<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anti-Empire Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heike</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-31129</link>
		<dc:creator>heike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-31129</guid>
		<description>Sweetheart, you&#039;re really digging the bottom of the barrel if you think Genosse Blum is some kind of objective source about anything.  He is wrong on so many things, one could write a book about them. 

You waste my time because I have to do research for you that you&#039;re incapable of doing on your own.  From Irving Louis Horowitz, &quot;Cuban Communism 1959-1995&quot;  New York: Transaction Publishers, 1995.  
p.87:  
&quot;It must now be agreed that the argument is critically flawed.  The March 1959 decision never happened.&quot;


 No matter how much lipstick  you put on these DGI pigs, they are still pigs.  Thanks hon, I have nothing to do with the CANF.  Are you really nuts?  Cuba under the constant threat of invasion?  Who&quot;&#039;s stopping Castro from &quot;relaxing control at home&quot;?  

Actually, Liebschen, your Cuban companeros are the ones who are trying to wreak havoc all over the world:

http://cubapolidata.com/2008/08/19/cuban-espionage-threat-to-the-americas/

And why do you lie in your website about the true nature of the Wasp Network?  These guys were no boy scouts.

http://www.america.gov/st/pubs-english/2008/June/20070712120209atlahtnevel0.7962915.html

And if you are so enamored of the Miami Herald, I dare you to print this article on your website:

http://www.cubastudygroup.org/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&amp;PressRelease_id=3710&amp;Month=7&amp;Year=2008

You still haven&#039;t responded to my other points, including why you refuse to champion the cause of political prisoners in Cuba, or why you are so butt-headed in insisting that the Prague Spring was &quot;supported by the CIA,&quot; so you have lost your argument by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweetheart, you&#8217;re really digging the bottom of the barrel if you think Genosse Blum is some kind of objective source about anything.  He is wrong on so many things, one could write a book about them. </p>
<p>You waste my time because I have to do research for you that you&#8217;re incapable of doing on your own.  From Irving Louis Horowitz, &#8220;Cuban Communism 1959-1995&#8243;  New York: Transaction Publishers, 1995.<br />
p.87:<br />
&#8220;It must now be agreed that the argument is critically flawed.  The March 1959 decision never happened.&#8221;</p>
<p> No matter how much lipstick  you put on these DGI pigs, they are still pigs.  Thanks hon, I have nothing to do with the CANF.  Are you really nuts?  Cuba under the constant threat of invasion?  Who&#8221;&#8216;s stopping Castro from &#8220;relaxing control at home&#8221;?  </p>
<p>Actually, Liebschen, your Cuban companeros are the ones who are trying to wreak havoc all over the world:</p>
<p><a href="http://cubapolidata.com/2008/08/19/cuban-espionage-threat-to-the-americas/" rel="nofollow">http://cubapolidata.com/2008/08/19/cuban-espionage-threat-to-the-americas/</a></p>
<p>And why do you lie in your website about the true nature of the Wasp Network?  These guys were no boy scouts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.america.gov/st/pubs-english/2008/June/20070712120209atlahtnevel0.7962915.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.america.gov/st/pubs-english/2008/June/20070712120209atlahtnevel0.7962915.html</a></p>
<p>And if you are so enamored of the Miami Herald, I dare you to print this article on your website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cubastudygroup.org/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&#038;PressRelease_id=3710&#038;Month=7&#038;Year=2008" rel="nofollow">http://www.cubastudygroup.org/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&#038;PressRelease_id=3710&#038;Month=7&#038;Year=2008</a></p>
<p>You still haven&#8217;t responded to my other points, including why you refuse to champion the cause of political prisoners in Cuba, or why you are so butt-headed in insisting that the Prague Spring was &#8220;supported by the CIA,&#8221; so you have lost your argument by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie Michel-Brüning</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-31122</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie Michel-Brüning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-31122</guid>
		<description>William Blum in 2001: &quot;Cuba 1959 to present: Fidel Castro came to power at the beginning of 1959. A U.S. National Security Council meeting of 10 March 1959 included on its agenda the feasibility of bringing &quot;another government to power in Cuba.&quot; There followed 40 years of terrorist attacks, bombings, full-scale military invasion, sanctions, embargos, isolation, assassinations ... Cuba had carried out The Unforgivable Revolution, a very serious threat of setting a &quot;good example&quot; in Latin America.
The saddest part of this is that the world will never know what kind of society Cuba could have produced if left alone, if not constantly under the gun and the threat of invasion, if allowed to relax its control at home. The idealism, the vision, the talent, the internationalism were all there. But we&#039;ll never know. And that of course was the idea.&quot; 
I)n case of the &quot;Cuban Five&quot; you and your CANF fellow are producing martyrs.
Espionage could never been proved by anybody, read the opinions auf the judges at www.freethefive.org .
We are aware of the case since the very artcle about their arrested was posted by &quot;Miami Herald&quot; on September 14, 1998.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Blum in 2001: &#8220;Cuba 1959 to present: Fidel Castro came to power at the beginning of 1959. A U.S. National Security Council meeting of 10 March 1959 included on its agenda the feasibility of bringing &#8220;another government to power in Cuba.&#8221; There followed 40 years of terrorist attacks, bombings, full-scale military invasion, sanctions, embargos, isolation, assassinations &#8230; Cuba had carried out The Unforgivable Revolution, a very serious threat of setting a &#8220;good example&#8221; in Latin America.<br />
The saddest part of this is that the world will never know what kind of society Cuba could have produced if left alone, if not constantly under the gun and the threat of invasion, if allowed to relax its control at home. The idealism, the vision, the talent, the internationalism were all there. But we&#8217;ll never know. And that of course was the idea.&#8221;<br />
I)n case of the &#8220;Cuban Five&#8221; you and your CANF fellow are producing martyrs.<br />
Espionage could never been proved by anybody, read the opinions auf the judges at <a href="http://www.freethefive.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.freethefive.org</a> .<br />
We are aware of the case since the very artcle about their arrested was posted by &#8220;Miami Herald&#8221; on September 14, 1998.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heike</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-31075</link>
		<dc:creator>heike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-31075</guid>
		<description>You write and talk like a DKP Genossin does so why deny it?  You use hypocritical double standards that deny the humanity of &quot;dissident voices&quot; in places like Cuba because its communist government is for you holy and untouchable.  Why haven&#039;t you written a single word in defense of the over 50 Cuban dissident voices rotting in that country&#039;s jails?  You hardly fit the bill for someone &quot;honestly seeking for truth and justice.&quot;  

