<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technological Fundamentalism in Media and Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/technological-fundamentalism-in-media-and-culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/technological-fundamentalism-in-media-and-culture/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:58:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/technological-fundamentalism-in-media-and-culture/#comment-27229</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2689#comment-27229</guid>
		<description>Robert,

In the spirit of our journey and the great nexus of the human journey of powerful ideas which took us this way rather than that, I offer...

Max-Neef&#039;s compelling narrative that complements your essay here.

What Next? 
Draft thematic paper From Knowledge to Understanding: Navigations and Returns 
Manfred A. Max-Neef
http://www.dhf.uu.se/whatnext/papers_public/Max-Neef-Draft.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>In the spirit of our journey and the great nexus of the human journey of powerful ideas which took us this way rather than that, I offer&#8230;</p>
<p>Max-Neef&#8217;s compelling narrative that complements your essay here.</p>
<p>What Next?<br />
Draft thematic paper From Knowledge to Understanding: Navigations and Returns<br />
Manfred A. Max-Neef<br />
<a href="http://www.dhf.uu.se/whatnext/papers_public/Max-Neef-Draft.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.dhf.uu.se/whatnext/papers_public/Max-Neef-Draft.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Nasreddin</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/technological-fundamentalism-in-media-and-culture/#comment-27180</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Nasreddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2689#comment-27180</guid>
		<description>Here are a couple of links for Postman. Technopoly is an interesting take on society and technology.

http://www.amazon.com/Technopoly-Surrender-Technology-Neil-Postman/dp/0679745408

http://www.booknotes.org/Transcript/?ProgramID=1115</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple of links for Postman. Technopoly is an interesting take on society and technology.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Technopoly-Surrender-Technology-Neil-Postman/dp/0679745408" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Technopoly-Surrender-Technology-Neil-Postman/dp/0679745408</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.booknotes.org/Transcript/?ProgramID=1115" rel="nofollow">http://www.booknotes.org/Transcript/?ProgramID=1115</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/technological-fundamentalism-in-media-and-culture/#comment-27154</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2689#comment-27154</guid>
		<description>when we used axes,picks, shovels we had  injuries but not many deaths.
then came so-called progress. which brought us  proportionately more injuries and deaths.
and much more cancer, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, divorce, pedophilia, thieving, murders, rage, etc.
naturally, people selling us  &#039;progress&#039;  always omitted the regress.    
thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when we used axes,picks, shovels we had  injuries but not many deaths.<br />
then came so-called progress. which brought us  proportionately more injuries and deaths.<br />
and much more cancer, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, divorce, pedophilia, thieving, murders, rage, etc.<br />
naturally, people selling us  &#8216;progress&#8217;  always omitted the regress.<br />
thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gliscameria</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/08/technological-fundamentalism-in-media-and-culture/#comment-27148</link>
		<dc:creator>Gliscameria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2689#comment-27148</guid>
		<description>This article reminds me of one of the last conversations in &#039;Brave New World&#039;, except this article took a huge turn for the worse.

Advancing technology for technology sake is something we are brainwashed with, and is detrimental to society.  Technology should be a tool for improving our way of life which, with out rapidly increasing knowledge, needs to be kept in check sometime.

It takes money and time to invent things, and we need to allocate those resources properly.  Our birdshot approach is making this tool we call technology entirely too cumbersome to use anymore.

I in no way condone any censorship on invention, but it&#039;s time to start finishing some old projects before we throw money and time at new ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article reminds me of one of the last conversations in &#8216;Brave New World&#8217;, except this article took a huge turn for the worse.</p>
<p>Advancing technology for technology sake is something we are brainwashed with, and is detrimental to society.  Technology should be a tool for improving our way of life which, with out rapidly increasing knowledge, needs to be kept in check sometime.</p>
<p>It takes money and time to invent things, and we need to allocate those resources properly.  Our birdshot approach is making this tool we call technology entirely too cumbersome to use anymore.</p>
<p>I in no way condone any censorship on invention, but it&#8217;s time to start finishing some old projects before we throw money and time at new ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
