Just like RFK Jr. said, “Americans are the most entertained and the least informed on the planet.” President Kennedy said essentially the same thing much earlier in his speech before the American Newspaper Publishers Association.

You can call me WTF you want, but this article is spot on.

.

In contrast, the destruction of parts of New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina were much more of an “inside job”, as governmental negligence (intended negligence) in conjunction with the hurricane caused the flooding.

The elite are not going to kill their own people, at least when they have a choice. If 9/11 was an “inside job” the targets would not have been high finance and the Pentagon, but more of the same people killed in the New Orleans disaster.

Yet virtually nothing is said about Hurricane Katrina being an “inside job”, which speaks volumes about the classism and racism found within the “9/11 movement”.

Not even 9-11 falls into the conspiracy-theory, because 9-11 was an inside job, because that’s more clearer than water.

.

Obama cannot speak to that. The role of POTUS does not address this. FDR may appear to have pushed the system, given some “perhaps”, BUT he did not transform the economics, he simply contained the problem, and left it to fester and grow for another time – Today.

Mr. Cook states: “He knows the economy can only recover if growth is rekindled.” This statement confuses while explaining the problem as defined by the system, not by a viable alternative, but with “business as usual”.

Growth is THE problem, it is NOT a solution. Jobs have meaning to the extent that they are integral to one’s life, family and community. We have built a world on uneconomic growth whereby meaningless “disempowering” jobs have consumed our lives while obliterating any sense of family and community and the relationships which are critical to our existence. (Certainly there are “jobs” which do not fit this description, but they are not the general fare.) We can “save” the auto industry through the continuation of Chaplin’s “Modern Times” or we can re-think a living economy that is sustainable and will match the earth’s capacity to “give”.

So, Obama is simply struggling with a problem that cannot be solved with the tools at his disposal (it is possible that the lack of tools actually handicaps his ability to really see the problem).

What he can do is begin to take down the hyper militarization industry and the industrialization of our food and the world created by fossil, and work to put in place a foundation which is not a “return” to a market based on needless, and uneconomic consumption. He can be bold where his position allows him to be bold and do what a nation-state leader can do.

He could look at the problem by NOT taking half-way measures doomed to failure – fight for single payer healthcare if you want to take the broken, worthless healthcare system on. Be bold, have a spine. If politics will NOT let him do this then he has no power, he is nothing but a fancy-pantsy orator with NOTHING to say. And soon no one will listen because empty slogans can be gotten elsewhere and the reality of this collapse is just to pressing to allow for television distractions.

Nationalize?

Nah. That puts the idiots we put into office in charge. Not a good idea. Most of them are in politics precisely because they are irredeemably unproductive … and lying is about the only skill they have.

So, let’s use the talent … rotten, corrupt, self-aggrandizing as it may be … in the banking industry, in the automobile industry, in all of the corporations and NOT nationalize … but rather …

… are YOU ready for this? …

… are YOU sure? …

BUST UP THE TRUSTS … decorporatize, break GM down into the twenty or so companies they swallowed … break CitiBank into a thousand smaller banks … make Ford a single product car company with spin-offs on its other so-called models … turn the Bank of America into something about the size of the local bank in a small American Town … in other words …

… well, use your imagination. And as far as corporation law is concerned … let’s do some reading and see just how things were before the American Civil War … when states were actively opposed to large corporations. As silly as his religious bs was (the Dayton Monkey Trial being what he mostly remembered for), William Jennings Bryan was correct when he suggested that banking interests were screwing the masses of Americans …

Anyway, in cynicism and literacy,

RG the LG

Um…The Federal Reserve is a ‘non-government, non-private’ entity, made up of 12 American private banks. This is who controls the prime rate, inflation and deflation, and LOANS EVERY DOLLAR IN OUR MONEY SUPPLY TO US AT INTEREST. This is outlined on THEIR WEBSITE and in “Modern Money Mechanics”, 1963, published by the FED. They control the corporations, which in turn control the government. If you dont think corporations greatly influence the government, you obviously don’t understand the relationship between Dick Cheney, former VP of the US, and CEO of Halliburton, and the war profiteering going on in Iraq, Afghanistan, and soon to be Iran, Pakistan and anywhere else we feel like expanding our empire.

It is NOT a conspiracy theory, considering the top bankers ADMIT that this is what they are doing. They are not hiding it.

“We shall have world government whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
-Paul Warburg, Council on Foreign Relations / Architect of The Federal Reserve System.

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.”

“But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government, the supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
-David Rockefeller, Council of Foreign Relations

I think it is you who have fallen asleep at the wheel, sir. I think it is your fault and everyone else’s who remains ignorant to the way the monetary system actually works. You leave your liberties and freedoms in the hands of bankers every time you show up to work, or pay taxes. Kiss your children tonight, because there is a good chance tomorrow they will be fitted with an RFID chip, and shipped to a U.S. “Civilian Prison Camp”. I do feel duped. By ignorant people who seek to establish dominance over their fellow man with such blatantly derogatory questions as, “Who’s your daddy?” without offering any insight as to how we are in error. For now, just let the big boys talk about the important stuff and you can go back to watching “Faux” News.

Have a great day.

If you don’t think that central banks (and the international bankers who run these organizations) have way too much power, then it is clear that you are either: a) ignorant of the system and its history, or b) have an interest in safeguarding said power.

It’s not just the United States. So in that sense Americans shouldn’t view themselves as victims of a world conspiracy, but recognize that this is the RESULT OF A PYRAMID STRUCTURE IN SOCIETY.

The Fed protects the pyramid structure, largely because it is part of a pyramid scheme. Wealth from the bottom is redistributed to those at the top. Hence all of these foreclosures where actual property goes to the bank even though the banks never had the capital they lent for mortgages… thus they receive true property in exchange for crafty bookkeeping.

In Canada we got a central banking system in 1934 thanks to our British overlords. There was a vote on whether to create a central bank. Two of the people voting were Canadians, three were English, led by Lord Macmillon. The 2 Canadians voted against it, and the three Brits made their numbers count in favour… That’s democracy at work! And we thought Canada was a sovereign nation!

So, in 1933, one year before the central bank, a loaf of bread cost 6 cents. That means you can buy about 16.7 loaves of bread for one dollar in 1933. In 2009 you can buy 0.45 loaves of bread for one dollar. That is an outstanding devaluation of our currency and thus of the Capital of our country (capital is savings, and inflation brings the value of savings down). In essence the Central Bank of Canada has taken the capital accumulated by the work of Canadians and redistributed it those higher up in the pyramid structure.

This is not a “conspiracy theory” as there is no “theory” involved. Certainly people have “conspired” in the sense of the Latin “conspirare to be in harmony, conspire, from com- + spirare to breathe”, which means that people work together (in harmony) towards a common end. In that sense the members of the Fed conspire to bring about policies. To describe those policies is not to theorize… the “conspiracy theory” red herring should therefore be laid to rest.

Have a great day.

Who spoke about the real problems that came with the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913 during the campaign? Well, Ron Paul did, but who could hear his honest, squeaky voice amidst the uplifting rhetoric of “change we can believe in” or the ponderous “100 more years in Iraq”?

We need explication, and instead, our winning candidates give us obfuscation. Now, whose “fault” is that? The media’s? The System’s? Yaweh’s?