Visiting rights for two of the wives were denied because they have committed acts of espionage against the U.S., which are grounds for making them ineligible for entry.  

Yes, communism has been responsible for millions of deaths in China, the USSR, and Eastern Europe.  Why do you write that opposing these murderers is somehow immoral?

You are clueless about what is going on in the world, a kind of Sarah Palin of the far Left with your ridiculous &quot;it&#039;s all a CIA plot&quot;  paranoia.  You still haven&#039;t answered my request for hard facts about &quot;CIA support for the Prague Spring&quot; because you simply have no facts.  If you had the slightest morality, you would simply graciously admit you didn&#039;t know a thing that you were talking about.  YOU are truly the one who sees the world as black and white, so don&#039;t accuse others of that sin!

How many people were killed by your Cuban companeros because of the &quot;armed struggle&quot; against &quot;capitalist imperialism&quot;?   

Wenn Du kann nicht auf Englische schreiben, dann bitte  schreib auf Deutsch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write and talk like a DKP Genossin does so why deny it?  You use hypocritical double standards that deny the humanity of &#8220;dissident voices&#8221; in places like Cuba because its communist government is for you holy and untouchable.  Why haven&#8217;t you written a single word in defense of the over 50 Cuban dissident voices rotting in that country&#8217;s jails?  You hardly fit the bill for someone &#8220;honestly seeking for truth and justice.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Visiting rights for two of the wives were denied because they have committed acts of espionage against the U.S., which are grounds for making them ineligible for entry.  </p>
<p>Yes, communism has been responsible for millions of deaths in China, the USSR, and Eastern Europe.  Why do you write that opposing these murderers is somehow immoral?</p>
<p>You are clueless about what is going on in the world, a kind of Sarah Palin of the far Left with your ridiculous &#8220;it&#8217;s all a CIA plot&#8221;  paranoia.  You still haven&#8217;t answered my request for hard facts about &#8220;CIA support for the Prague Spring&#8221; because you simply have no facts.  If you had the slightest morality, you would simply graciously admit you didn&#8217;t know a thing that you were talking about.  YOU are truly the one who sees the world as black and white, so don&#8217;t accuse others of that sin!</p>
<p>How many people were killed by your Cuban companeros because of the &#8220;armed struggle&#8221; against &#8220;capitalist imperialism&#8221;?   </p>
<p>Wenn Du kann nicht auf Englische schreiben, dann bitte  schreib auf Deutsch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie Michel-Brüning</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-31069</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie Michel-Brüning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-31069</guid>
		<description>Dear Heike,

