the old saw — words are mightier than white phosphorus bombs.

The Conservative government is on shaky ground these days. It is only because the opposition is split almost equally three ways that the united right can pretend to govern. Conservative strategists obviously feel that Galloway is not an issue that the opposition will rally around. After all, the new Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff supported the war in Iraq and the Liberal government under Prime Minister Jean Cretien provided troops for Afghanistan as early as 2002. The socialists and separatists are not happy with the war but are afraid to say so too openly, considering who controls the media and hence politicians’ fate in any elections.

Galloway’s host Toronto Coalition to Stop the War coordinator James Clark said: “We will not accept this ban, and we plan on challenging it.” Galloway stated that the government’s action merely proves that “unjust wars abroad will end up consuming the very liberties that make us who we are.” The obvious violation of Canada’s traditional tolerance and freedom of speech is in fact a windfall for the peaceniks.

Plans are going ahead for the speaking tour, which will start 30 March in Toronto, after which it goes on to Mississauga (home of many Afghan refugees), Montreal and Ottawa. Organizers are encouraging the public to continue buying tickets to show their support for free speech. “One way or another, we will bring George Galloway to Canada,” vowed Laith Marouf, coordinator of Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights. “We’re currently planning a delegation of MPs, lawyers and activists to escort Mr Galloway from the US across the Canadian border.”

Like last week’s attack on Chas Freeman in the US, this attempt to disrupt the support for the beleaguered Palestinians is backfiring. After a campaign by the Israeli lobby that Freeman said plumbs “the depths of dishonor and indecency,” he was forced to withdraw as Obama’s nominee for chairman of his National Intelligence Council, causing a furor that still resonates. The Galloway ban is giving much greater exposure to Canadians of his withering critique of Canada’s failed war: “Flagwaving, or in the case of Canada, shroud-waving of the brave Canadian soldiers who gave their lives for this failed policy of the Canadian government [in Afghanistan] is despicable beyond words.”

The decision to deny Galloway entry stands in stark contrast to the warm welcome the Conservative government and the Canadian media gave former US president George W Bush last week. Only a hardy band of 500 protesters braved the Calgary cold to throw shoes as close as possible to a man who many believe should not have been granted entry for his role in perpetuating crimes against humanity.

How unfortunate for Harper that this clumsy faux pas merely makes him and Canada look foolish around the world. Just about the only praise for Harper comes from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, which represents all 50 of the Israeli lobby groups in the US, and is arguably even more powerful than AIPAC. They honored Harper and the entire Conservative government last year by awarding them their very first International Leadership Award for his support of Israel.

The Galloway gaffe is not all the Conservatives have been up to. Immigration Minister Kenney just announced he was cutting funding for social programs provided by the Canadian Arab Federation for new Muslim immigrants (including many Afghans) because it openly criticizes the current government’s strongly pro-Israel stance in the Middle East.

Kenney has also been busy deporting another five US war resisters, including Kimberly Rivera, the first US woman Iraq war resister to go to Canada. Rivera, her husband and three children, including her six-week-old daughter, were forced to leave before parliament reconvened last month, when an angry opposition, smelling blood, could have overturned the heartless ruling. Kenney is on record saying the refugee claims of war resisters are “bogus”, that he “has no sympathy for them.” This is the same Canada that was a haven for 125,000 US Vietnam war resisters in the 1960-70s, the largest migration from the US to Canada since the American Revolution.

Curiously, Kenney’s 24-year-old yes-man, Alykhan Velshi, is a self-styled “moderate Muslim” who described Galloway as an “infandous street-corner Cromwell.” “We’re not going to seek to overturn that [CBSA] assessment in order to let into the country someone who … is, in a sense, a popinjay for those Taliban fighters who are trying to kill Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan.”

Though denying the charge that he financially supports Hamas, Galloway is otherwise treating the matter tongue-in-cheek. In a press release, he pointed out: “In 2006 [Kenney] addressed a rally of the so called People’s Mujahideen of Iran, a Waco-style cult, banned in the European Union as a terrorist organization . . . Being banned by such a man is like being lectured on due diligence by Lord Conrad Black, a Kenney ally, now breaking stones in the hot sun.”

Concerning his views of the Taliban, as a young Labour backbencher he told prime minister Margaret Thatcher that she “had opened the gates to the barbarians” and that “a long, dark night would now descend upon the people of Afghanistan.” He calls the current policy “equally a profound mistake … worse than a crime, as Talleyrand said, it’s a blunder.”

