<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Prophetic Challenge: “Few Are Guilty, but All Are Responsible”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:56:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26053</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 08:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26053</guid>
		<description>The idea of the people being the revolution is sort of right. BUT. The people still need some sort of common direction, some common belief behind which they can unite. What is that direction, that belief? The idea that some great leader will emerge to lead us out of the wilderness is now too discredited for anyone to seriously trust - that&#039;s the trick that all revolutions use, and always result only in replacing one set of tyrants with another leaving the people just as downtrodden as they were before.

Free Democracy is an answer. It has no leaders, just an administration that the people directly control.

www.freedemocrats.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of the people being the revolution is sort of right. BUT. The people still need some sort of common direction, some common belief behind which they can unite. What is that direction, that belief? The idea that some great leader will emerge to lead us out of the wilderness is now too discredited for anyone to seriously trust &#8211; that&#8217;s the trick that all revolutions use, and always result only in replacing one set of tyrants with another leaving the people just as downtrodden as they were before.</p>
<p>Free Democracy is an answer. It has no leaders, just an administration that the people directly control.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freedemocrats.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.freedemocrats.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26029</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26029</guid>
		<description>birgit,
you are right. ruling class in US will never tolerate two, or three party system.
it likes one policy for controling domestic people and one policy controling foregn pop.
doemstics are controled by lies, etc.  foreign pops are controled by bombs/missiles, etc.
it&#039;s control that matters. it is obtained by whatever means necessary.
if the means become less fruitful, they can be changed. as long as they are very fruitful, amers will enjoy some freedoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>birgit,<br />
you are right. ruling class in US will never tolerate two, or three party system.<br />
it likes one policy for controling domestic people and one policy controling foregn pop.<br />
doemstics are controled by lies, etc.  foreign pops are controled by bombs/missiles, etc.<br />
it&#8217;s control that matters. it is obtained by whatever means necessary.<br />
if the means become less fruitful, they can be changed. as long as they are very fruitful, amers will enjoy some freedoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birgit</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26027</link>
		<dc:creator>birgit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26027</guid>
		<description>Let go of the false left right paradigm.
The 2 alleged political parties are nothing but two turds that came out of the same place
There is no difference.We  are being shown a circus, the real criminals are out of sight, behind the curtain.Bushcheney inc are just puppets on a string...why can&#039;t we grasp that?
It has been us against the elite for millenias.We are kept at each others throats artificially, and intentionally to keep our focus off the ones that are really doing a number on us. Wake sheeples, once and for all wake up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let go of the false left right paradigm.<br />
The 2 alleged political parties are nothing but two turds that came out of the same place<br />
There is no difference.We  are being shown a circus, the real criminals are out of sight, behind the curtain.Bushcheney inc are just puppets on a string&#8230;why can&#8217;t we grasp that?<br />
It has been us against the elite for millenias.We are kept at each others throats artificially, and intentionally to keep our focus off the ones that are really doing a number on us. Wake sheeples, once and for all wake up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26017</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26017</guid>
		<description>millennia ago, a hunter may have said to his clan of , let&#039;s say, 100 people, I&#039;ve seen deer by our pond. let&#039;s go and slay one!
sure enough there were deer by their pond. one was killed and all ate.
the tribe trusted the hunter. the trusting being our greatest wealth and security.
even today most people most of  the time love to trust their hunter. but now the hunter is no longer the hunter but the great hunter.
the words of the ancient hunters had full symbolic value. words such as We&#039;ll all eat! One for all, all  for one! ok, we have just two little girls which we need to procreate and remain as clan. watch them!  
but then come along mad priests; spreading dissent/fear; collaborating with one or two equally mad people.
subjugation began.
ooh,how good IS trust/hope/wish everything go well.
but for those mad people.........
thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>millennia ago, a hunter may have said to his clan of , let&#8217;s say, 100 people, I&#8217;ve seen deer by our pond. let&#8217;s go and slay one!<br />
sure enough there were deer by their pond. one was killed and all ate.<br />
the tribe trusted the hunter. the trusting being our greatest wealth and security.<br />
even today most people most of  the time love to trust their hunter. but now the hunter is no longer the hunter but the great hunter.<br />
the words of the ancient hunters had full symbolic value. words such as We&#8217;ll all eat! One for all, all  for one! ok, we have just two little girls which we need to procreate and remain as clan. watch them!<br />
but then come along mad priests; spreading dissent/fear; collaborating with one or two equally mad people.<br />
subjugation began.<br />
ooh,how good IS trust/hope/wish everything go well.<br />
but for those mad people&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Koontz</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26016</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Koontz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26016</guid>
		<description>&quot;I disagree with the view that ordinary people are responsible for the actions of their leaders - this accepts the notion that ordinary people have some sort of control or influence over their decision makers and we all know that simply isn’t true. Our so-called ‘democracies’ allow us to change the front men who appear to be making the decisions, but not the real decision makers.&quot;