First of all: I am no &quot;DKP-Genossin&quot;. and I saw the film, &quot;Das Leben der anderen&quot;. Sorry for my poor English, but you can’t divide living into black and white: on one side the evil communists and on the other the good people. - Well, I am grown up and living still in Western Germany experiencing the local reality, for instance the reduction of social achievements after the Capitalism has won, learning by personal meetings with former citizens of the GDR, as well as DKP members living in Western Germany and learning by a lot of literature about former &quot;Headquarters of the CIA&quot; in Germany and elsewhere. Moreover, I don&#039;t want to make conversation nor discuss with somebody aggressively defending prejudices and misinformations.
The reason for my comment was the following:
As it seems to me, the U.S. government cannot regard humanitarian reasons or international agreements, as for instance, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, nor their own constitution, if it comes to Cuba.
Apart from that, Cuba complaint in 1999 3.478 dead people and 2.099 invalid people because of the terrorist attacks coming from U.S. territory carried out mainly by exile Cubans. That was why, the Cuban Five came into the USA - unarmed risking their lives, saving lives, not only those of their compatriots but also those of U.S. citizens.

There is an U.S. law regarding the &quot;defence of necessity&quot;, but the U.S. government does not want to apply it to those &quot;Cuban Spies&quot; while neglecting the evidences, obviously, just because of revanchism and so called anti communism.
They rather punished them repeatedly by arbitrary isolation confinements amounting to torture for overall 18 months and additionally, they still deny visitng rights for two wives of the Five, which is another kind of psychological torture, while neglecting their own constitution referring the protection of families, again. (s. www.freethefive.org )

Apart from that: the first Christians were communist too, they condemned greed like Jesus did and wanted to share everything with each other. 
The Bush administration referred repeatedly to Christian believes, however, “You shall recognize them at their fruits.”, s. Matth. 7,16.

Sincerely to all of you
honestly seeking for truth, peace and justice
those of &quot;good will&quot;
Josie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Heike,</p>
<p>First of all: I am no &#8220;DKP-Genossin&#8221;. and I saw the film, &#8220;Das Leben der anderen&#8221;. Sorry for my poor English, but you can’t divide living into black and white: on one side the evil communists and on the other the good people. &#8211; Well, I am grown up and living still in Western Germany experiencing the local reality, for instance the reduction of social achievements after the Capitalism has won, learning by personal meetings with former citizens of the GDR, as well as DKP members living in Western Germany and learning by a lot of literature about former &#8220;Headquarters of the CIA&#8221; in Germany and elsewhere. Moreover, I don&#8217;t want to make conversation nor discuss with somebody aggressively defending prejudices and misinformations.<br />
The reason for my comment was the following:<br />
As it seems to me, the U.S. government cannot regard humanitarian reasons or international agreements, as for instance, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, nor their own constitution, if it comes to Cuba.<br />
Apart from that, Cuba complaint in 1999 3.478 dead people and 2.099 invalid people because of the terrorist attacks coming from U.S. territory carried out mainly by exile Cubans. That was why, the Cuban Five came into the USA &#8211; unarmed risking their lives, saving lives, not only those of their compatriots but also those of U.S. citizens.</p>
<p>There is an U.S. law regarding the &#8220;defence of necessity&#8221;, but the U.S. government does not want to apply it to those &#8220;Cuban Spies&#8221; while neglecting the evidences, obviously, just because of revanchism and so called anti communism.<br />
They rather punished them repeatedly by arbitrary isolation confinements amounting to torture for overall 18 months and additionally, they still deny visitng rights for two wives of the Five, which is another kind of psychological torture, while neglecting their own constitution referring the protection of families, again. (s. <a href="http://www.freethefive.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.freethefive.org</a> )</p>
<p>Apart from that: the first Christians were communist too, they condemned greed like Jesus did and wanted to share everything with each other.<br />
The Bush administration referred repeatedly to Christian believes, however, “You shall recognize them at their fruits.”, s. Matth. 7,16.</p>
<p>Sincerely to all of you<br />
honestly seeking for truth, peace and justice<br />
those of &#8220;good will&#8221;<br />
Josie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heike</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-31002</link>
		<dc:creator>heike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-31002</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Genossin.  Your unreconstructed DKP mental twists don&#039;t hold water.  &quot;CIA supported Prague Spring.&quot; You write incredible nonsense.  Walter Ulbricht is dead and gone but his spirit still lives in your communist soul.  Go look up the documents from 1968, many of which have been published, and try to find a single mention in the internal Soviet discussion about concern over &quot;CIA interference.&quot;  You can&#039;t.  The Soviets did try a black operation by planting arms in western Bohemia and making it seem that the BND was cavorting with the Prague reformers.  They were exposed by the CSSR minister of interior Josef Pavel.  You insult the intelligence of millions of Czechs and Slovaks who wanted to live in a system that they controlled and where they would be as free to speak their minds as you are.   The only pressure the Czechs and Slovaks faced was from the Soviet superpower, whose leaders conspired with local quislings to request the &quot;Bruderliche Hilfe&quot; behind the backs of the country&#039;s own leadership. Actually, if anyone supported the Prague Spring, it was the reformist CPs of Western Europe (the DKP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the SED, was certainly not one of them)

