You have also hit the nail on the head. God cannot be institutionalized. In an institution of “God” I would lose my sense of justice and dignity.

Thank you

Yes, you have hit the nail on the head.

Thank you

the cultists are similar to the others who have lorded over people, in that their power derives from “credibility”. We owe “spiritual” debt to the “credible” priests/rabbis/imams. We owe monetary debt to the financial creditors. Credibility/credit, from latin credere, credo (to believe, I believe).

To stop problems, first step is to stop believing. Realize that our “debt” to “God” is really our obligation to one another and this planet, not to individuals who proclaim such and such policies/doctrines. God is creation. Through “God”, we have language and community, and the possibility of recognizing our interconnectedness. What religion or cult is spreading this true belief in creation? What cultists have not profited from destruction and division?

God cannot be institutionalized/organized.

ok, I understand. Let us struggle for gustice without “divine” inspirations.

Thank you and take care of yourself

And this is precisely the situation Israel does not want to find itself in. Today Israel is the unchallenged top dog of the Middle East and would hate to find itself in a position of having to restrain itself in its present compulsive brutality because there is now a nation, Iran, which could turn to it and say: Hey, mate, you better watch your step, because we can just as easily teach you a lesson or two…

Like in a school playground, the reigning bully finds himself in the unconfortable situation that there is now a newcomer around as big and strong as he to whom the erstwhile unprotected little guys can ran to…such severe deflation of the bully’s ego would be too painful to bear and must be avoided at all costs or at least delayed for as long as possible…

you may be right about islam not being much better, if at all. i read some of it. it was one of dullests books i have ever read. it like the bible, torah, is full of promises.
and i evaluate all promises as lies; unless an actual god spoke to me and promised me this and that, i wld believe him/her or it.
but then i wld think, why me only, god? that wld lead me to the conclusion that i am delusional. thnx

The american-european plan of making a ‘schemitisch freies’ Palestine and installing puppets in arab lands is successfully going on. As to religion, I am not sure, whether Islam is less cultish than judaism and christianity. Let us stress the following: Regardless of religion theres is no legitimation to rob human beings of their habitat and their dignity. A religion would tolerate another religion, only if the tolerating side is stronger than the weaker tolerated. If you feel weak and disadvantaged, thers is no place for toleration. It is always the policy of the “stonger”. I think starting from religion would lead us nowhere.

it is bad enough having just the two sisters axis of evil, but nearly all christians are evil as well.
it is the religion or, rather, cultish behavior at its worst to date that probably will even worsen.
a cult, such as christianity ( among others) with mass of delusional/maniacal teaching/behavior, will never accept other cults, such as judaism and islam.

socalled zionists (euros, really) can espy this; they know they’ll be egged on to ever greater paroxism because of intolerance of a cult for another cult.
perhaps, islam may be less cultish than judaism and christianity but it might not make difference.

israel, i propose, is being used by christians in the main to make sure that no arab (at least) land obtains wmd.
the payback for the israeli dirty work wld be to reward the criminal state with at least all of palestine (schemitischen frei), parts of jordan, syria, and lebanon and to boot, install puppet govt’s in all arab lands.

will the plan (inferred) work? we don’t know!

If the USA initiates reparations to Iran for past transgressions, this would be to declare the end of imperialism that the forge of evil, the White House, can ‘t afford doing.

Thank you

Israel is too tiny, too impoverished, but the US administration, especially G. W. Bush has always looked it in the eyes and enriched it with the most destructive weapons available. What does that mean for justice seeking people? I am afraid, the world will look Obama in the ass and see a black hole of hopelessness.

Thank you

about israel,
even with all israel has now it is too tiny, too impoverished; thus, it may not be satisfied with just that; which means more genocide by US/israel.
thnx

However, the deterrent of mutually assured destruction (remember that quaint little phrase?) only works when the leadership on both sides is… what’s the word?…. sane. In the situation of Iran v. Israel, the vastly more powerful side has shown that it’s more than willing to commit genocide, and likely would start another full-fledged holocaust, rather than even consider coexisting on fair or equal terms with anyone else. What’s a poor ayatollah to do?

“If…then…would you?”

If Obama was a lizard man, then wouldn’t it make sense for him to advance the rapidity of global warming, because he’s cold blooded and he needs more sun? Would you tell this man he does not know what’s best?

Israeli actions regarding nuclear weapons have always been contrary to international law. Their use of Depleted Uranium muniitions has stay behind effects that are very real. Regardless of what Iran may or may not be doing, we would largely take away their need to “act” or to “acquire weapons”, if we with the real power would begin to abide by laws and treaties.

The only box you have is the one you’ve created via the “info” you’ve collected. You cannot access the truth of which you are not aware. The info is obviously sill minimal for you to end up with such a perspective… but I suppose one must begin learning somewhere.

but this attitude denies people the universl right to bear arms. and an unarmed nation is under constant threat of an attack from stronger adversaries.

if iraq and afgh’n had wmd, US wld have never, i deduce, invaded these countries.
israel with wmd and armed with US weaponry cld bomb osirak reactor and a syrian site with impunity.

what if US had not nuked hiroshima and nagasaki? japan wld be free and probably armed with wmd; it wldn’t be occupied, either.

what if iran attacked israel with a Nbomb? but when? if in two or ten or twenty years it wld be a desert land.

what wld happen if US/Israel obeyed 242 UN resolution? what wld happen then? what if US stopped commiting crimes against humanities?
what do you think wld happen then? more peaceful world, right?
but with more or much more peaceful world US/ Israel cannot expand; i.e., steal more land.
you obviously thought by asking only one ‘queston’, that that exhaust further inquiry.
such a ruse deosn’t work well among us on DV. thnx

Your mindset is suspicious and the wholeness of your box is a hollow rubbish. Why dont ‘t you accept the historical fact that Iran has not seriously attacked another country in the last thousand years?

I understand what you are saying and it is openly obvious as to your mindset. So, seeing this for what you depict it to be I personally feel that it would be best to merely sit on the sidelines and watch the game and rhetoric as it continues to unfold.

With that I have but one question for you – if by some remote chance Israel is attacked with a nuclear weapon and that weapon has been delivered via an Iranian missile (parts supplied by Russia & China) would your overall sentiment concerning this possibly stand a chance to change?

Ya know it’s kinda funny that I always taught my son a little trick that truly helped him in deciding what would be best to do or commit himself to. It’s very simple actually and it goes like this. Whatever it may be look upon it as if you’re in a big box. A box has four sides, top and bottom. And each side of the box both holds and will show you a portion of the whole that you must decide on. All you have to do is step outside of the box and calmly look at all sides of the box before making a committed decision. Look closely at all perspectives so you’ll have a much clearer understanding as to what the box is on whole. Not merely one side, one top or one bottom. From viewing things in this manner you would truly be surprised how much clearer of an understanding you can come to. Try it, I think you’ll find it rather interesting as to how you will view things.

Craig D. USN ret.

Certainly you know about the zionist misleading propaganda. But I only wanted to indicate that we should not give the zionists any kind of psychosis which could excuse them from their evil.

Thank you