Ordinary people have to seize power. That&#039;s what democracy is - it&#039;s &quot;one human, one unit of power&quot;. Ordinary people need to create that political reality, and not stop until it&#039;s accomplished, and afterwards sustain it. If instead the people believe...

&quot;The people as a group cannot be blamed for this - they mostly just want to live and let live and are mostly too worn down just trying to survive and provide better for their children. Of course they are deliberately maintained in this condition - but they cannot be blamed for that.&quot;

Are their descendants going to forgive them for being &quot;too beaten down to create a better world&quot;? Is that the kind of thing that should be on someone&#039;s tombstone? I would have trouble leaving any flowers upon my ancestors&#039; graves if that inscription was etched.

Struggle is the only path in life - struggle is perpetual until victory is achieved. Capitalists understand this and live just that reality yet the supposed &quot;social justice movement&quot; makes up excuses like &quot;Oh, no, it&#039;s just too difficult to fight!&quot;

The reason we are nearing a world of capitalist totalitarian control is because for the most part capitalists have defeated socialists. The only way to correct that is for socialists to defeat capitalists. The only way to produce that victory is to fight and destroy capitalism. &quot;We&#039;re too beaten down to fight&quot; is not a path to victory.

&quot;Most revolutions have used the people to overthrow their tyrants simply to see the old tyrants replaced with a new batch.&quot;

In a democratic revolution, the revolution IS the people. There is no such thing as a democratic revolution that involves a &quot;vanguard&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I disagree with the view that ordinary people are responsible for the actions of their leaders &#8211; this accepts the notion that ordinary people have some sort of control or influence over their decision makers and we all know that simply isn’t true. Our so-called ‘democracies’ allow us to change the front men who appear to be making the decisions, but not the real decision makers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ordinary people have to seize power. That&#8217;s what democracy is &#8211; it&#8217;s &#8220;one human, one unit of power&#8221;. Ordinary people need to create that political reality, and not stop until it&#8217;s accomplished, and afterwards sustain it. If instead the people believe&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;The people as a group cannot be blamed for this &#8211; they mostly just want to live and let live and are mostly too worn down just trying to survive and provide better for their children. Of course they are deliberately maintained in this condition &#8211; but they cannot be blamed for that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are their descendants going to forgive them for being &#8220;too beaten down to create a better world&#8221;? Is that the kind of thing that should be on someone&#8217;s tombstone? I would have trouble leaving any flowers upon my ancestors&#8217; graves if that inscription was etched.</p>
<p>Struggle is the only path in life &#8211; struggle is perpetual until victory is achieved. Capitalists understand this and live just that reality yet the supposed &#8220;social justice movement&#8221; makes up excuses like &#8220;Oh, no, it&#8217;s just too difficult to fight!&#8221;</p>
<p>The reason we are nearing a world of capitalist totalitarian control is because for the most part capitalists have defeated socialists. The only way to correct that is for socialists to defeat capitalists. The only way to produce that victory is to fight and destroy capitalism. &#8220;We&#8217;re too beaten down to fight&#8221; is not a path to victory.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most revolutions have used the people to overthrow their tyrants simply to see the old tyrants replaced with a new batch.&#8221;</p>
<p>In a democratic revolution, the revolution IS the people. There is no such thing as a democratic revolution that involves a &#8220;vanguard&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26015</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26015</guid>
		<description>I disagree with the view that ordinary people are responsible for the actions of their leaders - this accepts the notion that ordinary people have some sort of control or influence over their decision makers and we all know that simply isn&#039;t true. Our so-called &#039;democracies&#039; allow us to change the front men who appear to be making the decisions, but not the real decision makers.