You also write utter nonsense about the cinco companeros.  They were spies, plain and simply, sent by the DGI on a mission to the U.S called La Red Avispa.  
http://canf.org/2005/1es/historia/la-red-avispa-en-estados-unidos.htm

I&#039;d like to ask you what would happen to CIA spies sent to Cuba.  They wouldn&#039;t have to worry about visits by their spouses because they would have been sent to the wall without further ado.  If you really cared about Cubans, you would direct your efforts to securing the freedom of Cubans who were sentenced to long prison terms because they dared to criticize El Barbudo or to demand freedoms in their country.  And please, none of this scheiße about &quot;they&#039;re all CIA agents.&quot;  
http://marcmasferrer.typepad.com/uncommon_sense/Group56.html

AI has written extensively about the plight of prisoners of conscience in Cuba.
http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&amp;id=ENGUSA20080317005

If you haven&#039;t seen it already, I suggest you watch &quot;Das Leben Der Anderen,&quot; which neatly sums up the hypocrisy of the Communist paradise which existed behind the Mauer in the &quot;DDR.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Genossin.  Your unreconstructed DKP mental twists don&#8217;t hold water.  &#8220;CIA supported Prague Spring.&#8221; You write incredible nonsense.  Walter Ulbricht is dead and gone but his spirit still lives in your communist soul.  Go look up the documents from 1968, many of which have been published, and try to find a single mention in the internal Soviet discussion about concern over &#8220;CIA interference.&#8221;  You can&#8217;t.  The Soviets did try a black operation by planting arms in western Bohemia and making it seem that the BND was cavorting with the Prague reformers.  They were exposed by the CSSR minister of interior Josef Pavel.  You insult the intelligence of millions of Czechs and Slovaks who wanted to live in a system that they controlled and where they would be as free to speak their minds as you are.   The only pressure the Czechs and Slovaks faced was from the Soviet superpower, whose leaders conspired with local quislings to request the &#8220;Bruderliche Hilfe&#8221; behind the backs of the country&#8217;s own leadership. Actually, if anyone supported the Prague Spring, it was the reformist CPs of Western Europe (the DKP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the SED, was certainly not one of them)</p>
<p>You also write utter nonsense about the cinco companeros.  They were spies, plain and simply, sent by the DGI on a mission to the U.S called La Red Avispa.<br />
<a href="http://canf.org/2005/1es/historia/la-red-avispa-en-estados-unidos.htm" rel="nofollow">http://canf.org/2005/1es/historia/la-red-avispa-en-estados-unidos.htm</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to ask you what would happen to CIA spies sent to Cuba.  They wouldn&#8217;t have to worry about visits by their spouses because they would have been sent to the wall without further ado.  If you really cared about Cubans, you would direct your efforts to securing the freedom of Cubans who were sentenced to long prison terms because they dared to criticize El Barbudo or to demand freedoms in their country.  And please, none of this scheiße about &#8220;they&#8217;re all CIA agents.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://marcmasferrer.typepad.com/uncommon_sense/Group56.html" rel="nofollow">http://marcmasferrer.typepad.com/uncommon_sense/Group56.html</a></p>
<p>AI has written extensively about the plight of prisoners of conscience in Cuba.<br />
<a href="http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&#038;id=ENGUSA20080317005" rel="nofollow">http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&#038;id=ENGUSA20080317005</a></p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it already, I suggest you watch &#8220;Das Leben Der Anderen,&#8221; which neatly sums up the hypocrisy of the Communist paradise which existed behind the Mauer in the &#8220;DDR.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie Michel-Brüning</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30993</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie Michel-Brüning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30993</guid>
		<description>Appreciating this article as much as the others by William Blum - certainly my husband and I will quote it (translated into German) by letters to the editor, even if they will never be posted by German main stream press - I want to refer to Michael Kenny:
&quot;Communism died in Prague in 1968. After the repression of the Prague Spring, everybody, all over Europe, east and west, and most of all the young, my generation, realised that communism was just another form of fascism. Once the young turn their backs on anything, it is condemned to die of old age. Gorby was 37 in 1968. Thus, nearly 20 years before he came to power, Gorbachev and his generation realised that communism was a failure.&quot;
I can&#039;t prove it by now, but, dear Michael, you can be sure, that there was an inteference between the spring in Prague (supported by the CIA then) and the kind of violence the military of the Soviet Union reacted on it.
Apart from all failures communist leaders have committed, you cannot judge before regarding the interferences, the pressure they had to face by U.S.  Super Power. 
I hope William Blum can prove it to you. 
Apart from that, from my point of view every &quot;ism&quot; or fanatically presented ideology is a failure. 
