then we watched Iraeli aggression of ‘67 and theft of all of palestine. We saw ’settling’ of gaza and later siege of gaza, assassination of pals, torture, abduction, man hunts, jenin, gaza raid, three invasions of lebanon, israel’s attack against egypt ‘56, etcetc.

yes we watched qassams and suicide bombers. tnx

I am amazed how can a decent human being shrug when faced with the images of children, elderly, women and innocent civilians killed by IDF in what they call a “targeted attack on militants” albeit the Gaza strip prevents any real targeting what so ever as it simply too densely populated area.

To add insult to misery Gaza strip is, in fact, overly populated due to long-term invasion by Israeli settlers who took the land where these people could have otherwise lived, chunk-by-chunk and peace by peace ….

And, while all this is taking place, the world shrugs, the leaders talk incessantly about the need for stopping civilian casulaties over their fancy dinners and while sipping their fine wines ….

What have we become …. how can we face ourselves in the mirrors after seeing the scenes of dead children on countless TV reports …. how many of these innocent poor souls have to die before someone puts an end to this … ?

May God help us all …

Israel is the aggressor…and illegal occupier.

Is that also a lie?

http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTMillerGoodQuestion5.html

READ AND WEEP!

“For the sake of argument, let’s just assume that despite having said that the Israelites were to destroy totally the Canaanites and to leave none of them alive to breathe, Yahweh meant only that those who refused to “migrate” out of the land were to be killed. What would be moral about ordering people to abandon their homes, fields, vineyards, wells, etc., which they had worked to build and maintain, and go to another land? Let’s suppose that the United States should try to end the fiasco in Iraq by ordering all of the people to leave and go to other countries with the warning that those who stayed would be killed. If such an order were issued, would Mr. Miller defend the morality of killing those who stayed in Iraq?”

WHAT WOULD BE THE MORAL OF TELLING THE PALESTINIANS TO LEAVE THEIR HOMES? IF THEY LEAVE THEY GET BOMBED ANYWAY.

How can you even begin to compare 4 deaths, vs. 450….??????

YOU CAN WRITE WHAT YOU WANT, PEOPLE ARE NOT DUMB THEY KNOW THE TRUTH…!!!!!!!

yhwh

1 Samuel 15:1 Samuel said to Saul, “I am the one [Yahweh] sent to anoint you king over His people Israel. Therefore, listen to [Yahweh's] command! 2 Thus said [Yahweh] of hosts: I am exacting the penalty for what Amalek did to Israel, for the assault he made upon them on the road, on their way out of Egypt. Now go, attack Amalek, and proscribe all that belongs to them. Spare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camel and asses!”

how are palestinians women and children responsible for hamas?
you see the ruthless israel’s using bombs and weapons on palestinian women and children because what they are indoctrinated with is that an innoncent is RESPONSIBLE FOR OTHER ppls crimes.