The people as a group cannot be blamed for this - they mostly just want to live and let live and are mostly too worn down just trying to survive and provide better for their children. Of course they are deliberately maintained in this condition - but they cannot be blamed for that.

Neither can they be expected to rebel unless a better life can really be delivered. Most revolutions have used the people to overthrow their tyrants simply to see the old tyrants replaced with a new batch.

A solution is Free Democracy - a system where the people, properly informed, may directly make the decisions of their government without relying on &#039;leaders&#039; to do so. Until such a government is created, giving the people real power for the first time in history, the people should not be blamed for the actions of those the system prevents them from controlling.

www.freedemocrats.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the view that ordinary people are responsible for the actions of their leaders &#8211; this accepts the notion that ordinary people have some sort of control or influence over their decision makers and we all know that simply isn&#8217;t true. Our so-called &#8216;democracies&#8217; allow us to change the front men who appear to be making the decisions, but not the real decision makers.</p>
<p>The people as a group cannot be blamed for this &#8211; they mostly just want to live and let live and are mostly too worn down just trying to survive and provide better for their children. Of course they are deliberately maintained in this condition &#8211; but they cannot be blamed for that.</p>
<p>Neither can they be expected to rebel unless a better life can really be delivered. Most revolutions have used the people to overthrow their tyrants simply to see the old tyrants replaced with a new batch.</p>
<p>A solution is Free Democracy &#8211; a system where the people, properly informed, may directly make the decisions of their government without relying on &#8216;leaders&#8217; to do so. Until such a government is created, giving the people real power for the first time in history, the people should not be blamed for the actions of those the system prevents them from controlling.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freedemocrats.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.freedemocrats.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Koontz</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26013</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Koontz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26013</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s false that the privileged people in imperial societies bear more responsibility - with privilege comes the need to protect those privileges.

It&#039;s the &quot;poor&quot; people of the United States who have the most in common with the non-American victims of the American state. It&#039;s the unemployed and the minimum wagers who are in the best position to share solidarity. But when a minimum-wager in America earns in an hour what 2 billion global workers earn in a week, there&#039;s not a whole lot in common. American minimum wagers eat meat - those global workers eat mud cakes and rice. Americans, top to bottom, are the enemy for most of the world.

No amount of willpower or good intentions can overcome the material reality that the privileged class in America will always protect their status. Their excuses are endless, &quot;feeding my family&quot; being the most common. University professors are victims - victims of their own affluence. They will never serve the interests of the poor as they simply do not share those interests.

Harry Callahan said it succinctly: &quot;A man&#039;s got to know his limitations&quot;.

American progressives are great at dreaming and terrible at reality.

More than 40 years ago Martin Luther King, Jr. gave his greatest speech, at Riverside Church in New York City.  This was the speech that heralded his approach toward global socialism, which threatened American hegemony and led quickly to his murder. Here&#039;s a highlight from that speech:

&quot;I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a &quot;thing-oriented&quot; society to a &quot;person-oriented&quot; society. when machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.
A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. On the one hand we are called to play the good Samaritan on life&#039;s roadside, but that will be only an initial act. one day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be transformed so that men and women will not be consantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life&#039;s highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. it comes to see that an edifice which produces begars needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: &quot;This is not just.&quot; It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say: &quot;This is not just.&quot; The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: &quot;This way of settling differences is not just.&quot; This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation&#039;s homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into veins of people normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.&quot;