However, what is currently more important to me and many of my friends all over the world, we can&#039;t trust in U.S.  jurisdiction, the so called Common Law, to which justice seems to depend on what is &quot;common&quot; just now. 
The mentioned case of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg reminds us at the case of the &quot;Cuban Five&quot;. This violance of human and international rights is happening now. Their lawers are filing a petition to the Supreme Court by now. However, as all of us know, the Supreme has to be alarmed by public opinion for regarding a case at all.
Please, dear Mr. Blum and all of you, inform your people about this case the world is looking at you.
Sincerely, Josie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciating this article as much as the others by William Blum &#8211; certainly my husband and I will quote it (translated into German) by letters to the editor, even if they will never be posted by German main stream press &#8211; I want to refer to Michael Kenny:<br />
&#8220;Communism died in Prague in 1968. After the repression of the Prague Spring, everybody, all over Europe, east and west, and most of all the young, my generation, realised that communism was just another form of fascism. Once the young turn their backs on anything, it is condemned to die of old age. Gorby was 37 in 1968. Thus, nearly 20 years before he came to power, Gorbachev and his generation realised that communism was a failure.&#8221;<br />
I can&#8217;t prove it by now, but, dear Michael, you can be sure, that there was an inteference between the spring in Prague (supported by the CIA then) and the kind of violence the military of the Soviet Union reacted on it.<br />
Apart from all failures communist leaders have committed, you cannot judge before regarding the interferences, the pressure they had to face by U.S.  Super Power.<br />
I hope William Blum can prove it to you.<br />
Apart from that, from my point of view every &#8220;ism&#8221; or fanatically presented ideology is a failure.<br />
However, what is currently more important to me and many of my friends all over the world, we can&#8217;t trust in U.S.  jurisdiction, the so called Common Law, to which justice seems to depend on what is &#8220;common&#8221; just now.<br />
The mentioned case of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg reminds us at the case of the &#8220;Cuban Five&#8221;. This violance of human and international rights is happening now. Their lawers are filing a petition to the Supreme Court by now. However, as all of us know, the Supreme has to be alarmed by public opinion for regarding a case at all.<br />
Please, dear Mr. Blum and all of you, inform your people about this case the world is looking at you.<br />
Sincerely, Josie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hylen Smurr</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30950</link>
		<dc:creator>Hylen Smurr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30950</guid>
		<description>The McCain-Pinochet meeting was in 1985, not 1975 as you have it. Just a typo no doubt. Otherwise an excellent article. Keep up great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McCain-Pinochet meeting was in 1985, not 1975 as you have it. Just a typo no doubt. Otherwise an excellent article. Keep up great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Paul Oberg</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Paul Oberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30906</guid>
		<description>You know, the more I hear about Bill Ayers, the more I&#039;m obliged to say: Good for him! Here was a man who believed in something and acted on it. If only we had people like this today. We&#039;re way overdue for another 60&#039;s. I sincerely believe that. In fact, considering the level of seething, pulsating evil we now have in the Pentagon, and in police stations, and in government and bureaucratic buildings nowadays, I say we&#039;re in even greater need of people like Ayers now than in that time. In a time when the police were beating peaceful protesters to death in the streets regularly, not to mention what the blacks went through, why is everyone so up in arms about a guy who planted a few homemade wake-up calls in homebases for corruption and oppression?  No wonder Americans are so willing to take a George Bush, a John McCain, a Barack Obama. We&#039;ve been trained to sympathize with the enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the more I hear about Bill Ayers, the more I&#8217;m obliged to say: Good for him! Here was a man who believed in something and acted on it. If only we had people like this today. We&#8217;re way overdue for another 60&#8242;s. I sincerely believe that. In fact, considering the level of seething, pulsating evil we now have in the Pentagon, and in police stations, and in government and bureaucratic buildings nowadays, I say we&#8217;re in even greater need of people like Ayers now than in that time. In a time when the police were beating peaceful protesters to death in the streets regularly, not to mention what the blacks went through, why is everyone so up in arms about a guy who planted a few homemade wake-up calls in homebases for corruption and oppression?  No wonder Americans are so willing to take a George Bush, a John McCain, a Barack Obama. We&#8217;ve been trained to sympathize with the enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30899</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30899</guid>
		<description>Eddie,
In general, I concur. This was, relative to the other pieces I&#039;ve read from Blum, a very disappointing one. 