The irony of refusing to allow Galloway to come to Canada after he managed to break the two-year siege of Gaza by the Israelis was apparently lost on Kenney and Velshi. Galloway has spoken in Canada before about the Middle East without setting off any alarm bells.

Galloway recalled another such attempt to prevent free speech across the US-Canada border, when “Paul Robeson was forbidden to enter Canada not by Ottawa but by Washington, which had taken away his passport. But he was still able to transfix a vast crowd of Vancouver’s mill hands and miners with a 17-minute telephone concert culminating in a rendition of the Ballad of Joe Hill. Technology has moved on since then. And so from coast to coast, Minister Kenney notwithstanding, I will be heard one way or another.”

Eric Walberg is a journalist who worked in Uzbekistan and is now writing for Al-Ahram Weekly in Cairo. He is the author of From Postmodernism to Postsecularism: Re-Emerging Islamic Civilization and Postmodern Imperialism: Geopolitics and the Great Games. Read other articles by Eric, or visit Eric's website.

8 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. kalidas said on March 25th, 2009 at 9:53am #

    Canada, the Canada held so dearly in the hearts of people all over the word, ceased to exist when Canada, for all the world to see, sent Ernst Zundel to Germany.

  2. Brian said on March 25th, 2009 at 3:09pm #

    Canada banned the wrong guy. They let a war criminal in (Bush) and ban a peace advocate.

    Pathetic.

  3. Shabnam said on March 25th, 2009 at 3:27pm #

    Canada is a zionist occupied land. Her policy against Muslims is indistinguishable from the United States and Israel. Canada is guilty of supporting war crimes around the world. The population of Canada, like the US, Australia and other Western countries, benefit from phony ‘war on terror’ – zionist war – and is deeply involved in the war against Muslims.

  4. russell olausen said on March 25th, 2009 at 8:24pm #

    The present government of Canada is on tender hooks and rightly so.The Prime Minister is a shill for the banks and backs every distasteful right wing fad of the day. These P.R. blunders must surely come home to roost.On his side is an economically fearful population justly known for small c provincialism. It turns out that modern North Americas roots are not so embedded in freedom of speech. I only wish an Orwell equivilent could be found somewhere in this trash heap of Cowboys, Sodbusters, and Bankers.

  5. John S. Hatch said on March 26th, 2009 at 3:48pm #

    Canada, to the shame of Mr. Harper and his crackpot Conservatives, is the only Western nation to have neglected to repatriate one of its citizens held for six years at Guantanamo, where conditions have recently badly deteriorated as guards ‘get their kicks in’ before the hellhole closes (if it does).

    Omar Khadr was fifteen at the time of his capture (and near murder), a child soldier under the UN Protocol Concerning the Safety of the Child, to which Canada is a signatory, and which calls for such child soldiers to be supported and rehabilitated, not tortured as was Mr. Khadr.

    Harper’s complicity in acts of torture is a disgrace.

  6. Tree said on March 27th, 2009 at 5:45am #

    US war resisters are in the military by choice and therefore should face the consequences of their actions.
    During the Vietnam War, men were drafted which was altogether different.

    It seems ridiculous to me that Galloway was refused entry. Galloway is at the very least an interesting guy although too much of a showman. I tend to think any good he does is by accident, something incidental to getting lots of press. Further, while I support the people of Gaza, I don’t agree with anyone who buddies up to Hamas which at bottom is a religious organization that wants a theocracy and shoots rockets, neither goal I would support. It all looks to me like one big photo op for Galloway.

  7. bozh said on March 27th, 2009 at 8:05am #

    tree,
    yes, hamas and other palestinians adhere to a cult. many israelis and other ‘jews’ are also followers of a cult. this cult, of three major cults, misteaches more than the other two.
    chrisitanity, on the other hand, endangers world more than any cult.
    islam mistreats their women more than the other two cults/shamanisms.

    world jewry kills by tanks, jets, helis, and artillery and gazans kill with qassams. but israeli destruction and killings are much greater.
    and israel is not occupied or losing land; palestina shrinks and is occupied.
    and ashk’c folks have stolen al the land they now have. tnx

  8. Sweet Dissident said on July 4th, 2009 at 1:51pm #

    Any word at all re: Viva Palestina effort today? This second convoy was supposed to arrive in Gaza today, but I cannot find any news articles re: this and You Tube is down. Anyone? Did they make it?