<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Tinkering with Inflation Measurements May Have Led to the Current Financial Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/03/how-tinkering-with-inflation-measurements-may-have-led-to-the-current-financial-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/03/how-tinkering-with-inflation-measurements-may-have-led-to-the-current-financial-crisis/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/03/how-tinkering-with-inflation-measurements-may-have-led-to-the-current-financial-crisis/#comment-40561</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=7110#comment-40561</guid>
		<description>The &#039;shopping basket&#039; of goods used to calculate the UK rate of inflation comprises a constantly changing sample from more than 100,000 items. In addition, these items may be &#039;weighted&#039; according to quite arbitrary factors. So it is perfectly possible to start out with some desired number in mind, 4.7% say, and mix and match the items in your shopping basket together with how they&#039;re &#039;weighted&#039; and arrive at exactly 4.7%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;shopping basket&#8217; of goods used to calculate the UK rate of inflation comprises a constantly changing sample from more than 100,000 items. In addition, these items may be &#8216;weighted&#8217; according to quite arbitrary factors. So it is perfectly possible to start out with some desired number in mind, 4.7% say, and mix and match the items in your shopping basket together with how they&#8217;re &#8216;weighted&#8217; and arrive at exactly 4.7%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2009/03/how-tinkering-with-inflation-measurements-may-have-led-to-the-current-financial-crisis/#comment-40381</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 02:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=7110#comment-40381</guid>
		<description>Nicely reasoned.

I am a teacher and our contract negotiations are always based off of the &quot;official&quot; inflation rate.    We&#039;ve been getting screwed for several decades now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely reasoned.</p>
<p>I am a teacher and our contract negotiations are always based off of the &#8220;official&#8221; inflation rate.    We&#8217;ve been getting screwed for several decades now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