The whole issue is a duopoly red herring. First, while I do have an issue with you&#039;re citing Obama&#039;s age (it seems pedantic), I do think this is revisionist history. Judge the Weathermen and Ayers on their own &quot;merits&quot; which have absolutely nothing to do with Obama (there&#039;s probably 6 degrees of separation between most of us and Adolf Hitler).

Obama is, generally speaking a conservative Democrat. Ayers is whatever he&#039;s become in the interim of the early 70&#039;s and now (who cares other than the phony media and their mindless pundants and the Republican say-anything-got-to-get-elected-machine?).

The whole issue is in accord with Obama being a socialist; and the equally ludicrous notion that pouring money into Wall Street is corporate socialism - that is an oxymoron which has nothing to do with socialism any more than poverty stricken rich people do.

Instead of giving socialism a bad name by labeling Obama one, let&#039;s just call Obama for what he is - a, perhaps, soon to be killer in the name of her majesties Manifest Destiny. And if not him the irksome McCain.

The real issues are easy for most busy and uncomplicated people to figure out. As the song says: We don&#039;t need a Weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie,<br />
In general, I concur. This was, relative to the other pieces I&#8217;ve read from Blum, a very disappointing one. </p>
<p>The whole issue is a duopoly red herring. First, while I do have an issue with you&#8217;re citing Obama&#8217;s age (it seems pedantic), I do think this is revisionist history. Judge the Weathermen and Ayers on their own &#8220;merits&#8221; which have absolutely nothing to do with Obama (there&#8217;s probably 6 degrees of separation between most of us and Adolf Hitler).</p>
<p>Obama is, generally speaking a conservative Democrat. Ayers is whatever he&#8217;s become in the interim of the early 70&#8242;s and now (who cares other than the phony media and their mindless pundants and the Republican say-anything-got-to-get-elected-machine?).</p>
<p>The whole issue is in accord with Obama being a socialist; and the equally ludicrous notion that pouring money into Wall Street is corporate socialism &#8211; that is an oxymoron which has nothing to do with socialism any more than poverty stricken rich people do.</p>
<p>Instead of giving socialism a bad name by labeling Obama one, let&#8217;s just call Obama for what he is &#8211; a, perhaps, soon to be killer in the name of her majesties Manifest Destiny. And if not him the irksome McCain.</p>
<p>The real issues are easy for most busy and uncomplicated people to figure out. As the song says: We don&#8217;t need a Weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30898</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30898</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like revisionary history, I don&#039;t like people who are informed and I don&#039;t like people who lie.  Which Blum&#039;s practicing I&#039;ll leave for others to judge.  This is incorrect: &quot;Governor Palin has accused Obama of “palling around with terrorists”, although Ayers’ association with the Weathermen during their period of carrying out anti-Vietnam War bombings in the United States took place when Obama was around 8-years-old. &quot;  

It is the Barack talking point, it is not true.  Here are bombings Weather carried out via Third Estate:

