Point well taken.

Max

As such, I don’t understand why Iranians would ever want to re-establish relations with the United States, and in light of this, President Ahmadinejad’s demand for an apology and a real change of policy from the United States is quite judicious on his part.

My bad. I did not make myself clear. i was agreeing with you fully. YOu were saying that we needed a president w/ balls, and I just wanted to elucidate what I was confident you meant but didn’t explicitly say. I’ve heard you echo those sentiments before.

What I’m saying is that Opee hasn’t got the balls to do what needs to be done. Not start wars (he thinks that’s what he has to do to show he has the balls to be Commander and Frigg’n Chief). Its the balls to see clearly the problem, and say fuc*k you to the establishment and do what needs doing. And that aint kissing Republican asses or Democratic asses.

He’s a lier and his lies are manifested in the continued bombing and killing of civilians using US dollars. He’s already got blood on his hands, he’s tainted. You can’t be a half way murder because you say something about torture or Gitmo. Bush was what he was. And Obama is a straight up lier.

“The elitist President” figures it well out, but he is not ready to concede to it, serving his opportunism. It is rather those electing and celebrating him with tears in the eyes like Messiah, who are not capable of figuring it out, except the zionists who exactly know what goes on and what they want to obtain.

I would add that the president needed is the one who would realize that there should be no president. That role is a folly of old ways of thinking.

How can we have a president, one who “presides over”?. From Latin praesident, pp of praesidēre, prae + sedere; literally to sit over. The concept suggests that the president can somehow be detached from the body he is sitting over. This is foolishness. obviously he or she came to be president after a process occurring through the “body”. Clearly his family and friends remain part of the “body”, results of decisions affect body. I point to Descartes, but Hobbes’ Leviathan, in which monarch is head (mind) and people/state is body, is also traditional source of confusion.

We don’t even preside (sit over) our own lives, we sit in them.. banality no more. no more presidents.

Let’s be clear, he’s the right person to do a re-enactment of previous presidents during the hayday of empire, but that’s over…and the empire is dropping fast.

What he’s yet to provide is evidence that he really understands this time and place. History tells you something about the fall of empires, but it tells you nothing about NOW. I’ve said this here repeatedly, this is not the 1920s/30s. The confluence of dangerous forces to human existence have never been witnessed in all of human history.

He hired old shoes and talks a talk while bombing yet another sovereign nation just the other day and killing 22 (18 of which were clearly civilians). But it’s not simply the continuation of the butchery, it’s the fact that he’s not the guy that’s needed.

From a person perspective, local change is all I can muster. But the national change needed is so profound and fundamental that our new elitist President won’t figure it out until it’s too late (we’re just about there). We don’t need a popular president. We don’t need a black president. We don’t need a brilliant president. We don’t need a photogenic president.

We need someone with balls who can think clearly through the problem, and not give a f$$$ck what the MSM or the polls or pols say.

He aint the guy. He’s a get along sort that may have worked a few decades ago when we had the luxury of banality.

The field studies of Gates and his empirical results will most likely find application by the new face of the old ideology, Obama who like none of his predecessors offered AIPAC at its annual meeting last year a boundless obsequiousness. Obama tells us, a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, whereas a nuclear, chemical and biological Isreal, a criminal beyond reasonable doubt, is in defiance of “international law” acceptable and even defendable.

This is exactly the zionist misleading about Iran striving for the destruction of Israel with wmd? Why should Iran risk being bombed back into a desert? Why should it inevitably destroy Palestinians? If you ask a sergeant or any war servant at the pentagon, would it be possible to destroy the White House with wmd and spare” good” Washingtonians around, his answer would be, No.