And by the way, in Sudan, both sides are black by usual definitions.

A pro-Palestinian student group at Hampshire College in western Massachusetts irked the college administration by disseminating a message on-line Thursday congratulating the school for becoming the first US college to divest from companies benefitting the “Israeli occupation of Palestine.”
Israeli group Anarchists…

Israeli group Anarchists Against the Wall organizes protests against the security barrier, such as this protest at the Palestinian village of Ni’lin [illustrative photo].
Photo: Ariel Jerozolimksi
Slideshow: Pictures of the week

Matan Cohen, a member of the college’s Students for Justice in Palestine organization and the former co-founder of the far-Left Israeli group Anarchists Against the Wall, insisted the divestment from a State Street corporation fund, which holds stock in the six companies in question, marked a dramatic first step toward an “international movement” of divestment from Israel.

An SJP statement insisted the group had “pressured Hampshire College’s Board of Trustees to divest from six specific companies due to human rights concerns in occupied Palestine. Over 800 students, professors and alumni have signed SJP’s ‘institutional statement’ calling for the divestment.”

The statement had spread widely across pro-Palestinian blogs within hours of its publication on Thursday.

Such a move by the small Massachusetts college would have dramatic symbolic power, as Hampshire was the first US college to divest from the apartheid regime of South Africa in the late 1970s.

But the college’s director of communications, Elaine Thomas, insisted the message spread on-line was incorrect.

In a “statement of clarification” sent by Thomas to The Jerusalem Post on Thursday evening, the college’s president, chairman of the board of trustees, and dean of faculty insisted the decision to divest from State Street had been made because the fund had been found by an outside consultant to hold stocks in “well over 100 companies engaged in business practices that violate the college’s policy on socially responsible investments. These violations include: unfair labor practices, environmental abuse, military weapons manufacturing, and unsafe workplace settings.”

The statement acknowledged that the Board of Trustees’ initial review of the college’s State Street holdings had been based on a complaint by Students for Justice in Palestine about six companies doing business in Israel.

But the college’s top leadership insisted the “decision expressly did not pertain to a political movement or single out businesses active in a specific region or country. No other report or interpretation of the actions of February 7, 2009 by the Hampshire College board of trustees is accurate.”

The six companies that earned the SJP’s disapproval were Caterpillar, United Technologies, General Electric, ITT Corporation, Motorola and Terex. They sell products in Israel used both by the military and by civil and commercial sectors of society.

Asked if the SJP would encourage the college to divest from companies providing similar “dual-use” products in Gaza that assist Hamas’s fighting efforts, Cohen replied, “the bottom line is that we as an institution have money invested in the Israeli occupation. We do not have money in Hamas. So it’s a non-issue.”

http://www.hsjp.org/2009/02/13/sjp%E2%80%99s-official-response-to-the-administrative-statement-regarding-divestment-from-the-occupation-of-palestine-021309/

http://voicesofdivestment.wordpress.com/

http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2006/05/13/joanne-landy-at-it-again/

http://www.counterpunch.org/bricmont02122009.html

These closet Zionists used their positions and have successfully prevented any action against Israel including sanction, divestment and boycott.
This tactic is used on Iran as well and majority of the ‘left’ in the west dominated by the closet Zionists in the position of ‘leadership’ of the ‘left’ organizations or party including Green Party, Campaign for Peace and Democracy and HOPI with a misleading slogan such as ‘Neither Imperialist war, nor theocratic regime’ implementing the neocon foreign policy of ‘regime change.’ Louis Proyect has criticized Joanne Landy, from the ‘peace and democracy ‘ whose political activity, from the ‘left’, most helpful to CIA agenda. He writes On Joanne Landy one of the supporters of HOPI and co-director of Campaign for Peace and Democracy:

{She also makes the record that she too is opposed to Iran having nuclear weapons, even though Israel has between 2 and 3 hundred. To reduce the threat of nuclear war in the Middle East, “a new democratic U.S. foreign policy” is required. In keeping with the generally moralistic posture that characterizes the “third camp,” there is not the slightest inkling of how such a policy can be realized, especially in light of the deepening bellicosity of the US ruling class and its two parties. Perhaps George W. Bush will read the open letter, slap his forehead and cry out, “Why hadn’t I considered this before?” Nor is there much likelihood that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will be moved by these words.}

Majority of these closet Zionists are responsible for lack of knowledge among not only members of the ‘left’ in general, but also among the population at large to protect Zionist’s interest. Iranian fools have been misled by the closet Zionists for a long time are waking up slowly but surely.

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2009/02/13/dershowitz-calls-for-idf-siege-of-hampshire-college/