Marin County Courthouse bombed October 8, 1970 (Barack is nine)
Traffic-court building in Queens bombed October 10, 1970
Harvard Center for International Affairs is bombed October 14, 1970
US Capitol building bombing March 1, 1971
Office of California Prisons is bombed August 29, 1971 (when Barack is ten)
NY Dept of Corrections (Albany, NY) is bombed September 17, 1971
MIT bombed October 15, 1971
Pentagon bombing comes in here on May 19, 1972
103rd NYC Police Precinct bombed May 18, 1973 (Barack is now eleven)
ITT NY headquarters is bombed September 28, 1973 (Barack is twelve)
San Francisco Dept of Health, Education and Welfare is bombed March 6, 1974
Office of Calif Attorney General bombed May 31, 1974
Pittsburgh headquarters of Gulf Oil bombed June 17, 1974
Anaconda Corp bombed September 11, 1974 (Barack is thirteen)
The State Dept is bombed January 29, 1975
NY&#039;s Banco de Ponce is bombed June 16, 1975
Kennecott Corporation is bombed September 1975 (Barack is fourteen)


Also not true is that Weather was about ending the Vietnam War.  Weather was about revolutionary change, revolutionary struggle.  It is appalling to see so many on the left lie about what Weather stood for in order to elect Barack.  It&#039;s like stripping Emma Goldman of her history or watering her down.  Accomplishments are accomplishments and history is history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like revisionary history, I don&#8217;t like people who are informed and I don&#8217;t like people who lie.  Which Blum&#8217;s practicing I&#8217;ll leave for others to judge.  This is incorrect: &#8220;Governor Palin has accused Obama of “palling around with terrorists”, although Ayers’ association with the Weathermen during their period of carrying out anti-Vietnam War bombings in the United States took place when Obama was around 8-years-old. &#8221;  </p>
<p>It is the Barack talking point, it is not true.  Here are bombings Weather carried out via Third Estate:</p>
<p>Marin County Courthouse bombed October 8, 1970 (Barack is nine)<br />
Traffic-court building in Queens bombed October 10, 1970<br />
Harvard Center for International Affairs is bombed October 14, 1970<br />
US Capitol building bombing March 1, 1971<br />
Office of California Prisons is bombed August 29, 1971 (when Barack is ten)<br />
NY Dept of Corrections (Albany, NY) is bombed September 17, 1971<br />
MIT bombed October 15, 1971<br />
Pentagon bombing comes in here on May 19, 1972<br />
103rd NYC Police Precinct bombed May 18, 1973 (Barack is now eleven)<br />
ITT NY headquarters is bombed September 28, 1973 (Barack is twelve)<br />
San Francisco Dept of Health, Education and Welfare is bombed March 6, 1974<br />
Office of Calif Attorney General bombed May 31, 1974<br />
Pittsburgh headquarters of Gulf Oil bombed June 17, 1974<br />
Anaconda Corp bombed September 11, 1974 (Barack is thirteen)<br />
The State Dept is bombed January 29, 1975<br />
NY&#8217;s Banco de Ponce is bombed June 16, 1975<br />
Kennecott Corporation is bombed September 1975 (Barack is fourteen)</p>
<p>Also not true is that Weather was about ending the Vietnam War.  Weather was about revolutionary change, revolutionary struggle.  It is appalling to see so many on the left lie about what Weather stood for in order to elect Barack.  It&#8217;s like stripping Emma Goldman of her history or watering her down.  Accomplishments are accomplishments and history is history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron ridenour</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30861</link>
		<dc:creator>ron ridenour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30861</guid>
		<description>Excellent piece, Bill. I can find nothing to disagree with you so I will simply offer praise, and one comment about the also excellent non-published letter about the Rosenbergs by John Gerassi. I have always meant the same as he about them: they were heroes regardless of their &quot;guilt&quot;. And, if they did pass on information to the Soviets that helped it become an atomic balance to the US of Amerikkka then they are the best heroes ever.

I recall when ex-radical Ronald Radosh had his &quot;The Rosenberg File: A search for the truth&quot; published, in 1983--based largely on FBI sources--I was writing for In These Times from Denmark and Central America. I was appalled when editor James Weinstein wrote an editorial applauding the book&#039;s finding that they were, indeed, &quot;guilty&quot; and thus traitors. He wrote, to the effect, that he had long thought they were but had protested the sentence of death, that is, murder. He was relieved now that the &quot;truth&quot; was out and he no longer had to feel any sense of support--something to that effect; my memory after 25 years fails me. But I clearly remember my anger and that I wrote to him in distress of his position and for applauding the turn-coat radical Radosh. I stopped writing for ITT, albeit it was one of very few more-decent-than not publications on the left.