Fair enough - if we were approaching spiritual death more than 40 years ago, what is the current status of Americans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s false that the privileged people in imperial societies bear more responsibility &#8211; with privilege comes the need to protect those privileges.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the &#8220;poor&#8221; people of the United States who have the most in common with the non-American victims of the American state. It&#8217;s the unemployed and the minimum wagers who are in the best position to share solidarity. But when a minimum-wager in America earns in an hour what 2 billion global workers earn in a week, there&#8217;s not a whole lot in common. American minimum wagers eat meat &#8211; those global workers eat mud cakes and rice. Americans, top to bottom, are the enemy for most of the world.</p>
<p>No amount of willpower or good intentions can overcome the material reality that the privileged class in America will always protect their status. Their excuses are endless, &#8220;feeding my family&#8221; being the most common. University professors are victims &#8211; victims of their own affluence. They will never serve the interests of the poor as they simply do not share those interests.</p>
<p>Harry Callahan said it succinctly: &#8220;A man&#8217;s got to know his limitations&#8221;.</p>
<p>American progressives are great at dreaming and terrible at reality.</p>
<p>More than 40 years ago Martin Luther King, Jr. gave his greatest speech, at Riverside Church in New York City.  This was the speech that heralded his approach toward global socialism, which threatened American hegemony and led quickly to his murder. Here&#8217;s a highlight from that speech:</p>
<p>&#8220;I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a &#8220;thing-oriented&#8221; society to a &#8220;person-oriented&#8221; society. when machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.<br />
A true revolution of values will soon cause us to question the fairness and justice of many of our past and present policies. On the one hand we are called to play the good Samaritan on life&#8217;s roadside, but that will be only an initial act. one day we must come to see that the whole Jericho road must be transformed so that men and women will not be consantly beaten and robbed as they make their journey on life&#8217;s highway. True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar; it is not haphazard and superficial. it comes to see that an edifice which produces begars needs restructuring. A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say: &#8220;This is not just.&#8221; It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of Latin America and say: &#8220;This is not just.&#8221; The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just. A true revolution of values will lay hands on the world order and say of war: &#8220;This way of settling differences is not just.&#8221; This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation&#8217;s homes with orphans and widows, of injecting poisonous drugs of hate into veins of people normally humane, of sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fair enough &#8211; if we were approaching spiritual death more than 40 years ago, what is the current status of Americans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sk</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-26004</link>
		<dc:creator>sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-26004</guid>
		<description>George Orwell made a similar &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orwell.ru/library/reviews/kipling/english/e_rkip&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;point&lt;/a&gt; in an essay on the Nobel-winning author and poet who coined the phrase &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/Kipling.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;White Man&#039;s Burden&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
All left-wing parties in the highly industrialized countries are at bottom a sham, because they make it their business to fight against something which they do not really wish to destroy. They have internationalist aims, and at the same time they struggle to keep up a standard of life with which those aims are incompatible. We all live by robbing Asiatic coolies, and those of us who are &#039;enlightened&#039; all maintain that those coolies ought to be set free; but our standard of living, and hence our &#039;enlightenment&#039;, demands that the robbery shall continue. A humanitarian is always a hypocrite, and Kipling&#039;s understanding of this is perhaps the central secret of his power to create telling phrases. It would be difficult to hit off the one-eyed pacifism of the English in fewer words than in the phrase, &#039;making mock of uniforms that guard you while you sleep&#039;.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Orwell made a similar <a href="http://www.orwell.ru/library/reviews/kipling/english/e_rkip" rel="nofollow">point</a> in an essay on the Nobel-winning author and poet who coined the phrase <a href="http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/Kipling.html" rel="nofollow"><i>White Man&#8217;s Burden</i></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
All left-wing parties in the highly industrialized countries are at bottom a sham, because they make it their business to fight against something which they do not really wish to destroy. They have internationalist aims, and at the same time they struggle to keep up a standard of life with which those aims are incompatible. We all live by robbing Asiatic coolies, and those of us who are &#8216;enlightened&#8217; all maintain that those coolies ought to be set free; but our standard of living, and hence our &#8216;enlightenment&#8217;, demands that the robbery shall continue. A humanitarian is always a hypocrite, and Kipling&#8217;s understanding of this is perhaps the central secret of his power to create telling phrases. It would be difficult to hit off the one-eyed pacifism of the English in fewer words than in the phrase, &#8216;making mock of uniforms that guard you while you sleep&#8217;.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-25999</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-25999</guid>
		<description>Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel said . . .  Few are guilty, but all are responsible.&quot;
Actually, in this country, whether at home, work, ball games, church, etc., most comments I hear from Americans are they are supporting the troops, praying for them and victory, and were 100% behind our president when he sent them over to Iraq or Afganistan. They parrot the same lies that Bush and Cheney repeat daily on the news. I&#039;d have to say anyone who voted to put these guys in power is guilty. Even those who voted for the other guy are just as guilty, since they buy into the system which is throughly corrupt. The crimes being committed have the blessing of the people so they can continue to remain in their state of complete denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel said . . .  Few are guilty, but all are responsible.&#8221;<br />
Actually, in this country, whether at home, work, ball games, church, etc., most comments I hear from Americans are they are supporting the troops, praying for them and victory, and were 100% behind our president when he sent them over to Iraq or Afganistan. They parrot the same lies that Bush and Cheney repeat daily on the news. I&#8217;d have to say anyone who voted to put these guys in power is guilty. Even those who voted for the other guy are just as guilty, since they buy into the system which is throughly corrupt. The crimes being committed have the blessing of the people so they can continue to remain in their state of complete denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-25998</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-25998</guid>
		<description>&quot;Blind men and women have been the motor of modern history and the source of endless misery and destruction. Aspiring leaders of great powers can neither understand nor admit the fact that their strategies are extremely dangerous because statecraft by its very nature always calculates the ability of a nation&#039;s military and economic resources to overcome whatever challenges it confronts.  To reject such traditional reasoning, and to question the value of conventional wisdom and react to international crises realistically on the basis of past failures would make them unsuited to command.  The result is that politicians succeed in terms of their personal careers, states make monumental errors, and people suffer.  The great nations of Europe and Japan put such illusions into practice repeatedly before 1945.&quot;


