<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Path to Victory in Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/path-to-victory-in-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/path-to-victory-in-iraq/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:46:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/path-to-victory-in-iraq/#comment-30602</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4207#comment-30602</guid>
		<description>This is a great piece - a good antidote to the media &quot;consensus&quot; about the present state of things in Iraq. If the left isn&#039;t able to break free of the cliché analysis of &quot;the war is bad, but Iraq was such an evil dictatorship before we went there&quot; or &quot;if we leave now, sectarian civil war will engulf everything,&quot; then it will never be capable of putting forward a coherent response to the U.S. occupation. 

The war is not just a humanitarian disaster – it is a total violation of the sovereignty and independence of a whole people and needs to be understood in those terms. The only solution is the restoration of Iraq&#039;s self-determination through the victory of the national resistance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great piece &#8211; a good antidote to the media &#8220;consensus&#8221; about the present state of things in Iraq. If the left isn&#8217;t able to break free of the cliché analysis of &#8220;the war is bad, but Iraq was such an evil dictatorship before we went there&#8221; or &#8220;if we leave now, sectarian civil war will engulf everything,&#8221; then it will never be capable of putting forward a coherent response to the U.S. occupation. </p>
<p>The war is not just a humanitarian disaster – it is a total violation of the sovereignty and independence of a whole people and needs to be understood in those terms. The only solution is the restoration of Iraq&#8217;s self-determination through the victory of the national resistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar  bob  balkas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/10/path-to-victory-in-iraq/#comment-30420</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar  bob  balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=4207#comment-30420</guid>
		<description>kosta harlan&#039;s piece tacitly suggest that the planners of the iraq invasion have not been aware that most likely there wld be armed resistance to subsequent occupation and  installment of a puppet.
     they must have at least thought of a possible interethnic and intersectarian violence and displacement of people.  
but even more important is the question, Did the plannners of the iraqi invasion count on a victory?
or democratization of iraq?
it seems to me that uncle went yet to another war in order to win it.
win it, as he has described it prior to invasion and as he will (have no doubt) describe it in a decade or century? 
w. the exception of nam, US had to date won every war and w. full justification.
w. full justification, according to uncle&#039;s historians.
the only historians that children will know ab and learn history from. 
     in short, uncle has succeded once again. if for no other reason than the fact tha he obtains a foothold in iraq.
and, dear friends, american dead in iraq whether it be eventually a 100, 000 wld have been worth it to the plutocrats.
and to inspiere future cannon fodder, the dead wld be mightily praised. thnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kosta harlan&#8217;s piece tacitly suggest that the planners of the iraq invasion have not been aware that most likely there wld be armed resistance to subsequent occupation and  installment of a puppet.<br />
     they must have at least thought of a possible interethnic and intersectarian violence and displacement of people.<br />
but even more important is the question, Did the plannners of the iraqi invasion count on a victory?<br />
or democratization of iraq?<br />
it seems to me that uncle went yet to another war in order to win it.<br />
win it, as he has described it prior to invasion and as he will (have no doubt) describe it in a decade or century?<br />
w. the exception of nam, US had to date won every war and w. full justification.<br />
w. full justification, according to uncle&#8217;s historians.<br />
the only historians that children will know ab and learn history from.<br />
     in short, uncle has succeded once again. if for no other reason than the fact tha he obtains a foothold in iraq.<br />
and, dear friends, american dead in iraq whether it be eventually a 100, 000 wld have been worth it to the plutocrats.<br />
and to inspiere future cannon fodder, the dead wld be mightily praised. thnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.262 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-08 04:34:23 -->