In solidarity, Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent piece, Bill. I can find nothing to disagree with you so I will simply offer praise, and one comment about the also excellent non-published letter about the Rosenbergs by John Gerassi. I have always meant the same as he about them: they were heroes regardless of their &#8220;guilt&#8221;. And, if they did pass on information to the Soviets that helped it become an atomic balance to the US of Amerikkka then they are the best heroes ever.</p>
<p>I recall when ex-radical Ronald Radosh had his &#8220;The Rosenberg File: A search for the truth&#8221; published, in 1983&#8211;based largely on FBI sources&#8211;I was writing for In These Times from Denmark and Central America. I was appalled when editor James Weinstein wrote an editorial applauding the book&#8217;s finding that they were, indeed, &#8220;guilty&#8221; and thus traitors. He wrote, to the effect, that he had long thought they were but had protested the sentence of death, that is, murder. He was relieved now that the &#8220;truth&#8221; was out and he no longer had to feel any sense of support&#8211;something to that effect; my memory after 25 years fails me. But I clearly remember my anger and that I wrote to him in distress of his position and for applauding the turn-coat radical Radosh. I stopped writing for ITT, albeit it was one of very few more-decent-than not publications on the left.</p>
<p>In solidarity, Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30830</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30830</guid>
		<description>Mr Blum is right when he says that Gorbachev wanted to align the Soviet Union on Western Europe but he doesn’t go into why he wanted to do that. 

Communism died in Prague in 1968. After the repression of the Prague Spring, everybody, all over Europe, east and west, and most of all the young, my generation, realised that communism was just another form of fascism. Once the young turn their backs on anything, it is condemned to die of old age. Gorby was 37 in 1968. Thus, nearly 20 years before he came to power, Gorbachev and his generation realised that communism was a failure.

The communist attempt to hijack the Portuguese revolution, which was ultimately blocked by the Catholic Church, gave people the idea as to how to overthrow the communist dictatorships and the obvious place to strike was the country where the Church was strongest: Poland!

The supposed “stability”, i.e. the inability to evolve within the parameters of the system, was the very factor that brought about the downfall of the system! Civil society wanted change. The “end of history” mentality of the system didn’t allow for change. Ergo, the system had to go!

The great blessing of all this is that communism was capitalism’s “crutch”. With communism gone, the same “end of history” mentality and its concomitant incapacity to adapt is bringing down US-dominated globalised, financialised capitalism. In its place, we in Europe at least will probably get the social democracy which comes naturally to most Europeans (including Gorbachev!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Blum is right when he says that Gorbachev wanted to align the Soviet Union on Western Europe but he doesn’t go into why he wanted to do that. </p>
<p>Communism died in Prague in 1968. After the repression of the Prague Spring, everybody, all over Europe, east and west, and most of all the young, my generation, realised that communism was just another form of fascism. Once the young turn their backs on anything, it is condemned to die of old age. Gorby was 37 in 1968. Thus, nearly 20 years before he came to power, Gorbachev and his generation realised that communism was a failure.</p>
<p>The communist attempt to hijack the Portuguese revolution, which was ultimately blocked by the Catholic Church, gave people the idea as to how to overthrow the communist dictatorships and the obvious place to strike was the country where the Church was strongest: Poland!</p>
<p>The supposed “stability”, i.e. the inability to evolve within the parameters of the system, was the very factor that brought about the downfall of the system! Civil society wanted change. The “end of history” mentality of the system didn’t allow for change. Ergo, the system had to go!</p>
<p>The great blessing of all this is that communism was capitalism’s “crutch”. With communism gone, the same “end of history” mentality and its concomitant incapacity to adapt is bringing down US-dominated globalised, financialised capitalism. In its place, we in Europe at least will probably get the social democracy which comes naturally to most Europeans (including Gorbachev!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Horn</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/the-anti-empire-report-3/#comment-30827</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Horn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4353#comment-30827</guid>
		<description>Great article, as always, by one of the most astute observers of US and international history and politics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, as always, by one of the most astute observers of US and international history and politics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