From The Age of War: The United States Confronts the World by Gabriel Kolko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Blind men and women have been the motor of modern history and the source of endless misery and destruction. Aspiring leaders of great powers can neither understand nor admit the fact that their strategies are extremely dangerous because statecraft by its very nature always calculates the ability of a nation&#8217;s military and economic resources to overcome whatever challenges it confronts.  To reject such traditional reasoning, and to question the value of conventional wisdom and react to international crises realistically on the basis of past failures would make them unsuited to command.  The result is that politicians succeed in terms of their personal careers, states make monumental errors, and people suffer.  The great nations of Europe and Japan put such illusions into practice repeatedly before 1945.&#8221;</p>
<p>From The Age of War: The United States Confronts the World by Gabriel Kolko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/the-prophetic-challenge-%e2%80%9cfew-are-guilty-but-all-are-responsible%e2%80%9d/#comment-25997</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2478#comment-25997</guid>
		<description>i agree. there are hardly any innocent people anywhere. we have rape, wife beating,robberies, murders, class differences (masters class and serf class), anger, meaness, rudeness, envy, hatred, greed, religious misteachings, miseducation. warfare, wmd, etc.
most of us ignore all of these issues; we are not working on any of these ills that  befell us.
there are degrees of gulit. among the guiltiest are miseducators of all kinds. clergy, politicians, master class is broadly  more responsible than the untermnschen. thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. there are hardly any innocent people anywhere. we have rape, wife beating,robberies, murders, class differences (masters class and serf class), anger, meaness, rudeness, envy, hatred, greed, religious misteachings, miseducation. warfare, wmd, etc.<br />
most of us ignore all of these issues; we are not working on any of these ills that  befell us.<br />
there are degrees of gulit. among the guiltiest are miseducators of all kinds. clergy, politicians, master class is broadly  more responsible than the untermnschen. thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