“Deuteronomy 25:17 Remember what the Amalekites did to you along the way when you came out of Egypt. 18 When you were weary and worn out, they met you on your journey and cut off all who were lagging behind; they had no fear of God.
To this, I can only say, “So what?” This incident had happened around 430 years before Saul was commanded to go destroy totally the Amalekites of his time. Is it morally right to hold people responsible for something their ancestors had done centuries earlier? This is the kind of thinking that results in centuries-old ethic grudges in places like Bosnia and the Near East, which we hear about so often in the news. If we went back in time 430 years, we would be in the year 1575, which would be just 83 years after the discovery of the “new world” and 31 years before the first permanent colony was established at Jamestown. An account by Robert Beverely described an Indian attack on the colony on March 22, 1622, which killed 347 colonial settlers. The attack was deceptive in that the Indians, who had been on friendly terms with the colony, came into Jamestown as friends, as they often had, and then turned on colonists. Here is Beverely’s description of the attack.
The very morning of the massacre they [the Indians] came freely and unarmed among them, eating with them and behaving themselves with the same freedom and friendship as formerly till the very minute they were to put their plot in execution. Then they fell to work all at once everywhere, knocking the English unawares on the head, some with their hatchets, which they call tomahawks, others with the hoes and axes of the English themselves, shooting at those who escaped the reach of their hands, sparing neither age nor sex but destroying man, woman, and child according to their cruel way of leaving none behind to bear resentment. But whatever was not done by surprise that day was left undone, and many that made early resistance escaped.
I doubt that any ethnically identifiable descendants of the Powhatan tribe exist today, but let’s suppose they did exist on some reservation like the present-day descendants of other tribes. What would public reaction be if the president of the United States should say that he was going to exact the penalty for what the Powhatan tribe had done at Jamestown in 1622 and then sent army troops onto their reservation to destroy totally all of them, including women, children, and infants, along with any livestock they might have? Do you suppose there would be any public outrage if such a deed as this were done? The Nazi holocaust happened just some 50-60 years ago, but what would world reaction be if the Israelis, who almost certainly have atomic weapons, should send a fleet of bombers into Germany to nuke them on the pretense of “extracting penalty” for what had been done to Jews during the Nazi era? Do you suppose there would be any cries of outrage around the world?
At times, I get the impression as I am going through Mr. Miller’s article that he is laying down a smokescreen by talking about “predators” and “raiders” to try to hide from his readers what the Bible really says about the Amalekite massacre, but if this is his intention, I urge readers to look through the smoke. For pity’s sake, the Bible plainly says that “God” gave a command to destroy completely the Amalekites of Saul’s day for something that their ancestors had done 430 years earlier. There is just no way to whitewash this incident and make it morally acceptable.”

hamas sends rockets that have killed less than 20 ppl in 5 yrs
in a military sense the rockets are nothing in comparison to the american bombs.why the israeli’s don’t use bombs similar to hamas’s to target hamas? should hamas learn from israel when it “avoids” civilians? one u.n american member sez he does not want to equate israel with hamas.will he equate when hamas kills 125 israeli’s for every palestinian?

4 israel v 500 palestinians
israel kills 125 palestinians for every israeli.
before they drop american bombs from land and see they know that there are civilians and before they bomb they claim “they have months of evidence” they send their planes to monitor palestine, yet they blame hamas when civilians die. is it fine to bomb every city of israel because an idf lives there ? shall palestians aquire bombs to bomb israel so that future palestinians won’t have to be bombed?
if your an israeli goverment member then i guess the answer is yes.
i say the israel are fukin coward motha fuckers. they hid behind their children when hitler was doing his blitgrich over them.today they hide behind fighter planes , boats and billion dollar bombs.

‘No to Israeli aggression, No to Hamas theocracy,’ very much the same as ‘No to US imperialism, No to theocracy in Iran’
a reactionary slogan with hidden agenda.

Al Arabiya, is jointly owned by Saudi Arabia and an American company, I think for information gathering, has received many Israeli cyber-soldiers lately who leave long comments on unrelated issues to divert attention from Gaza massacre but they have not been successful because they have attacked by the rest of the posters, Persian speaking section. Ninety five percent (95%) of comments have anti ZIONIST attitude and pro Palestinian. Arabic section, as well as English section of Al Arabiya show high percentage of comments are against ZIONIST war crimes. Israel has not only uses all kind of WMD to eliminate Palestinian but also uses Cyber-soldiers for the same objective, FINAL SOLUTION. These war crimes have turned the international community against them and their war crime activities.
http://www.peykeiran.com/iran_news_body.aspx?ID=56489

It has been reported that people are conducting a cyber war against the Zionist baby killers.

{Hackers rewrote the content of several well-known Israeli websites and posted items about the atrocities committed by the Israeli army in Gaza. The hackers were thought to be operating from The hackers targeted websites of small companies as well as government bodies, including the Israeli Defense Forces and the Israel Discount Bank, according to Israeli radio.Lebanon, Morocco, Iran, and Turkey, the London-based newspaper Asharq al-Awsat reported Sunday.}

http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2009/01/05/63566.html

According to the witnesses, when Kuntar’s group found that the rubber boat they’d arrived in was disabled by gunfire, Kuntar shot Danny at close range in the back, in front of his daughter, and drowned him in the sea to ensure he was dead. Next, eyewitnesses said he smashed the head of 4 year-old Einat on beach rocks and crushed her skull with the butt of his rifle,